Link

Social

Embed

Disable autoplay on embedded content?

Download

Download
Download Transcript

[00:00:01]

OKAY. WE'RE GOING TO CALL TO ORDER THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SACHSE TO HOLD OUR REGULAR MEETING.

[1. Call to Order: The Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Sachse will hold a Regular Meeting on Monday, October 23, 2023, at 6 p.m. to consider the following items of business:]

IT IS MONDAY, OCTOBER 23RD, 2023.

IT'S 6:00 PM.

EXACTLY. AND WE'RE GOING TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING ITEMS OF BUSINESS.

FIRST WILL BE THE INVOCATION AND PLEDGE.

COMMISSIONER OHMAN, HOW DO YOU FEEL ABOUT BOTH? NOPE. I DO THE PLEDGES.

YOU'LL DO THE PLEDGES. ANYBODY ELSE WANT TO TAKE THE INVOCATION? OKAY, I'LL DO IT. YOU GUYS ARE GOING TO MAKE IT HARD ON ME TONIGHT.

SO IF EVERYONE WILL RISE.

DEAR HEAVENLY FATHER, PLEASE BE WITH US THIS EVENING AS WE MAKE SOME IMPORTANT DECISIONS FOR THE CITY OF SACHSE THAT WILL BE CARRIED ON TO CITY COUNCIL.

PLEASE CONTINUE TO BLESS OUR FIRST RESPONDERS.

THEY WORK THEIR TAILS OFF EVERY DAY.

BUT EXCEPTIONALLY THIS WEEKEND THEY WERE SUPER BUSY WITH LOTS OF EVENTS.

PLEASE BLESS OUR STAFF.

THEY WORK SO HARD FOR THE CITY OF SACHSE AS WELL.

IN JESUS NAME WE PRAY.

AMEN.

THANK YOU SIRS.

OKAY. THE PUBLIC IS INVITED TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION REGARDING ANY TOPIC NOT ALREADY ON THE AGENDA.

THE TIME LIMIT IS THREE MINUTES PER SPEAKER.

A PUBLIC COMMENT CARD SHOULD BE PRESENTED TO OUR ACTING SECRETARY, MS. MEGAN. PRIOR TO THE MEETING, ACCORDING TO THE TEXAS OPEN MEETINGS ACT, THE COMMISSION IS PROHIBITED FROM DISCUSSING ANY ITEM NOT POSTED ON THE AGENDA, BUT WILL TAKE COMMENTS UNDER ADVISEMENT. ANYBODY HERE FOR JUST GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT? EXCELLENT. THEN WE WILL MOVE ON AND CONSIDER APPROVAL OF THE AUGUST 14TH, 2023 MEETING MINUTES.

[4. Consider approval of the August 14, 2023, meeting minutes.]

HAS EVERYONE HAD AN OPPORTUNITY TO REVIEW THEM.

AND THEN I WILL LOOK VERY FORWARD TO A MOTION TO APPROVE.

I MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE.

EXCELLENT. DO I HAVE A SECOND? SECOND. THIRD.

EXCELLENT. CAN WE GO AHEAD AND VOTE, MISS MEGAN? HOLD IT DOWN.

DID IT? WAS IT APPROVED? AND IT'S APPROVED UNANIMOUSLY.

EXCELLENT. WE ARE ALSO GOING TO CONSIDER AN ACT ON A REVISED PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR THE AREA RETAIL EDITION, GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF

[5. Consider and act on a revised Preliminary Plat for the Aria Retail Addition, generally located at the northeast corner of President George Bush Turnpike and Merritt Road, within Sachse city limits.]

PRESIDENT GEORGE BUSH TURNPIKE AND MERRITT ROAD WITHIN THE SACHSE CITY LIMITS.

MR. ROBERTSON, DO YOU HAVE A PRESENTATION FOR US? YES, I DO. THIS WILL BE A VERY BRIEF PRESENTATION.

AS MENTIONED, THIS IS A REVISED PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR THE ARIA RETAIL EDITION, GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF PRESIDENT GEORGE BUSH TURNPIKE AND MERRITT ROAD.

THE PROPOSAL IS TO PRELIMINARY PLAT FIVE COMMERCIAL LOTS ON APPROXIMATELY 7.01 ACRES OF LAND.

THE PROPERTY IS CURRENTLY VACANT AND IT IS PART OF THE PGT TURNPIKE MIXED USE ZONING DISTRICT.

