E. Consent Agenda - All items listed on the consent agenda will be considered by the City Council and will be enacted on by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Councilmember so requests.

[E. Consent Agenda - All items listed on the consent agenda will be considered by the City Council and will be enacted on by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Councilmember so requests.]

ALL ITEMS LISTED ON THE CONSENT AGENDA WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THE CITY COUNCIL WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE MOTION.

THERE WILL BE NO SEPARATE DISCUSSION OF THESE ITEMS UNLESS A COUNCILMEMBER SO REQUESTS.

ITEM E1 APPROVE THE NOVEMBER 6TH, 2023 MEETING MINUTES ITEM TO ACCEPT THE MONTHLY REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE REPORT FOR THE PERIOD ENDING OCTOBER 31ST, 2023, EXCEPT THE QUARTERLY BUDGET AND INVESTMENT REPORTS FOR THE QUARTER ENDING SEPTEMBER 30TH, 2023.

ITEM FOUR APPROVE A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE CITY OF SACHSE, SACHSE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, SACHSE MUNICIPAL DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT TAX INCREMENT FINANCING REINVESTMENT ZONE NUMBER ONE, TAX INCREMENT FINANCING REINVESTMENT ZONE NUMBER TWO, AND TAX INCREMENT REINVESTMENT ZONE NUMBER THREE INVESTMENT POLICY PARENTHESES SACHSE INVESTMENT POLICY.

ITEM FIVE ADOPT A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING AND APPROVING THE DALLAS COUNTY 2023 TAX ROLL, RESOLVING OTHER MATTERS RELATED TO THE SUBJECT AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.

ITEM SIX APPROVE A RESOLUTION ADOPTING PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLAT CHECKLIST.

COMPLETE APPLICATION CHECKLIST, THE PLAT FORMAT CHECKLIST, AND APPROVING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.

ITEM SEVEN AUTHORIZE THE CITY MANAGER TO ENTER INTO AN AGREEMENT WITH VECTOR CONCEPTS INCORPORATED FOR THE PURCHASE AND INSTALLATION OF CARPET ON THE SECOND FLOOR OF CITY HALL

[00:25:03]

AT THE FIRE STATION NUMBER ONE, AND AT THE PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING IN THE AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $183,381.98.

ADAM AUTHORIZE THE PURCHASE OF TWO 2024 CHEVROLET TAHOE POLICE PURSUIT VEHICLES, TWO WHEEL DRIVE FROM RELIABLE CHEVROLET UTILIZING TIFFS CONTRACT NUMBER 230404, IN THE AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $105,378.18.

ITEM NINE AUTHORIZE THE PURCHASE OF RADIOS AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT FOR THE POLICE DEPARTMENT IN THE AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $359,508.44 FROM THE GMRS PARENTHESES HTAC-RA05-21 CONTRACT.

ITEM TEN AUTHORIZED THE PURCHASE OF RADIOS ASSOCIATED WITH EQUIPMENT FOR THE SACHSE FIRE AND RESCUE, IN THE AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $165,187.45 FROM THE GMRS PARENTHESES HTACRA05-21 CONTRACT.

ITEM 11 AUTHORIZE THE PURCHASE OF THREE OUTDOOR WARNING SIRENS AND THREE PARK WARNING SPEAKER DEVICES FROM GOODARD ENTERPRISES MASS NOTIFICATION SYSTEMS THROUGH THE INTER LOCAL PURCHASING SYSTEM TIPS PURCHASING PROGRAM, NOT TO EXCEED THE BUDGETED FUNDS OF $120,207 FOR SACHSE FIRE AND RESCUE AND EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AND LAST BUT CERTAINLY NOT LEAST, ITEM 12 AUTHORIZE THE CITY MANAGER TO NEGOTIATE AND ENTER INTO A CONTRACT WITH NO-DIGTEC FOR PIPE BURSTING IMPROVEMENTS FOR WATER AND SEWER MAINS AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS.

PARENTHESES W-21-08 AND SS-21-11 THROUGH THE INTER LOCAL PURCHASING SYSTEM TIPS PROGRAM CONTRACT NUMBER 20110401.

IN THE AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $2,189,213, AND I AM TIRED WITH THAT.

MOTIONS, DISCUSSIONS ON THE CONSENT AGENDA.

MS. HOWARTH.

IF THERE'S NO DISCUSSION, I MOVE THAT WE APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED.

MOST OF MY MS. HOWARTH TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED.

DO I HAVE A SECOND? MS. LINDSEY? OH, EXCUSE ME, MR. LINDSEY.

[CHUCKLING] IT'S CHRISTMAS TIME.

I KNEW I WAS GOING TO DO IT FOR THE END OF THE YEAR.

I HAVE A SECOND BY MR. LINDSEY TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED.

ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? HEARING NONE. PLEASE CAST YOUR BALLOT.

MOTION CARRIES UNANIMOUSLY.

NEXT ITEM ON THE AGENDA IS ITEM F, REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS.

[1. Consider approving a resolution casting Sachse's vote for the fourth member of the Board of Directors of the Dallas Central Appraisal District.]

ITEM ONE CONSIDER APPROVING A RESOLUTION CASTING SACHSE'S VOTE FOR THE FOURTH MEMBER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE DALLAS CENTRAL APPRAISAL DISTRICT.

MS. NASH. MAYOR AND COUNCIL.

SO THIS IS YOUR OPPORTUNITY NOW THAT WE DO HAVE COUNCILMEMBER SORRY, MAYOR PRO TEM BRETT FRANKS ON THE BALLOT FOR THE DALLAS CENTRAL APPRAISAL DISTRICT, AND YOU ALL CAN CAST YOUR BALLOT FOR HIM OR ANYBODY ELSE YOU SEE FIT ON THE AGENDA.

THANK YOU, MS. NASH. ANY QUESTIONS FOR MS. NASH? MAYOR PRO TEM FRANKS, DO YOU WANT A CAMPAIGN SPEECH OR ANYTHING? NO. I JUST WANTED TO GIVE YOU THE OPPORTUNITY, SIR.

OKAY, SO AS MS. NASH MENTIONED, THIS IS AN ITEM TO WHERE THE LIST OF CANDIDATES ARE IN THE PACKET.

SO YOU CAN CAST ALL THE CITY.

YOU CAN MAKE A MOTION TO CAST OUR VOTE TO MR. FRANKS OR ANYBODY ON THE LIST THAT YOU WANT.

SO WITH THAT, WE'LL CERTAINLY OPEN UP FOR DISCUSSION QUESTIONS OR MOTIONS.

MS. BUHLER I MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE A RESOLUTION CASTING SACHSE'S VOTE FOR BRETT FRANKS TO BE THE FOURTH MEMBER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE DALLAS CENTRAL APPRAISAL DISTRICT.

I HAVE A MOTION BY MS. BUHLER TO CAST SACHSE'S VOTE FOR MR. BRETT FRANKS TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS FOR THE DALLAS CENTRAL APPRAISAL DISTRICT.

DO I HAVE A SECOND? MR. PRESTENBERG? SECOND. HAVE A SECOND BY MR. PRESTENBERG. ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? HEARING NONE. PLEASE CAST YOUR BALLOT LITERALLY.

MOTION CARRIES UNANIMOUSLY. CONGRATULATIONS, MAYOR PRO TEM FRANKS.

ALL RIGHT, THE NEXT ITEM ON THE AGENDA IS ITEM TWO.

[2. Conduct a public hearing to consider and act on an ordinance amending the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance and map, to grant a change of zoning from Agricultural District (AG) to a Residential-39 District (R-39) on an approximately 4.7 acre tract of land out of the R.D. Newman Survey, Abstract No. 660, City of Sachse, Dallas County, Texas, more particularly described in Exhibit "A" and located east of the intersection of Hooper Road and Bailey Road; providing a conflicts resolution clause, a severability clause, a savings clause, a penalty of fine not to exceed the sum of two thousand dollars ($2,000) for each offense, and an effective date.]

AM I ALLOWED TO CONTINUE? IT'S NOT BORING ANYMORE. OKAY.

[00:30:01]

AT LEAST I HADN'T STARTED READING IT YET.

ITEM TWO CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER AND ACT ON AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE TWO AND MAP TO GRANT A CHANGE IN ZONING FROM AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT TO RESIDENTIAL 39 DISTRICT OR R-39 ON APPROXIMATELY 4.7 ACRE TRACT OF LAND OUT OF THE NEWMAN SURVEY.

ABSTRACT NUMBER 660, CITY OF SACHSE, DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS.

MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT A, LOCATED EAST OF THE INTERSECTION OF HOOPER ROAD AND BAILEY ROAD PROVIDING A CONFLICT RESOLUTION CLAUSE, A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE, A SAVINGS CLAUSE, A PENALTY OF FINE NOT TO EXCEED THE SUM OF $2,000 FOR EACH OFFENSE, AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE.

JOE, CAN YOU DO ANYTHING ABOUT THESE CAPTIONS LEGALLY? I'LL TAKE THAT AS A NO.

MS. NASH.

MAYOR, OUR ESTEEMED DIRECTOR ALWAYS DOES A BETTER JOB PRESENTING THIS MORE SUCCINCTLY THAN I WILL.

SO IT'S A REZONING REQUEST, AND HE WILL BE ABLE TO PRESENT THAT.

WELL, I'M CERTAIN.

HELLO, SIR. HELLO, SIR.

THANK YOU, MR. MAYOR, CITY COUNCIL.

AS MENTIONED, THIS IS A REZONING REQUEST FOR APPROXIMATELY 4.7 ACRES OF LAND FROM AG AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT TO R-39 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT.

THE PROPERTY IS CURRENTLY AN UN-PLATTED LOT WITH ONE SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING ON IT.

AS YOU CAN SEE HERE, LOCATED EAST OF THE INTERSECTION OF HOOPER ROAD AND BAILEY ROAD.

AS YOU CAN SEE HERE, THE PROPERTY IS ZONED AG.

SURROUNDING PROPERTY TO THE WEST IS ZONED R-2-A, WHICH IS APPROXIMATELY 10,000 SQUARE FOOT LOTS.

PROPERTY TO THE EAST IS ZONED R-12, WHICH IS 12,000 SQUARE FOOT LOTS.

PD-10 TO THE SOUTH, WHICH HAS A MIX OF RESIDENTIAL LOT SIZES RANGING FROM TWO ACRES ALL THE WAY DOWN TO 10,000FT², AND THEN FURTHER SOUTH IS ZONED R-1, WHICH IS 39,000 SQUARE FOOT LOT SIZES.

BEFORE YOU ARE THE R-39 SINGLE FAMILY ZONING DISTRICT STANDARDS, WHICH ARE 39,000FT² FOR EACH LOT, 2000 SQUARE FOOT MINIMUM BUILDING SIZE AND SOME SIZABLE SETBACK.

THE FUTURE LAND USE PLAN DESIGNATES THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FOR LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL USES, WHICH ARE DESCRIBED AS NEIGHBORHOODS WITH CONVENTIONAL DETACHED, SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS ON A RANGE OF LOT SIZES AND VARIOUS SETBACKS.

THIS ENTIRE AREA IS DESIGNATED AS LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL, SO ANYTHING UP TO ABOUT AN ACRE IS CONSIDERED LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL FOR AS CLASSIFIED IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, AS NOTED.

STATE LAW REQUIRES THAT ZONING DECISIONS MUST BE ADOPTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, AND THE PROPOSED REQUEST IS IN COMPLIANCE WITH THAT.

STAFF IS RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THE PROPOSED REZONING REQUEST, AS IT IS CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND IS IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE FUTURE LAND USE PLAN, AND THE PERMITTED USES WITHIN THE PROPOSED REZONING REQUEST WOULD BE CONSISTENT WITH SURROUNDING RESIDENTIALLY ZONED AND DEVELOPED LAND.

IN ADDITION, AT THE OCTOBER 23RD REGULAR MEETING, THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION VOTED FIVE ZERO TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE ITEM.

THE APPLICANT IS HERE TONIGHT TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS THAT YOU MAY HAVE.

WITH THAT, THAT CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION.

I'D BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS THAT YOU MAY HAVE.

THANK YOU, MR. ROBINSON.

DOES THE COUNCIL HAVE QUESTIONS OF MR. ROBINSON? HEARING NONE.

THANK YOU SIR. IT IS A PUBLIC HEARING, SO WE WILL AT THIS TIME I WILL DECLARE THE PUBLIC HEARING OPEN.

I DO HAVE A REQUEST TO SPEAK, MR. [INAUDIBLE]. YEAH.

SORRY.

STATE YOUR NAME? DAVE TEASDALE.

I'M AT 6409 BAILEY ROAD.

BEEN THERE ABOUT 30 YEARS.

ANYTHING ELSE? I THINK THAT'S ALL I'M SUPPOSED TO ADDRESS, RIGHT? YEAH YOU'RE GOOD. I WAS GOING TO SAY IS.

IS THAT. IT'S WEIRD.

LIVED HERE FOR 30 YEARS.

I'VE NEVER HAD TO COME TO THE CITY COUNCIL AND THIS YEAR I SEEMED TO HAVE HAD TO DO IT TWO OR THREE TIMES.

MY UNDERSTANDING, OF COURSE.

I LIVE ON THE WEST SIDE OF BAILEY ROAD, WHICH IS IN THE R DESIGNATION.

PEOPLE THAT I KNOW ARE ACROSS THE STREET, AND THEY ARE ROUTINELY BEING HOUNDED BY DEVELOPERS AND OTHER PEOPLE TO ACQUIRE THAT LAND. I DON'T UNDERSTAND WHY WE'RE TALKING ABOUT A FUTURE USE PLAN AND COMPLIANCE WITH THAT WHEN THE STREET IS ALREADY BUILT OUT.

THERE ISN'T ANYTHING ELSE TO DO.

I'VE DEALT WITH THESE THINGS WITH MINING AND STUFF, WHERE YOU START WITH THE ZONING AND THEN YOU GO TO THE USE PLAN AND THEN YOU GO TO WHATEVER AND THROUGH AND SO FORTH, BUT I'VE NOT SEEN PEOPLE DO THIS WITH LAND THAT'S ALREADY IN USE, DEVELOPED FOR WHAT THE CITY IS EXPECTING IT TO BE USED FOR AND I DON'T, I OPPOSE, I THINK UNLESS SOMEBODY IS GOING TO TELL ME THERE'S SOMETHING UNIQUE ABOUT THIS PROPERTY, I OPPOSE THIS GREATLY BECAUSE ALL IT DOES IS SET IT UP SO THAT THERE'S A PRECEDENT FOR PEOPLE TO JUST BUY DOWN THE REST OF THE STREET, AND WITH 200 EXTRA HOUSES ON A STREET THAT WAS NEVER INTENDED TO

[00:35:10]

HAVE THEM. SO TO THE EXTENT THAT I CAN AFFECT ANYBODY'S OPINION TONIGHT, GIVEN THE FACT THAT EVERYBODY HAS HAD AN OPPORTUNITY TO THINK ABOUT THIS PROBABLY A LOT LONGER THAN ME.

I JUST WANT TO SAY THAT I OPPOSE THIS AND I HOPE YOU'LL VOTE IT DOWN.

THANK YOU, MR. TEASDALE. ANYONE ELSE LIKE TO ADDRESS THIS ITEM? OKAY. SEEING NONE, WE'LL CLOSE THE PUBLIC.

I DECLARE PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED.

QUESTIONS FOR COUNSELORS.

MS. HOWARTH.

I GUESS THIS IS FOR MATT.

R-39 IS IF MY MATH IS RIGHT, 39,000FT² MINIMUM IS AN ACRE.

RIGHT. SO WHAT WOULD WE BE ALLOWING ON THIS? WHAT'S THE SIZE OF THIS PROPERTY? FOUR ACRES.

IT'S 4.7 ACRES.

4.7, SO WE WOULD ALLOW IT TO GO FROM AG WHICH IS FIVE, BUT THEY'RE NOT REQUESTING A REPLAT OR THIS IS THE FIRST STEP.

THIS IS THE FIRST STEP.

OKAY. SO A FEW THINGS TO NOTE WITH THIS SPECIFIC PROPERTY.

THIS PROPERTY IS ZONED AG.

THIS IS THE ONLY PROPERTY ZONED AG WITHIN COULD SOMEONE PUT THE MAP BACK UP JUST FOR REFERENCE.

SORRY I PUT IT UP ON MY SCREEN.

[CHUCKLING] THAT DOESN'T DO US ANY GOOD.

OKAY, GREAT. OKAY, SO THIS IS THE ONLY PROPERTY REMAINING THAT IS ZONED AG.

IT IS UN-PLATTED. SO IT WAS NEVER PART OF ANY SUBDIVISION WITHIN THE PROPERTIES TO THE WEST, TO THE EAST, TO THE SOUTH, THOSE HAVE ALL BEEN SUBDIVIDED AND THEY HAVE ALL BEEN ZONED FOR RESIDENTIAL USE.

