>> I'D LIKE TO WELCOME EVERYONE OUT TO THE SACHSE CITY COUNCIL MEETING.
[A. Meeting Opening]
[00:00:06]
TODAY IS MONDAY, JUNE 17TH, 2024. THE TIME, MS. GRANGER?>> TIME IS 6:30 PM. MEETING IS CALLED TO ORDER.
NEXT ITEM ON THE AGENDA IS INVOCATION AND PLEDGES OF ALLEGIANCE.
I'VE ASKED MAYOR PRO TEM FRANKS TO OFFER INVOCATION AND MS. BUHLER TO LEAD THE PLEDGES. IF YOU WILL PLEASE RISE.
>> PLEASE PRAY WITH ME. LORD, THANK YOU FOR ALLOWING US TO GATHER TONIGHT AS WE LISTEN TO EACH OTHER, AND EVALUATE OUR OPTIONS AND MAKE THE BEST DECISION FOR OUR CITY AS A WHOLE.
AS WE PLAN FOR OUR FUTURE, GIVE US THE WISDOM AND THE PATIENCE TO UNDERSTAND ALL POINTS OF VIEW AND MAKE THE BEST DECISION.
I ALWAYS ASK THAT YOU LOOK OUT FOR ALL OF OUR CITY STAFF AS THEY KEEP US GOING AND KEEP OUR CITY GOING THROUGHOUT THE DAY IN EACH AND EVERY DAY.
I ALWAYS ASK THAT YOU LOOK OUT FOR ALL THE MILITARY ALL OVER THE HOME AND THE WORLD AS THEY MAY NOT BE ABLE TO SPEND TIME WITH THEIR FAMILIES AT THIS TIME, TO KEEP THEM SAFE AND IN YOUR PRAYERS.
WATCH OVER US AS WE PLAN OUR FUTURE AND MAKE THE BEST DECISIONS WE CAN. AMEN.
>> YOU MAY BE SEATED. NEXT ITEM ON OUR AGENDA IS ITEM B, RECOGNITION.
[B. Recognition]
THE FIRST ITEM OR ONLY ITEM, PRESENT A PROCLAMATION RECOGNIZING THE MONTH OF JULY, 2024 AS PARKS AND RECREATION MONTH IN SACHSE.IF I COULD HAVE JORDAN BOYER AND CYNTHIA WISEMAN, AMONG OTHERS, JOIN ME DOWN FRONT.
I'VE BEEN PRACTICING, SO I THINK TO GO ON THIS SIDE, IS IT? I ALWAYS TOLD YOU ON WHICH SIDE TO GOING.
WELL, THIS IS OUR ALL STAR PARKS CREW, IF YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THEY ARE.
YOU MIGHT NOT BECAUSE THEY DO A LOT OF THINGS BEHIND THE SCENES.
LIKE MOST THINGS THAT ARE SUCCESSFUL, A LOT OF TIMES YOU DON'T SEE THEM.
THEY'RE BEHIND THE SCENES, MAKING THINGS WORK.
THIS CREW RIGHT HERE IS TRULY AN ALL STAR CREW.
WE COULD LITERALLY BE HERE ALL NIGHT IF WE WANT TO LIST ALL THE ACCOMPLICES THEY'VE ACHIEVED THESE PAST YEARS, REALLY, NOT JUST THIS PAST YEAR, BUT WE WON'T DO THAT TONIGHT, BUT WE DID WANT TO TAKE THE OPPORTUNITY TO RECOGNIZE ALL FORMALLY AND THE GREAT JOB YOU'RE DOING.
WITH THIS BEING PARKS AND RECREATION MONTH IN SACHSE WOULD LIKE TO READ THE PROCLAMATION TO THAT EFFECT.
WITH THAT, I'LL READ THE PROCLAMATION.
WHEREAS PARKS AND RECREATION ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF COMMUNITIES THROUGHOUT THIS COUNTRY, INCLUDING THE CITY OF SACHSE AND PROMOTE PHYSICAL AND MENTAL HEALTH, AND WHEREAS PARKS AND RECREATION PROGRAMS ARE VITALLY IMPORTANT TO ESTABLISHING AND MAINTAINING THE QUALITY OF LIFE IN OUR COMMUNITIES, PROMOTING THE PHYSICAL AND MENTAL HEALTH OF ALL RESIDENTS, AND CONTRIBUTING TO THE ECONOMIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL WELL BEING OF THE COMMUNITY AND REGION.
WHEREAS PARKS AND RECREATION PROGRAMS ENCOURAGE HEALTHY, ACTIVE COMMUNITIES BY PROVIDING SPACE FOR POPULAR SPORTS, HIKING, TRAILS, AND MANY OTHER ACTIVITIES, DESIGNED TO PROMOTE ACTIVE LIFESTYLES.
WHEREAS THE PARKS AND NATURAL RECREATION AREAS ENSURE THE ECOLOGICAL BEAUTY OF OUR COMMUNITY AND PROVIDE A PLACE FOR CHILDREN AND ADULTS TO CONNECT WITH NATURE AND RECREATE OUTDOORS, AND WHEREAS THE CITY OF SACHSE RECOGNIZES THE BENEFITS DERIVED FROM PARKS AND RECREATION RESOURCES, NOW, THEREFORE, I, JEFF BICKERSTAFF, MAYOR OF THE CITY OF SACHSE, DO HEREBY PROCLAIM JULY, 2024, AS NATIONAL PARKS AND RECREATION MONTH HERE IN SACHSE, AND ENCOURAGE ALL TO CELEBRATE BY PARTICIPATING IN THE RAFFLE CONTEST AND AT THE PARKS AND RECREATION ACTIVITIES AND EVENTS.
CONGRATULATIONS. I GOT A LITTLE EXTRA SURPRISE FOR YOU.
AS WE TALKED ABOUT BEFORE, THE SACHSE NEWS DOES HAVE THEIR READER'S CHOICE AWARDS, AND I'M HAPPY TO SAY THAT HERE ARE THE WINNERS.
THE ACTUAL EVENT, I SHOULD SAY, IS A READER'S CHOICE, AND THAT IS THE RED, WHITE, AND BLUE BLAST.
CONGRATULATIONS TO THESE GUYS FOR WINNING THAT AWARD WITH THE SACHSE NEWS.
WE HAVE THE COMMEMORATIVE COPY AND THE CERTIFICATE FOR THEM TO CELEBRATE.
[00:05:12]
>> AS MAYOR BICKERSTAFF VERY WELL SAID, JULY IS NATIONAL PARKS AND RECREATION MONTH.
THIS YEAR, JUST LIKE LAST YEAR, WE HAVE OUR BASKET FULL OF GOODIES.
ALL OF IT IS DONATED FROM LOCAL BUSINESSES AND PLACES IN THE AREA.
THIS BASKET IS WORTH OVER $1,000.
IT'S GREAT FOR FAMILIES, PEOPLE WITH KIDS, EVEN JUST PEOPLE IN GENERAL.
THERE'S LOTS OF GOODIES IN HERE, I WOULD SAY.
YOU'LL BE SURE, YOU GO ON OUR FACEBOOK PAGE AND YOU'LL LEARN ABOUT THE RAFFLE.
WE'LL BE POSTING IT WITHIN THE NEXT WEEK OR TWO.
>> THANK YOU, MAYOR. NOW, I JUST WANT TO SAY THANK YOU TO THE AMAZING GROUP OF STAFF THAT I WORK WITH EACH DAY, BECAUSE JULY ISN'T JUST ABOUT ENJOYING THE GREEN SPACES AND THE RECREATIONAL FACILITIES THAT ARE IN OUR COMMUNITIES, BUT IT'S JUST ALSO ABOUT CELEBRATING THE GROUP OF PEOPLE THAT MAKE THE EXPERIENCES THAT WE HAVE IN THESE SPACES POSSIBLE.
I KNOW ALL OF THESE FOLKS LOVE WHAT THEY DO, AND THEY JUST LIKE SEEING EVERYONE AT THE RED, WHITE, AND BLUE BLAST.
>> I PROMISE WE'RE DONE NOW. YOU CAN SIT DOWN.
I JUST WANT TO ADD ONE MORE QUICK THING TO THAT WHEN I FIRST GOT HERE IN 1999, I THINK IT'S SAFE TO SAY THAT OUR PARKS PROGRAMS WEREN'T QUITE WHAT THEY ARE TODAY.
OUR PARK STAFF, STARTING WITH LANCE WHITWORTH, WE HIRED MANY YEARS AGO, I BELIEVE OR NOT FROM KANSAS, AND THE FIRST THING I SAID WAS THERE'S NO TREES IN KANSAS, WHICH ARE OUR TREES.
BUT ALL THE PARK STAFF HAS DONE A GREAT JOB.
I REALLY APPRECIATE YOU-ALL, AND WE'RE ABOUT READY TO DO ONE OF OUR SIGNATURE EVENTS, RED, WHITE, BLUE BLAST, SO WE'RE LOOKING FORWARD TO THAT.
