[A. Meeting Opening]
[00:00:03]
I'D LIKE TO CALL THIS MEETING TO THE SACHSE CITY COUNCIL TO ORDER.
TODAY IS MONDAY, MARCH THE 4TH, 2024.
NEXT ITEM ON THE AGENDA IS ITEM A.2.
INVOCATION AND PLEDGES OF ALLEGIANCE.
I'VE ASKED MISS HOWARTH TO LEAD OUR INVOCATION AND MAYOR PRO TEM FRANKS TO LEAD OUR PLEDGES.
IF YOU'LL PLEASE RISE. OUR KIND AND GRACIOUS HEAVENLY FATHER.
DO OUR BEST TO MAKE WISE DECISIONS AND TO TREAT EACH OTHER WITH RESPECT AND COURTESY.
WE'RE GRATEFUL FOR OUR CITY STAFF AND THE GREAT THINGS THAT THEY DO.
AND WE ASK THESE THINGS IN THY NAME, JESUS CHRIST.
AMEN. PLEASE FACE THE AMERICAN FLAG.
MAY BE SEATED. NEXT ITEM ON THE AGENDA IS ITEM B, PUBLIC COMMENT.
[B. Public Comment]
THE PUBLIC IS INVITED TO ADDRESS COUNCIL REGARDING ANY TOPIC NOT ALREADY ON THE REGULAR AGENDA.COMMENTS REGARDING THE CONSENT AGENDA MAY BE ADDRESSED DURING PUBLIC COMMENT.
THE TIME LIMIT IS THREE MINUTES PER SPEAKER.
A PUBLIC COMMENT CARD SHOULD BE PRESENTED TO THE CITY SECRETARY PRIOR TO THE MEETING.
I DO HAVE ONE CARD MARTY HOBART.
MARTY HOBOKEN, 5511 OAK RIDGE CIRCLE.
IT'S MARCH IN SEXY, SO THAT MEANS IT'S BUDGET TIME.
TWO YEARS AGO, Y'ALL MISAPPROPRIATED $500,000 AND PRESTENBERG SLUSH FUND WAS CREATED. AND YOU ASK AND YOU ASK, AND YOU ASK AND YOU NEVER GET ANY ANSWERS WHERE THAT AT LEAST HALF $1 MILLION WENT.
LOOKING FORWARD TO WHAT HAPPENS THIS YEAR.
LAST YEAR, WHEN ASKED WHAT HAPPENED TO PRESTENBERG SLUSH FUND AND WHY CAN'T YOU EXPLAIN IT, THE ANSWER WAS NO. WE'RE GOING TO DO IT AGAIN.
SO, I DON'T REALLY KNOW WHAT LAST YEAR'S MISAPPROPRIATION WAS.
AND THEN A WEEK AGO OR TWO WEEKS AGO, ME AND THE BOY SCOUTS LEARNED THAT IN THE INFAMOUS FINANCIAL DECISION MAKING OF THIS CITY, Y'ALL WERE GOING TO AWARD A FIVE-YEAR MONOPOLY FOR COMMERCIAL TRASH PICKUP IN THIS CITY.
AND YOU DIDN'T EVEN KNOW HOW MUCH THAT WAS WORTH.
AND YOU SAT UP HERE AND MADE EXCUSES.
BUT YOU FEEL LIKE Y'ALL KNOW MORE THAN THE BUSINESSES DO.
I CAN TELL YOU THIS, I DESERVE BETTER.
AND I THINK THE PEOPLE OF THIS CITY KNOW BETTER.
SO, AS YOU TAX THIS INTO OBLIVION, WHY DON'T YOU JUST TRY TO ANSWER SOME QUESTIONS? THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
THANK YOU, MR. HOLBROOKE. ANYONE ELSE LIKE TO ADDRESS THE COUNCIL AT THIS TIME ON THE CONSENT AGENDA OR AN ITEM NOT ON THE REGULAR AGENDA? HEARING NONE. WE'LL MOVE ON.
NEXT ITEM ON THE AGENDA IS ITEM C COUNCIL STAFF REPORTS AND UPDATES.
[C. Council/Staff Reports and Updates]
ITEM ONE MAYOR AND COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS REGARDING SPECIAL EVENTS, CURRENT ACTIVITIES AND LOCAL ACHIEVEMENTS.ANYONE ON COUNCIL WOULD LIKE TO ADDRESS THE COUNCIL AND THE AUDIENCE AT THIS TIME WITH ANY ANALYSIS.
MR. PRESTENBERG? YES. FIRST, I THINK I WAS ELECTED MAY 2022, JUST THE TWO YEARS AGO, I WASN'T ON COUNCIL, SO BUT FIRST OFF, SECOND OFF, I WANT TO SAY I WANT TO COMMEND LANCE AND THE PARKS AND REC TEAM ON AN AMAZING DADDY DAUGHTER DANCE FROM FEBRUARY THE 23RD.
THEY PUT ON A TOP-NOTCH PERFORMANCE FOR THE AGES.
[00:05:03]
THEY HAD THE SAME PEOPLE THERE FOR THE DJ AND THE DANCE CREW TO LEAD US INTO VARIOUS DANCING.HOPEFULLY THERE'S NO VIDEO OF THAT.
MY GIRLS HAD A BLAST, AND ALL THEIR FRIENDS HAD A BLAST TOO.
YEAH, I'LL PIGGYBACK OFF THAT REAL QUICK.
ESTHER ACTUALLY DID A REALLY GOOD JOB IF SHE DID POST THAT TODAY.
HIGHLIGHTS I DON'T KNOW IF YOU'RE IN THE VIDEO, BUT IT WAS IT WAS A REALLY GREAT TURNOUT.
AND SO, WE'VE ALWAYS HAD A GOOD TURNOUT WITH THAT.
SO, I APPRECIATE YOU MENTIONING THAT.
MAYOR PRO TEM FRANKS. THANKS, MAYOR.
WE HAD ANOTHER GREAT TODDLER TIME.
ON MARCH 1ST, WE HAD ABOUT 100 IN ATTENDANCE MOMS AND TODDLERS.
IT WAS ORGANIZED CHAOS AT ITS BEST.
IF YOU DIDN'T ATTEND AND YOU HAVE A TODDLER, THEN THE NEXT ONE IS MARCH 15TH FROM 10 TO 1130.
ANYONE ELSE ON COUNCIL WOULD LIKE TO ADDRESS US AT THIS TIME? ALL RIGHT. SEEING NONE, MISS NASH.
FIRST, WE'RE EXCITED TO WELCOME FIREFIGHTER PARAMEDIC SCOTT CASTILLO TO SACHSE.
AND HE COMES TO US FROM THE CITY OF DALLAS, WHERE HE WAS A FIREFIGHTER PARAMEDIC FOR TWO YEARS.
AND JESSE LEGASPI IS OUR NEWEST POLICE OFFICER.
AND JESSE COMES TO US FROM THE CITY OF ROCKWALL, WHERE HE WAS A DETENTION OFFICER.
HE ALSO WORKED AS A DEPUTY SHERIFF IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY FOR 15 YEARS.
SO, WE ARE GLAD TO HAVE HIM ON OUR TEAM AND HE HAS A LOT OF EXPERIENCE.
AND JUST A LITTLE PUBLIC SERVICE ANNOUNCEMENT.
AND FINALLY, I'M VERY EXCITED TO ANNOUNCE A PROMOTION.