THE AG ZONING DISTRICT IS TYPICALLY HELD FOR PROPERTY THAT IS ANNEXED INTO THE CITY, AND IT'S A HOLDING ZONE.

IN ADDITION IT'S ALSO FOR USES FOR AGRICULTURAL FARMING THOSE TYPE OF THINGS.

SO THIS IS LOCATED WITHIN WHAT HAS BEEN SURROUNDED BY NEIGHBORHOODS NOW.

SO THAT'S WHY STAFF IS SUPPORTING, SO THE AG ZONING IS A HOLDOVER FROM MANY YEARS.

AS LONG AS THE WHENEVER THEY PURCHASED IT OR WHATEVER.

OKAY. FOR CLARIFICATION, I WOULD SAY THAT IT'S MY GUESS IS IT'S BEEN ZONED THE AXIS OF THAT PIECE OF PROPERTY IS ACTUALLY ANNEXED INTO THE CITY.

I WOULD BE WILLING TO VENTURE A GUESS THAT'S THE CASE.

BACK IN THE DAY WHEN WE HAD LAND ANNEXED, THAT'S, LIKE YOU SAID, THAT'S THE ZONING THAT GOT WHEN LAND WAS ANNEXED, IT GOT AG, AND IT PROBABLY NEVER CHANGED UP UNTIL THIS PROPOSAL TO ADDRESS THE GENTLEMAN THAT SPOKE ABOUT SUBDIVIDING THE PROPERTIES ALONG HERE.

THE REST OF THE PROPERTIES ARE ALREADY ZONED FOR RESIDENTIAL USE.

SO IF THEY ARE ABLE TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS AND ABLE TO SUBDIVIDE IT THAT WAY, AS FAR AS MEETING THE ZONING AND SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS, THEY WOULD BE ABLE TO DO THAT ALREADY, BUT THIS PROPERTY IN SPECIFIC IS ZONED AG IN A PREDOMINANTLY RESIDENTIAL AREA.

I THINK YOU HAD A ZONING EXHIBIT, RIGHT? OKAY. IT'S NOT ZOOMED FULLY OUT, BUT.

OKAY. SO THAT KIND OF ILLUSTRATES WHAT'S AG AND WHAT'S BASICALLY SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL.

CORRECT. OTHER QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? OKAY. MA'AM, DID YOU WANT TO SPEAK? I DO HAVE A QUESTION.

OKAY, LET ME OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING BACK UP AND THEN.

OKAY. I DO DECLARE THE PUBLIC HEARING OPEN.

COME ON DOWN, MA'AM. IF YOU'LL STATE YOUR NAME AND CITY OF RESIDENCE.

HI, I'M CINDY ELK AT 6404 BAILEY ROAD IN SACHSE.

I AM A LITTLE CONFUSED, AND MAYBE IT'S BECAUSE OUR PROPERTY IS PLATTED, BUT THERE'S ABOUT 7 OR 8 HOUSES OF US ALL TOGETHER THAT ARE STILL.

WELL, WE CAN DEFINITELY CLARIFY THAT FOR YOU.

SO BUT I MEAN, MAYBE IT'S BECAUSE WE PLATTED WE WERE REQUIRED TO WHEN WE PURCHASED THE LAND BE AT THE TIME BECAUSE IT WAS LESS THAN FOUR ACRES.

WE DID HAVE TO PLAT IT.

MY ONLY QUESTION IS WHEN I WAS LOOKING, IF I READ IT CORRECTLY, THIS 4.7 ACRES COULD BE SUBDIVIDED INTO THREE SEPARATE RESIDENCES, IS WHAT HE'S ASKING, AND IT'S A LITTLE CONFUSING TO ME.

WHAT'S GOING TO HAPPEN TO THE END OF OUR ROAD.

THAT'S ALREADY A DIFFICULT THAT BEND WHERE HOOPER GOES INTO BAILEY.

THAT'S MY ONLY OR ONE OF MY CONCERNS IS WHAT'S GOING TO HAPPEN.

IF THE PROPERTY TO THE NORTH OF WHAT THEY'RE SAYING AND TO THE SOUTH HAS ROADS GOING ON INTO BAILEY, BUT WE DO HAVE AGRICULTURE ON THE STREET. WE'RE NOT THE ONLY ONES.

YEAH, AND ONE POINT OF CLARIFICATION FOR YOUR QUESTION ABOUT THE ROAD.

OF COURSE, WE ARE REBUILDING, BAILEY, AS YOU KNOW.

SO THAT WILL ADDRESS PART OF THAT ISSUE ON THE CURVE.

I'M SURE STAFF CAN CLARIFY THIS.

I'M NOT SURE THAT THIS REQUEST WOULD HAVE A DIRECT BEARING ON THAT, BUT I UNDERSTAND WHAT YOU'RE ASKING, AND I THINK THE MORE RELEVANT QUESTION IS

[00:40:10]

HOW MANY? I THINK MR. ROBINSON TALKED ABOUT THIS, BUT HOW MANY LOTS ARE THEY REQUESTING TO GET TOTAL? IS THAT WHAT YOU'RE ASKING? YES.

OKAY. THAT'S GREAT.

WE CAN ANSWER THAT. OKAY.

THANK YOU. SO FROM I'M SORRY I DECLARE THE PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED.

OKAY. GO AHEAD. THE APPLICANT HAS INDICATED HIS STAFF THAT THEY WOULD KEEP THE EXISTING HOUSE ON THE PROPERTY AND THEN SUBDIVIDE IT INTO A TOTAL OF THREE LOTS.

SO KEEPING THE EXISTING HOUSE AND THEN TWO MORE LOTS TO MAKE A TOTAL OF THREE LOTS.

AS FAR AS HER QUESTION ABOUT THE AG, I'M THINKING THAT'S RELATED TO THE APPRAISAL DISTRICT AND A PORTION OF THEIR PROPERTY BEING DESIGNATED AS AG.

AS FAR AS THE ZONING DISTRICTS, THESE ARE ALL ZONED AS EITHER R-1, R-2, R-2-A, PD-10, R-12.

THIS IS THE ONLY PROPERTY THAT IS ZONED AG ALONG BAILEY ROAD.

EVERYTHING ELSE IS ZONED ALL THE WAY, ALL THE WAY UNTIL YOU GET TO INTO SACHSE ROAD.

OKAY, THANK YOU FOR CLARIFICATION.

OTHER QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS FROM COUNCIL.

MAYOR PRO TEM FRANKS.

YEAH. SO FORMER COUNCILMEMBER COLIN KING AND I DISAGREED ON ALMOST EVERYTHING.

ONE OF THE THINGS WE AGREED ON IS HAVING DIVERSITY IN OUR CITY AS FAR AS LOTS IN DIFFERENT PLACES TO LIVE IN DIFFERENT AREAS TO LIVE.

ONE OF THE THINGS WE WANTED MORE OF WAS THE ABILITY TO HAVE THOSE LARGER LOTS OFF OF BEN ROAD.

WE TALKED ABOUT THAT OFF OF PLEASANT VALLEY ROAD.

WE TALKED ABOUT THAT. WE HAVE THOSE NOW.

I AM NOT IN FAVOR OF TAKING A PROPERTY LIKE THIS, WHICH IS IN.

WE HAVE A FEW OF THESE.

DON'T GET ME WRONG, BUT WE DON'T HAVE AN ABUNDANCE OF THESE IN MY OPINION, AND I DON'T WANT TO BREAK THAT UP AND ADD MORE.

I KNOW WE HAVE A NEIGHBORHOOD THAT'S MUCH, MUCH MORE DIVIDED DEVELOPMENT BEHIND IT, AND EVEN DOWN THE STREET THERE'S SOMEWHAT SMALLER LOTS, BUT I WANT THAT DIVERSITY AND THE OPTIONS TO HAVE THOSE DIFFERENT SIZES AND ABILITY TO DO DIFFERENT THINGS ON YOUR LOT.

SO I AM NOT IN FAVOR OF THIS.

OTHER QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS FROM COUNCIL.

MR. LINDSEY.

IT SOUNDS LIKE I'M NOT ABLE TO GET A STAFF ANSWER ON THE PARTICULAR AG DESIGNATION BY THE APPRAISAL DISTRICT.

SO JUST, THROUGH MY DECISION MAKING PROCESS IN HERE, IS THAT THE AG EXEMPTION THAT'S GRANTED BY THE APPRAISAL DISTRICT IS UNRELATED TO THE ZONING. SO I'M NOT CONCERNED ABOUT THIS CHANGE AFFECTING THE OTHER PROPERTIES, AG EXEMPTIONS OR [INAUDIBLE].

THE QUESTION I DO HAVE IS JUST TO CLARIFY, YOU SAID THE OTHER PROPERTY.

