[00:00:01]
[1. Call to Order: The Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Sachse will hold a Regular Meeting on Monday, October 23, 2023, at 6 p.m. to consider the following items of business:]
IT IS MONDAY, OCTOBER 23RD, 2023.EXACTLY. AND WE'RE GOING TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING ITEMS OF BUSINESS.
FIRST WILL BE THE INVOCATION AND PLEDGE.
COMMISSIONER OHMAN, HOW DO YOU FEEL ABOUT BOTH? NOPE. I DO THE PLEDGES.
YOU'LL DO THE PLEDGES. ANYBODY ELSE WANT TO TAKE THE INVOCATION? OKAY, I'LL DO IT. YOU GUYS ARE GOING TO MAKE IT HARD ON ME TONIGHT.
PLEASE CONTINUE TO BLESS OUR FIRST RESPONDERS.
THEY WORK THEIR TAILS OFF EVERY DAY.
BUT EXCEPTIONALLY THIS WEEKEND THEY WERE SUPER BUSY WITH LOTS OF EVENTS.
THEY WORK SO HARD FOR THE CITY OF SACHSE AS WELL.
OKAY. THE PUBLIC IS INVITED TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION REGARDING ANY TOPIC NOT ALREADY ON THE AGENDA.
THE TIME LIMIT IS THREE MINUTES PER SPEAKER.
A PUBLIC COMMENT CARD SHOULD BE PRESENTED TO OUR ACTING SECRETARY, MS. MEGAN. PRIOR TO THE MEETING, ACCORDING TO THE TEXAS OPEN MEETINGS ACT, THE COMMISSION IS PROHIBITED FROM DISCUSSING ANY ITEM NOT POSTED ON THE AGENDA, BUT WILL TAKE COMMENTS UNDER ADVISEMENT. ANYBODY HERE FOR JUST GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT? EXCELLENT. THEN WE WILL MOVE ON AND CONSIDER APPROVAL OF THE AUGUST 14TH, 2023 MEETING MINUTES.
[4. Consider approval of the August 14, 2023, meeting minutes.]
HAS EVERYONE HAD AN OPPORTUNITY TO REVIEW THEM.AND THEN I WILL LOOK VERY FORWARD TO A MOTION TO APPROVE.
EXCELLENT. DO I HAVE A SECOND? SECOND. THIRD.
EXCELLENT. CAN WE GO AHEAD AND VOTE, MISS MEGAN? HOLD IT DOWN.
DID IT? WAS IT APPROVED? AND IT'S APPROVED UNANIMOUSLY.
[5. Consider and act on a revised Preliminary Plat for the Aria Retail Addition, generally located at the northeast corner of President George Bush Turnpike and Merritt Road, within Sachse city limits.]
PRESIDENT GEORGE BUSH TURNPIKE AND MERRITT ROAD WITHIN THE SACHSE CITY LIMITS.MR. ROBERTSON, DO YOU HAVE A PRESENTATION FOR US? YES, I DO. THIS WILL BE A VERY BRIEF PRESENTATION.
THE PROPOSAL IS TO PRELIMINARY PLAT FIVE COMMERCIAL LOTS ON APPROXIMATELY 7.01 ACRES OF LAND.
THE PROPERTY IS CURRENTLY VACANT AND IT IS PART OF THE PGT TURNPIKE MIXED USE ZONING DISTRICT.
YOU CAN SEE THE PROPOSED AREA HERE.
THE PROPOSED PRELIMINARY PLAT LOCATED HERE.
AND THEN, PER STAFF'S TECHNICAL REVIEW, THE PROPOSED PLAT IS IN CONFORMANCE WITH SACHSE SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS AND ZONING ORDINANCE, AND STAFF IS RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THE REVISED PRELIMINARY PLAT.
I'D BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU MAY HAVE.
SEE WHAT HAPPENS. DO THEY ALREADY HAVE RETAILERS ALLOCATED FOR THIS, OR ARE THEY JUST PUTTING THE STREETS IN THE PARKING LOTS IN? AND SO WHAT THIS REVISED PRELIMINARY PLAN IS DOING IS KIND OF LAYING OUT THE OVERALL LOT CONFIGURATION.
IF YOU GUYS RECALL AT THE AT THE HARD CORNER OF MERRITT AND PTBT, WE HAD A SUP FOR A GAS STATION.
FROM MY UNDERSTANDING, THAT'S STILL MOVING FORWARD.