AGAIN, THANK YOU TO ALL NOT JUST THE PARK EMPLOYEES REPRESENTED TONIGHT, BUT ALL OF OUR EMPLOYEES THAT COULDN'T BE HERE, AND TELL THEM THANK YOU FROM THE COUNCIL. WE APPRECIATE WHAT YOU'LL DO.
NEXT ON THE AGENDA IS PUBLIC COMMENT.
[C. Public Comment]
THE PUBLIC IS INVITED TO ADDRESS COUNSEL REGARDING ANY TOPIC, NOT ALREADY ON THE REGULAR AGENDA.COMMENTS REGARDING THE CONSENT AGENDA MAY BE ADDRESSED DURING PUBLIC COMMENT.
THE TIME LIMIT IS THREE MINUTES PER SPEAKER.
A PUBLIC COMMENT CARD SHOULD BE PRESENTED TO THE STATE SECRETARY PRIOR TO THE MEETING.
ACCORDING TO THE TEXAS OPEN MEETINGS ACT, COUNSEL IS PROHIBITED FROM DISCUSSING ANY ITEM NOT POSTED ON THE AGENDA, BUT WILL TAKE THE COMMENTS UNDER ADVISEMENT.
HAVE A COUPLE OF CARDS. MARTIN HOBOT.
>> MARTY GABLE. 651103, CIRCLE TOP OF THE HILL.
IN HONOR OF THE GREAT JOHNNY OLSON, I WANT TO SAY, D. D. WITT, COME ON BACK DOWN.
BECAUSE NOT TOO LONG AGO, YOU CAME UP HERE AND YOU ASKED ABOUT BLACKBURN-INGRAM AND YOU WERE TOLD DIDN'T MAKE THE BOND ELECTION, SO WE AIN'T GOING TO DO NOTHING.
WELL, IT'S SAD BECAUSE THERE'S A WALL JUST RIGHT AROUND THE CORNER FROM ME THAT DID NOT MAKE THE BOND ELECTION AND YOU SPENT A MILLION DOLLARS ON IT.
I'M GOING TO PUT THAT IN THE, THAT'S A CRAPPY ANSWER COLUMN.
I STOOD UP HERE LAST WEEK AND ASKED, "YOU'RE THROWING AWAY BAILEY ROAD.
WHO WERE THE CONTRACTORS AND WHAT WERE THE BIDS?" AND YOU JUST SAID, "TRUST ME." DO YOU NOT THINK THAT PEOPLE IN THIS CITY HAVE THE RIGHT TO KNOW THAT THERE WAS A LOW BID THAT WAS $2.5 MILLION BELOW THE ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE, AND YOU DIDN'T BOTHER TO SAY ANYTHING.
Y'ALL, AS A COUNCIL JUST SAT THERE AND DIDN'T SAY ANYTHING EITHER.
WHERE'S THE COMMUNICATION SUPPOSED TO BE BESIDES JUST TRUST ME? Y'ALL DIDN'T EVEN KNOW THAT THERE WERE SPEED BUMPS ON HIGHRIDGE ALLEY SO WHY SHOULD WE TRUST YOU? I'M NOT EVEN SURE ABOUT THE COMPETENCY.
$2.5 MILLION AND WE DON'T EVEN GET TO KNOW THAT.
I WENT TO A FARMER'S MARKET IN WYLIE A COUPLE OF WEEKS BACK, AND THEY PUT IT IN A MOVIE THEATER PARKING LOT.
[00:10:01]
I WENT TO A FARMERS MARKET IN ENNIS OVER THE WEEKEND.THEY CLOSED OFF A COUPLE STREETS.
WHERE'S THE TRUST? BECAUSE THERE'S NOT ANY.
Y'ALL SPEND MONEY LIKE A FRAT HOUSE CHECKBOOK AND THERE'S NO ACCOUNTABILITY.
WE DON'T HAVE TO TELL YOU, AND WE'RE SURE THE HELL NOT GOING TO.
THOSE ARE REALLY LASTING WORDS. THANK YOU. [APPLAUSE]
>> THANK YOU SO MUCH. I WOULD REMIND, NO OUTBURST FROM THE AUDIENCE.
THANK YOU. CANDICE, SORRY, I GOT YOUR NAME.
>> JANICE. COME ON DOWN. YOU CAN SET IT RIGHT THERE IF YOU WANT.
>> I'D LIKE TO LAUGH ABOUT IT IF IT'S JANICE, NOT JANEPHEW.
>> LET ME GET UP HERE SO YOU CAN HEAR ME. [OVERLAPPING]
>> YOU CAN ADJUST THAT IF YOU WANT TO.
>> I SAID I LIKE TO LAUGH ABOUT IT IF IT'S JANICE, NOT JANEPHEW.
>> JUST DOESN'T LOOK LIKE THAT.
WELL, TODAY, I WILL SAY IT AGAIN.
I'VE BEEN A SACHSE RESIDENT SINCE AUGUST OF 2000, AND I HAVE THE FOLLOWING REQUESTS.
ONE, WHEN A MOM STAYS HOME WITH HER AND HER HUSBAND'S CHILDREN AND BECOMES DISABLED AFTERWARD, SHE SHOULD QUALIFY FOR DISABILITY AT THE RATE OF HER HUSBAND'S PAY.
NOT BE PENALIZED FOR STAYING HOME WITH HER BABIES.
INSTEAD OF PUNISHING HER, GIVE HER SOCIAL SECURITY BENEFITS EQUAL TO THAT OF HER SPOUSE.
THEY EACH HAVE A PART IN THEIR MARRIAGE AND SHOULD BENEFIT FROM THEIR UNION EQUALLY.
NUMBER 2, AN AT-HOME MOM SHOULD GET A SPECIAL WORK CREDIT APPLIED FOR EACH QUARTER FOR HER ATTENTIVENESS TO HER DEPENDENT CHILDREN.
DAYCARE IN DALLAS COST AROUND $2,500 A MONTH, AND MOST FAMILIES CANNOT AFFORD IT, SO MOM HAS TO STAY HOME, SO SHE'S PENALIZED FOR THAT AS WELL, FOR BEING POOR.
NUMBER 3, TO DEMAND A MOM WITH PRESCHOOLERS OR DISABLED CHILDREN GET A JOB OPENS THE CRIMINAL DOOR FOR CHILD ABUSE.
FOR EXAMPLE, IF HER FOUR-YEAR-OLD GRABS A KNIFE THEN FALLS ON THE SHARP END AND GETS WOUNDED OR DIES, SHE WILL BE CRIMINALLY PROSECUTED FOR CHILD ABUSE.
HOWEVER, IT WAS THE LAW NUMBER EN-05-10029 THAT FORCED HER TO GET A JOB WHILE WATCHING HER CHILDREN.
NUMBER 4, SPOUSAL BENEFITS SHOULD BE OFFERED TO A DISABLED 50-YEARS-OLD, AT LEAST 50%, JUST AS IT IS OFFERED, SHE GETS FULL SURVIVOR BENEFITS IF HE DIES.
I'M JUST SAYING, MAKE IT EQUAL FOR SPOUSAL BENEFITS WHILE HE'S ALIVE THAT SHE SHOULD STILL QUALIFY.
HERE WE GO. NUMBER 5, GIVE DISABLED BENEFITS TO FULL RETIREMENT BENEFITS WITH NO PENALTY FOR REMARRYING BEFORE THE NORMAL RETIREMENT AGE.
THEY ARE DISABLED AND SHOULD NOT LOSE THEIR RIGHTS TO RECEIVE SOCIAL SECURITY BENEFITS FROM A PREVIOUS MARRIAGE, IF THE SECOND MARRIAGE DOES NOT LAST 10 YEARS.
MY CITY REQUEST, AND THIS IS THE FINAL IS FOR YARD ASSISTANCE FOR DISABLED RESIDENTS.
I HAVE NO INCOME BUT HAVE TO PAY FOR YARD HELP. [OVERLAPPING]
>> MA'AM, SORRY, YOUR TIME HAS EXPIRED BUT I'LL LET YOU FINISH YOUR THOUGHTS.
>> MY MIRACLE STORY AGAIN IS RECEIVINGFREEDOM.COM, AND THAT'S IT. THANK YOU.
>> THANK YOU, MA'AM. [APPLAUSE] THERE'S NO MORE OUTBURST FROM THE AUDIENCE. I APPRECIATE THAT. THANK YOU.
ANYONE ELSE LIKE TO ADDRESS COUNCIL AT THIS TIME? HEARING NONE. WE'LL MOVE ON. NEXT ITEM ON THE AGENDA IS ITEM D,
[D. Council/Staff Reports and Updates]
COUNCIL STAFF REPORTS AND UPDATES.ITEM 1, MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS REGARDING SPECIAL EVENTS, CURRENT ACTIVITIES, AND LOCAL ACHIEVEMENTS.
ANYONE ON COUNCIL LIKE TO ADDRESS THE AUDIENCE AT THIS TIME? MAYOR PRO TEM FRANKS.