SO IF WE GO, FOR EXAMPLE, JUST TO THE PROPERTY TO THE SOUTH, IS THIS FOR MR. ROBINSON? YES.

OKAY. I'M SORRY, I'M LOOKING AT THE WRONG PERSON AGAIN.

I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE.

SO IF WE JUST TAKE THAT PROPERTY TO THE SOUTH, JUST FOR EXAMPLE, IT COULD BE SOMEBODY COULD FILE A PLAT TODAY.

IT WOULD NEED TO GO THROUGH ANY KIND OF SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS OR ANYTHING ELSE.

THEY COULD BULLDOZE THE HOUSE AND MAKE TWO LOTS.

THE PROPERTIES TO THE SOUTH.

YEAH, JUST TO THE IMMEDIATE SOUTH OF IT.

THOSE ARE PART OF THE WOODBRIDGE SUBDIVISION, SO THEY WOULD HAVE TO MEET THE STANDARDS OF THE WOODBRIDGE SUBDIVISION.

WHATEVER. IF YOU PUT THAT ZONING MAP SHOWS THE PD, THAT'S ALL PART OF PD-10.

SO THOSE ARE PLATTED LOTS, PART OF THE WOODBRIDGE SUBDIVISION.

I WOULD HAVE TO GO THROUGH AND LOOK AT THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS OF THAT ZONING DISTRICT TO SEE IF THAT'S SOMETHING THAT WOULD BE PERMITTED.

OKAY. SO ALL OF THAT ALONG, I'M TRYING TO FIND AN EXAMPLE.

I MEAN, IF THERE'S ANY OTHER LOTS THAT ARE AT RISK ON BAILEY ROAD OF BEING SUBDIVIDED.

WE'VE GOT IT LOOKS LIKE SOME PROPERTIES TO THE FURTHER SOUTH THAT EXTEND WAY OUT TO THE EAST, BUT THERE'S THERE WOULDN'T BE ANY KIND OF ROAD ACCESS, I GUESS, TO THOSE PARTICULAR THE CHALLENGE YOU WOULD FACE WITH THE PROPERTIES FURTHER SOUTH IS HAVING THE MINIMUM LOT WIDTH FOR THE ZONING DISTRICT.

SO THIS ZONING DISTRICT REQUIRES A MINIMUM OF 130 FOOT IF I PULL IT UP A 130FT AT THE BUILDING SETBACK LINE. SO THAT'S WHERE THIS PROPERTY THAT THIS GENTLEMAN IS TRYING TO REZONE.

HE COULD ONLY GET TWO MORE LOTS WITHOUT DEMOLISHING THE EXISTING HOUSE.

OKAY. YEAH, THAT MAKES SENSE.

WITH THE MINIMUM LOT WIDTH.

THAT'S WHERE I WAS KIND OF CONCERNED ABOUT, AND IF WE JUST ON THE ON THE FIELD TRIP, IF WE GO TO THE PROPERTY RIGHT TO THE NORTH, THAT'S COMMERCIAL ZONING.

[00:45:04]

YOU DON'T HAVE THE, THE BOX BEHIND THAT BACKWARDS L-SHAPED BUILDING.

OKAY. SO IT IS ALREADY COMMERCIAL, TOO; SO ANYTHING THAT GOES INTO THAT PROPERTY THERE WOULD NOT HAVE ACCESS FROM HOOPER BAILEY ROAD.

IS THAT CORRECT? WE WOULD HAVE TO LOOK AT IT WITH A DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL, BUT AT THIS POINT, NO, I THINK THERE IS A GAP BETWEEN WHERE THE WHERE BAILEY ROAD ENDS AND THIS PROPERTY.

SO I THINK THEY WOULDN'T HAVE ACCESS RIGHT OFF OF THAT.

OKAY, THANKS, MR. PRESTENBERG. JUST FOR THE RECORD, CAN YOU JUST STATE LIKE WHAT THE REQUIREMENTS WERE FOR NOTIFICATION FOR THOSE WITHIN SO MANY THOUSAND FEET OR WHATEVER? SO THE NOTIFICATION BOUNDARY IS 1000FT, WHICH IS GREATER THAN STATE REQUIREMENT, WHICH IS CORRECT ME IF I'M WRONG, JOE.

IS IT 250 OR 200? 200. OKAY, AND THEN RESPONSE FROM THAT WE RECEIVED.

WELL, I DID NOT RECEIVE THE LETTER DIRECTLY.

I BELIEVE THE COUNCIL RECEIVED AN EMAIL REQUEST.

THAT WAS THE ONLY ONE THAT I'VE SEEN, BUT WE SENT IT CERTIFIED.

SO WE GOT RECEIPT THAT THEY ALL.

WELL WE HAVE A LEGAL NOTICE THAT WE POST THE NEWSPAPER AT LEAST 15 DAYS IN ADVANCE AND THEN WE SEND OUT POSTCARDS, BUT WE HAVE NOT RECEIVED ANY, ANY FEEDBACK ASIDE FROM THE EMAIL THAT WAS FORWARDED TO ME.

GOT IT. THANK YOU.

SO, MATT, A COUPLE OF THINGS.

YOU TALKED ABOUT THE AG ZONING, WHICH IS REALLY A TEMPORARY ZONING, AND SO THAT'S REALLY ONE ISSUE THAT WE'RE DEALING WITH BECAUSE. WHAT'S THERE NOW WHEN THEY REFER TO BUILD? YOU COULD PROBABLY ARGUE THAT MIGHT FIT AG, BECAUSE THERE WAS PROBABLY NOTHING ELSE AROUND IT AND THE WAY THEY USED THEIR PROPERTY BEFORE.

NOW IN ORDER TO DO ANYTHING.

OF COURSE YOU WOULD. YOU CAN'T DO IT AG.

YOU'VE GOT TO CHANGE IT TO SOMETHING, AND SO THE R-39 DISTRICT, CORRECT ME IF I'M WRONG.

I BELIEVE THAT'S THE LEAST DENSE RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT.

OR WE HAVE TWO DISTRICTS THAT ARE OPTIONS RE WHICH IS THE ESTATE RESIDENTIAL ESTATE, BUT IT ALSO HAS LET ME PULL THAT ONE UP REAL QUICK.

THAT HAS A MINIMUM OF FIVE ACRES, WHICH ONCE AGAIN, THIS IS JUST UNDER FIVE ACRES.

SO RE IS NOT REALLY AN OPTION, ALTHOUGH IN THEORY YOU COULD DO A PD AND ALL THAT.

SO RE IS NOT AN OPTION BASED ON THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENT.

SO THE NEXT RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT DOWN IF YOU WILL IS WHAT HE'S REQUESTING CORRECT.

CORRECT. R-39 IS THE LARGEST OKAY, AND IF I HEARD YOU CORRECTLY, HE IS GOING TO KEEP THE HOUSE ON ONE OF THOSE QUOTE UNQUOTE THREE LOTS. THAT'S MY UNDERSTANDING.

WE CAN HAVE THE APPLICANT COME UP HERE AND SPEAK TO THAT.

THAT'S ACTUALLY A GOOD IDEA.

SO THE APPLICANT.

IF YOU COULD STATE YOUR NAME AND CITY OF RESIDENCE.

THIS IS HABIB [INAUDIBLE], 7200 BAILEY ROAD.

OKAY, AND THANK YOU FOR GIVING ME THE OPPORTUNITY.

YEAH. SO IF YOU DON'T MIND, JUST BRIEFLY, WHY DO YOU WANT TO DO THIS? WHY DO YOU WANT TO DO THIS? OKAY, I HAVE THIS PROPERTY, 4.7 ACRES, AND THE PREVIOUS OWNER, IF I UNDERSTAND RIGHT, USED TO OWN THE PROPERTY BEHIND, LIKE THE WOODBRIDGE, AND THEN HE SOLD IT OFF AND KEPT IT AS AGRICULTURE.

SO THE COLLIN COUNTY REQUIREMENTS CANNOT BE MET FOR EXEMPTIONS FOR THE AGRICULTURE BECAUSE IT IS UNDER THE FIVE ACRES. SO IT IS AUTOMATIC DENIAL ONCE THE PROPERTY OWNERSHIP HAS CHANGED.

THE 4.7 ACRES IS THE REQUIREMENT FOR ME.

I WOULD LIKE TO SUBDIVIDE IT INTO LIKE THREE LOTS TO HAVE ADULT CHILDREN.

I WOULD LIKE THEM TO BUILD THE HOUSES AND THEY I HAVE BEEN IN COLLIN COUNTY FOR 30 YEARS AND I WOULD LIKE TO CONTINUE MY CHILDREN TO INHERIT THAT AND AS WELL AS LIKE BUILD THEIR HOUSES AND LAND IN THAT AREA.