BUT AT THIS POINT WE HAVE NOT SEEN ANY OF THE SPECIFIC RETAILERS BEYOND THERE BEING A GAS STATION THERE AND THEN SOME RETAIL PAD SITES AND, AND POTENTIAL STRIP CENTERS. OKAY.
COMMISSIONER MONDOK. SO I DID HAVE A COUPLE OF QUESTIONS REGARDING THE FIVE FOOT DRAINAGE EASEMENT.
[00:05:02]
THOSE SEEM TO BE A LITTLE SMALL.ARE THOSE WHAT ARE THOSE ABOUT? I'D HAVE TO PULL IT UP.
I'LL GIVE YOU AN IDEA ON THE WHAT WOULD BE LOT FIVE ON THAT EASTERN PORTION.
IT'S JUST LIKE A FIVE FOOT AROUND THE PROPERTY LINE.
AND THEN YOU ALSO HAVE ANOTHER ONE WHAT LOOKS TO BE BISECTING LOT NUMBER THREE.
I WOULD HAVE TO CONFIRM WITH ENGINEERING ON THOSE COMPONENTS.
THE SITE IS ENCUMBERED WITH A NUMBER OF EASEMENTS ALREADY, BUT I THINK THAT'S THAT'S A PRIVATE DRAINAGE EASEMENT RIGHT THERE BETWEEN LOT THREE AND LOT FOUR.
I'M LOOKING FOR THE OTHER ONE FOR BETWEEN 1 AND 5 AS WELL.
SO AS PART OF THEIR PLAN, I DON'T HAVE ANY CONCERNS.
I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE THERE'S NOT A RESIDUAL THING FOR IT'S NOT RESIDUAL FROM PREVIOUS PLANS.
SO LIKE I SAID THIS IS A PRELIMINARY.
THE OTHER QUESTION I WANTED TO ASK WAS IN REGARDS TO ACCESS.
IF WE LOOK ON THE AREA OF MERRITT ROAD, THERE'S TWO ENTRANCE POINTS.
THERE'S ONE OF THEM MAY RIGHT LIKE RIGHT IN, RIGHT OUT, LIKE A RESTRICTED SCENARIO OR ARE THEY BOTH FULL ACCESS? THEY'RE BOTH RIGHT IN RIGHT OUT ONLY.
AND THEN THE ONE ON THE NORTH, IS THAT GOING TO BE FULL ACCESS? THE ONE THROUGH THE COMMERCIAL AREA THAT IS RIGHT IN, RIGHT OUT.
OKAY. IT'S JUST ALL THE RIGHT IN.
RIGHT OUTS ARE GOING TO MAKE IT VERY DIFFICULT FOR THAT SITE.
UNFORTUNATELY, THE CONDITIONS OF THAT CORNER.
IT IS TIGHT. IN ADDITION, THERE IS NO FRONTAGE ROAD ALONG PGT.
SO ALL THOSE THINGS, KIND OF ALL OF THOSE THINGS KIND OF WORK AGAINST THE FRONTAGE ROAD ALONG THERE.
OKAY. ANY ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS? THEN I'M SORRY.
IN THE SOUTH EASTERN CORNER, IT HAS A 24 FOOT PRIVATE ACCESS.
YOU KNOW, PRIVATE ACCESS DRIVE AND BUT IT DOESN'T LOOK LIKE THERE'S ANY CONNECTION, YOU KNOW, EASEMENT WISE, TO THE PLOT JUST EAST OF THERE. AND FROM ON THE AERIAL, YOU CAN SEE THAT THERE WAS A ROAD PAVEMENT STUB TO THIS PROPERTY KIND OF IN THAT LOCATION.
YEAH. SO THERE IS A 24 FOOT ACCESS THAT CONNECTS OVER TO ARIA DRIVE.
IT ACTUALLY GOES ALL THE WAY OVER TO THE EDGE.
THE BOXES FOR THESE THAT ARE SHOWN ON HERE KIND OF MAKE IT A LITTLE BIT MORE DIFFICULT.
THAT'S NOT ACTUALLY SHOWN ON THE PLAT ITSELF.
I THINK IT'S PART OF BEING LOADED INTO THE SOFTWARE.
SO THERE'S NOT BOXES AROUND. THAT PLOT TO THE EAST.
HAS THE ACCESS DRIVE CONNECTION THERE, CORRECT? OKAY. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? I DO HAVE ONE MORE NOW THAT YOU MENTIONED THAT ONE.