MANY OF YOU REMEMBER KYLE MURRAY.
HE'S BEEN WITH US SINCE 2017, AND HE WAS A PARK MAINTENANCE TECHNICIAN WHO PROMOTED A CREW LEADER AND HAS DECIDED TO MAKE A CAREER CHANGE, AND WE HAVE PROMOTED HIM TO PLANS EXAMINER.
AND KYLE WILL GET THE NECESSARY TRAINING AND THINGS THAT HE NEEDS FOR THAT POSITION.
SO, CONGRATULATIONS TO KYLE AND WE'RE EXCITED TO KEEP HIM ON THE TEAM.
YEAH, I WAS GOING TO SAY THANK YOU, MISS NASH KEEPING EVERYBODY ON THE TEAM.
THAT'S OBVIOUSLY A GREAT GOAL TO HAVE.
AND WE'VE HAD A REALLY GOOD JOB WITH THAT.
JUST ONE QUICK NOTE ABOUT SPLASH PAD.
YOU SAID IT OPENS APRIL 1ST, BUT NOT APRIL FOOL'S JOKE, RIGHT? NO, SIR. OKAY, IT'S FOR REAL.
JUST CHECKING. ALL RIGHT. I HAVE A COUPLE ANNOUNCEMENTS.
NOT SEEING ANYBODY ELSE IN THE QUEUE.
IF YOU DON'T KNOW IF YOU LOOKED OUTSIDE, WE HAVE ELECTION SIGNS OUT THERE.
WE JUST CONCLUDED EARLY VOTING.
SO TOMORROW, ELECTION DAY IS FROM 7 A.M.
OF COURSE, AS ALWAYS, IF YOU LIVE IN DALLAS COUNTY, YOU'RE GOING TO VOTE HERE.
IF YOU LIVE IN COLLIN COUNTY, YOU'RE GOING TO VOTE OVER AT THE REC CENTER.
SO, THE COUNTY ELECTION WEBSITE HAS WAY MORE DETAILS ABOUT THAT.
ALSO, WE HAVE A MUCH-NEEDED BLOOD DRIVE.
THAT'S TOMORROW, MARCH THE 5TH, FROM 10 A.M.
TO 2 P.M. HERE AT THE MUNICIPAL COMPLEX.
CARTER BLOODCARE PROBABLY SEEN THEM AROUND.
THEIR MOBILE CENTER WILL BE HERE PARKED AT CITY HALL, PARKED AT THE COMMUNITY CENTER.
THEY DO NEED YOU. THEY DO NEED DONATIONS.
SO, EACH DONATION SUPPORTS OUR VERY OWN SACHSE FIRE AND RESCUE DEPARTMENT THEIR BLOOD PROGRAM.
IF YOU CAN PLEASE, PLEASE COME OUT TO DONATE BLOOD.
I KNOW YOU PROBABLY REMEMBER THIS.
STON-107682I EXPECT YOU ALL TO REMEMBER THAT THAT WILL HELP GO THAT THE CODE WILL HELP EVERYTHING.
GO TO THE FIRE RESCUE DEPARTMENT.
MARCH 6TH WILL BE THE FIRST POP UP PARK EXPERIENCE AT HERITAGE PARK.
THE CITY GAMES AND EQUIPMENT TRAILER WILL BE AT THE PARK FROM 430 TO 6.
FOR A LOT OF EXCITEMENT, NO REGISTRATION REQUIRED.
SO NOT TOMORROW, A WEEK FROM TOMORROW.
AND THEN GETTING CLOSE TO EASTER.
THERE ARE SEVERAL EASTER EGG HUNTS HAPPENING IN SACHSE ON SATURDAY, MARCH THE 23RD.
CHECK OUT THE PARKS AND RECREATION SPECIAL EVENTS PAGE FOR MORE DETAILS.
[00:10:03]
IN RELATION TO THAT, CITY OFFICES WILL BE CLOSED ON MARCH 29TH FOR GOOD FRIDAY.AND THEN A NEW THING WE GOT GOING.
THE SACHSE LOCAL BUSINESS GRANT PROGRAM IS OFFICIALLY LIVE.
THE GOAL OF THIS PROGRAM IS TO RENOVATE, QUOTE UNQUOTE, 78 THROUGH A STAFF ADMINISTERED MATCHING GRANT PROGRAM FOR BUSINESSES IN CERTAIN AREAS ALONG HIGHWAY 78 ALONG THE HIGHWAY 78 CORRIDOR.
AS YOU CAN TELL, THERE'S A LOT INCLUDED.
VISIT SACHSEECONOMICDEVELOPMENT.COM TO VIEW THE COMPLETE PROGRAM GUIDELINES TO SEE IF YOUR BUSINESS IS ELIGIBLE FOR A GRANT, YOU MAY ALSO REACH OUT DIRECTLY TO MR. POTTS, OUR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT TEAM OR MR. POTTS OR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT TEAM.
AND YOU CAN ALSO EMAIL MR. POTTS AT JAYPOTTS@CITYOFSACHSE.COM.
SO, A GREAT PROGRAM. VERY EXCITED TO SEE THAT GOING.
CLASSES WILL BE HELD EVERY WEDNESDAY FROM APRIL 26TH TO JUNE 28TH, FROM 6 TO 8:30 P.M.
PARTICIPANTS WILL HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO RIDE ALONG WITH THE FIRE CREWS.
AND EXPERIENCE A DAY IN THE LIFE OF A FIREFIGHTER.
CHECK OUT THE CITY WEBSITE FOR MORE DETAILS.
SO AGAIN, THAT PROGRAM IS FROM APRIL 26TH TO MAY.
EXCUSE ME, APRIL 26TH TO JUNE 28TH.
AND SO, YOU GOT PLENTY OF TIME TO REGISTER.
SO, IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, SEE THIS ACTUALLY FIRE RESCUE DEPARTMENT OKAY.
I DON'T SEE ANYTHING ELSE. SO, WE WILL MOVE ON.
NEXT ITEM ON THE AGENDA IS ITEM D CONSENT AGENDA.
[D. Consent Agenda - All items listed on the consent agenda will be considered by the City Council and will be enacted on by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Councilmember so requests.]
ALL ITEMS LISTED ON THE CONSENT AGENDA WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THE CITY COUNCIL WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE MOTION.THERE WILL BE NO SEPARATE DISCUSSION OF THESE ITEMS UNLESS A COUNCIL MEMBER.
APPROVE THE FEBRUARY 17TH, 2024, SPECIAL RETREAT MEETING MINUTES.
ITEM TWO APPROVED THE FEBRUARY 19TH, 2024, REGULAR MEETING MINUTES.
MOTIONS FOR DISCUSSION ON THIS ON THE CONSENT AGENDA.
OKAY, SO, YOU KNOW, ITEMS FOR REMOVAL.
I'LL MAKE A MOTION THAT WE APPROVE ITEM D AS PRESENTED.
I WOULD SAY THE CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED.
OKAY, GREAT. HAVE MOST MEMBERS? HOWARD, TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED.
DO I HAVE A SECOND? MISS BUHLER? SECOND. I HAVE A SECOND BY MISS BUHLER.
ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? HEARING NONE. PLEASE CAST YOUR BALLOT.
NEXT ITEM ON THE AGENDA IS ITEM E, REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS.