[00:15:04]
>> THE PARKS AND REC DEPARTMENT, WHO WAS JUST UP HERE RECEIVING THEIR PROCLAMATIONS AND AWARDS, THAT'S GREAT, THEY'RE ON WEEK 3 OF SUMMER CAMPS.
THE COMMUNITY CENTER HAS ALREADY HAD OVER 160 KIDS IN A VARIETY OF CAMPS, INCLUDING COOKING, ART, KEYBOARD, PERFORMING ARTS, AND OTHER PRESCHOOL CAMPS.
WE ALSO HOSTED OUR FIRST TEEN-NIGHT, ABOUT 60 TEENS IN ATTENDANCE, WHICH IS FAR MORE THAN I THOUGHT WOULD SHOW UP TO BE HONEST.
THE NEXT TEEN-NIGHT WILL HAVE A NINJA-NIGHT THEME, OBSTACLE COURSE TYPE THINGS.
THAT'S COMING UP AT JUNE 21ST.
THE THIRD OF THREE SUMMER CONCERTS WILL BE AT J.K SACHSE PARK ON AUGUST 2ND, TAYLOR SWIFT COVER BAND, REPUTATION, WILL BE HERE.
I'M SURE I'LL BE THERE WITH MY DAUGHTER WHETHER I WANT TO OR NOT, SO I'LL SEE YOU-ALL THERE.
>> OTHER COUNCIL MEMBERS LIKE TO ADDRESS THE AUDIENCE AT THIS TIME?
>> MAYOR, JUST ONE QUICK ANNOUNCEMENT, I WANTED TO WELCOME ONE OF OUR NEW EMPLOYEES, SHANE DENNIS, AS A FIREFIGHTER RECRUIT.
HE JUST EARNED HIS EMT PARAMEDIC LICENSE, AND HE WILL BE ATTENDING THE FIRE ACADEMY, AND THEN WILL BE JOINING US ONCE HE COMPLETES THAT. WELCOME TO SHANE.
>> YES. INDEED, WELCOME, SHANE.
JUST A COUPLE OF ANSWERS FROM ME.
REGISTRATION FOR THE 2024 CITIZENS POLICE ACADEMY IS NOW OPEN. EXCUSE ME.
THE SPACE IS LIMITED, SO TURN IN YOUR APPLICATIONS NOW, CHECK THE CITY'S WEBSITE FOR DETAILS.
OUR OFFICE WILL BE CLOSED THIS COMING WEDNESDAY, JUNE 19TH IN OBSERVANCE OF THE JUNETEENTH HOLIDAY.
AS I MENTIONED BRIEFLY WITH THE PARKS DEPARTMENT AWARD, OUR ANNUAL RED WHITE AND BLUE BLAST IS COMING UP, JULY 3RD AT HERITAGE PARK.
WE HAVE LIVE ENTERTAINMENT WITH THE PARTY MACHINE BAND.
THAT BEGINS AT 6:00 P.M. WE HAVE FOOD TRUCKS, VENDORS, GAMES, AND SPLASH DOWN PROVIDED BY SACHSE FIRE RESCUE.
THANK YOU, CHIEF RICHARDSON FOR THAT.
THIS IS ALWAYS AN EXCITING EVENT, PROBABLY OUR BIGGEST EVENT OF THE YEAR, SO YOU DON'T WANT TO MISS IT.
AGAIN, JULY 3RD AT 6:00 P.M. HERITAGE PARK.
ALSO, OUR CITY OFFICES WILL BE CLOSED THE NEXT DAY, JULY 4TH, IN OBSERVANCE OF INDEPENDENCE DAY.
THEN AS A REMINDER, WE WILL NOT HAVE ANY REGULAR COUNCIL MEETINGS OR COMMISSION MEETINGS IN JULY.
OUR NEXT MEETING WILL BE A SPECIAL MEETING IN JULY 29TH FOR THE BUDGET.
YOU CAN CHECK THE CITY WEBSITE FOR UP TO DATE CALENDAR ENTRIES.
AND IF YOU IF YOU WANT TO GET AN AGENDA EMAILED TO YOU, THEN YOU CAN GO TO THE WEBSITE AND GET THAT BY SIGNING IN AND SUBSCRIBING.
THE KEYWORD THERE IS SUBSCRIBING, GO SUBSCRIBE.
IF YOU DO THAT, YOU CAN GET THE AGENDA EMAIL TO YOU.
IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS ABOUT THAT, YOU CAN CONTACT MISS GRANGER.
SHE WILL BE HAPPY TO HELP YOU DO THAT.
WITH THAT, SEEING NO OTHER ANNOUNCEMENTS, WE'LL MOVE ON.
NEXT ITEM ON THE AGENDA IS ITEM E CONSENT AGENDA.
[E. Consent Agenda - All items listed on the consent agenda will be considered by the City Council and will be enacted on by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Councilmember so requests.]
ALL ITEMS LISTED ON THE CONSENT AGENDA WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THE CITY COUNCIL, ENACTED BY ONE MOTION.THERE WILL BE NO SEPARATE DISCUSSION OF THESE ITEMS UNLESS A COUNCIL MEMBERS STILL REQUESTS.
ITEM E1 APPROVE THE JUNE 3RD, 2024, MEETING MINUTES.
ITEM 2 APPROVE A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE PROJECT SPECIFIC AGREEMENT REGARDING THE STRIPING OF TYPE B PUBLIC ROADWAYS MADE PURSUANT TO THE ROAD AND BRIDGE MASTER INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF SACHSE AND DALLAS COUNTY, FOR THE PURPOSE OF TRANSPORTATION RELATED MAINTENANCE AND REPAIRS TO BE UNDERTAKEN ON TYPE B ROADWAYS LOCATED WITHIN THE TERRITORIAL AND JURISDICTIONAL LIMITS OF THE CITY IN PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
ITEM 3, APPROVE A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING A PRELIMINARY 2024 ANNUAL SERVICE PLAN UPDATE FOR OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE FOR THE SACHSE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NUMBER 1, INCLUDING A DETERMINATION OF COST, A SERVICE PLAN, AND ASSESSMENT ROLES, DIRECTING THAT THE PRELIMINARY 2024 ANNUAL SERVICE PLAN UPDATE BE MADE AVAILABLE FOR PUBLIC INSPECTION, ORDERING A PUBLIC HEARING FOR AUGUST 19TH, 2024, TO CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE LEVYING ASSESSMENTS AGAINST THE ASSESSED PROPERTY WITHIN THE DISTRICT THAT IS ESPECIALLY BENEFITED BY AUTHORIZING SERVICES BEING FINANCED, AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE PUBLICATION AND MAILING OF NOTICES FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING, PROVIDING A SEPARABILITY CLAUSE, AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
ANY COUNCILMEMBER THAT WOULD LIKE TO REMOVE ANYTHING OFF THE CONSENT AGENDA? IF NOT, I'LL ENTERTAIN MOTIONS. MS. BUHLER.
>> I MAKE A MOTION TO ACCEPT THE CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED.
>> I HAVE A MOTION BY MS. BUHLER TO ACCEPT THE CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED.
DO I HAVE A SECOND. MR. PRESTENBERG.
>> SECOND BY MR. PRESTENBERG. ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? HEARING NONE. PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTE.
NEXT ITEM ON THE AGENDA IS ITEM F, REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS.
[1. Discuss and consider authorizing the City Manager to spend an amount not to exceed $300,000 for special debris pickup by Community Waste Disposal (CWD) due to the May 28, 2024, storms.]
[00:20:01]
ITEM 1, DISCUSS AND CONSIDER AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO SPEND AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $300,000 FOR SPECIAL DEBRIS PICKUP BY COMMUNITY WASTE DISPOSAL, CWD DUE TO THE MAY 28TH, 2024, INSTALLMENTS. MS. NASH.>> MAYOR AND COUNSEL, I WANTED TO GIVE YOU AN UPDATE ON THIS PRESENTATION BY GIVING YOU THIS PRESENTATION WITH REGARD TO WHERE WE ARE WITH STORM DEBRIS PICK UP AND GET SOME POLICY DIRECTION AND DECISION MAKING FROM YOU ALL AS TO WHAT YOU'D LIKE TO DO RELATIVE TO NEXT STEPS WITH PICKING THAT UP.
I WILL GIVE THE PRESENTATION THIS EVENING.
JASON RAMER WITH CWD IS HERE, ACTUALLY HE WAS ALREADY PLANNED TO BE HERE FOR THE COMMERCIAL TRANSITION DISCUSSION LATER IN THE AGENDA, AND HE GETS TO BE HERE TO TALK ABOUT THIS AS WELL.
REALLY, I JUST WANT TO PROVIDE AN OVERVIEW OF WHAT HAPPENED WITH THE STORM.
WHAT OUR COLLECTION PLAN HAS BEEN, HOW WE'VE COMMUNICATED WITH THE PUBLIC, SHARING SOME PHOTOS WITH YOU, GIVE YOU A CURRENT UPDATE, AND THEN REALLY HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY TO TALK TO YOU ALL ABOUT NEXT STEPS AND ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS THAT YOU HAVE.