YOU CAN SEE THE PROPOSED AREA HERE.

THE PROPOSED PRELIMINARY PLAT LOCATED HERE.

AND THEN, PER STAFF'S TECHNICAL REVIEW, THE PROPOSED PLAT IS IN CONFORMANCE WITH SACHSE SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS AND ZONING ORDINANCE, AND STAFF IS RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THE REVISED PRELIMINARY PLAT.

I'D BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU MAY HAVE.

SEE WHAT HAPPENS. DO THEY ALREADY HAVE RETAILERS ALLOCATED FOR THIS, OR ARE THEY JUST PUTTING THE STREETS IN THE PARKING LOTS IN? AND SO WHAT THIS REVISED PRELIMINARY PLAN IS DOING IS KIND OF LAYING OUT THE OVERALL LOT CONFIGURATION.

IT WAS DONE A COUPLE OF YEARS AGO, BUT SINCE THAT TIME THEY'VE THEY'VE KIND OF ALTERED SOME OF THEIR PLANS.

IF YOU GUYS RECALL AT THE AT THE HARD CORNER OF MERRITT AND PTBT, WE HAD A SUP FOR A GAS STATION.

FROM MY UNDERSTANDING, THAT'S STILL MOVING FORWARD.

BUT AT THIS POINT WE HAVE NOT SEEN ANY OF THE SPECIFIC RETAILERS BEYOND THERE BEING A GAS STATION THERE AND THEN SOME RETAIL PAD SITES AND, AND POTENTIAL STRIP CENTERS. OKAY.

COMMISSIONER MONDOK. SO I DID HAVE A COUPLE OF QUESTIONS REGARDING THE FIVE FOOT DRAINAGE EASEMENT.

[00:05:02]

THOSE SEEM TO BE A LITTLE SMALL.

ARE THOSE WHAT ARE THOSE ABOUT? I'D HAVE TO PULL IT UP.

I'LL GIVE YOU AN IDEA ON THE WHAT WOULD BE LOT FIVE ON THAT EASTERN PORTION.

IT'S JUST LIKE A FIVE FOOT AROUND THE PROPERTY LINE.

AND THEN YOU ALSO HAVE ANOTHER ONE WHAT LOOKS TO BE BISECTING LOT NUMBER THREE.

I WOULD HAVE TO CONFIRM WITH ENGINEERING ON THOSE COMPONENTS.

THE SITE IS ENCUMBERED WITH A NUMBER OF EASEMENTS ALREADY, BUT I THINK THAT'S THAT'S A PRIVATE DRAINAGE EASEMENT RIGHT THERE BETWEEN LOT THREE AND LOT FOUR.

I'M LOOKING FOR THE OTHER ONE FOR BETWEEN 1 AND 5 AS WELL.

ONE AND FIVE.

SO AS PART OF THEIR PLAN, I DON'T HAVE ANY CONCERNS.

I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE THERE'S NOT A RESIDUAL THING FOR IT'S NOT RESIDUAL FROM PREVIOUS PLANS.

AND THEN AS FAR AS MOVING FORWARD WITH THIS DEVELOPMENT, IF EASEMENTS CHANGE OR WHATEVER, THEY'LL BE TWEAKED ON THE FINAL PLAT.

SO THIS FIVE FOOT MAY BE DESIGNATED ON HERE AT THE MOMENT FOR THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT, BUT IT MAY END UP GOING AWAY DEPENDING ON HOW THINGS CHANGE OUT ON THE SITE.

SO LIKE I SAID THIS IS A PRELIMINARY.

SO SOME OF THESE EASEMENTS MAY END UP BEING MOVED AROUND DEPENDING ON SITE CONDITIONS AND OVERALL SITE DEVELOPMENT.

THE OTHER QUESTION I WANTED TO ASK WAS IN REGARDS TO ACCESS.

IF WE LOOK ON THE AREA OF MERRITT ROAD, THERE'S TWO ENTRANCE POINTS.

THERE'S ONE OF THEM MAY RIGHT LIKE RIGHT IN, RIGHT OUT, LIKE A RESTRICTED SCENARIO OR ARE THEY BOTH FULL ACCESS? THEY'RE BOTH RIGHT IN RIGHT OUT ONLY.