[1. Receive the City's Annual Comprehensive Financial Report (ACFR) and Federal Single Audit Report for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2023.]
ITEM ONE RECEIVED THE CITY'S ANNUAL COMPREHENSIVE FINANCIAL REPORT, A CFR AND FEDERAL SINGLE AUDIT REPORT FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING 20.EXCUSE ME. SEPTEMBER 30TH, 2023.
MAYOR AND COUNCIL, EACH OF YOUR PLACES TONIGHT.
YOU DO HAVE A COPY OF THE FINAL VERSION OF OUR CITY'S AUDIT.
BWNC, THEY ARE HERE, OUR CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS, TO GIVE AN OVERVIEW, BUT AN INTRODUCTION WILL BE GIVEN TONIGHT BY OUR ESTEEMED ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF FINANCE, RYAN BREDEHOFT. GOOD EVENING, SIR.
GOOD EVENING, COUNCIL AND MAYOR.
THESE REPORTS ARE THE WORK OF THE ENTIRE FINANCE DEPARTMENT.
SO, I DEFINITELY WANT TO THANK THE ENTIRE DEPARTMENT FOR ALL THEIR EFFORTS THE PAST FISCAL YEAR.
SO, BOTH ELECTRONICALLY, ONLINE, ON THE CITY'S WEBSITE AND AT THE LIBRARY.
SO, IN PHYSICAL HARD COPY FORM.
SO NOW I WOULD LIKE TO INVITE LEWIS BREEDLOVE OF BROOKS WATSON AND COMPANY.
HE'S GOING TO SHARE SOME HIGHLIGHTS OF THE AUDIT AS WELL AS THE TWO REPORTS.
MY NAME IS LEWIS BREEDLOVE, SENIOR AUDIT MANAGER AT BROOKS WATSON.
I HAD THE PLEASURE OF CONDUCTING THE AUDIT FOR CITY OF SACHSE FOR 2023 FISCAL YEAR.
RIGHT. FIRST, I DO LIKE TO ALWAYS GIVE AN OVERVIEW OF THE AUDIT PROCESS.
[00:15:04]
THIS YEAR AS THERE WAS A SINGLE AUDIT REQUIRED.SO, WE COME OUT ANYWHERE WHERE MONEY'S COMING IN OR MONEY'S GOING OUT.
WE'RE EVALUATING THE PROCESSES THAT ARE IN PLACE.
SO, WE'RE SITTING DOWN WITH THE FOLKS IN THOSE DEPARTMENTS.
AND ONCE WE'VE DONE THAT, WE TAKE A SAMPLE OVER EACH OF THOSE AREAS TO ENSURE THAT WHAT WE SEE IN PRACTICE IS, IS CONSISTENT WITH WHAT WE'RE SEEING DURING THAT WALKTHROUGH PROCESS. AND FROM THAT, WE WOULD PROVIDE ANY FEEDBACK, AS IN TERMS OF ANY POTENTIAL CONTROL ISSUES OR EFFICIENCIES OR ANYTHING OF THAT NATURE THAT WE MIGHT BE ABLE TO COMMUNICATE AT THAT TIME TO MANAGEMENT, WHICH WE DID NOT IDENTIFY ANY.
THEN WE MOVE INTO OUR RISK-BASED APPROACH.
SO, WE EVERY YEAR HAVE TO EVALUATE AND ANALYZE WHETHER WHAT THAT RISK IS.
AND THAT VARIES FROM YEAR TO YEAR.
THEN THERE'S A COMPLIANCE TESTING COMPONENT.
WE REVIEW ALL CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES TO TO SEE IF THERE WAS ANYTHING APPROVED DURING THE MEETING THAT MAY HAVE A COMPLIANCE COMPONENT TO IT, AND WE WOULD REVIEW THAT AS WELL. THEN WE MOVE INTO THAT FIELD WORK PHASE.
THAT'S GOING TO BE AFTER YEAR END.
THE BOOKS ARE BEING CLOSED OUT AND WE START TO TEST THOSE AND VERIFY THOSE.
ONCE ALL PERFORMED TESTING IS PERFORMED, WE MOVE INTO THAT CONCLUSION AND REPORTING PHASE, WHERE IT GOES THROUGH VARIOUS LEVELS OF REVIEW TO ENSURE THAT NO ADDITIONAL PROCEDURES ARE NECESSARY, AND THEN PREPARE THOSE REPORTS AND LETTERS FOR YOU THAT WE HAVE FOR YOU TODAY.
NEXT IS TO GO OVER THE COMPONENTS OF THE AUDIT REPORT.
THAT'S OUR OPINION OVER CONCERNING THE FINANCIALS.
BEHIND THAT IS THE MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS.
THAT'S GOING TO GIVE YOU A LITTLE BIT OF YEAR-TO-YEAR COMPARISON, AS WELL AS GIVE YOU SOME INFORMATION AT A HIGHER-LEVEL CONCERNING THING OF LIKE BUDGET, CAPITAL ASSETS, LONG TERM DEBT, THINGS OF THAT NATURE.
BEHIND THAT IS YOUR FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
THAT'S GOING TO CONTAIN BOTH YOUR FULL ACCRUAL GOVERNMENT WIDE STATEMENTS AS WELL AS YOUR FUND LEVEL STATEMENTS, AND THEN THE NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, WHICH IS GOING TO GIVE YOU A LOT OF DETAILED BREAKDOWNS OF WHAT THOSE NUMBERS IN THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONSISTS OF BEHIND.
THAT'S YOUR SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION.
THE CITY DID RECEIVE THE CERTIFICATE AWARD FROM THE GFOA THIS PAST YEAR.
AND WE FULLY EXPECT THE CITY TO RECEIVE IT AGAIN.
THERE'S AN UNMODIFIED, QUALIFIED, DISCLAIMED OR AN ADVERSE OPINION.
THE CITY DID RECEIVE AN UNMODIFIED OPINION THAT'S OFTEN REFERRED TO AS A CLEAN OPINION.
AND THAT'S THE HIGHEST LEVEL OF ASSURANCE THAT WE AS AUDITORS ARE ABLE TO PROVIDE.
NEXT IS GO OVER SOME FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS.
THIS IS LOOKING AT THE FUND LEVEL THE CHANGE YEAR TO YEAR OF FUND OF THE FUND BALANCE.
SO GENERAL FUND WE SAW AN INCREASE THERE OF 234,000 DEBT SERVICE FUNDS.
WE SAW AN INCREASE THERE OF 250,000 CAPITAL PROJECTS.
WE SAW A DECREASE THERE OF 5.4 MILLION.
THAT'S JUST DUE TO THE UTILIZATION OF THOSE FUNDS THAT ARE INTENDED FOR CAPITAL PROJECTS.
WE SAW AN INCREASE OF 1.1 MILLION.
THAT'S DUE TO IMPACT FEES AND THEN INTEREST EARNED ON FUNDS IN THAT ACCOUNT, IN THAT FUND.
AND THEN THE FIRST FUND, WE SAW AN INCREASE THERE OF 1.2 MILLION.
THIS IS DUE TO PROPERTY TAX THAT ARE ALLOCATED TO THE TOURS.
AND THEN ALL THE OTHER NON-MAJOR FUNDS WHICH ARE GOING TO CONSIST OF, I BELIEVE IT'S FOUR OTHER FUNDS THAT ARE QUALIFIED TO BE PRESENTED AS NON-MAJOR OVERALL HAD A DECREASE OF 1.7 MILLION.