IS THERE ANY MEANS BY WHICH TO RESTRICT ACCESS OR I SHOULDN'T SAY ACCESS, BUT JUST KIND OF CUT THROUGH TRAFFIC FROM MERRITT TO ARIA VIA THAT ACCESS EASEMENT, BECAUSE IT COULD BE KIND OF A QUICK TURN IN AND OUT, KIND OF REALLY BE PROBLEMATIC WITH TRAFFIC IN FRONT OF THOSE OR AROUND THOSE, THOSE TWO LOTS.
[00:10:05]
IT WOULD INCREASE SOME SPEED. IS THERE ANY WAY TO ENSURE THAT WE GET LIKE SOME TRAFFIC CONTROL MEASURES LIKE SPEED BUMPS OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT, JUST TO SLOW THAT TRAFFIC DOWN A LITTLE? SO WITH WITH SITE DEVELOPMENT, WE'LL BE LOOKING AT THERE'LL BE CURBS, THERE WILL BE LIMITATIONS FOR THE DRIVE AISLES, ALL THOSE KIND OF COMPONENTS TO BREAK IT UP, TO SLOW DOWN ANY TRAFFIC THAT GOES THAT IS GOING THROUGH THERE.ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? OKAY, THEN WE'LL ENTERTAIN A MOTION.
I'LL MAKE A MOTION THAT WE APPROVE AS PRESENTED, SUBJECT TO THE STIPULATIONS OF THE, HIS GROUP.
ANY ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS? THEN LET'S HAVE A VOTE.
THE MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY.
[6. Conduct a public hearing to consider and act on a final plat of 5th Street District Phase 1, being a replat of lots 1-6, Block 44 of Original Town of Sachse, generally located between 5th Street and Sachse Road and south of Alexander Street, within Sachse city limits.]
PHASE ONE BEING A REPLAT OF LOTS ONE THROUGH SIX BLOCKS 44 OF ORIGINAL TOWN OF SACHSE, GENERALLY LOCATED BETWEEN FIFTH STREET AND SACHSE ROAD AND SOUTH OF ALEXANDER STREET WITH SACHSE CITY LIMITS.FIRST, MR. ROBINSON, YOU HAVE A PRESENTATION FOR US.
YES I DO. AS MENTIONED, THIS IS A FINAL PLAT, BEING A REPLAT OF SIX COMMERCIAL LOTS TO GO DOWN INTO FOUR COMMERCIAL LOTS. IT'S ON APPROXIMATELY 2.44 ACRES OF LAND, AND IT IS LOCATED WITHIN THE OLD TOWN DISTRICT.
AND ON THE MAP YOU CAN SEE THE LOCATION OF THE PROPERTY.
YOU CAN SEE THE GHOSTED LINES IN THE BACKGROUND OF THE ORIGINAL SIX LOTS.
AS MENTIONED, THIS IS GOING INTO FOUR COMMERCIAL LOTS.
THERE IS PROPOSED REDEVELOPMENT IN THIS AREA.
AND THEN, AS PER STAFF'S TECHNICAL REVIEW, THE PROPOSED PLAT IS IN CONFORMANCE WITH SACHSE SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS AND ZONING ORDINANCE, AND STAFF IS RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THE REPLAT.
I'D BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU MAY HAVE.
YES, ANOTHER FOLLOW UP QUESTION ON THIS ONE LOT NUMBER FOUR, BLOCK A HAS A VERY UNIQUE SHAPE, WHICH COULD CAUSE SOME PROBLEMS WITH SOME SETBACK REQUIREMENTS SET ON THIS, THAT ONE LOT.
WHAT WOULD THE SETBACK REQUIREMENTS BE FOR THAT ONE LOT ITSELF? SO WITH WITH THE OLD TOWN ZONING DISTRICT, YOUR THE INTENT IS TO BUILD THE BUILDING CLOSER TO THE STREET.
SO ZERO LOT LINE BASICALLY 0 TO 15FT.
THAT LOT FOUR IS BASICALLY CONFIGURED TO THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT THAT WE'VE BEEN WORKING WITH FOR THAT INDIVIDUAL LOT. SO THAT'S WHY IT'S CONFIGURED IN SUCH A WEIRD FASHION.