AND THEN THE ONE ON THE NORTH, IS THAT GOING TO BE FULL ACCESS? THE ONE THROUGH THE COMMERCIAL AREA THAT IS RIGHT IN, RIGHT OUT.

THERE MAY BE AN OPPORTUNITY TO HAVE A LEFT TURN MOVEMENT OUT OF THERE, BUT I BELIEVE IT'S A LITTLE TOO CLOSE TO THE INTERSECTION.

OKAY. IT'S JUST ALL THE RIGHT IN.

RIGHT OUTS ARE GOING TO MAKE IT VERY DIFFICULT FOR THAT SITE.

UNFORTUNATELY, THE CONDITIONS OF THAT CORNER.

WE HAVE A MEDIAN ALONG MERRITT ROAD ALREADY, AND THE MEDIAN ALONG PLEASANT VALLEY MAKE IT VERY DIFFICULT TO GET IN AND OUT OF THAT SITE.

IT IS TIGHT. IN ADDITION, THERE IS NO FRONTAGE ROAD ALONG PGT.

SO ALL THOSE THINGS, KIND OF ALL OF THOSE THINGS KIND OF WORK AGAINST THE FRONTAGE ROAD ALONG THERE.

FROM MY UNDERSTANDING, NO.

OKAY. ANY ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS? THEN I'M SORRY.

I DO HAVE ONE QUESTION. YES.

IN THE SOUTH EASTERN CORNER, IT HAS A 24 FOOT PRIVATE ACCESS.

YOU KNOW, PRIVATE ACCESS DRIVE AND BUT IT DOESN'T LOOK LIKE THERE'S ANY CONNECTION, YOU KNOW, EASEMENT WISE, TO THE PLOT JUST EAST OF THERE. AND FROM ON THE AERIAL, YOU CAN SEE THAT THERE WAS A ROAD PAVEMENT STUB TO THIS PROPERTY KIND OF IN THAT LOCATION.

YEAH. SO THERE IS A 24 FOOT ACCESS THAT CONNECTS OVER TO ARIA DRIVE.

IT ACTUALLY GOES ALL THE WAY OVER TO THE EDGE.

THE BOXES FOR THESE THAT ARE SHOWN ON HERE KIND OF MAKE IT A LITTLE BIT MORE DIFFICULT.

THAT'S NOT ACTUALLY SHOWN ON THE PLAT ITSELF.

I THINK IT'S PART OF BEING LOADED INTO THE SOFTWARE.

SO THERE'S NOT BOXES AROUND. THAT PLOT TO THE EAST.

HAS THE ACCESS DRIVE CONNECTION THERE, CORRECT? OKAY. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? I DO HAVE ONE MORE NOW THAT YOU MENTIONED THAT ONE.

IS THERE ANY MEANS BY WHICH TO RESTRICT ACCESS OR I SHOULDN'T SAY ACCESS, BUT JUST KIND OF CUT THROUGH TRAFFIC FROM MERRITT TO ARIA VIA THAT ACCESS EASEMENT, BECAUSE IT COULD BE KIND OF A QUICK TURN IN AND OUT, KIND OF REALLY BE PROBLEMATIC WITH TRAFFIC IN FRONT OF THOSE OR AROUND THOSE, THOSE TWO LOTS.

WHICH COMING IN THROUGH HERE, IF THEY WERE TO TURN IN AND COME INTO THE COMPLEX HERE AND GO OUT THROUGH HERE TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD.

SO IN OUR ORIGINAL CONVERSATIONS WITH THE DEVELOPER, THEY DID HAVE A STRAIGHT SHOT GOING STRAIGHT BACK TO I BELIEVE THAT IS BARITONE COURT.

WE HAVE ASKED THEM TO REMOVE THAT, TO PROVIDE SOME BREAK UP, SO THERE ISN'T AS MUCH CUT-THROUGH TRAFFIC THROUGH THE SITE.

WELL, I COULD JUST SEE A LOT OF PEOPLE COMING IN OFF OF MARIN JUST TRYING TO GET OVER THERE, AND THEY'RE JUST PASSING THROUGH THE SITE.