AND THOSE ARE ALL SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS.
AND PRIMARILY IN THE PRIMARY MOVER FOR THAT CATEGORY WAS THE ARPA FUND.
[00:20:03]
THAT NEW YEAR WITHOUT RECEIVING ANY ADDITIONAL FUNDS, ASSUMING YOU WERE TO STREAMLINE THAT OUT EQUALLY THROUGHOUT THAT YEAR.FOR 2023 FISCAL YEAR, IT WAS AT 70%.
SO, EXCEEDING THE GOAL FOR THE CITY AND THE GENERAL FUND.
BUT I DID WANT TO NOTE THAT ALREADY, SINCE YOU'RE IN AND ACTIVELY THE CITY IS USING THAT UNASSIGNED FUND BALANCE TO IN DRAWING DOWN FROM THAT TO DO DIFFERENT PROJECTS THROUGHOUT THE CITY AS IT RELATES TO THE BUDGET RESULTS FOR THE YEAR, REVENUES CAME IN A LITTLE UNDER EXPECTATIONS BY 64,000, AND THAT'S LARGELY DUE TO PERMITS COMING IN UNDER EXPECTATIONS.
EXPENDITURES WERE UNDER BUDGET BY 1.2 MILLION.
OTHER SOURCES AND USES ARE GOING TO BE YOUR TRANSFERS IN, TRANSFERRED OUT AND THINGS OF THAT NATURE.
SO, WE HAD A NEGATIVE VARIANCE THERE OF 902,000 DUE TO TRANSFERS.
BUT OVERALL, THE BUDGET HAD A POSITIVE BUDGET VARIANCE OF 259,000.
NEXT LOOKING AT THE PROPRIETARY FUNDS.
SO, THIS CAN BE YOUR UTILITY FUND.
THESE DO OPERATE MORE LIKE A BUSINESS.
AND SO WE EVALUATE THEM ACCORDINGLY.
FIRST, WE LOOK AT THE OPERATIONS AND TO SEE IF THERE'S AN INCOME OR A LOSS.
THERE WAS A 4.7 IN INCOME AFTER OTHER SOURCES AND USES AND THINGS OF THAT NATURE.
THERE WAS OVERALL AT A POSITIVE INCREASE IN NET POSITION OF 6.1 MILLION.
JUST TO GET A BREAKDOWN OF WHAT THAT CONSISTS OF ITS OVERALL NET POSITION IS 53.4 MILLION.
THAT CONSISTS OF 30 MILLION IN NET INVESTMENT IN CAPITAL ASSETS.
SO, ALL THAT INFRASTRUCTURE THAT YOU HAVE FOR THE WATER AND SEWER.
AND THEN YOUR UNRESTRICTED PORTION IS 23.3 MILLION.
NEXT. CONCERNING THE SINGLE AUDIT, THERE IS A REPORT GOING OVER WHETHER OR NOT THERE WERE ANY FINDINGS OVER MATERIAL WEAKNESSES OR ANY TYPE OF CONTROL CONCERNS. THERE WERE NO FINDINGS AS IT RELATED TO THE FINANCIALS OR TO THE COMPLIANCE COMPONENT FOR THE GRANTS.
AND THEN NEXT. THIS IS JUST A VIEW OF THE CFA OR THE SCHEDULE OF EXPENDITURES OF FEDERAL AWARDS.
AND THIS, AS YOU CAN SEE, WAS.
ALMOST ENTIRELY DUE TO THE CORONAVIRUS, STATE AND LOCAL RECOVERY FUNDS OR THOSE ARPA FUNDS.
NEXT THE COMMUNICATION LETTER.
THERE'S A LOT OF LANGUAGE IN THAT LETTER.
AND THERE'S A LOT OF OTHER LANGUAGE IN THERE.
BUT I DO LIKE TO ALWAYS PULL OUT A FEW FACTORS FROM THAT LETTER THAT I WANT TO HIGHLIGHT.
ONE AUDIT WAS CONDUCTED IN COMPLIANCE WITH ALL ETHICS REQUIREMENTS.
TWO, WE HAD NO DIFFICULTIES ENCOUNTERED WHEN WORKING WITH MANAGEMENT.
AND THEN THREE AUDIT ADJUSTMENTS IDENTIFIED WERE CORRECTED BY MANAGEMENT.
THE SECOND LETTER IS COMMUNICATION REGARDING INTERNAL CONTROLS.
THIS IS WHERE WE WOULD LIST OUT ANY CONCERN.
IS ANY FINDINGS, ANY MATERIAL WEAKNESSES.
LAST YEAR WE DID HAVE A COUPLE SMALL RECOMMENDATIONS THAT WERE INCLUDED IN THAT LETTER.
THOSE WERE IMMEDIATELY TAKEN CARE OF BY THE CITY LAST YEAR.
AND SO VERY, VERY CLEAN AUDIT.
AND WITH THAT, I'LL OPEN UP TO ANY QUESTIONS YOU MIGHT HAVE.
I HAVE A COUPLE OF MR. BREEDLOVE.
YES, SIR. NUMBER ONE IN READING EVERYTHING, THIS IS A FAIRLY COMPREHENSIVE AUDIT, CORRECT? YES, SIR. SO, YOU PRETTY MUCH LOOK AT EVERYTHING.
WE DON'T LOOK AT EVERY SINGLE TRANSACTION, BUT WE LOOK AT A LOT OF DATA.
YES, SIR. SO, IF THERE WERE MISAPPROPRIATION OF FUNDS, WOULD YOU SEE THAT? I WOULD LIKE TO THINK SO.
YEAH. WE DO TEST ANY MATERIAL TRANSACTION THAT'S OCCURRING.
WE EVALUATE THOSE WE TEST A LARGE PART OF YOUR TRANSACTIONS.
WE WOULD EVALUATE THOSE AND TEST THOSE.
WHAT ABOUT ON THE SCALE OF 500,000? WE WOULD. THAT WOULD DEFINITELY FALL WITHIN THE RANGE OF WHAT WE WOULD BE TESTING.
YES, SIR. OKAY. JUST CHECKING.
ALSO, TOO, IF THERE ARE ANY SLUSH FUNDS, WOULD YOU FIND THOSE, DO YOU THINK? I WOULD HOPE SO.
I DON'T KNOW WHY I THOUGHT ABOUT THAT, MISS HOWARTH.
I THINK YOU ANSWERED MY QUESTION.
OKAY, COOL. MR. PRESTENBERG? YES.
ON YOUR OPINION TYPES WHERE IT'S UNMODIFIED, QUALIFIED WHATNOT.
IN YOUR OPINION, HOW MANY CITIES ATTAIN THE UNMODIFIED PERCENTAGE WISE?
[00:25:02]
I GUESS I MEAN, OF THE CITIES THAT WE AUDIT.THE MAJORITY, I MEAN, IT'S THE GOAL THAT YOU WOULD LIKE TO HOPE THAT YOU GET THAT IF YOU DON'T HAVE THAT, THERE WOULD BE AN ISSUE OF MATERIAL WEAKNESS OF SOME SORT OR A MAJOR ISSUE IN BEING ABLE TO PROVIDE THE SUPPORT NECESSARY TO SUPPORT THE NUMBERS, WHICH WE WOULD THEN HAVE TO QUALIFY THE OPINION IN SOME WAY.