OKAY. THANK YOU.

ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT FROM COUNCIL? THANK YOU SIR. THANK YOU. OKAY, MATT, COME ON, BACK UP.

OKAY. SO WE'VE KIND OF ESTABLISHED R-39 DISTRICT.

AS FOR WHAT THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING TO DO.

THAT'S REALLY THE OPTION HE HAS.

CORRECT. SO WHAT THIS DID PASS P&Z UNANIMOUSLY JUST WHAT'S THE READER'S DIGEST VERSION OF WHAT THEY TALKED ABOUT ? REALLY AND TRULY IT WAS FAIRLY STRAIGHTFORWARD.

[00:50:03]

I DON'T THINK THEY HAD MANY QUESTIONS.

IF I REMEMBER CORRECTLY, THEY WERE ASKING ABOUT POTENTIAL DRIVEWAYS AND THEN WHAT THE ACTUAL REQUEST WOULD BE.

HOW MANY LOTS IS HE LOOKING AT DOING? WHICH, AS HE HAS STATED, WOULD BE THREE.

THOSE WERE THE MAIN POINTS OF QUESTION AT THE MEETING, AND THE VOTE OBVIOUSLY REFLECTED NOT A LOT OF CONCERNS.

OKAY, JUST ONE THING I'D LIKE TO POINT OUT AGAIN RELATED TO THE FUTURE LAND USE PLAN, THIS AREA IS DESIGNATED AS LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL, WHICH IS A VARIETY OF LOT SIZES, AND THE ESTATE RESIDENTIAL IS REALLY INTENDED FOR THE ONE ACRE OR GREATER LOTS, AND THAT'S TYPICALLY FOUND ON THE EAST SIDE OF MERRITT ROAD.

MERRITT ROAD, PLEASANT VALLEY AREA AS DESIGNATED ON THE COMP PLAN.

SO THAT'S ONE OF THE REASONS WHY STAFF IS RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THIS.

THANK YOU, MR. ROBINSON. MR. GORFIDA, I WAS JUST GOING TO HAVE MATT CLARIFY WHAT HE JUST SAID, THAT THIS ZONING REQUEST IS IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE ADOPTED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.

YEAH, OKAY. THANK YOU, SIR.

MR. PRESTENBERG.

LAST QUESTION ON I KNOW IT'S NOT NECESSARILY A HOA TYPE.

YOU KNOW, BUILD THESE CERTAIN SPECS, BUT ARE THERE CERTAIN? COULD A METAL SHED GO UP AS A POSSIBLE HOUSE LOCATION OR A BARNDOMINIUM TYPE THING? YOU KNOW WHAT I MEAN? OR IS IT STILL GOING TO KEEP THE SAME SORT OF BAILEY LOOK AND FEEL? WELL, AS FAR AS BUILDING MATERIAL WISE FOR THE HOME ITSELF, WE'RE NOT ABLE TO DICTATE THE ACTUAL BUILDING MATERIALS OF THE HOME.

AS FAR AS ACCESSORY STRUCTURES, WE DO HAVE SOME LIMITATION ON THAT.

I BELIEVE I'D HAVE TO LOOK REAL QUICK, BUT I BELIEVE UNDER AG YOU CAN DO JUST METAL BARNS AND THINGS LIKE THAT.

SO THE EXISTING ONE, YOU DO HAVE A LITTLE BIT MORE FREEWAY LEEWAY THAN YOU DO UNDER THE R-39.

OTHER QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS? THANK YOU, MR. ROBINSON. OKAY, SO WE DO HAVE A REQUEST TO REZONE FROM AG TO R-39.

SO WE CAN DISCUSS MORE OR WE CAN MOTION, WE CAN DO WHATEVER WE LIKE.

DON'T ALL JUMP AT ONCE. MR. PRESTENBERG. I MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE ITEM F2 AS PRESENTED.

I HAVE A MOTION BY MR. PRESTENBERG TO APPROVE ITEM F2 AS PRESENTED TO HAVE A SECOND.

MS. HOWARTH.

SECOND. I HAVE A SECOND BY MS. HOWARTH. ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? I DO WANT TO SAY ONE QUICK THING.

I UNDERSTAND THE CONCERNS THAT HAVE BEEN RAISED.

THE REASON I BROUGHT UP THE DISCUSSION AROUND AG AND R-39 IS BECAUSE THE AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT IS NOT A DISTRICT THAT IS REALLY INTENDED TO EVER CONTINUE IN PERPETUITY.

SO I THINK THE REQUEST IS A VALID REQUEST IN THE SENSE THAT IF HE WANTS TO DO RESIDENTIAL, THAT'S THE BEST DISTRICT TO DO IT IN.

THE OTHER THING THAT MR. GORFIDA JUST POINTED THIS OUT IS IT DOES COMPLY WITH OUR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, AND IF THE PROPOSAL IS APPROVED AS IT'S PRESENTED, IT WOULD NOT REPRESENT SOMETHING THAT'S DISSIMILAR FROM WHAT'S OUT THERE FROM A NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTER STANDPOINT, AND THAT'S THE REASON I'LL SUPPORT IT, IS BECAUSE WE DO HAVE THE LAND USE PLAN, AND I DON'T THINK THE CHARACTER OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD WILL BE CHANGED TREMENDOUSLY BY APPROVING SOMETHING LIKE THIS.

I DO UNDERSTAND THAT IT'S GOING TO BE DIFFERENT, BUT I THINK THE THINGS THAT I WILL LOOK AT TO MAKE MY DECISION.

THAT'S MY COMMENTS. ANY OTHER COMMENTS? HEARING NONE. PLEASE CAST YOUR BALLOT.

MOTION CARRIES, WITH MAYOR PRO TEM FRANKS VOTING NO.

NEXT ITEM ON THE AGENDA IS ITEM F3.

[3. Consider authorizing the City Manager to execute a TIF Zone Number Two Economic Development Incentive and Infrastructure Reimbursement Agreement among the City of Sachse, the TIRZ #2 Board, and the PMB Station Developer, LLC.; and any amendments or instruments related thereto.]

CONSIDER AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A TAX INCREMENT REINVESTMENT ZONE (TIRZ) REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY OF SACHSE.

THE TIRZ #2 BOARD THE PMB STATION DEVELOPER, LLC AND ANY AMENDMENTS OR [SNEEZING] EXCUSE ME OR INSTRUMENTS RELATED THERETO.

MS. NASH.

MAYOR AND COUNCIL, THIS IS A CONTINUATION FROM THE TIRZ #2 BOARD MEETING EARLIER THIS EVENING, AND AS WE DISCUSSED THERE, THE TIRZ #2 BOARD.

YOU ALL MADE A RECOMMENDATION AT THAT MEETING FOR THIS ITEM TO COME TO THE CITY COUNCIL FOR FINAL APPROVAL.

MS. ROSE DOES HAVE A PRESENTATION.

IT'S THE SAME ONE THAT YOU SAW EARLIER, MAYOR.

IF YOU SO CHOOSE, SHE CAN WALK THROUGH IT QUICKLY AGAIN.

OR YOU ALL CAN JUST DISCUSS AND MOVE FORWARD.

I DIDN'T FORGET ANYTHING. I MEAN, WE'LL SEE, DOES COUNCIL DESIRE MS. ROSE TO PRESENT AGAIN? I DON'T HEAR ANY REQUEST. NO OFFENSE.

SO JUST FOR COUNCIL'S REMINDER, BEING THAT WE ARE THE TIRZ #2 BOARD, THAT BOARD RECOMMENDED THAT TO THE COUNCIL.

SO NOW IT'S OUR TURN TO ACT ON THAT REQUEST.

[00:55:02]

SO WITH THAT DISCUSSION OR MOTION.

I APOLOGIZE. ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE WOULD LIKE TO ADDRESS THIS.

OKAY SEEING NONE. ALL RIGHT.

NOW DISCUSSIONS OR MOTION. MS. HOWARTH. IF THERE'S NO DISCUSSION, I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE ITEM WHATEVER SECTION WE'RE IN THREE THREE AS PRESENTED.

F3. YES, I HAVE A MOTION BY MS. HOWARTH TO APPROVE ITEM F3 AS PRESENTED.

MR. PRESTENBERG SECOND.

HAVE A SECOND BY MR. PRESTENBERG.

ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? HEARING NONE. PLEASE CAST YOUR BALLOT.

MOTION CARRIES UNANIMOUSLY.