[00:10:05]

IT WOULD INCREASE SOME SPEED. IS THERE ANY WAY TO ENSURE THAT WE GET LIKE SOME TRAFFIC CONTROL MEASURES LIKE SPEED BUMPS OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT, JUST TO SLOW THAT TRAFFIC DOWN A LITTLE? SO WITH WITH SITE DEVELOPMENT, WE'LL BE LOOKING AT THERE'LL BE CURBS, THERE WILL BE LIMITATIONS FOR THE DRIVE AISLES, ALL THOSE KIND OF COMPONENTS TO BREAK IT UP, TO SLOW DOWN ANY TRAFFIC THAT GOES THAT IS GOING THROUGH THERE.

ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? OKAY, THEN WE'LL ENTERTAIN A MOTION.

I'LL MAKE A MOTION THAT WE APPROVE AS PRESENTED, SUBJECT TO THE STIPULATIONS OF THE, HIS GROUP.

RIGHT. I'LL SECOND THAT.

EXCELLENT. THANK YOU SO MUCH.

ANY ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS? THEN LET'S HAVE A VOTE.

THE MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY.

WE'RE GOING TO MOVE ON TO OUR FIRST OUR PRESENTATION, BUT THIS WILL CONTAIN A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER AND ACT ON A FINAL PLAT OF THE FIFTH STREET DISTRICT.

[6. Conduct a public hearing to consider and act on a final plat of 5th Street District Phase 1, being a replat of lots 1-6, Block 44 of Original Town of Sachse, generally located between 5th Street and Sachse Road and south of Alexander Street, within Sachse city limits.]

PHASE ONE BEING A REPLAT OF LOTS ONE THROUGH SIX BLOCKS 44 OF ORIGINAL TOWN OF SACHSE, GENERALLY LOCATED BETWEEN FIFTH STREET AND SACHSE ROAD AND SOUTH OF ALEXANDER STREET WITH SACHSE CITY LIMITS.

FIRST, MR. ROBINSON, YOU HAVE A PRESENTATION FOR US.

YES I DO. AS MENTIONED, THIS IS A FINAL PLAT, BEING A REPLAT OF SIX COMMERCIAL LOTS TO GO DOWN INTO FOUR COMMERCIAL LOTS. IT'S ON APPROXIMATELY 2.44 ACRES OF LAND, AND IT IS LOCATED WITHIN THE OLD TOWN DISTRICT.

THIS APPLICATION IS BEING PRESENTED BY KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, BUT THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY IS THE CITY OF SACHSE.

AND ON THE MAP YOU CAN SEE THE LOCATION OF THE PROPERTY.

AND HERE'S THE PROPOSED PLOT.

YOU CAN SEE THE GHOSTED LINES IN THE BACKGROUND OF THE ORIGINAL SIX LOTS.

AS MENTIONED, THIS IS GOING INTO FOUR COMMERCIAL LOTS.

THERE IS PROPOSED REDEVELOPMENT IN THIS AREA.

IN ADDITION, ALEXANDER STREET IS CURRENTLY UNDER RECONSTRUCTION AS PART OF THE FUTURE PROJECT THAT'S PROPOSED FOR THIS AREA.

AND THEN, AS PER STAFF'S TECHNICAL REVIEW, THE PROPOSED PLAT IS IN CONFORMANCE WITH SACHSE SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS AND ZONING ORDINANCE, AND STAFF IS RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THE REPLAT.

I'D BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU MAY HAVE.

YES, ANOTHER FOLLOW UP QUESTION ON THIS ONE LOT NUMBER FOUR, BLOCK A HAS A VERY UNIQUE SHAPE, WHICH COULD CAUSE SOME PROBLEMS WITH SOME SETBACK REQUIREMENTS SET ON THIS, THAT ONE LOT.

WHAT WOULD THE SETBACK REQUIREMENTS BE FOR THAT ONE LOT ITSELF? SO WITH WITH THE OLD TOWN ZONING DISTRICT, YOUR THE INTENT IS TO BUILD THE BUILDING CLOSER TO THE STREET.

SO ZERO LOT LINE BASICALLY 0 TO 15FT.

THAT LOT FOUR IS BASICALLY CONFIGURED TO THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT THAT WE'VE BEEN WORKING WITH FOR THAT INDIVIDUAL LOT. SO THAT'S WHY IT'S CONFIGURED IN SUCH A WEIRD FASHION.

OKAY. AND SO IF WE MOVE FORWARD WITH THIS, SO LONG AS WE'RE NOT GOING TO BE COMING BACK LATER WITH SAYING, HEY, I NEED A REPLAT OF THIS BECAUSE I NEED TO MAKE THIS CHANGE, OR I THINK THEY'RE REALLY COMMITTED TO WHAT THEY'VE GOT AT THIS POINT.