SO, I MEAN, THERE DEFINITELY ARE MANY CITIES THAT DON'T RECEIVE IT.
DEFINITELY. THERE ARE SOME THAT DON'T.
OKAY. YEAH, I APPRECIATE THAT.
I'M JUST CURIOUS IF IT WAS A GRADE THAT'S JUST GIVEN.
KIND OF LIKE IF YOU WENT TO A&M OR SOMETHING, YOU KNOW.
RIGHT. CAREFUL, CAREFUL, CAREFUL.
I'M KIDDING. BUT YEAH, FANTASTIC JOB ON IT.
IT SOUNDS LIKE, YOU KNOW, A LOT OF GOOD WORK WAS DONE LAST YEAR.
WE DO A LOT OF WORK, BUT I DO, AND I THINK THIS HAS BEEN COMMUNICATED BEFORE.
YOU GUYS HAVE A FANTASTIC TEAM HERE.
SOME OF THE QUICKEST RESPONSES I RECEIVE SUPPORT IS TOP NOTCH.
SO, YOU GUYS HAVE Y'ALL'S FINANCE TEAM HERE IS TOP NOTCH.
AND THAT GOES AS WELL AS COURT UTILITY.
ALL THE FOLKS THAT WE HAVE TO GET SUPPORT FROM AND INTERVIEW.
Y'ALL ARE VERY FORTUNATE TO HAVE A GOOD TEAM.
GREAT. MRS. BUHLER? I KIND OF WANTED TO ECHO THE SAME SENTIMENT.
OKAY. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FROM COUNCIL? ANYONE FROM THE AUDIENCE LIKE TO ADDRESS ASIDE.
MARTY HOBO 5511 OAK RIDGE CIRCLE, SACHSE, TEXAS.
TOP OF THE HILL. IF TWO YEARS AGO THEY BUDGETED 1.33.
TIMES THE INSURANCE COST AND ONLY SPENT 0.90 TIMES THE INSURANCE COST.
WOULD YOU PICK THAT UP IN YOUR AUDIT? THANK YOU. COULD YOU JUST ADDRESS THE COUNCIL? THANK YOU, MISS HOWARTH.
I THINK WE'RE ALL VERY AWARE THAT UNSPENT BUDGETED ALLOWANCES RETURNED TO THE GENERAL FUND AS UN.
WHEN THEY'RE NOT SPENT, THEY GO BACK, RIGHT? YEAH, THAT'S WHAT I THOUGHT I WAS.
ANYBODY ELSE LIKE TO ADDRESS THIS ITEM? THANK YOU, MR. BREEDLOVE.
SIR, MY CONTACT INFORMATION IS THERE, SO IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, FEEL FREE TO REACH OUT.
I JUST WANT TO ECHO MISS FIELDER'S COMMENT REAL QUICK.
THE FINANCE DEPARTMENT DID A GREAT JOB.
AS HAS BEEN MENTIONED SEVERAL TIMES TODAY, THEY ARE AWARD WINNING FINANCE DEPARTMENT.
SO, THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR THE JOB YOU DO, GUYS.
THIS IS JUST A RECEIVE ITEM SO NO NEED TO VOTE.
ANY OTHER COMMENTS FROM COUNCIL ON THIS.
ALL RIGHT. SEEING NONE WE'LL MOVE ON.
NEXT ITEM ON THE AGENDA IS ITEM TWO.
[2. Discuss and consider an Ordinance adopting the City of Sachse Engineering Design Manual; providing a repealing clause; providing a severability clause; and providing for an effective date.]
EXCUSE ME. DISCUSS AND CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING THE CITY OF SACHSE ENGINEERING DESIGN MANUAL, PROVIDING A REPEALING CLAUSE, PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. THANK YOU, MR. GORFIDA, FOR NOT MAKING IT TERRIBLY LONG.MAYOR AND COUNCIL AT ANOTHER NEW FACE.
YOU'RE GOING TO GET TO SEE UP AT THE PODIUM TONIGHT.
WELL, YOU GET TO SEE YOU KNOW COREY.
BUT WHAT WE DO HAVE TONIGHT UP HERE IS CAMERON SERMON, WHO IS OUR ONE OF OUR ENGINEERS ON THE STAFF, AND HE IS HE, COREY, AND SOME OF THE OTHER STAFF WITHIN OUR ENGINEERING AND PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENTS HAVE DONE A GREAT DEAL OF WORK UPDATING OUR ENGINEERING DESIGN MANUAL.
AND SO, THEY DID A GREAT JOB, I BELIEVE, OF SUMMARIZING OVER 200-PAGE DOCUMENT.
AND I HOPE WITH TONIGHT'S POWERPOINT PRESENTATION CAMERON WILL BE ABLE TO WALK YOU THROUGH A LOT OF THOSE HIGHLIGHTS AND GIVE TIME FOR YOU TO ASK ANY SPECIFIC QUESTIONS, MR. NESBITT? WELL, THAT WAS A, I WAS GOING TO SAY SO, YEAH.
AND, WELL, I WANTED TO JUST INTRODUCE CAMERON.
THIS IS HIS FIRST TIME COMING UP HERE.
SO, HE SPENT A LOT OF TIME WORKING ON THIS.
SO, I DON'T KNOW IF IT'S PUNISHMENT OR REWARD, BUT HE'S STILL HERE, SO THAT'S GOOD.
[00:30:02]
HE'S STILL HERE. SO, THIS IS A HUGE UNDERTAKING, HONESTLY.AND SO THAT'S WHY I JUST WANT TO MAKE TO LET EVERYBODY KNOW THAT THIS IS A BIG TASK.
SO, HE'S DONE A GOOD JOB OF COMPILING THIS.
OVER THE LAST SIX MONTHS HE'S BEEN WORKING ON THIS.
SO, WITH THAT, I'M GOING TO TURN IT OVER TO CAMERON.
HE'S GOING TO GIVE YOU A QUICK LITTLE 15 SLIDE PRESENTATION, OVER 200-PAGE DOCUMENT.
SO, WE'LL ANSWER QUESTIONS AT THE END.
AND IF YOU GUYS HAVE ANYTHING BUT JUST CAMERON WELCOME MR. SHERMAN. THANK YOU.
ALL RIGHT. JUST WANT TO SAY THE POINT OF THE ENGINEERING DESIGN MANUAL IS TO PROVIDE PROSPECTIVE DEVELOPERS AND ENGINEERS A SINGLE LOCATION FOR ALL RELEVANT DESIGN STANDARDS AND REQUIREMENTS FOR NEW DEVELOPMENT IN THE CITY.
SO, THE GOAL IS TO HAVE A DOCUMENT TO HELP CITY STAFF WORK WITH ENGINEERS AND DEVELOPERS.
TO ENSURE NEW DEVELOPMENTS ARE PROPERLY DESIGNED AND CONSTRUCTED.
SO, FOR THIS PRESENTATION, WE'RE GOING TO GO OVER WHAT WE'VE BEEN DOING TO WRITE THE NEW THE NEW MANUAL, WHAT THE CURRENT MANUAL LOOKS LIKE, WHAT THE PROPOSED MANUAL LOOKS LIKE, THEN THE NEXT STEPS FOR THE MANUAL, AND THEN ANY DISCUSSION AND QUESTIONS THAT YOU ALL HAVE.