OKAY. AND SO IF WE MOVE FORWARD WITH THIS, SO LONG AS WE'RE NOT GOING TO BE COMING BACK LATER WITH SAYING, HEY, I NEED A REPLAT OF THIS BECAUSE I NEED TO MAKE THIS CHANGE, OR I THINK THEY'RE REALLY COMMITTED TO WHAT THEY'VE GOT AT THIS POINT.
I BELIEVE THEY'RE STILL WORKING ON THE DEVELOPMENT DEAL POINTS, BUT IF THE PLAT ITSELF NEEDS TO BE ADJUSTED, THEY CAN GO THROUGH THE PLAT PROCESS TO EITHER ADJUST BOUNDARY LINES. THAT IS A STAFF APPROVAL.
IT DOES NOT HAVE TO GO BACK THROUGH THROUGH THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION.
BUT RIGHT NOW WE'RE MOVING FORWARD WITH THE PROPOSED LAYOUT AS SHOWN HERE.
IF WE DO NEED TO ADJUST THESE LATER ON FOR ANOTHER TENANT OR ANOTHER DEVELOPER OR ANOTHER DEVELOPMENT ON THIS SITE, WE CAN DO THAT THROUGH AN AMENDING PLAT VERY PRETTY EASILY.
OKAY. AND THIS DOES NOT SHOW ANY UTILITY EASEMENTS OR ANYTHING ELSE.
SO THAT'S THERE IS NO INTENTION FOR UTILITY EASEMENT.
SO ALL THE UTILITIES FOR THIS WE CAN COME BACK LATER THROUGH AN AMENDING PLAT TO, TO GET THESE.
RIGHT NOW WE DON'T HAVE IT DEFINED SITE.
THE SITE PLAN THAT IS COMING IN.
WE HAVE A BOUNDARY OF THE PROPOSED LOCATION.
WE DO NOT HAVE THE ACTUAL SITE CIVIL PLANS FOR EACH OF THOSE USERS.
[00:15:05]
SO WE'LL COME BACK FORWARD WITH AN AMENDING PLAT TO DEDICATE ANY ADDITIONAL EASEMENTS AT A LATER TIME.ONE. WHAT EXACTLY? THIS IS RETAIL, RIGHT? YOU SAY COMMERCIAL OR IS THIS COMMERCIAL RETAIL, OFFICE? OKAY. RESTAURANTS, BARS, STUFF LIKE THAT.
EXCELLENT. THE OTHER THING IS.
BEFORE I VOTE, WE NEED TO DETERMINE IF MY CLOSE PROXIMITY TO THE SITE REQUIRES ME TO ABSTAIN, I KNOW IT'S 250 YARDS, AND I'M EITHER WITHIN THAT OR MY PROPERTY'S EXTREMELY CLOSE TO 250 YARDS OF THIS SITE.
SO UNLESS YOU HAVE A VESTED INTEREST IN THE SPECIFIC PROPERTY ITSELF, YOU SHOULD BE FINE TO VOTE.
SO THOSE ARE MINISTERIAL IN NATURE.
SO PROVIDED THEY MEET ALL THE REQUIREMENTS THE COMMISSION IS REQUIRED TO APPROVE THE PLAT.
OKAY. I JUST DIDN'T KNOW IF I NEEDED TO.
ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? DID YOU SAY THE MINIMUM SETBACK REQUIREMENTS FOR THIS PROPERTY ALLOW THE FIVE FOOT RIGHT OF WAY DEDICATION ALONG FIFTH STREET? THE FIVE FOOT RIGHT OF WAY DEDICATION IS TO ENCOMPASS ANY STREET TREES AND THOSE KIND OF PUBLIC COMPONENTS.
AS FAR AS THE SETBACK ITSELF, THE SETBACK IN THE ZONING DISTRICT, I WANT TO SAY IS 0 TO 15FT.
I WOULD HAVE TO PULL IT UP, BUT THE INTENT IS TO PULL THE BUILDINGS UP TO THE STREET TO FRAME THE STREET, AND ONE THAT HELPS SLOW DOWN TRAFFIC ALSO BUILDS THAT PEDESTRIAN, PEDESTRIAN FEEL ALONG FIFTH STREET.
SO. SO WE THINK FIVE FOOT RIGHT OF WAY DEDICATION IS ALL THAT'S NEEDED ALONG FIFTH STREET.
THE RIGHT OF WAY IS ALREADY CONSTRUCTED.
THEY'RE ALL THERE ALREADY ON FIFTH STREET ON SAXON ROAD.