I BELIEVE THEY'RE STILL WORKING ON THE DEVELOPMENT DEAL POINTS, BUT IF THE PLAT ITSELF NEEDS TO BE ADJUSTED, THEY CAN GO THROUGH THE PLAT PROCESS TO EITHER ADJUST BOUNDARY LINES. THAT IS A STAFF APPROVAL.

IT DOES NOT HAVE TO GO BACK THROUGH THROUGH THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION.

HOWEVER, IF ULTIMATELY WE WANTED TO SUBDIVIDE THIS FURTHER AND GO INTO MUCH SMALLER LOTS FOR WHATEVER, THEN IT WOULD COME BACK BEFORE THE COMMISSION.

BUT RIGHT NOW WE'RE MOVING FORWARD WITH THE PROPOSED LAYOUT AS SHOWN HERE.

IF WE DO NEED TO ADJUST THESE LATER ON FOR ANOTHER TENANT OR ANOTHER DEVELOPER OR ANOTHER DEVELOPMENT ON THIS SITE, WE CAN DO THAT THROUGH AN AMENDING PLAT VERY PRETTY EASILY.

OKAY. AND THIS DOES NOT SHOW ANY UTILITY EASEMENTS OR ANYTHING ELSE.

SO THAT'S THERE IS NO INTENTION FOR UTILITY EASEMENT.

SO ALL THE UTILITIES FOR THIS WE CAN COME BACK LATER THROUGH AN AMENDING PLAT TO, TO GET THESE.

RIGHT NOW WE DON'T HAVE IT DEFINED SITE.

THE SITE PLAN THAT IS COMING IN.

WE HAVE A BOUNDARY OF THE PROPOSED LOCATION.

WE DO NOT HAVE THE ACTUAL SITE CIVIL PLANS FOR EACH OF THOSE USERS.

[00:15:05]

SO WE'LL COME BACK FORWARD WITH AN AMENDING PLAT TO DEDICATE ANY ADDITIONAL EASEMENTS AT A LATER TIME.

OKAY. TWO QUESTIONS.

ONE. WHAT EXACTLY? THIS IS RETAIL, RIGHT? YOU SAY COMMERCIAL OR IS THIS COMMERCIAL RETAIL, OFFICE? OKAY. RESTAURANTS, BARS, STUFF LIKE THAT.

EXCELLENT. THE OTHER THING IS.

WE NEED TO.

BEFORE I VOTE, WE NEED TO DETERMINE IF MY CLOSE PROXIMITY TO THE SITE REQUIRES ME TO ABSTAIN, I KNOW IT'S 250 YARDS, AND I'M EITHER WITHIN THAT OR MY PROPERTY'S EXTREMELY CLOSE TO 250 YARDS OF THIS SITE.

SO UNLESS YOU HAVE A VESTED INTEREST IN THE SPECIFIC PROPERTY ITSELF, YOU SHOULD BE FINE TO VOTE.

AS MENTIONED, THIS IS A PLAT.

SO THOSE ARE MINISTERIAL IN NATURE.

SO PROVIDED THEY MEET ALL THE REQUIREMENTS THE COMMISSION IS REQUIRED TO APPROVE THE PLAT.

OKAY. I JUST DIDN'T KNOW IF I NEEDED TO.

EXCELLENT QUESTION. YEAH.

ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? DID YOU SAY THE MINIMUM SETBACK REQUIREMENTS FOR THIS PROPERTY ALLOW THE FIVE FOOT RIGHT OF WAY DEDICATION ALONG FIFTH STREET? THE FIVE FOOT RIGHT OF WAY DEDICATION IS TO ENCOMPASS ANY STREET TREES AND THOSE KIND OF PUBLIC COMPONENTS.

AS FAR AS THE SETBACK ITSELF, THE SETBACK IN THE ZONING DISTRICT, I WANT TO SAY IS 0 TO 15FT.

I WOULD HAVE TO PULL IT UP, BUT THE INTENT IS TO PULL THE BUILDINGS UP TO THE STREET TO FRAME THE STREET, AND ONE THAT HELPS SLOW DOWN TRAFFIC ALSO BUILDS THAT PEDESTRIAN, PEDESTRIAN FEEL ALONG FIFTH STREET.