SO, THE CURRENT MANUAL WAS APPROVED IN MAY OF 2019.
FIRST STEP OF THE PROCESS WAS LEARNING WHAT THE CURRENT STANDARDS ARE, AND TALKING ABOUT SOME OF THE COMMON CONFUSION ASPECTS AND PRESSURE POINTS THAT WE HAVE WITH THE CURRENT STANDARDS WITH DEVELOPERS AND ENGINEERS.
IN EARLY FEBRUARY, WE SENT OUT THE PROPOSED DESIGN MANUAL, A DRAFT OF THE MANUAL TO ENGINEERS AND DEVELOPERS WITH RECENT EXPERIENCE IN SACHSE, FOR COMMENT AND REVIEW.
WE SENT THE INVITE AND THE DRAFT OUT TO 21 DIFFERENT PEOPLE 15 ENGINEERS, SIX DEVELOPERS.
AND WE GOT ABOUT ONE RESPONSE BACK AND INCORPORATED THAT INTO THE MANUAL.
SO, FOR THE CURRENT RENEWAL, I DON'T THINK YOU NEED TO READ TOO MUCH INTO THE PAGE COUNT.
AND NOT HAVE TO HAVE A DEVELOPER.
AN ENGINEER REFERENCING BACK TO AN APPENDIX, HAVE IT ALL IN ONE PLACE SO IT'S EASY TO REFERENCE.
THERE'S THREE CHAPTERS ROADWAY, WATER AND SEWER AND DRAINAGE.
SOME OF THE INFORMATION IS A LITTLE DATED.
AND THEN, LIKE I SAID EARLIER, IT'S BEEN DIFFICULT TO REFERENCE WHEN TALKING TO.
DEVELOPERS AND ENGINEERS ABOUT PROBLEMS. THE PROPOSED MANUAL IS 218 PAGES WITH APPENDIXES.
THERE'RE NINE SECTIONS THAT WE'RE GOING TO GO THROUGH RIGHT NOW.
SO, SECTION ONE IS GENERAL DESIGN REQUIREMENTS.
THERE'S BEEN MORE INFORMATION ADDED ON HOW AND WHO TO SUBMIT DESIGN DOCUMENTS TO CITY STAFF.
THAT ANY DEVELOPMENT IS GOING TO HAVE TO ADHERE TO.
SECTION TWO IS ROADWAY DESIGN CHANGES.
THIS IS GOING TO MAKE IT EASIER FOR OUR CONSTRUCTION INSPECTORS AND CONTRACTORS.
TO KNOW THAT WE DO NOT ALLOW LOWER THAN 4000 PSI CONCRETE ON ANYTHING IN THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY.
[00:35:05]
SECTION THREE DRAINAGE REQUIREMENTS.SO WE HAD ABOUT A PARAGRAPH AND A HALF OF THEORY ABOUT DRAINAGE DESIGN.
IT DEFINES THE MINIMUM DESIGN REQUIREMENTS FOR STORM DRAINAGE FACILITIES.
AND IT DEFINES MINIMUM EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL REQUIRED FOR CONSTRUCTION.
ALL DRAINAGE IS GOING TO BE BASED ON FULLY DEVELOPED WATERSHED CONDITIONS.
AND THEN WE HAVE UPDATED STORM INFORMATION FROM NOAA AND ATLAS RAINFALL NUMBERS.
WHICH WE CURRENTLY HAVE NO STANDARDS ON.
ARE THE GENERAL UTILITIES DESIGN REQUIREMENTS.
SO, THIS IS HOW WATER AND SEWER INTERACT WITH EACH OTHER.
SO BASICALLY, ALL WATER AND SEWER DESIGNS NEED TO COMPLY WITH THE MASTER PLANS.
BUT THE IMPORTANT SECTION IS THAT ALL UTILITY DESIGNS WILL BE EXTENDED TO THE UPSTREAM NEIGHBORS.
AND DESIGNS WILL NEED TO COMPLY WITH VARIOUS STANDARDS OUTSIDE OF THE CITY.
STANDARDS SECTION FIVE IS WATER DESIGN REQUIREMENTS.
SO, WE HAVE UPDATED REFERENCES AND DESIGN STANDARDS OVERALL.
MAIN SIZES SHALL BE DESIGNED TO MATCH THE CURRENT WATER MASTER PLAN.
MINIMUM COVER FOR 12 INCH AND SMALLER PIPES IS 3.5FT.
16 INCH AND LARGER PIPES IS FIVE FEET.
AND THEN WE HAVE DESIGN REQUIREMENTS TO ALLOW FOR ISWIM AND VARIOUS WATER.
TECHNOLOGIES. SECTION SIX SANITARY SEWER.
AGAIN, ANY SEWER DESIGN IS GOING TO.
B MATCHING OF THE CITY MASTER PLAN.
THE MINIMUM SIZE FOR A MAIN IS EIGHT INCHES.
AND THEN WE HAVE SOME TABLES SHOWING MINIMUM SIZE AND THICKNESSES FOR THOSE MANHOLES.
WE ALSO HAVE A NEW SECTION ON LIFT STATION REQUIREMENTS.
IF THAT IS NEEDED TO BE INSTALLED.
SECTION SEVEN STRUCTURAL DESIGN REQUIREMENTS.
AS PART OF THAT DESIGN, A GEOTECHNICAL REPORT WILL BE REQUIRED.
RETAINING WALLS TWO FEET AND HIGHER REQUIRE A DETAIL IN THE PLANS THAT ARE SUBMITTED TO THE CITY.
ALL COMMERCIAL AND MULTIFAMILY APPLICATIONS REQUIRE ENGINEERING DESIGN.
SECTION EIGHT IS LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION DESIGN.
THESE PLANS MUST BE SEALED BY A LICENSED REGISTERED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT.
AND THEN SECTION NINE IS DEFINITIONS AND ABBREVIATIONS.
THE CURRENT MANUAL HAS THEM THROWN AT THE IN EACH SECTION.
NOW THERE'S ONE AT THE END THAT'S EASIER TO REFERENCE.
ALL RIGHT. THE NEXT STEPS WILL BE TO THE ORDINANCE TO ADOPT THE MANUAL.
IT HAS BEEN PUBLISHED TO THE CITY WEBSITE, AND IT WILL BE AVAILABLE AT THE CITY SECRETARY'S OFFICE.
AND MOVING FORWARD, THE CITY STAFF WILL CONTINUE TO EVALUATE AND UPDATE THE MANUAL BASED ON.
UPDATED TECHNOLOGY, ENGINEERING, JUDGMENT AND BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES.
[00:40:03]
THANK YOU, MR. CHAIRMAN. APPRECIATE THE PRESENTATION.MR. PRESTENBERG ARE YOU DOING.
I DON'T KNOW IF I'VE GOT TO MEET YOU YET, SO WELCOME.
A LOT OF I LIKE ENGINEERING STUFF, SO THIS IS PRETTY COOL.
SO, SECTION THREE IF YOU GO TO THAT ONE REAL QUICK, IT SAYS DRAINAGE DESIGN REQUIREMENTS.
UNDER THE NEW SECTIONS, IT TALKS ABOUT DETENTION AND RETENTION FACILITIES.
IS THAT LIKE A DETENTION POND OR SOMETHING ALONG THOSE LINES? DETENTION PONDS, OPEN CHANNELS AND DITCHES.