SO ON THE MORNING OF MARCH 28, OBVIOUSLY, WE EXPERIENCED SEVERE WEATHER CONDITIONS THAT REALLY CAUSED WIDESPREAD DAMAGE THROUGHOUT THE CITY.
AND WE KNEW THAT WE HAD STRONG STORMS, BUT WITH SOME IN INTENSITY TO THEM, BUT THE SEVERE WINDS, CERTAINLY THE MAYOR CAN TELL YOU OVER 70 MILES AN HOUR AND REALLY EQUIVALENT TO A LEVEL 1 HURRICANE IN TERMS OF THE TYPES OF WINDS THAT WE HAD.
SO THAT REALLY LED TO DOWNED POWER LINES, OF COURSE, NUMEROUS BROKEN TREES THROUGHOUT THE CITY.
AND THE SEVERITY OF THIS WEATHER, UNFORTUNATELY, RESULTED IN CERTAINLY DISRUPTION OF SERVICES, AND WE'VE HAD TO DO SOME EXTENSIVE CLEANUP NOT JUST BY US, BUT RESIDENTS, AND IT'S REALLY BEEN A BIG COMMUNITY EFFORT.
BUT WE REALLY HAD COMMUNITY ISSUES CITYWIDE WITH THIS, WHERE WE HAD SOME NEIGHBORHOODS THAT WEREN'T IMPACTED AT ALL.
I'VE DRIVEN EVERY NEIGHBORHOOD IN THIS COMMUNITY WITH REGARD TO THIS STORM MULTIPLE TIMES, AND THERE WERE NEIGHBORHOODS THAT HAD NO POWER THAT LITERALLY DIDN'T HAVE A LEAF ON THE GROUND.
AND THEN I HAD NEIGHBORHOODS THAT HAD EVERY TREE DOWN YOU COULD POSSIBLY IMAGINE AND EVERYTHING KIND OF IN BETWEEN, SO REALLY DISPARATE EFFECTS THROUGHOUT THE COMMUNITY.
BUT WE WERE ABLE TO IMPLEMENT A PLAN WITH CWD STARTING ON SATURDAY, JUNE 1ST.
IT WAS REALLY THE FIRST DAY WE WERE ABLE TO START THE CLEAN UP.
CWD DID HAVE SOME SCHEDULING DIFFICULTIES TRYING TO COMPLETE THE MAY BLUE ZONE COLLECTION FROM THE HOLIDAY WEEK.
AS YOU RECALL, THAT LAST WEEK OF MAY, JUNE 1ST, WE KIND OF RAN INTO THE JUNE CALENDAR BECAUSE OF THAT, THE WAY THAT THOSE DATES FELL, WE'RE STILL TRYING TO CLEAN UP FROM THE MAY BLUE ZONE COLLECTION HOLIDAY WEEK.
SO THERE'S A LITTLE BIT OF CHALLENGES THERE WITH SCHEDULING TRYING TO GET THAT STARTED.
WE DID INVITE RESIDENTS TO PUT THEIR STORM DEBRIS ON THEIR FRONT CURBS WITH NO LIMITS ON SIZE.
AGAIN, JUST TRYING TO GET THINGS CLEANED UP AND OFF THE CURBS AS FAST AS WE CAN.
THROUGHOUT THE CITY, WE THOUGHT WHAT WOULD BE A GOOD IDEA IN DISCUSSIONS WITH CWD IS TO PUT ROLL OFF DUMPSTERS SO RESIDENTS COULD PUT ANY DEBRIS THAT THEY COULD HAUL OUT AT EITHER WHITT ELEMENTARY OR HERITAGE PARK.
THESE ARE EMPTIED EVERY OTHER DAY.
THEY ARE FILLED TO THE BRIM, AND THEN WE ARE EMPTYING THEM.
RESIDENTS ALSO HAVE THE ABILITY TO DO DIRECT DROP OFFS AT THE HINTON LANDFILL FOR FREE AS PART OF THE CITY'S SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY OF GARLAND.
BUT I KNOW THAT THE LINES THERE WERE PRETTY CRAZY, PEOPLE TRYING TO DUMP, AS WELL AS ALL OF THE REFUSE HAULERS ALSO TRYING TO TAKE THINGS THERE AT THE SAME TIME, SO IT WAS PRETTY CROWDED.
WE WORKED REALLY HARD SINCE MAY 28TH TO COMMUNICATE.
WE WERE COMMUNICATING ALMOST BY THE HOUR THAT FIRST DAY, AND MULTIPLE TIMES A DAY SINCE THEN, AND THEN WE'VE TRIED TO LIMIT SOME OF OUR EMAILS AND POSTINGS ON SOCIAL MEDIA, JUST TO MAKE SURE IMPORTANT INFORMATION DOESN'T GET HIDDEN.
AND I THINK ESTHER, OUR COMMUNICATION STRATEGIST, HAS DONE A GREAT JOB OF TRYING TO MAKE THESE LARGER POSTS TO KEEP THEM FULL OF INFORMATION, BUT THAT WAY, NOT BEING ONE AT A TIME, SO PEOPLE CAN READ ONE THING AND REALLY GET EVERYTHING THAT THEY NEED TO KNOW WITH REGARD TO OUR STORM CLEANUP.
>> WE POSTED OUR PLAN ON THURSDAY, MAY 30TH, AND INITIALLY, WE ANNOUNCED THAT REGULAR BULK AND BRUSH WOULD CONTINUE, AND WE ASKED THAT THE RESIDENTS WOULD PLEASE WAIT TO PLACE THEIR REGULAR BULK OUT UNTIL THEIR REGULARLY SCHEDULED PICKUP AND NOT DO IT DURING THIS SPECIAL DEBRIS CLEANUP.
BUT ONCE THE FULL SCOPE OF THE CLEANUP BECAME APPARENT, WE ANNOUNCED AT THE JUNE 3RD, CITY COUNCIL MEETING THAT CWD WOULD THEN BE JUST PRIORITIZING STORM DEBRIS COLLECTION.
[00:25:03]
AT THAT POINT, WE'RE ASKING RESIDENTS, PLEASE REFRAIN FROM PLACING YOUR REGULAR BULK OUT THIS MONTH.WE'RE TRYING TO GET A TIMELY PICKUP OF THIS BRUSH AND OTHER DEBRIS THAT PEOPLE CAN'T HELP, BUT NEED TO GET THAT PICKED UP.
JUNE 4TH, WE POSTED THE SAME INFORMATION ON OUR CHANNELS AND REALLY ASKED EVERYBODY TO GO AHEAD, PLEASE DROP OFF AT WHITT ELEMENTARY AND A HERITAGE PARK, BUT TRY TO KEEP ANY OF YOUR REGULAR BULK THAT ISN'T OF AN EMERGENCY MATTER TO TRY NOT TO PUT OFF PUTTING THAT OUT.
THEN WE DID A WEEKLY UPDATE ON JUNE 11TH, REITERATING THIS INFORMATION, AGAIN, ONLY PUTTING OUT THE EMERGENCY STUFF AND PROVIDING AN OVERALL UPDATE ON CWD'S PROGRESS.
HERE'S SOME PICTURES JUST OF A TYPICAL TRUCK THAT CWD HAS OUT THERE AND THE PILES THAT THEY'RE ATTEMPTING TO CLEAN UP, SO YOU KIND OF GET AN IDEA OF THE VEHICLE THAT'S USED AND THE PILES THAT FOLKS HAVE.
SOME OF THESE I WOULD CONSIDER THESE MAYBE TO BE SLIGHTLY AVERAGE.
A LOT OF WHAT YOU SEE OUT THERE IS MUCH BIGGER THAN THIS.
THE PHOTO TO THE LEFT WAS OF A HOME THE DAY THAT THE MAYOR AND I WENT OUT AND TALKED TO RESIDENTS, THIS WAS A HUGE TREE THAT JUST UPROOTED AND BROKE THEIR DRIVEWAY.
THEN YOU CAN SEE SOME OF THESE HOUSES WITH JUST YARDS AND YARDS OF DEBRIS IN FRONT OF THEM.
SINCE JUNE 3RD, CWD HAS SPENT OVER 197 HOURS AND COLLECTED 264 TONS OF MATERIAL FROM THE CURB.
I JUST WANT TO MAKE THAT POINT CLEAR THAT WHILE I KNOW SOME FOLKS ARE FRUSTRATED THAT SOME OF THE THINGS HAVEN'T BEEN PICKED UP, 264 TONS IS A LOT OF STUFF.
THEY HAVE COMPLETED 11 ROLL OFF HALLS AT THE HERITAGE PARK AND WHITT ELEMENTARY LOCATIONS, AND THEY HAVE USED A TRANSFER TRAILER LOCATED HERE AT CITY HALL TO OFFLOAD THE BRUSH TRUCK TO, AGAIN, TRY TO KEEP THEM GETTING OUT THERE AND PICKING THAT STUFF UP OFF OF PEOPLE'S PROPERTIES.