SO. SO WE THINK FIVE FOOT RIGHT OF WAY DEDICATION IS ALL THAT'S NEEDED ALONG FIFTH STREET.

THEY WON'T NEED ADDITIONAL.

THE RIGHT OF WAY IS ALREADY CONSTRUCTED.

SO THIS IS JUST FOR SOME ADDITIONAL AREA THAT WAS THAT WAS DETERMINED TO BE NEEDED AS PART OF THIS DEVELOPMENT.

PARKING SIDEWALKS.

THEY'RE ALL THERE ALREADY ON FIFTH STREET ON SAXON ROAD.

WELL, IN THIS SECTION ACTUALLY DOES NOT HAVE ANY PARKING ON IT AS IT COMES INTO THE TURNABOUT.

YEAH. SAY NORTH ALEXANDER.

NORTH OF ALEXANDER STREET. THAT'S WHERE THE ON STREET PARKING IS.

SO FIFTH STREET IS ULTIMATELY A 90 FOOT RIGHT OF WAY STREET SECTION.

AND I GUESS I'M SEEING 4 OR 5 FOOT OF ADDITIONAL RIGHT OF WAY DEDICATION BY THIS PLAT JUST FOR THE PURPOSE OF ADDITIONAL ROOM THAT FOR ONE IS AVAILABLE AND TWO NOT NEEDED FOR THE INDIVIDUAL LOTS, I GUESS.

ANY ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS? I'M HAPPY TO ENTERTAIN A MOTION.

OH, SORRY. OH.

EVERY TIME. OKAY.

AT THIS TIME, I NEED TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING.

IS THERE ANYONE HERE THAT WOULD LIKE TO COMMENT ON THIS PARTICULAR AGENDA ITEM? NO ONE IS JUMPING UP AND RUNNING.

SO WITH Y'ALL'S PERMISSION, I'M GOING TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.

AND NOW WE CAN VOTE.

THAT MOTION THAT WE APPROVE THIS FINAL PLAT AS CURRENTLY CONSTITUTED.

PERFECT. THANK YOU. COMMISSIONER MONDOK.

DO I HAVE A SECOND? SECOND? SECOND BY COMMISSIONER OHMAN.

ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION OR QUESTIONS? LET'S DO IT.

AND THAT MOTION PASSES UNANIMOUSLY.

WE'RE GOING TO MOVE ON TO OUR SECOND PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER AN ACT ON A REQUEST BY MR.

[7. Conduct a public hearing to consider and act on a request by Habeeburrahman Syed Quadri to rezone approximately 4.7 acres of land from AG, Agricultural District to R-39 Single Family Residential District, generally located east of the intersection of Hooper Road and Bailey Road, within Sachse city limits.]

QUADRI TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 4.7 ACRES OF LAND FROM AG AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT TO R 39 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT LOCATED EAST OF THE INTERSECTION OF HOOPER ROAD AND BAILEY ROAD WITHIN CITY LIMITS.

FIRST UP IS GOING TO BE MR. ROBINSON WITH THE PRESENTATION.

THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

AS MENTIONED, THIS IS A REZONING REQUEST FOR APPROXIMATELY 4.7 ACRES TO GO FROM AG TO R 39 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT.

THE PROPERTY IS CURRENTLY ONE LOT WITH ONE SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING ON IT.

YOU CAN SEE THAT ON THE AERIAL MAP LOCATED HERE.

OH REALLY? AND AS MENTIONED, THE PROPERTY IS ZONED AG.

THE SURROUNDING ZONING DISTRICTS ARE EITHER COMMERCIAL TO THE NORTHWEST OR LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL TO THE SOUTHWEST.

SOUTHEAST AND NORTHEAST.

[00:20:01]

SO AS PART OF THE 39 SINGLE FAMILY ZONING DISTRICT, THIS REQUIRES A MINIMUM LOT AREA OF 39,000FT².

THIS IS ONE OF THE LARGEST ZONING DISTRICTS SINGLE FAMILY ZONING DISTRICTS WITHIN THE CITY OF SACHSE.

IT DOES ALSO REQUIRE A 2000 SQUARE FOOT BUILDING SIZE, MINIMUM HEIGHT OF TWO STORIES, AND A MINIMUM WIDTH AT THE STREET RIGHT OF WAY OF 100FT FOR THE LOT.