WELL, IN THIS SECTION ACTUALLY DOES NOT HAVE ANY PARKING ON IT AS IT COMES INTO THE TURNABOUT.
NORTH OF ALEXANDER STREET. THAT'S WHERE THE ON STREET PARKING IS.
SO FIFTH STREET IS ULTIMATELY A 90 FOOT RIGHT OF WAY STREET SECTION.
AND I GUESS I'M SEEING 4 OR 5 FOOT OF ADDITIONAL RIGHT OF WAY DEDICATION BY THIS PLAT JUST FOR THE PURPOSE OF ADDITIONAL ROOM THAT FOR ONE IS AVAILABLE AND TWO NOT NEEDED FOR THE INDIVIDUAL LOTS, I GUESS.
ANY ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS? I'M HAPPY TO ENTERTAIN A MOTION.
AT THIS TIME, I NEED TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING.
IS THERE ANYONE HERE THAT WOULD LIKE TO COMMENT ON THIS PARTICULAR AGENDA ITEM? NO ONE IS JUMPING UP AND RUNNING.
SO WITH Y'ALL'S PERMISSION, I'M GOING TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.
THAT MOTION THAT WE APPROVE THIS FINAL PLAT AS CURRENTLY CONSTITUTED.
PERFECT. THANK YOU. COMMISSIONER MONDOK.
DO I HAVE A SECOND? SECOND? SECOND BY COMMISSIONER OHMAN.
ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION OR QUESTIONS? LET'S DO IT.
AND THAT MOTION PASSES UNANIMOUSLY.
WE'RE GOING TO MOVE ON TO OUR SECOND PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER AN ACT ON A REQUEST BY MR.
[7. Conduct a public hearing to consider and act on a request by Habeeburrahman Syed Quadri to rezone approximately 4.7 acres of land from AG, Agricultural District to R-39 Single Family Residential District, generally located east of the intersection of Hooper Road and Bailey Road, within Sachse city limits.]
QUADRI TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 4.7 ACRES OF LAND FROM AG AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT TO R 39 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT LOCATED EAST OF THE INTERSECTION OF HOOPER ROAD AND BAILEY ROAD WITHIN CITY LIMITS.FIRST UP IS GOING TO BE MR. ROBINSON WITH THE PRESENTATION.
THE PROPERTY IS CURRENTLY ONE LOT WITH ONE SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING ON IT.
YOU CAN SEE THAT ON THE AERIAL MAP LOCATED HERE.
OH REALLY? AND AS MENTIONED, THE PROPERTY IS ZONED AG.
[00:20:01]
SO AS PART OF THE 39 SINGLE FAMILY ZONING DISTRICT, THIS REQUIRES A MINIMUM LOT AREA OF 39,000FT².IT'S DESIGNATED AS LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL USES, WHICH ARE DESCRIBED AS NEIGHBORHOODS WITH CONVENTIONAL DETACHED, SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS ON A RANGE OF LOT SIZES AND VARIOUS SETBACKS. SO THE PROPOSED REZONING REQUEST IS IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE FUTURE LAND USE PLAN OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
STAFF IS RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF PROPOSED REZONING REQUEST FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS.
AND WITH THAT, I WOULD BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS THE COUNCIL THE COMMISSION HAS.
WHAT IS THE ACTUAL SETBACK? HARD QUESTIONS TONIGHT.
IT IS A 90 FOOT FRONT SETBACK, 90 FOOT SETBACK.
SO RIGHT NOW THAT 4.7 ACRES COULD BE DIVIDED INTO FOUR LOTS TOTAL, RIGHT? RIGHT NOW IT CAN ONLY BE THE ONE PIECE OF PROPERTY RIGHT NOW.
CORRECT. OKAY. DOES ANYONE HAVE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS ABOUT THIS? OKAY, A COUPLE QUESTIONS.
RIGHT? THEY ARE LOOKING TO HAVE.
WELL, DO YOU WANT TO OPEN IT UP TO THE APPLICANT? LET HIM SPEAK. IF YOU DON'T MIND COMING FORWARD.
I'LL ADDRESS YOUR QUESTION REAL QUICK.
IF YOU WOULD INTRODUCE YOURSELF.
YEAH. MY NAME IS HABIB CHAUDHRY.
I'M THE OWNER OF THAT PROPERTY.
AND THIS WAS ZONED AS AGRICULTURE FROM A PREVIOUS OWNER.