NEXT ITEM ON THE AGENDA IS ITEM F4 CONSIDER AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACT FOR THE DESIGN OF THE SOUTHEAST SEWER EXPANSION TRUNK LINE

[4. Consider authorizing the City Manager to execute a professional services contract for the design of the Southeast Sewer Expansion: Trunk Line A from Sachse Road to the Southeast Lift Station between the City of Sachse and Cobb, Fendley & Associates, Inc. in an amount not to exceed Six Hundred Sixty-Six Thousand, Nine Hundred Four and No/100 Dollars ($666,904.00).]

A FROM SACHSE ROAD TO THE SOUTHEAST LIFT STATION BETWEEN THE CITY OF SACHSE AND COBB, FENDLEY AND ASSOCIATES, INC.

IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED 666, EXCUSE ME, 666,904. TONGUE TWISTER.

MS. NASH.

MAYOR AND COUNCIL ACTUALLY WE'LL HAVE BRYAN JAFFE HERE, OUR ASSISTANT DIRECTOR, ESTEEMED FROM THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, TO TALK TO YOU ABOUT THE SPECIFICS OF THIS PROJECT.

OF COURSE, COREY IS ALSO HERE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS, AS AM I.

SO, MR. JAFFE, YOU PRESENTED BEFORE US? THIS IS YOUR FIRST TIME. THIS IS MY SECOND.

SECOND. OKAY. SO WE DON'T NEED TO DO THE INITIATION.

OKAY. ALL RIGHT.

CARRY ON. OKAY.

THIS IS FOR THE SOUTHEAST SEWER EXPANSION TRUNK LINE FROM SACHSE ROAD TO THE SOUTHEAST LIFT STATION.

GO OVER THE OVERVIEW REAL QUICK THERE.

THIS IS THE LOCATION OF THE PROJECT WE ARE STARTING.

AS I MENTIONED, THERE'S A LIFT STATION ON SACHSE ROAD ON THE NORTH PART OF THIS MAP, AND IT IS GOING TO GO ALL THE WAY THROUGH THAT PART OF TOWN ALONG MUDDY CREEK, AND IT ENDS AT THE SOUTHEAST LIFT STATION, WHICH IS AT THE END OF EAST VIEW LANE.

SO THIS PROJECT ADDRESSES THE NEED FOR SEWER IN THAT AREA.

THERE'S A LARGE PORTION OF TOWN OVER THERE THAT JUST DOESN'T HAVE ACCESS TO SEWER.

SO THIS IS GOING TO ADDRESS THAT.

INSTALLING THE STRUCTURE HELPS TO MAKE THIS AREA MORE DEVELOPABLE BY PROVIDING ACCESS TO SANITARY SEWER ALONG THE MUDDY CREEK, AND THIS PROJECT IS PART OF A LARGER OVERALL PROJECT THAT WAS CALLED THE SOUTHEAST SEWER EXPANSION.

I BELIEVE THAT'S BEEN GOING ON FOR SEVERAL YEARS.

THE PROJECT IS APPROXIMATELY 11,830 LINEAR FEET OF SANITARY SEWER FROM SACHSE ROAD LIFT STATION TO THE SOUTHEAST LIFT STATION.

IT ALSO INCLUDES SOME TEN FOOT WIDE MULTI-PURPOSE TRAIL WHICH WILL BE ADJACENT TO THE MUDDY CREEK.

KIND OF IN THE GREEN SPACE AREA THAT WAS IN THAT AREAS THAT ARE NOT ALREADY ACCESSIBLE.

WE'LL NEED TO BUILD THAT TRAIL SO THAT WE CAN ACCESS OUR NEW SEWER, AND THE PROJECT WILL ALSO ALLOW US TO DECOMMISSION THE OLD LIFT STATION THAT IS ON SACHSE ROAD.

SO AT THIS TIME, STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT WE AUTHORIZE THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACT FOR THE DESIGN OF THE SOUTHEAST SEWER EXPANSION TRUNK LINE A FROM SACHSE ROAD TO THE SOUTHEAST LIFT STATION BETWEEN THE CITY OF SACHSE AND COBB, FENDLEY AND ASSOCIATES, FOR AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $666,904. FUNDING FOR THIS WILL BE THROUGH THE UTILITY FUND, ARPA AND SANITARY SEWER IMPACT FEES, AND THIS WAS INCLUDED IN OUR MOST RECENT BUDGET.

THANK YOU, MR. JAFFE. FOR THOSE WHO MAY NOT KNOW, COULD YOU TELL US WHAT ARPA IS? IT'S THE FEDERAL FUNDING THAT WAS PROVIDED I DON'T ACTUALLY KNOW WHAT THAT STANDS FOR, TO BE COMPLETELY HONEST, BUT IT IS FEDERAL FUNDING THAT'S GRANTED DURING COVID.

OKAY. THANK YOU. QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS FROM MISTER JAFFE.

MR. LINDSEY.

THANKS FOR THE PRESENTATION.

I'M LOOKING BACK AT AN AGENDA ITEM FROM 2018 JUST TO KIND OF TRY TO UNDERSTAND HOW WE GOT HERE IN 2018.

ON THE AGENDA IS SAID THAT PHASE THREE OF THE SEWER EXPANSION IS CURRENTLY AT 90% DESIGNED AND WILL BE ADVERTISED FOR CONSTRUCTION IN THE FIRST QUARTER OF 2019. SO DID WE PREVIOUSLY DO SOME DESIGN WORK ON THIS? THERE WAS SOME PREVIOUS DESIGN WORK THAT WAS DONE.

THE PROJECT NEVER MADE IT TO COMPLETION.

I'M NOT SURE THAT I HAVE THE BEST ANSWER FOR WHY THAT HAPPENED.

MR. NESBIT DOES. COREY MAY KNOW BETTER ON WHY THAT.

SO WHAT WAS THE QUESTION AGAIN I'M SORRY.

YEAH. SO BACK IN DECEMBER MEETING BACK IN 2018, THE AGENDA ITEM READ PHASE THREE OF THE SEWER EXPANSION IS CURRENTLY AT 90% DESIGNED

[01:00:10]

AND WILL BE ADVERTISED FOR CONSTRUCTION IN 2019.

SO IT SEEMED LIKE AT THAT POINT WE HAD ALL THE DESIGN ALMOST DONE.

WE WERE READY TO BID IT OUT.

SO I'M TRYING TO UNDERSTAND WHY ARE WE GOING BACK TO THE DRAWING BOARD AND STARTING OVER AGAIN WITH THE DESIGN? SO WE'RE NOT GOING BACK TO THE DRAWING BOARD.

SO MOST OF THE PLANS THAT WE'RE GOING TO BE ABLE TO SALVAGE.

SO SOME OF THE DESIGN ISSUES THAT WE RAN INTO GOING THROUGH THE MUDDY CREEK PRESERVE WITH DALLAS COUNTY, THEY WERE NOT FAVORABLE WITH THIS PROJECT.

SO WE ACTUALLY DID THE REALIGNMENT STUDY HERE BEGINNING AT THE SUMMER.

WAS IT SUMMERTIME WE DID A REALIGNMENT STUDY, BASICALLY CAME UP WITH A NEW ALIGNMENT, AND SO THIS IS TAKING US TO THE ORIGINAL DESIGN, SOME NEW COMPONENTS, AND THIS IS WHAT YOU'RE SEEING NOW TO GET TO THE FINAL DESIGN.

THAT'S WHY THAT'S WHY IT DIDN'T PROGRESS PAST THE.

ORIGINAL DESIGN. GOOD TO KNOW, AND I DID REVIEW THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WITHIN IT, IT DID MENTION THE AMOUNTS THAT WE PUT SO FAR INTO THE PROJECTS.

I THINK WE'RE ABOUT $150,000 IN THIS PROJECT SO FAR, AND THAT'S ALL OF RECENT THIS LAST FISCAL YEAR.

SO JUST CURIOUS WHAT THOSE EXPENSES SO FAR THAT HAVE BEEN PUT INTO PHASE THREE.

SO THE PHASE THREE, WE DID THE ALIGNMENT STUDY, WHICH WAS $49,000, AND I'D HAVE TO GO BACK AND LOOK AND SEE WHAT THE OTHER $100,000 THAT MAY HAVE BEEN PART OF THE ORIGINAL CONTRACT THAT THEY COMPLETED, THAT WE DIDN'T ACTUALLY GO TO GO PAST THE 90% PLAN.

SO, OKAY, FINISHING WHAT THEY'VE ALREADY STARTED, AND THEN THE REALIGNMENT, I BELIEVE THAT'S WHAT IT'S FOR, BUT WE CAN GET AN ANSWER ON THAT, AND THE MAGIC QUESTION IS, OKAY, WE'RE GOING TO GET TO THE DESIGN.