SO STAFF TAKES A LOOK AT THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ANYTIME A ZONING REQUEST COMES FORWARD, AND ON THE FUTURE LAND USE PLAN THAT IS PART OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.

IT'S DESIGNATED AS LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL USES, WHICH ARE DESCRIBED AS NEIGHBORHOODS WITH CONVENTIONAL DETACHED, SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS ON A RANGE OF LOT SIZES AND VARIOUS SETBACKS. SO THE PROPOSED REZONING REQUEST IS IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE FUTURE LAND USE PLAN OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.

STAFF IS RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF PROPOSED REZONING REQUEST FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS.

IT'S CONSISTENT WITH THE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND IS IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE FUTURE LAND USE PLAN.

PERMITTED USES WITHIN THE PROPOSED REZONING REQUEST WOULD BE CONSISTENT WITH SURROUNDING RESIDENTIALLY ZONED AND DEVELOPED LAND.

AND LASTLY, THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THE CITY COUNCIL AT THEIR DECEMBER 4TH, 2023 REGULAR MEETING.

AND WITH THAT, I WOULD BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS THE COUNCIL THE COMMISSION HAS.

IT IS A MAXIMUM OF THREE STORIES, NOT A MINIMUM OR MAXIMUM OF TWO STORIES, NOT A MINIMUM OF TWO STORIES.

CORRECT? CORRECT. OKAY.

WHAT IS THE ACTUAL SETBACK? HARD QUESTIONS TONIGHT.

IT IS A 90 FOOT FRONT SETBACK, 90 FOOT SETBACK.

SO BASICALLY ANYTHING BUILT ON THE PROPERTY GOING FORWARD BASICALLY HAVE TO BE ABOUT THE SAME SETBACK AS WHAT WE'RE SEEING WITH THE HOUSE THAT CURRENTLY IS THERE.

CORRECT. OKAY.

I HAVE ONE MORE QUESTION.

SO RIGHT NOW THAT 4.7 ACRES COULD BE DIVIDED INTO FOUR LOTS TOTAL, RIGHT? RIGHT NOW IT CAN ONLY BE THE ONE PIECE OF PROPERTY RIGHT NOW.

CORRECT. BUT IF THIS WERE APPROVED BY BY COUNCIL AFTER US, THEN IF THIS HOUSE WAS TORN DOWN, THERE COULD BE FOUR LOTS HERE.

CORRECT. OKAY. DOES ANYONE HAVE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS ABOUT THIS? OKAY, A COUPLE QUESTIONS.

SO MOST LIKELY END UP BEING ONE ROAD IN WITH KIND OF LIKE A KNUCKLE OR CUL DE SAC STRAIGHT OFF THE THING.

RIGHT? THEY ARE LOOKING TO HAVE.

WELL, DO YOU WANT TO OPEN IT UP TO THE APPLICANT? LET HIM SPEAK. IF YOU DON'T MIND COMING FORWARD.

I'LL ADDRESS YOUR QUESTION REAL QUICK.

THEY'RE LOOKING TO SUBDIVIDE INTO TWO ADDITIONAL LOTS, AND ALL THREE LOTS WOULD HAVE ACCESS OFF OF BAILEY ROAD.

PULL IT DOWN. THANK YOU.

IF YOU WOULD INTRODUCE YOURSELF.

YEAH. MY NAME IS HABIB CHAUDHRY.

I'M THE OWNER OF THAT PROPERTY.

AND THIS WAS ZONED AS AGRICULTURE FROM A PREVIOUS OWNER.

AND NOW I WOULD LIKE TO CHANGE IT TO THE REQUESTING CHANGE TO RESIDENTIAL ZONING. THE PROPOSAL, MY INTENT AND THE PROPOSAL IS TO SUBDIVIDE INTO LIKE THREE LOTS EQUALLY.

I MEAN, THE LAND IS 4.7 ACRES, SO MOST PROBABLY IT IS GOING TO BE AROUND ONE AND A HALF ACRE EACH WITH VERY SIMILAR FRONTAGE.

EXCELLENT. AND THOSE WILL BE DRIVEWAYS OFF OF BAILEY ROAD.

CORRECT? EXCELLENT.

ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? YOU RECENTLY ACQUIRED THE PROPERTY.

IT HAS BEEN ONE AND A HALF YEARS.