AND NOW I WOULD LIKE TO CHANGE IT TO THE REQUESTING CHANGE TO RESIDENTIAL ZONING. THE PROPOSAL, MY INTENT AND THE PROPOSAL IS TO SUBDIVIDE INTO LIKE THREE LOTS EQUALLY.
I MEAN, THE LAND IS 4.7 ACRES, SO MOST PROBABLY IT IS GOING TO BE AROUND ONE AND A HALF ACRE EACH WITH VERY SIMILAR FRONTAGE.
EXCELLENT. AND THOSE WILL BE DRIVEWAYS OFF OF BAILEY ROAD.
ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? YOU RECENTLY ACQUIRED THE PROPERTY.
IT HAS BEEN ONE AND A HALF YEARS.
SO WHAT IS THE CURRENT? LAND HAS BEEN CLASSIFIED AS AGRICULTURE FOR THE LAST YEAR AND A HALF.
I'M ASSUMING. IS THERE A DESIGNATION FOR THAT AS SPECIFICALLY FOR THIS LOT? IT'S BEEN ZONED AGRICULTURAL FOR PROBABLY SINCE IT CAME INTO THE CITY.
IS THERE AGRICULTURE? THE MINIMUM STANDARDS FOR AGRICULTURAL IS A FIVE ACRE LOT.
SO THIS IS ACTUALLY UNDERSIZED FOR THAT.
AND THEN NUMBER TWO YOU'RE LIMITED TO ONE SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE.
AND THEN YOU CAN HAVE SUPPORTING ACCESSORY STRUCTURES.
AS YOU CAN NOTE HERE THERE IS A SINGLE FAMILY HOME AND THEN THERE ARE ACCESSORY BUILDINGS ON IT.
LIKE THE COLLIN COUNTY HAS REQUIREMENT OF AT LEAST FIVE ACRES FOR A AGRICULTURE ZONING.
SO THIS IS LIKE A GRANDFATHERED AGRICULTURAL ZONING THAT I ACQUIRED.
[00:25:01]
AND NOW THAT COLLIN COUNTY HAS REMOVED THAT AGRICULTURAL ZONING.SO IT BECOMES KIND OF CONFORMANCE WITH THE CURRENT LAYOUT OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD.
AND JUST TO CONFIRM WHEN HE'S SPEAKING THAT THAT'S COLLIN COUNTY.
RIGHT. WHERE IS THE COUNTY LINE? BECAUSE IT'S PRETTY CLOSE, ISN'T IT? IT'S JUST TO THE SOUTH.
OKAY. YOU CAN SEE IT'S RIGHT ABOUT DOWN HERE.
SO JUST SO I UNDERSTAND THE SITE, YOU HAVE ONE HOUSE THAT'S ON THERE NOW.
YOUR INTENT IS TO PUT TWO MORE TO IT.
JUST DRIVEWAYS. THEY'RE NOT NECESSARILY GOING TO BE LIKE A ROAD DEDICATION OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT.
NO, MY THE INTENT IS TO USE THE EXISTING BAILEY ROAD AS THE ENTRANCE.
ANY ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS? OKAY, THEN AT THIS TIME, I'D LIKE TO OPEN.
YOU MAY. YOU MAY TAKE A BREAK IF YOU'D LIKE.
I'D LIKE TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING.
IS THERE ANYONE HERE TO SPEAK ON THE THIS SPECIFIC SUBJECT? HEARING NONE, WE'LL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING, AND I'LL BE HAPPY TO ENTERTAIN A MOTION.
I MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE ZONING CHANGE AS PRESENTED.
DO WE HAVE ANY OTHER ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS OR DISCUSSION? THEN LET'S VOTE.
MOTION IS APPROVED UNANIMOUSLY.
THIS WILL CONTINUE ON TO CITY COUNCIL ON DECEMBER 4TH.
AND WITH THAT, WE HAVE NO FURTHER ITEMS ON OUR AGENDA, SO WE WILL ADJOURN.
THANK YOU. ALL NEED TO CORRECT THE SECOND ON THERE.
DO I NEED TO CORRECT THE SECOND? I'M SORRY, WHO WAS IT? YOU PUT DANIEL ON THE DANIEL ON IT? I THOUGHT IT WAS DANIEL.
SORRY. I THINK WE SAID IT. I SAID IT AT THE SAME TIME.
THANK YOU ALL SO MUCH FOR COMING OUT TONIGHT.
THANK YOU. EXCELLENT.
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.