THIS SAVES THEM TIME BY NOT HAVING TO TAKE THOSE MULTIPLE TRIPS TO THE LANDFILL, AND AS I SAID, WAITING IN LINE AT THE LANDFILL, AT ONE POINT WAS TAKING TWO HOURS JUST TO BE ABLE TO GET INTO THE LANDFILL AND DUMP.
WHAT WE'RE REALLY LOOKING FOR HERE IS A CONVERSATION TONIGHT AMONGST YOU ALL TO GET SOME POLICY DIRECTION ON WHAT WE WANT TO DO NEXT WITH REGARD TO THIS SPECIAL STORM CLEANUP.
WHAT WE PUT ON THE AGENDA IS SEEKING APPROVAL REALLY TO COVER THE COSTS IF WE WERE TO GO AND TRY TO CLEAN EVERYTHING ELSE UP.
THIS IS AN ESTIMATE BASED ON A CONVERSATION THAT I HAD WITH JASON RAMER ABOUT WHAT WE THINK IT WOULD TAKE TO DO THIS.
WE'RE REALLY JUST LOOKING FOR SOME FEEDBACK ON WHAT TO DO NEXT WITH REGARD TO THE DEBRIS REMOVAL.
THE WAY WE WOULD FUND THIS IS, AS YOU RECALL, FROM LAST YEAR, FROM THE BUDGET, THE 2023-'24 BUDGET, YOU WILL ALLOW ME TO SET ASIDE A CITY MANAGER CONTINGENCY OF $100,000 FOR SITUATIONS JUST LIKE THIS.
I DIDN'T THINK WE'D END UP USING IT THE FIRST YEAR, BUT HERE WE ARE.
THIS IS A POSSIBILITY, BUT I OBVIOUSLY HAVE TO HAVE CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL IN WHICH TO DO SO.
THEN ALSO, WE THINK THAT WE WILL HAVE DEPARTMENT SAVINGS FROM THINGS LIKE VACANCIES AND OTHER OPPORTUNITIES WITHIN DEPARTMENTS THAT WE THINK WOULD BE SUFFICIENT ENOUGH AMOUNT TO COVER ALL OF THE NEED.
AGAIN, AS OF LATE LAST WEEK, 197 HOURS AND 264 TONS, BUT ONLY 20% OF THE CITY HAS BEEN COLLECTED.
NOW, WHAT I WANT TO SAY ABOUT THAT IS, I DON'T WANT YOU TO DO THE MATH AND THINK THIS IS A LINEAR EQUATION BECAUSE IT ISN'T.
JUST BECAUSE 20% HAS BEEN COLLECTED, THAT DOESN'T MEAN THAT IT'S GOING TO BE AN EQUAL AMOUNT FOR 80% OF THE REST OF THE CITY.
THEY TRIED TO HIT WORST FIRST AND THE STREETS THAT HAD SUCH BIG PILES THAT THERE WERE SITE ISSUES, SITE VISIBILITY, THAT KIND OF THING.
WE'RE TRYING TO REALLY HIT THE HARDEST HIT ONES FIRST.
THAT'S HOW WE ARE LOOKING AT THIS FROM HERE IS WE DO BELIEVE THAT IF WE DO UTILIZE THE FUNDS UP TO THE AMOUNT THAT YOU AUTHORIZE, THAT WE WILL BE ABLE TO COLLECT THIS.
WHAT I DO WANT TO MENTION THOUGH IS A CAVEAT TO THAT IS UNDERSTAND THAT WHEN WE GO BUY A HOME OR HOMES ON THE STREET AND WE PICK UP THIS DEBRIS, PEOPLE ARE PUTTING MORE OUT.
THE HARD PART IS, YOU CAN STILL SWEEP A CITY, THE WHOLE CITY, AND THEY'LL PUT MORE OUT AGAIN.
ONE OF THE OTHER QUESTIONS AND TOPICS I THINK THAT NEEDS TO BE TALKED ABOUT TONIGHT IS, AT WHAT POINT DO WE SAY, THIS IS THE AMOUNT WE CAN PICK UP AND THIS IS WHAT WE CAN DO?
[00:30:02]
BECAUSE OTHERWISE, I THINK WE COULD GET IN A SITUATION WHERE IT JUST DOESN'T END AND WE KEEP GOING AROUND THE CITY AND PICKING UP MORE AND MORE RELATIVE TO THAT.QUESTIONS, LET ME TURN THE NEXT SLIDE.
WE'RE REALLY IN CONSTANT COMMUNICATION WITH CWD.
OBVIOUSLY, LOGAN IS FEELING THE MAJORITY OF THE CALLS. HE'S STILL HERE.
I'M PRETTY GLAD OF THAT BECAUSE HE'S BEEN HIT PRETTY HARD WITH CONTACT FROM RESIDENTS ABOUT THIS AND FRUSTRATIONS, AND HE'S HANDLED THAT VERY WELL AND VERY PROFESSIONALLY AND TRYING TO GET PEOPLE HELP AND GETTING THEM ANSWERS AS WE CAN.
BUT AGAIN, AS I SAID, WE REALLY WANT TO UNDERSTAND DIRECTION AND FEEDBACK FROM YOU ALL.
HOW MUCH MORE DO WE WANT TO PROCEED? DO YOU WANT TO PROCEED WITH SPECIAL COLLECTION POINTS? WHEN DO YOU WANT TO GO AHEAD AND REINSTATE STANDARD BOLT COLLECTION? WE'RE GOING TO CONTINUE TO PROVIDE WEEKLY UPDATES ON STORM DEBRIS MANAGEMENT TO RESIDENTS.
WE'RE GOING TO CONTINUE TO DO THAT SO PEOPLE UNDERSTAND WHERE WE'VE BEEN, WHERE WE ARE, WHAT WE'RE TRYING TO ACCOMPLISH, SO PEOPLE FEEL LIKE WE'RE HEARING THEM AND THEY'RE GETTING UPDATES AS TO WHAT'S HAPPENING SO THEY DON'T THINK WE'RE NOT DOING THINGS THAT WE ARE WORKING TOWARDS TRYING TO FIND A SOLUTION AND GET THIS STUFF PICKED UP.
WITH THAT, MAYOR, REALLY ANSWER QUESTIONS AND GET FEEDBACK AND INPUT FROM YOU ALL. [INAUDIBLE] I KNOW HOW TO PROCEED.
>> THANK YOU, MS. NASH. QUESTIONS FROM COUNCIL? MR. LINDSAY.
>> WELL, I SEE THAT WE MADE A PROMISE TO OUR CITIZENS ALREADY.
WE SAID, IF YOU PUT IT OUT ON THE CURB, WE WILL GET TO IT, SO I'M DEFINITELY FOR COMPLETING THE REMAINING AREAS AND IT SHOULD JUST BE A SWEEP.
AT THIS POINT, WE CAN'T GO BACK AND REVISIT THE AREAS THAT WE DID.
I UNDERSTAND EARLY ON, WE MAY HAVE REVISITED SOME AREAS BECAUSE IT WAS STILL IN THE PROCESS OF PEOPLE WHO ARE STILL GETTING OUT TO THE CURB, BUT BY NOW, IT SHOULD BE ASSUMED THAT ALL THE DEBRIS HAS MADE IT TO THE CURB, SO WE SHOULD SYSTEMATICALLY GO THROUGH THE REMAINDER OF THE CITY.
FULFILL OUR PROMISE THAT WE MADE, GET IT TO THE CURB, WE WILL PICK IT UP.
CONTINUE OFFERING THE ROLL OFF DUMPSTERS AS WELL.
THE QUESTION THAT I DO HAVE IS THAT, CLAY JENKINS WITHIN THE COUNTY OF DALLAS, ALSO, I GUESS, IN COLLIN COUNTY AND THEN ALSO OUR STATE GOVERNOR DECLARED STATE OF EMERGENCY.
FEMA HAS PICKED IT UP AS WELL FROM A NATIONAL LEVEL.
THERE'S VARIOUS REIMBURSEMENTS THROUGH FEMA, AS I UNDERSTAND IT.
IS THERE ANYTHING THAT WE CAN SAY TO OUR CITIZENS REGARDING WHAT REIMBURSEMENTS WE MAY OR MAY NOT BE ELIGIBLE FOR AT THIS PERIOD?
>> THAT'S A GREAT POINT, COUNCILMAN LINDSAY, AND I DON'T WANT TO MAKE ANY PROMISES WITH THIS BECAUSE I'VE BEEN THROUGH THE FEMA REIMBURSEMENT PROCESS MANY TIMES IN MY CAREER.
SOMETIMES THEY WILL SAY THAT WE WILL GET 100% REIMBURSEMENT, AND IT JUST DOESN'T END UP HAPPENING.
WE ARE WORKING IN THE FIRE DEPARTMENT WITH KYLE POTRAZA, EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT ANALYST AND CHIEF WADE TO TRY TO GATHER ALL THE DATA TO TURN IN ALL OF THE PAPERWORK TO MAKE SURE THAT THERE IS A POSSIBILITY THAT WE CAN GET REIMBURSED FOR AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE.