SO WHAT IS THE CURRENT? LAND HAS BEEN CLASSIFIED AS AGRICULTURE FOR THE LAST YEAR AND A HALF.

I'M ASSUMING. IS THERE A DESIGNATION FOR THAT AS SPECIFICALLY FOR THIS LOT? IT'S BEEN ZONED AGRICULTURAL FOR PROBABLY SINCE IT CAME INTO THE CITY.

IS THERE AGRICULTURE? THE MINIMUM STANDARDS FOR AGRICULTURAL IS A FIVE ACRE LOT.

SO THIS IS ACTUALLY UNDERSIZED FOR THAT.

AND THEN NUMBER TWO YOU'RE LIMITED TO ONE SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE.

AND THEN YOU CAN HAVE SUPPORTING ACCESSORY STRUCTURES.

AS YOU CAN NOTE HERE THERE IS A SINGLE FAMILY HOME AND THEN THERE ARE ACCESSORY BUILDINGS ON IT.

JUST ONE MORE POINT.

LIKE THE COLLIN COUNTY HAS REQUIREMENT OF AT LEAST FIVE ACRES FOR A AGRICULTURE ZONING.

SO THIS IS LIKE A GRANDFATHERED AGRICULTURAL ZONING THAT I ACQUIRED.

[00:25:01]

AND NOW THAT COLLIN COUNTY HAS REMOVED THAT AGRICULTURAL ZONING.

SO IT BECOMES KIND OF CONFORMANCE WITH THE CURRENT LAYOUT OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD.

OKAY WHERE IT IS.

AND JUST TO CONFIRM WHEN HE'S SPEAKING THAT THAT'S COLLIN COUNTY.

AS FAR AS ANY KIND OF AG EXEMPTION AND THOSE KIND OF THINGS NOT RELATED TO THE ZONING ITSELF OF THE PROPERTY.

RIGHT. WHERE IS THE COUNTY LINE? BECAUSE IT'S PRETTY CLOSE, ISN'T IT? IT'S JUST TO THE SOUTH.

YEAH. CREEK CROSSING.

OKAY. YOU CAN SEE IT'S RIGHT ABOUT DOWN HERE.

SO JUST SO I UNDERSTAND THE SITE, YOU HAVE ONE HOUSE THAT'S ON THERE NOW.

YOUR INTENT IS TO PUT TWO MORE TO IT.

JUST DRIVEWAYS. THEY'RE NOT NECESSARILY GOING TO BE LIKE A ROAD DEDICATION OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT.

NO, MY THE INTENT IS TO USE THE EXISTING BAILEY ROAD AS THE ENTRANCE.

ANY ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS? OKAY, THEN AT THIS TIME, I'D LIKE TO OPEN.

YOU MAY. YOU MAY TAKE A BREAK IF YOU'D LIKE.

I'D LIKE TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING.

IS THERE ANYONE HERE TO SPEAK ON THE THIS SPECIFIC SUBJECT? HEARING NONE, WE'LL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING, AND I'LL BE HAPPY TO ENTERTAIN A MOTION.

I MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE ZONING CHANGE AS PRESENTED.

I HAVE A SECOND. I'LL SECOND.

EXCELLENT. THANK YOU.

DO WE HAVE ANY OTHER ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS OR DISCUSSION? THEN LET'S VOTE.

MOTION IS APPROVED UNANIMOUSLY.

THIS WILL CONTINUE ON TO CITY COUNCIL ON DECEMBER 4TH.

AND WITH THAT, WE HAVE NO FURTHER ITEMS ON OUR AGENDA, SO WE WILL ADJOURN.

THANK YOU. ALL NEED TO CORRECT THE SECOND ON THERE.

DO I NEED TO CORRECT THE SECOND? I'M SORRY, WHO WAS IT? YOU PUT DANIEL ON THE DANIEL ON IT? I THOUGHT IT WAS DANIEL.

SORRY. I THINK WE SAID IT. I SAID IT AT THE SAME TIME.

OKAY. SAME TIME. SORRY.

OKAY. THAT'S OKAY. EXCELLENT.

OKAY. THAT'LL WORK.

THEN WE ARE ADJOURNED.

THANK YOU ALL SO MUCH FOR COMING OUT TONIGHT.

OH, THE TIME IS 6:27.

THANK YOU. EXCELLENT.

* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.