HOW LONG IS THIS DESIGN GOING TO TAKE AND WHEN ARE WE GOING TO START WORK.

SO WE DO HAVE THAT SCHEDULE IN HERE.

SO DESIGN WILL BE IF THIS GETS APPROVED TONIGHT WE'LL START DESIGN HERE PROBABLY NEXT, NEXT FEW WEEKS WITH THE INTENT TO GO TO CONSTRUCTION.

THIS IS APRIL OF 2024.

SO LIKE I SAID WE'RE NOT STARTING AT ZERO.

WE'RE STARTING AT ABOUT 30-60%.

SO NOT YOU KNOW THERE'S SOME CATCH UP STUFF THAT'S A LITTLE BIT OF REDESIGN BUT HOPEFULLY START CONSTRUCTION IN THE SUMMER.

OKAY, AND FINAL QUESTION.

JUST MY OWN CURIOSITY.

WE'VE HAD THIS BEAUTIFUL PUMP STATION AT THE END OF [INAUDIBLE].

WHAT IS IT CURRENTLY DOING NOW IF NOTHING'S FED TO IT? SO MAYBE IF I GO BACK TO YOUR MAP.

SO THIS DOES COLLECT A LOT OF THE SEWER IN THE SOUTHEAST DOES COLLECT SOME OF THE STATION RUNOFF AS WELL.

SO IT RUNS BACK TOWARDS IT.

SO YES.

SO THERE'S ACTUALLY AN 18 INCH FORCE MAIN AND A 30 INCH GRAVITY LINE THAT GOES TO THAT LIFT STATION, AND AGAIN, THIS WILL ALLOW US TO DECOMMISSION THE EXISTING LIFT STATION ON SACHSE ROAD THAT PUMPS TO THE ROAD LIFT STATION THAT PUMPS TO THE 7-ELEVEN AT MILES, AND SO THIS IS A BIG COMPONENT KIND OF TAKES THAT TAKES ANOTHER LIFT STATION OFF THE OFF LINE.

SO GRAVITY IS ACTUALLY RUNNING FROM WEST TO EAST OVER THERE, AND THEN IT'S HITTING THIS LIFT STATION ACTUALLY BEING FORCED BACK TO GO ULTIMATELY TO GARLAND.

YES. CORRECT. OKAY.

THANKS. THANKS FOR EXPLAINING THAT.

IT MAKES A WHOLE LOT MORE SENSE ABOUT WHAT'S BEEN GOING ON DOWN THERE.

THANK YOU. I'M JUST TRYING TO COMPREHEND YOUR LIFT STATION BEING BEAUTIFUL.

[INAUDIBLE] DOWN THERE.

OKAY. I DON'T KNOW, VERY MANY BEAUTIFUL LIFT STATIONS.

I KNOW FUNCTIONAL LIFT STATIONS.

OKAY. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR MR. NESBIT OR MR. JAFFE? THANK YOU, GENTLEMEN.

ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE LIKE TO ADDRESS THIS ITEM? ALL RIGHT. HEARING NONE. DISCUSSION OF MOTIONS FROM COUNCIL.

MR. LINDSEY. MR. MAYOR, I MAKE A MOTION THAT WE APPROVE.

ITEM F4 AS PRESENTED.

MOTION BY MR. LINDSEY TO APPROVE ITEM F4 AS PRESENTED.

DO I HAVE A SECOND? MR. PRESTENBERG? SECOND. I HAVE A SECOND BY MR. PRESTENBERG. ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? HEARING NONE. PLEASE CAST YOUR BALLOT.

LITTLE TECHNICAL DIFFICULTY. STAND BY FOR THE OTHER [INAUDIBLE].

OKAY, WE'RE GOING TO DOCK YOU THOSE 30 SECONDS, BY THE WAY.

MOTION CARRIES UNANIMOUSLY. NEXT ITEM ON THE AGENDA IS ITEM F5.

[5. Discuss and consider an appointment to the City's Planning and Zoning Commission.]

DISCUSS AND CONSIDER AN APPOINTMENT TO THE CITY'S PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION.

MS. GRANGER.

THERE YOU GO.

[01:05:01]

YOU CAN DO IT YOURSELF.

MAYOR AND COUNCIL, WE HAVE A VACANCY THAT HAS OPENED UP ON OUR PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD.

WHAT YOU HAVE BEFORE YOU.

THIS ITEM IS REALLY JUST AN OPPORTUNITY TO DISCUSS.

IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO APPOINT SOMEBODY THAT YOU HAVE ALREADY INTERVIEWED, AND YOU HAVE A COUPLE APPLICATIONS ON YOUR DESKS THAT IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO DO THAT.

OTHERWISE, WE CAN TALK ABOUT WHETHER OR NOT YOU WANT TO DO FURTHER INTERVIEWS.

THANK YOU, MS. GRANGER.

I WOULD JUST ADD THAT AS MS. GRANGER SAID, WE DO HAVE A RECENT VACANCY AND THIS IS AN OPPORTUNITY TO, IF THE COUNCIL SO CHOOSES TO APPOINT SOMEONE TONIGHT, YOU CAN DO THAT TONIGHT OR WE CAN REVISIT THIS AT A FUTURE DATE.

SO WITH THAT, OPEN IT UP FOR DISCUSSION.

MAYOR PRO TEM FRANKS. YEAH, MAYOR, I'M NOT PREPARED TO DO THIS TONIGHT.

I WANT TO THINK ABOUT THIS AND GO OVER THESE APPLICATIONS A LITTLE BIT MORE BEFORE WE JUMP INTO SOMETHING, OKAY? ANYONE ELSE HAVE A DISSENTING OPINION? I AGREE WITH COUNCILMAN FRANKS I WOULD LIKE TO, I WOULD LIKE TO OPEN THIS UP AND SEE IF WE GET MORE APPLICATIONS AND CONSIDER ALL OPTIONS.

OKAY. ANYBODY OPPOSED TO THOSE TWO OPINIONS? IF NOT, THEN WE WILL NEED A MOTION TO POSTPONE IT, CORRECT? WE NEED A MOTION TO POSTPONE OR NOT NECESSARILY? NO ACTION. OKAY.

ITEM F5 WE WILL TAKE NO ACTION AT THIS TIME.

NEXT ITEM ON THE AGENDA IS ITEM G.

[G. Executive Session]

EXECUTIVE SESSION. THE CITY COUNCIL SHALL CONVENE INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION PURSUANT TO TEXAS GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 551.074 PERSONNEL MATTERS REGARDING THE ANNUAL REVIEW OF THE CITY MANAGER. ITEM G TO THE CITY COUNCIL SHALL CONVENE INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION PURSUANT TO TEXAS GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 551.087.

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DELIBERATIONS DELIBERATE THE OFFER OF A FINANCIAL OR OTHER INCENTIVE RELATED TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF PROJECT YOSEMITE.

THE TIME IS GRANGER 7:37 P.M..

WE ARE NOW ADJOURNED INTO THE EXECUTIVE SESSION AT 7:37 P.M..

ALL RIGHT. WE ARE RECONVENED INTO OPEN SESSION.

THE TIME IS GRANGER 8:54 P.M..

WE'RE NOW RECONVENED INTO OPEN SESSION AT 8:54 P.M..

THE NEXT ITEM ON THE AGENDA IS ITEM H.

REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS/MEETING CLOSING ITEM ONE.

[2. Take any action as a result of Executive Session - deliberate the offer of a financial or other incentive relating to the development of Project Yosemite.]

WE'RE ACTUALLY GOING TO TAKE ITEM TWO FIRST.

H2 TAKE ANY ACTION AS A RESULT OF EXECUTIVE SESSION.

DELIBERATE THE OFFER OF A FINANCIAL OR OTHER INCENTIVE RELATING TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF PROJECT YOSEMITE.

DOES ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE LIKE TO ADDRESS THIS ITEM? HEARING NONE. NO ACTION TAKEN TONIGHT.

NEXT ITEM ON THE AGENDA IS ITEM H ONE.

[1. Take any action as a result of Executive Session: Regarding the annual review of the City Manager.]

TAKE ANY ACTION AS A RESULT OF THE EXECUTIVE SESSION REGARDING THE ANNUAL REVIEW OF THE CITY MANAGER, MS. HOWARTH, I'D LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION TO AUTHORIZE THE CITY MANAGER TO NEGOTIATE AND EXECUTE AN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF SACHSE WITH VACCARO PARTNERS OR [INAUDIBLE], VACCARO SACHSE TWO PARTNERS, LP, ITS ASSIGNS OR RELATED ENTITIES FOR PROJECT YOSEMITE, GENERALLY LOCATED ALONG MILES ROAD NORTH OF BUNKER HILL ROAD, AND ANY AMENDMENTS AND INSTRUMENTS RELATED THERETO.