I WOULD LOVE TO SAY THAT WE COULD GET REIMBURSED FOR ALL OF IT, BUT I JUST DON'T KNOW.
I'VE SIGNED ALL THE DOCUMENTATION FOR THE TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT TO START THE PROCESS, AND WE ARE RECORDING ALL OF THAT INFORMATION AND MAKING SURE THAT WE RECORD TIME THAT'S BEEN WORKED AND AMOUNTS THAT HAVE BEEN HAULED AND ALL OF THOSE THINGS.
I HOPE THAT WE WILL GET REIMBURSED FOR THIS, OFTEN THOUGH THESE REIMBURSEMENTS COULD TAKE A YEAR OR TWO AS THEY TRY TO SORT THROUGH THESE KINDS OF STORMS. WE WILL ABSOLUTELY DO THE WORK TO SUBMIT EVERYTHING, AND I HOPE THAT WE CAN GET REIMBURSED FOR IT. YES.
>> FIRST, I WANT TO SAY THANKS TO OUR CITY STAFF AND CWD.
I LOVE THE PRESENCE THAT I'VE SEEN, NOT ONLY ONLINE, BUT JUST OUT IN THE COMMUNITY.
I LOVE THAT THE TRUCKS ARE ROLLING, AND I LOVE THAT THE PICKUPS TO DATE HAVE HAPPENED AND THE TONNAGE THAT'S BEEN PICKED UP SHOWS ALL THE HARD WORK TO DATE.
ON THIS UP TO $300,000 MARK, IS THAT JUST FOR CLEANUP? THAT'S NOT ANY REPLACEMENT OF ANY LOST TREES OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT?
>> THEN FROM A BULK PICKUP STANDPOINT, DO WE BELIEVE THAT UP TO OR NOT TO EXCEED 300K WILL LAST FOR THE 80%?
>> GREAT. THEN WHAT'S THE TIME FRAME FOR THE REMAINING 80%? WE'VE DONE THE MASS, THE 20% FIRST, BUT WHAT'S THE OTHER 80% LOOK LIKE?
[00:35:01]
>> WE NEED TO WORK WITH JASON ON A PLAN SPECIFICALLY AS TO HOW WE'RE GOING TO FOCUS ON THIS.
FIRST, WHAT I WANTED TO DO BEFORE HE PUT FORTH THAT EFFORT WAS TO SEE WHAT YOU ALL WERE INTERESTED IN DOING.
BUT WE THINK IT COULD TAKE THREE WEEKS TO A MONTH.
>> WELL, THAT LEADS ME TO MY NEXT THING IS, WOULD JULY 1ST BE TOO SOON? IT SOUNDS LIKE IT WOULD BE.
I WOULD RECOMMEND JUST FOR THEIR SAKE AND OUR OWN PLANNING SAKE THAT IT STARTS ON THE 1ST.
WHATEVER WE DECIDE TO DO, IF WE THINK IT'S TWO-AND-HALF MONTHS, THEN LET'S MAKE IT SEPTEMBER 1ST.
IF WE THINK IT'S A MONTH AND A HALF THEN AUGUST 1ST TO ROLL OUT NORMAL BULK PICKUP SCHEDULES.
TO COUNCILMAN LINDSAY'S QUESTION OR COMMENT YES, SOME PEOPLE MIGHT BE LEAVING OUT MULTIPLE DAYS WORTH OF STUFF AFTER YOU JUST PICK IT UP, BUT WE MADE A PROMISE.
THEN LET THEM KNOW AND COMMUNICATE THAT YOU'VE GOT THIS, I WANT TO SAY GET OUT OF JAIL FREE CARD, BUT IT'S SIMILAR TO THAT.
BUT IF THEY GOT STUFF, GET IT OUT BECAUSE ON THIS DATE, IT'S GOING BACK TO NORMAL 7 CUBIC YARD, 8 CUBIC.
>> SIX. THANK YOU. I KNOW WE'VE TALKED ABOUT IT MANY TIMES.
>> I WON'T BRING UP SISTER CITIES OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT, BUT I LOVE READING THE DAILY TEA ON SOCIAL MEDIA, AND THERE'S A LOT OF COMPLAINTS, AND WHEN I DIVE DEEPER, AND I ASK, ARE YOU SACHSE? THE FIRST THING I GET IS NO.
REALLY HUGE COMBINATIONS TO THE CITY STAFF AND THE CWD, I REALLY APPRECIATE IT.
>> OTHER QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS FROM COUNCIL? MS. BUHLER.
>> I AGREE WITH MY COLLEAGUES.
THIS IS DEFINITELY OUR RESPONSIBILITY TO TAKE CARE OF OUR CITIZENS.
WE SAID WE WOULD PICK IT ALL UP, SO THIS CHARGE IS A VITAL SERVICE FOR OUR CITY, SO I SUPPORT IT.
>> I AGREE ALSO THAT SINCE WE MADE THE COMMITMENT, WE HAVE TO DO THAT.
ALSO, I GOT TO COME BACK AND MAKE US ANOTHER COMMENT.
IF YOU REMEMBER, JUST A FEW MONTHS AGO, WE WERE DOING A BULK TRASH PRICE PICKUP.
WE HAD A PHENOMENAL OFFER FROM CWD THAT KEEP A CERTAIN PRICE.
NOW, I THINK THE SCENARIO I USED WAS SIMILAR TO BUYING GASOLINE.
YOU HAVE A CONTRACT THAT YOU COULD BUY 10 GALLONS OR 10 CUBIC YARDS FOR SO MANY CENTS PER YARD.
WE DIDN'T WANT TO UP THAT TO ABOUT $0.19 PER YARD OR PER GALLON, SO WE DECIDED, WE'LL KEEP IT AT SIX CUBIC YARDS, WHERE WE COULD HAVE GONE TO 10, THEN THAT WOULD HAVE BEEN A LOT OF OUR PROBLEMS NOW BECAUSE RIGHT NOW, ANYTHING WHEN YOU GO BACK TO NORMAL PICKUP, ANYTHING OVER SIX CUBIC YARDS PER RESIDENCE IS GOING TO BE EXTRA COST TO THEM, WHERE WE COULD HAVE HAD 10 YARDS AT THE SAME PRICE.
I THINK WE, AS A CITY COUNCIL HAS BEEN REMISS, NOT LOOKING AT LONG-TERM FUTURE.
AS WE ALL KNOW, TORNADOES IS JUST LIKE FLOODS.
THEY COME IN CYCLES, THEY COME IN 10, 50, 100-YEAR, 200-YEAR FLOODPLAINS YEARS.
WE'VE GOT TO START MAKING ARRANGEMENTS.
WE HAVEN'T HAD A TORNADO LIKE THIS IN YEARS, BUT WE'RE DUE FOR ONE.
WE MIGHT DUE FOR ANOTHER ONE, AND WE HAVE MADE NO ARRANGEMENTS.
A LOT OF OUR PROBLEMS NOW IS THE CITY'S DOING, AND SO I THINK THE CITY SHOULD BE THE ONE TO COUGH UP THE MONEY AND DO WHAT IT TAKES TO GET THE COMMUNITY PICKED UP.
OTHERWISE, IT'S GOING TO BE A LONG TIME AND A LOT OF MONEY FOR THE RESIDENTS THAT THEY SHOULDN'T HAVE TO BE PAYING FOR BECAUSE WE HAD AN OPPORTUNITY TO SOLVE THIS PROBLEM, A PART OF IT ANYWAY.
YOU LOOK THROUGH TOWN, THERE'S A TREMENDOUS AMOUNT OF LIMBS THAT ARE STILL IN THE TREES, STILL IN THE YARDS, BECAUSE THERE ARE NO PLACE TO PUT THEM OUT FRONT.
WE CAN'T REALLY SAY, WELL, WE'RE ONLY GOING TO PICK THIS BULK UP ON EMERGENCY BASIS FOR ANOTHER TWO WEEKS OR THREE WEEKS.
IT'S GOING TO BE LIKE THE ICE STORM LAST WINTER.
YOU'RE NOT GOING TO SEE A LOT OF DAMAGE UNTIL LATER.
I THINK IT'S OUR RESPONSIBILITY TO CONTINUE TO DO THIS AS NEEDED UNTIL WE GET IT PICKED UP.
>> WELL, I'LL BE THE ONE THAT SAYS THAT 300,000 IS RIDICULOUS.
BUT EVERY PRICE TAG OF EVERY PROJECT YOU'LL BRING TO COUNCIL IS RIDICULOUS.
THAT'S JUST THE NATURE OF THE BEAST THESE DAYS.
I CONSIDER MY NEIGHBORHOOD ONE OF THE HARDEST HIT AREAS, BUT I'M SURE EVERYONE THINKS THEIR NEIGHBORHOOD IS THE HARDEST HIT AREA.
MY NEIGHBOR AND I CUT TREES THE WEEK AND AFTER IN BOTH MY NEIGHBOR'S YARD, PUT THEM ON THE CURB.