SO, I'M JUST CURIOUS IF THAT THEY'RE GOING TO HAVE TO MAKE ANY CHANGES OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT.
SO NO, THEY ACTUALLY MEET MOST OF THESE REQUIREMENTS.
THEY ALREADY MEET THESE REQUIREMENTS OKAY.
AND AGAIN, THAT'S PART OF WORKING WITH P AND B.
THEY'VE DONE A GREAT JOB OF KIND OF LISTENING TO WHAT WE.
AND SO WE'RE TRYING TO TO TRANSPOSE THOSE INTO THE MANUAL AND ALSO WORKING WITH THE DEVELOPER.
AND SO AGAIN CERTAIN REQUIREMENTS AND THIS IS MORE TECHNICALLY OUTLINED THESE THINGS, BUT P AND B AND KIMLEY-HORN THEY'VE DONE A GREAT JOB OF ADDRESSING ALL THOSE CONCERNS WITH THE CURRENT DESIGN. SO, NO REDESIGN REQUIRED FOR THEM.
PERFECT. LET'S SEE SECTION SEVEN TALKING ABOUT THE RETAINING WALLS.
AND THIS IS JUST MY OWN LACK OF KNOWLEDGE, I GUESS.
BUT IS THIS FOR RESIDENTIAL, TOO, I'M ASSUMING, OR JUST COMMERCIAL OR.
IT'S FOR THE INTERPLAY BETWEEN RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL.
THERE WON'T BE RESIDENTIAL, SO SOMEONE HAS A RESIDENTIAL TWO FOOT RETAINING WALL.
THEIR LAND, THEY'RE NOT GOING TO BE HELD TO THESE STANDARDS OR.
OH, I SEE OKAY I THINK SORRY I THINK YOU'RE TALKING LIKE BUILDING PERMIT TYPE STUFF OR YOU'RE TALKING JUST REPAIRING OF A TWO-FOOT RETAINING WALL THAT THEY MIGHT HAVE BUILT 12, 15 YEARS AGO. THAT.
SO, THIS SO YEAH, WE'LL WORK WITH BUILDING INSPECTIONS ON THAT AS WELL.
YEAH. OKAY. WELL, THERE'S NOT THAT MANY NEW ONES THERE.
RIGHT. SO, IT'S ALL REPLACEMENT I WOULD IMAGINE NEW REPLACEMENT.
AND SO AGAIN BUT THIS SETS THE STANDARD AS WHAT WE EXPECT ON ANYTHING NEW OR TO BE REPLACED.
OKAY. AND LAST THING I HAD JUST WE HAD ONE ENGINEERING FIRM SHOW UP RIGHT TO GIVE FEEDBACK OR INPUT.
RIGHT. SO, ARE THERE ANY CONCERNS OR ANY MAJOR CHANGES THAT MAY AFFECT HOW ENGINEERING FIRMS WILL NEED TO WORK WITH US IN THE FUTURE THAT MAYBE THEY HAVEN'T HAD IN THE PAST? ARE WE CONCERNED WITH ANY OF THAT, OR ARE THEY JUST NOW MEETING STANDARDS THAT ARE EVERYWHERE ELSE? AND WE'RE JUST SO I THINK THERE'S AN INDUSTRY TREND THAT MOST MUNICIPALITIES ARE FOLLOWING.
AND SO, THIS KIND OF GETS US UP TO DATE WITH THAT.
CERTAINLY, WE'LL WORK WITH ALL DEVELOPERS ON THAT STUFF.
RIGHT. OUR ENGINEERING FIRMS. BUT THIS THIS MANUAL GENERALLY MATCHES WHAT THE INDUSTRY IS EXPECTS OR AS A STANDARD.
NOW THAT'S FINE. BUT I DIDN'T KNOW IF THERE WAS ANYTHING THAT WAS ABOVE AND BEYOND THAT BECAUSE THOSE ARE ALL MINIMUM STANDARDS, RIGHT? WHATEVER THE STANDARDS ARE, THESE ARE OUR MINIMUM STANDARDS.
RIGHT. AND SO, I THINK LIKE WITH THE GOOD EXAMPLES OF SCREENING WALL.
RIGHT. LIKE NOT ALL CITIES ARE DOING THAT.
RIGHT. BUT WE'VE SEEN THIS TO BE A SUCCESSFUL PRODUCT.
AND THAT'S SOMETHING WE WANT TO ADOPT AS OUR OWN.
I MEAN, THERE MAY BE SOME NUANCES, BUT I THINK, AGAIN, WE'VE SENT THIS TO MULTIPLE ENGINEERING FIRMS. NOBODY'S HAD ANY REAL CONCERNS OR ISSUES WITH WHAT WE'RE PROPOSING.
WELL, THANK YOU. THANKS FOR THE HARD WORK.
APPRECIATE IT, MR. LINDSEY. YEAH.
THANKS FOR THE PRESENTATION AGAIN.
WELCOME. DEFINITELY APPRECIATE ALL YOUR KNOWLEDGE, HARD WORK GOING INTO THIS.
I JUST HAD A COUPLE OF QUESTIONS.
AND I'LL PICK ON THE SCREENING WALLS JUST BECAUSE IT'S A GOOD EXAMPLE.
SO I'M JUST CURIOUS. LIKE, FOR EXAMPLE SCREENING WALLS, DAMAGED CAR RUNS INTO IT.
ARE ARE THEY HELD TO THESE NEWER GUIDELINES? I MEAN, IS THERE A CERTAIN PERCENTAGE OF THE THE WALL THAT'S DESTROYED THAT ALL OF A SUDDEN ENACTS, YOU KNOW, BUILDING UNDERNEATH THE MODERN CODE HERE HAS SOMETHING LIKE THAT WORK? I DON'T KNOW THAT.
I DON'T KNOW THAT THAT'S SOMETHING WE WOULD ADDRESS WITH THE MANUAL.
IT MAY BE MORE OF A BUILDING PERMIT OR A PLANNING BECAUSE THERE'S A PERCENTAGE OF WHAT THEY HAVE TO.
DOES THAT MAKE SENSE? CERTAINLY IF THEY CAME BACK WE WOULD RECOMMEND THAT THEY DO THIS.
[00:45:01]
AND IF IT'S ONE PANEL, IT PROBABLY DOESN'T MAKE SENSE TO DO RIGHT.MAYBE IT MAKES SENSE TO DO THE WHOLE THING, BUT I'LL DEFER TO PLANNING DEPARTMENT ON THAT.
OKAY. YEAH, I WAS JUST KIND OF CONCERNED WITH THAT, I MEAN, I GOT TO BELIEVE COMMON SENSE WOULD PREVAIL, BUT, I MEAN, THERE'S THERE'S A LOT OF GOOD BRICK WALLS THAT THAT ARE TAKEN CARE OF ON THERE.
AND THEN ON BOTH SIDES, IT LOOKED LIKE THE OLD SCREENING WALL.
SO AS LONG AS THERE'S ROOM FOR COMMON SENSE IN THERE.
THE OTHER THING THAT I WAS JUST CURIOUS ON IS, IS REACHING OUT, YOU KNOW, IT'S I SEE VERY FEW EXAMPLES OF WHERE THE PUBLIC IS GOVERNMENT'S REACHING OUT TO, TO PRIVATE STAKEHOLDERS. SO I'M JUST CURIOUS, HOW DOES THAT COME ABOUT? I KNOW YOU YOU HAD LIMITED RESPONSE.