YES, I WILL CLARIFY THAT'S H TWO AND I SAID NO ACTION NECESSARY, BUT THAT THERE IS ACTION NECESSARY, AND MS. HOWARTH JUST MADE THAT MOTION.

SO THAT'S ITEM H TWO.

IS THERE A SECOND? MR. PRESTENBERG SECOND. I HAVE A SECOND FOR MR. PRESTENBERG. ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION ON H TWO? HEARING NONE. PLEASE CAST YOUR BALLOT.

THERE IS ACTION ON H2 TO AUTHORIZE THE CITY MANAGER TO NEGOTIATE.

WE'RE GOING TO TAKE THAT ONE NEXT, I SWITCHED IT.

MAKE SURE EVERYBODY'S PAYING ATTENTION.

MOTION CARRIES.

OKAY. NOW ITEM H ONE.

TAKE ANY ACTION AS A RESULT OF THE EXECUTIVE SESSION REGARDING THE ANNUAL REVIEW OF THE CITY MANAGER.

I'M SORRY. BEFORE WE TAKE ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE LIKE TO ADDRESS THIS.

ALL RIGHT. HEARING NONE, MR. PRESTENBERG. YES.

LEGALLY, I GOT TO ASK YOU.

I'D LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION THAT WE INCREASE THE CITY MANAGER SALARY BY 5%, AND THAT WE INCREASE THE CAR ALLOWANCE TO $10,000 ANNUALLY. $10,000 ANNUALLY.

YEAH EFFECTIVE JAN ONE.

I DON'T KNOW WHEN THE EFFECT WE WOULD BE EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY.

[01:10:01]

EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY AS OF, LIKE NINE.

I'M JUST KIDDING. HOLD ON.

I'M SORRY. MAY I GET THE DOLLAR AMOUNT FOR THE ALLOWANCE? 10,000. MS. [INAUDIBLE]. I WAS GOING TO RECOMMEND THE.

[INAUDIBLE] SORRY, I CAN'T HEAR YOU. NO PROBLEM.

FOR THE SALARY CHANGE, I WAS GOING TO RECOMMEND THE FIRST DAY OF A PAY PERIOD, AND FOR THE CAR ALLOWANCE, IT WOULD BE THE JANUARY CAR ALLOWANCE WOULD BE MY RECOMMENDATION.

OKAY, SO WHAT'S THE NEXT EFFECTIVE PAY PERIOD? OH, I DO NOT HAVE THAT IN FRONT OF ME.

[INAUDIBLE].

OH, OKAY I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE LEGALLY, WE'RE OKAY WITH THAT.

OKAY. SO, MR. PRESTENBERG, YOU WANT TO RESTATE YOUR MOTION? YES. THANK YOU.

AS I WAS SAYING, [CHUCKLING] I'D LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION TO INCREASE THE CITY MANAGER SALARY BY 5%, EFFECTIVE THE NEXT PAY ROLL DATE OR CYCLE, AND INCREASE THE CAR ALLOWANCE TO $10,000 ANNUALLY, EFFECTIVE IN JANUARY 1ST, 2024.

OKAY, CLEAR AS MUD.

GOOD. DO IHAVE A SECOND? MS. HOWARTH.

SECOND. I HAVE A SECOND BY MS. HOWARTH, AND JUST FOR CLARIFICATION, I KNOW YOU TALKED ABOUT THE 5% ANNUAL.

WOULD THAT BE ANNUAL SALARY? IS THERE ANY OTHER KIND? YOU SAID SALARY, BUT YES ANNUAL SALARY.

JUST CLARIFICATION. OKAY.

I PROMISE I'M NOT TRYING TO BE THAT PERSON, BUT OKAY HEY, YOU GOT TO DOT THOSE I'S AND CROSS THOSE T'S.

OKAY. ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? HEARING NONE. PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTE.

MOTION CARRIES UNANIMOUSLY.

BEFORE WE ADJOURN, I DO WANT TO TAKE THIS OPPORTUNITY TO SAY THANK YOU TO COUNCIL.

THIS WILL BE OUR LAST MEETING BEFORE CHRISTMAS.

SO I WANT TO WISH THE WHOLE COUNCIL A MERRY CHRISTMAS AND A HAPPY NEW YEAR, ALL THAT GOOD STUFF, AND LASTLY, MS. NASH, I WANT TO THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR THE JOB YOU DO, THE LEADERSHIP YOU PROVIDE NOT ONLY FOR STAFF BUT FOR COUNCIL AND WE ARE VERY GLAD THAT YOU WANT TO BE HERE.

SO THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR A JOB WELL DONE AND LOOK FORWARD TO ACCOMPLISHING MANY GREAT THINGS IN THE FUTURE.

THANK YOU. WITH THAT, THE TIME IS GRANGER 8:59 P.M.

8:59 P.M.. WE ARE ADJOURNED.

* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.

A. Meeting Opening

B. Recognition

C. Public Comment

D. Council/Staff Reports and Updates

E. Consent Agenda - All items listed on the consent agenda will be considered by the City Council and will be enacted on by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Councilmember so requests.

F. Regular Agenda Items

1. Consider approving a resolution casting Sachse's vote for the fourth member of the Board of Directors of the Dallas Central Appraisal District.

3. Consider authorizing the City Manager to execute a TIF Zone Number Two Economic Development Incentive and Infrastructure Reimbursement Agreement among the City of Sachse, the TIRZ #2 Board, and the PMB Station Developer, LLC.; and any amendments or instruments related thereto.

5. Discuss and consider an appointment to the City's Planning and Zoning Commission.

1. Consider approving a resolution casting Sachse's vote for the fourth member of the Board of Directors of the Dallas Central Appraisal District.

3. Consider authorizing the City Manager to execute a TIF Zone Number Two Economic Development Incentive and Infrastructure Reimbursement Agreement among the City of Sachse, the TIRZ #2 Board, and the PMB Station Developer, LLC.; and any amendments or instruments related thereto.

5. Discuss and consider an appointment to the City's Planning and Zoning Commission.

G. Executive Session

H. Regular Agenda Items / Meeting Closing

1. Take any action as a result of Executive Session: Regarding the annual review of the City Manager.

2. Take any action as a result of Executive Session - deliberate the offer of a financial or other incentive relating to the development of Project Yosemite.

1. Take any action as a result of Executive Session: Regarding the annual review of the City Manager.

2. Take any action as a result of Executive Session - deliberate the offer of a financial or other incentive relating to the development of Project Yosemite.

Dec 04, 2023 City Council

A. Meeting Opening

B. Recognition

C. Public Comment

D. Council/Staff Reports and Updates

E. Consent Agenda - All items listed on the consent agenda will be considered by the City Council and will be enacted on by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Councilmember so requests.

F. Regular Agenda Items

1. Consider approving a resolution casting Sachse's vote for the fourth member of the Board of Directors of the Dallas Central Appraisal District.

3. Consider authorizing the City Manager to execute a TIF Zone Number Two Economic Development Incentive and Infrastructure Reimbursement Agreement among the City of Sachse, the TIRZ #2 Board, and the PMB Station Developer, LLC.; and any amendments or instruments related thereto.

5. Discuss and consider an appointment to the City's Planning and Zoning Commission.

1. Consider approving a resolution casting Sachse's vote for the fourth member of the Board of Directors of the Dallas Central Appraisal District.

3. Consider authorizing the City Manager to execute a TIF Zone Number Two Economic Development Incentive and Infrastructure Reimbursement Agreement among the City of Sachse, the TIRZ #2 Board, and the PMB Station Developer, LLC.; and any amendments or instruments related thereto.

5. Discuss and consider an appointment to the City's Planning and Zoning Commission.

G. Executive Session

H. Regular Agenda Items / Meeting Closing

1. Take any action as a result of Executive Session: Regarding the annual review of the City Manager.

2. Take any action as a result of Executive Session - deliberate the offer of a financial or other incentive relating to the development of Project Yosemite.

1. Take any action as a result of Executive Session: Regarding the annual review of the City Manager.

2. Take any action as a result of Executive Session - deliberate the offer of a financial or other incentive relating to the development of Project Yosemite.

F. Regular Agenda Items

H. Regular Agenda Items / Meeting Closing

Dec 04, 2023 City Council

F. Regular Agenda Items

H. Regular Agenda Items / Meeting Closing

Link

Social

Embed

Download

Download Selected Item