THEY WERE PICKED UP WITHIN THE WEEK.
HE'S GOT THE SAME, IF NOT MORE ON HIS CURB NOW.
HE HAS A LARGER LOTS OF TREE DAMAGE, LOTS OF TREES.
[00:40:03]
WHAT HAPPENS TO THE TYPE OF SCENARIO THAT'S ALREADY BEEN PICKED UP THAT PEOPLE MAY HAVE NOT HAD AN OPPORTUNITY TO HAVE CREWS COME OUT WITHIN THE WEEK OR TWO OF THEIR BULK TRASH COME BY AND PICK THOSE UP.NOW THAT 20% HAS ALREADY BEEN PICKED UP, SO WE'RE NOT GOING TO GIVE THEM AN OPPORTUNITY TO GET PICKED UP AGAIN, OR ARE WE? THAT'S WHAT I WANT TO IRON OUT.
I FEEL LIKE I'M TALKING TO MY KIDS.
>> WELL, WHO'S YOUR QUESTION DIRECTED TO?
>> YES. THAT'S A DECISION WE HAVE TO MAKE. IT'S NOT ONE PERSON.
I IMAGINE THAT THERE'S NOT TOO MANY HOUSEHOLDS, BUT AS COUNCILMAN MILLSAP SAID, THERE'S A COUPLE OF BRANCHES OF MY TREES THAT ARE WAY UP THERE, MY TREE GUY SAYS, WE'LL GET TO THEM.
I DON'T KNOW WHEN THAT'S GOING TO BE.
I'M NOT IN A HURRY, HE'S NOT IN A HURRY.
WELL, HE PROBABLY IS, BUT HE'S BUSY.
I GET CARDS ON MY DOOR A COUPLE A WEEK FROM TREE PEOPLE, AND I'VE CALLED A COUPLE OF THEM AND THEY'RE LIKE, WE'D BE GLAD TO GET OUT THERE.
GREAT. WHEN CAN YOU BE HERE? WE'LL LET YOU KNOW.
WE WANT YOUR BUSINESS, I JUST DON'T KNOW WHEN WE CAN COME DO IT.
AS A LOT OF THESE COMPANIES AND/OR FOLKS ARE BUSY WITH OTHER OPPORTUNITIES, I'LL SAY IS FOR THEIR BUSINESS.
I JUST DON'T KNOW THAT THE 80% THAT HASN'T BEEN PICKED UP, AND THE ONE TIME THROUGH, IF THAT'S GOING TO BE EQUITABLE FOR SOME OF THE HARDER HIT AREAS, AND SOME OF THE HARDER HIT AREAS MAY NOT EVEN HAVE HAD AN OPPORTUNITY TO BE PICKED UP YET.
>> DO WE HAVE OTHER QUESTIONS FROM COUNCIL MEMBERS, SO WE'LL GO THERE FIRST. MS. BUHLER.
>> AT THIS POINT WHERE SO MUCH NOT PICKED UP, I WOULD BE HESITANT TO MAKE A DATE.
LIKE YOU SAID, SOME PEOPLE MAY NOT HAVE THE ROOM TO PUT OUT THE DEBRIS BECAUSE THERE'S SO MUCH ALREADY ON THE CURB.
COULD WE JUST ADDRESS THIS AT EVERY CITY COUNCIL MEETING GOING FORWARD UNTIL WE HAVE A BETTER IDEA OF THE TIMELINE AND ADDRESS A DATE AT THE POINT WHERE WE FEEL LIKE IT'S COMING TO AN END?
>> WELL, MY QUESTION ACTUALLY BE, WHEN YOU SAY ADDRESS IT AT EVERY MEETING?
>> WE'LL GET AN UP STORM, CLEAN UP UP DATE, AND THEN AT SOME POINT WHEN WE'VE REALIZED WE'RE REACHING COMPLETION, THEN SET A DATE.
I JUST FEEL LIKE IT'S PREMATURE WHEN 20% HAS TAKEN 17 DAYS.
WE DON'T REALLY KNOW WHAT TIMELINE THE REST OF THE CITY IS GOING TO BE.
>> NO, I THINK YOU'RE RIGHT ABOUT THAT.
IRONICALLY, WE'VE BEEN TALKING ABOUT THE COST OF NOT BEING LINEAR, THE OTHER 80%, AND I THINK THE TIME FRAME IS ANOTHER GOOD EXAMPLE OF THAT, IS THAT NOBODY REALLY KNOWS FROM TODAY IT'LL BE 28 DAYS, AND IT WILL BE DONE.
THAT'S PROBABLY THE QUESTION NOBODY COULD PROBABLY ANSWER, REALLY. MR. LINDSAY.
>> I DID HAVE A QUESTION FOR OUR CITY MANAGER HERE JUST ON POLICY BASED ON WHAT MAYOR PRO TEM FRANKS WAS SAYING.
IF YOU HIRE A PROFESSIONAL TO COME OUT AND DO TREE TRIMMING, OUR POLICY AND THE COMMUNICATIONS THAT I'VE SEEN THAT WE PUT OUT THE WAY.
I READ THAT IS, YOU'RE HIRING A PROFESSIONAL, THEY ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR HAULING IT OFF, AND THAT IT'S NOT LEGAL IN THAT SENSE TO PUT YOUR LIMBS AND TREES AT THE FRONT.
>> I'M NOT SURE WHAT SPECIFICALLY YOU'RE REFERRING TO.
WHAT WE'RE TRYING TO TELL PEOPLE IS, YOU'VE HIRED A SERVICE, AND THAT SERVICE IS SUPPOSED TO THEN TAKE THOSE LIMBS FOR YOU.
THEY'RE A CONTRACTOR, AND SO CONTRACTORS DOING THEIR OWN WORK SHOULD HAUL OFF THEIR OWN WORK AND SO THAT'S WHAT WE'RE SAYING IN THAT.
WHAT OUR GOAL HERE IS RESIDENTS TRIMMING THEIR OWN TREES AND TRYING TO TAKE CARE OF THEIR THINGS AND PUT THEM TO THE CURB WE WANT TO PICK THAT STUFF UP FOR THEM AND GET IT OFF OF THE CURB FOR THEM.
THOSE THAT ARE HIRING TREE SERVICES, THAT'S A SERVICE THAT SHOULD BE THEN TAKING THAT.
THAT'S A CONTRACTOR SERVICE THEY SHOULD BE TAKING THAT AWAY.
>> WE'RE USING THE TERM SHOULD VERSUS MUST SO TECHNICALLY, SOMEBODY COULD PAY A PROFESSIONAL, AND IT'S OKAY IF THEY DUMP THE ADDITIONAL DEBRIS ONTO THE CURB ON THERE.
>> IT'S NOT OUR PREFERENCE, BUT THEY CERTAINLY CAN.
>> GOT YOU. AS FAR AS THE TIMING OF IT, THE WAY THAT I LOOK AT THE STORM DEBRIS REMOVAL IS WHAT FELL TO THE GROUND.
UNDERSTANDABLY TREES, CERTAIN LIMBS MAY HAVE FALLEN, AND NOW IT'S ADVANTAGEOUS TO GO AND TRIM, FOR EXAMPLE, THE OTHER SIDE OF THE TREE TO BALANCE IT OUT AND STUFF LIKE THAT AND TO ME, THAT JUST FALLS UNDERNEATH THE REGULAR, YARD WORK THAT SOMEBODY WOULD DO.
THE LONGER WE TAKE AND GETTING TO THE LAST PEOPLE, THE MORE THAT THEY WILL CONTINUE TO ADD TO A PILE I KNOW I CERTAINLY WOULD,
[00:45:04]
IF IT WAS AT MY RESIDENCE, I'M GOING TO CUT DOWN ADDITIONAL STUFF AND KEEP DOING IT AND ADDING TO THE PILE SO I DON'T KNOW HOW YOU STOP THAT.I HEARD EQUITABLE, IT'S THE FOUR LETTER F WORD THAT I'VE HEARD SO MUCH ABOUT IS FAIR AND UNFORTUNATELY, SYSTEMS LIKE THIS, THEY'RE NOT FAIR.
ON THERE YOU CAN'T MAKE EVERYBODY HAPPY SO WE DO OUR BEST ATTEMPT I THINK WE FOCUS ON WHAT FELL TO THE GROUND.
WE HIT 20% OF THE CITY WE GO THROUGH THE REMAINING AREA AND WE GET IT OUT.
I DON'T THINK THERE'S NECESSARILY ANYTHING ABOUT A CERTAIN DATE THAT WE GET IT DONE AS QUICKLY AS WE CAN, AND THEN WE GO BACK TO BUSINESS AS USUAL.
I LIKE HAVING THE UPDATES AT THE COUNCIL MEETING, THOUGH, BUT UNFORTUNATELY, WE'RE NOT GOING TO HAVE A COUNCIL MEET UNTIL THE END OF JULY, HOPEFULLY BY THEN, WE'RE CLOSE TO BEING DONE.