SO BUT IS THERE LIKE A TRADE GROUP YOU, YOU REACH OUT TO OR SOME, SOME KIND OF ORGANIZATION THAT REPRESENTS LAND DEVELOPERS AND THE ENGINEER FIRMS I REACHED OUT TO, SPECIFICALLY FIRMS THAT HAVE SUBMITTED PLANS TO CITY SACS IN THE LAST YEAR OR SO.
JUST TO MAKE SURE THAT THE PEOPLE WHO HAVE BEEN WE'VE BEEN TALKING TO.
CAN HAVE INPUT ON WHAT IT WOULD BE LIKE GOING FORWARD.
I JUST DEFINITELY WANTED TO THANK YOU FOR THAT.
I MEAN, ANY OPPORTUNITY, EVEN THOUGH THERE'S ALWAYS LIMITED RESPONSE GETTING THE WORD OUT.
I MEAN, IT'S ONE THING TO HAVE, YOU KNOW, PUBLIC BULLETINS AND EVERYTHING OUT THAT NOT EVERYBODY READS, BUT ACTUALLY BEING PROACTIVE REACHING OUT TO THAT COMMUNITY AND SAYING, HEY, THIS IS WHAT WE'RE PROPOSING.
I HOPE THAT'S THE WAY THAT WE CONTINUE TO DO THINGS.
THAT'S ALL I GOT. OTHER QUESTIONS FROM COUNCIL.
MR. MILLSAP. I DON'T REMEMBER WHAT IT WAS EITHER ON SECTION 1 OR 2.
BUT ANYWAY, YOUR 4000 FOOT POUND CONCRETE, DO WE HOW DO YOU GUARANTEE WE GET THIS? AND THE REASON I'M ASKING THIS IS 20 PLUS YEARS AGO, WHEN MILES ROAD WAS POURED, EVERY FOURTH OR FIFTH TRUCK, THEY ACTUALLY PULLED A SAMPLE AND TESTED IT.
WHEN SACHSE ROAD WAS POURED JUST A FEW YEARS AGO.
I DON'T REMEMBER EVER SEEING A SAMPLE BUCKET, BUT ARE WE JUST RELYING ON THE INTEGRITY OF THE COMPANY WE'RE BUYING IT FROM WHEN WE'RE SPEC IT AS IT'S 4,000 POUNDS? OR DO OR DO WE KNOW HOW DO WE GUARANTEE THAT WE'RE GETTING WHAT WE'RE PAYING FOR? SO ON OUR CIP PROJECTS, WE WE SPECIFICALLY SPECIFY THAT OUT.
RIGHT. AND SO WE'LL HAVE A TESTING LAB THAT ACTUALLY TESTS EVERY 150YD³ OF CONCRETE.
SO WHO TESTED DO WE TEST IT OR DO WE RELY ON.
WE HAD A THIRD PARTY TESTING FIRM.
YEAH OKAY. AND SO SAME THING WITH THE DEVELOPER.
WHEN THE DEVELOPER COMES IN AND THEY'RE BUILDING A RESIDENTIAL STREET, THEY'LL HIRE A THIRD PARTY TESTING FIRM TO TEST THE CONCRETE AS WELL TO MAKE SURE THAT IT MEETS OUR SPECIFICATIONS. OKAY.
AND ON HERE IN SECTION SEVEN, WE HAVE UP HERE, DETAILS MUST BE PROVIDED FOR WALLS OVER TWO FEET.
WHEN YOU MADE THAT, WHEN YOU POINTED THAT OUT, I THINK YOU USED THE TERM RETAINING WALL.
HOW DO WE DISTINGUISH THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN A RETAINING WALL AND A LANDSCAPE WALL IN A, IN A RESIDENTIAL AREA OR OPEN OPEN AREA? DO WE HAVE ANY DISTINCTION BETWEEN A LANDSCAPE WALL AND A RETAINING WALL? I THINK IN PART I THINK YOU SHOULD BE, BECAUSE THERE IS TOTALLY I THINK, YEAH.
AND AGAIN, THAT PROBABLY COMES BACK TO BUILDING INSPECTIONS A LITTLE BIT.
BUT AGAIN, YOU COULD HAVE THE HOME DEPOT STACKED BLOCK WALL, TWO FEET.
RIGHT. AND YOU COULD GIVE US A DETAIL FOR THAT.
RIGHT. SO I DO THINK WE NEED TO DISTINGUISH THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THEM AND IDENTIFY THAT ANOTHER THING ON SECTION EIGHT.
AS A GRADUATE HORTICULTURIST, I AM OPPOSED TO THAT.
BY WHOSE DEFINITION OF APPROVED? I THINK THAT SHOULD BE RECOMMENDED LIST.
SO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT HAS AN APPROVED TREE LIST.
AND THAT'S WHAT THAT'S WHAT THIS REFERS TO.
THAT'S WHAT I'M SAYING. THIS NEEDS TO BE CHANGED.
WHETHER IT BE CHANGED IN THIS MANUAL OR PLANNING DEPARTMENT, WHATEVER IT SHOULD NOT BE.
[00:50:06]
AGRICULTURE AS OBNOXIOUS PLANTS.YEAH WE DON'T ACTUALLY AND A TREE EXAMPLES WOULD THAT WOULD BE SALT CEDAR IS ONE.
CHINESE TALLOW IS ONE THAT WAS USED IN THE 50S AND 60S AND 70S TREMENDOUSLY IN DALLAS.
BUT NOW IT'S LISTED AS AN INVADER AND IT'S ONLY LIST.
SO THERE'S SOME QUALIFICATIONS.
BUT I AM BASICALLY DEFINITELY OPPOSED TO SAYING APPROVED LIST.
I THINK IT SHOULD BE A RECOMMENDED LIST.
LET PEOPLE PICK THEIR OWN PLANTS.
BUT WHAT I CAN DO IS I CAN SHARE WITH YOU THE LIST THAT'S APPROVED BY ORDINANCE.
AND IF IT'S SOMETHING THAT COUNCIL WANTS TO TAKE A LOOK AT AGAIN, WE CERTAINLY CAN.
YOU KNOW IT'S NOT JUST GREEN LEAVES IN A IN A WOODY BARK TREE TRUNK.
THERE'S A LOT MORE TO A DESIGN FEATURE OF A TREE.
OKAY. OTHER QUESTIONS FROM COUNCIL.
MARTY. HOBO. YOU ANSWERED MY QUESTION.
OKAY. SO THIS IS ACTUALLY A CONSIDER ITEM.
SO IF THERE IS FURTHER DISCUSSION WE CAN TAKE IT NOW.
MR. MAYOR, I'D LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION THAT WE APPROVE ITEM E TWO AS PRESENTED.
I HAVE A MOTION BY MR. LINDSEY TO APPROVE ITEM E TWO AS PRESENTED.
TO HAVE A SECOND. MR. PRESTENBERG SECOND.
I HAVE A SECOND BY MR. PRESTENBERG.
ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? HEARING NONE. PLEASE CAST YOUR BALLOT.
MOTION CARRIES WITH MR. MILLSAP VOTING NO.
NEXT ITEM ON THE AGENDA IS ITEM THREE.
ADJOURNMENT. THE TIME IS GRANGER 7:22 P.M..
WE ARE ADJOURNED AT 7:22 P.M..
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.