>> COUNCILMAN LINDSAY TO THAT POINT, THAT'S PART OF THE REASON WHY WE WANTED THE AUTHORIZATION AS HIGH AS WE WANTED FOR THE DOLLAR AMOUNT AND CERTAINLY I CAN SHARE UPDATES WITH YOU ON WHERE WE'RE AT WITH THAT.
BUT WHAT I DIDN'T WANT TO DO IS ASK FOR AN AMOUNT AND HAVE TO COME BACK.
I WANTED TO BE ABLE TO HAVE THE ABILITY TO DO THIS ALL DURING THE MONTH OF JULY AND GET A HANDLE ON IT AND THEN BE ABLE TO COME BACK AND SAY, HERE'S WHERE WE ARE, WHERE DO WE WANT TO PROCEED FROM HERE?
>> REAL QUICK, I DID WANT TO GET CLARIFICATION ON WHAT YOU SAID EARLIER ABOUT PICKING UP AN AREA AND PEOPLE PUTTING STUFF BACK OUT IN THAT AREA BECAUSE IF I'VE HEARD MR. LINDSAY CORRECTLY, WE DON'T HAVE THE ISSUE WITH YOU'RE NOT PICKED UP YET AND ADDING TO IT THE ISSUE WAS, YOU'VE ALREADY BEEN PICKED UP IN YOUR [OVERLAPPING]
>> I THINK IT'S TWOFOLD THERE ARE PARTS OF THE CITY THAT HAVE NOT BEEN PICKED UP YET I DON'T WANT TO SUGARCOAT THIS AT ALL.
THERE ARE PARTS OF THE CITY, LIKE I SAID, WITH THAT MUCH TONNAGE, WE JUST HAVEN'T GOTTEN TO YET.
BUT I THINK IT'S A POLICY DECISION TO SAY, DO WE MARK OFF ALL THOSE STREETS ON THE MAP, AND ONCE WE'VE PICKED THEM UP, ARE WE GOING TO GO BACK AROUND AGAIN? I GUESS THAT'S THE THING I THINK WE NEED REALLY SOME GOOD CLARIFICATION ON SO WE KIND OF UNDERSTAND WHERE TO STOP.
>> THAT MAKES MORE SENSE. MS. HOWARD,
>> THAT WAS WHAT I WAS GOING TO ASK IS THAT I THINK WE NEED A SYSTEM IN PLACE THAT ONCE YOUR STUFF HAS BEEN PICKED UP, YOU DON'T GET IT PICKED UP AGAIN TILL WE GO BACK TO REGULAR SERVICE.
OUR NEIGHBORHOOD GOT PICKED UP RELATIVELY EARLY AND THEN WE ALSO WERE ON THE SCHEDULE FOR REGULAR BULK PICKUP AND THERE IS MORE DEBRIS AND MATTRESSES AND TOILETS AND WASHERS AND THERE'S STUFF ALL OVER THE NEIGHBORHOOD BECAUSE PEOPLE THINK BULK TRASH IS HAPPENING, BUT IT ISN'T.
WE'RE GOING TO DO THAT ALL SUMMER LONG BUT OUR STORM DEBRIS GOT PICKED UP ONCE ALREADY SO PICKING UP ALL THAT STUFF IN MY NEIGHBORHOOD ISN'T FAIR TO A NEIGHBORHOOD THAT HASN'T HAD ANYTHING PICKED UP, BUT WE ALSO DON'T WANT JUNK SITTING EVERYWHERE UNTIL THE 1ST SEPTEMBER BECAUSE WE'RE PICKING UP BRUSH FROM A STORM THAT HAPPENED IN JUNE SO I DON'T KNOW WHAT THE SOLUTION TO THAT IS.
I DON'T KNOW IF THAT'S A MAP AND AN ADDRESS MARK OFF OR HOW THAT WORKS, BUT I THINK THERE NEEDS TO BE SOMETHING TO KEEP US FROM BEING IN A LITTLE BIT OF A PERPETUAL PROBLEM.
THE SECOND THING I WAS GOING TO SAY IS THAT JUST THE $300,000 IS A HORRIFIC AMOUNT OF MONEY.
I WILL SAY MY DAUGHTER LIVES IN AN AREA THAT DOESN'T HAVE A CITY.
THEY'RE NOT IN A CITY AND THEY HAD A HUGE STORM, HAD A THIRD OF THE CANOPY IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD LANDED ON THE STREET IN AN ICE STORM AND THE MUD THAT THEY LIVE IN SAID, TOO BAD FOR YOU, DEAL WITH IT AND IT COST EVERY HOME OWNER ABOUT 5-$700 TO DEAL WITH THE DEBRIS THAT WAS ON THE GROUND.
IF YOU DO THE MATH ON THE 300 AND ABOUT 8,000 HOUSEHOLDS, THAT'S ABOUT $40 A HOUSEHOLD THAT'S A DIFFERENT NUMBER THAN HIRING SOMEBODY YOURSELF TO COME DO THIS.
I DON'T WANT TO PUT THAT BURDEN ON FOLKS, BUT EVERYBODY GETS ALL THEIR TREES PICKED UP ONCE AND ONCE IT'S ALL PICKED UP, THEN WE'LL JUST DEAL WITH WHAT'S LEFT AS REGULAR BULK TRASH, OR HOWEVER WE NEED TO DO IT.
>> WELL, ANOTHER ALTERNATIVE TO THAT, COUNCILWOMAN IS WE COULD I MEAN, WE HAVEN'T REALLY NONE OF YOU HAVE BROUGHT BACK UP AGAIN WE COULD KEEP THE ROLL-OFFS.
I MEAN, AND ALLOW PEOPLE TO BE ABLE TO PUT IN THEM.
WHAT WE'RE FINDING, THOUGH IS, WE'RE FINDING CONTRACTORS DUMPING IN THEM, WE'RE FINDING PEOPLE DUMPING IN THEM THAT PROBABLY DON'T LIVE HERE.
THERE'S A LOT OF ISSUES WHEN YOU LEAVE THESE OPEN DUMPSTERS THAT YOU'RE JUST ALLOWING THEM TO JUST FILL UP, AND YOU'RE NOT NECESSARILY POLICING THEM.
>> WOULD IT BE FAIR TO SAY THE FOLKS THAT HAVE THE ABILITY TO USE THE ROLL OFF DROP OFFS HAVE ALREADY DONE IT? THAT THE SEFTON TOWN IS STILL THE PEOPLE THAT DON'T HAVE A TRUCK TO HAUL IT TO THE STATION OR.
>> IT COULD BE, OR THEY HAVE CAPABILITIES, AND SO THE CAN TAKE IT THERE [OVERLAPPING]
[00:50:01]
>> ALREADY HAPPENED I DON'T [OVERLAPPING].
>> OR THEY HAVEN'T EVEN GOTTEN TO IT YET.
>> THERE'S STILL SO MUCH MORE, ESPECIALLY WITH I THINK WHAT WE'RE FINDING TOO IS YOU GET THAT FIRST ROUND OF THE STUFF THAT'S OBVIOUSLY DOWN AND THEN MAYBE YOU HAVE, WE'RE FINDING FROM FOLKS, THEY HAD, A TREE SERVICE COME OUT AND SAY, IT'S STANDING TODAY, BUT THAT THING'S NOT GOING TO MAKE IT, WE NEED TO GO AHEAD AND TAKE IT DOWN AND SO THERE'S A LOT OF DELAY OF MORE THINGS.
>> I WILL SAY WE HAD I DON'T KNOW, A DOZEN PEOPLE KNOCK ON THE DOOR TO COME DEAL WITH A DOWN TREE BECAUSE IT WAS OBVIOUSLY IN THE FRONT YARD AND IT [LAUGHTER] WAS EASY TO SEE I THINK IT WAS ABOUT THE SEVENTH PERSON THAT AGREED TO DO IT AND HAUL THE BRANCHES OFF.
WE JUST TOLD THEM NO UNTIL THEY WERE WILLING TO TAKE IT THEMSELVES, AND NOT LEAVE IT ON THE CURB WE JUST WAITED FOR THE NEXT GUY TO COME KNOCK ON THE DOOR.
YOU DON'T ALWAYS HAVE TO GO WITH THE FIRST GUY THAT KNOCKS, BUT THAT GOT IT OFF THE CURB QUICK BECAUSE WE DIDN'T PUT IT THERE IN THE FIRST PLACE.
>> A COUPLE OF THINGS I WANT TO ADDRESS.
ONE IS, I DON'T BELIEVE WE SHOULD PICK UP A SECOND ROUND ON ANYONE'S HOUSE BEFORE ANY AREAS THAT HAVE NOT GOTTEN PICK UP AT ALL.
I DON'T AGREE THAT WE SHOULD NOT GO BACK AND PICK UP STUFF AS THE FOUR PEOPLE THAT SPOKE BEFORE ME, SAID, IS OUR RESPONSIBILITY WE TOLD THEM WE WERE GOING TO DO IT SO IF THEY DIDN'T HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY TO PUT STUFF OUT, THE STORM WAS ON TUESDAY.
THEY PICKED UP HALF OF MY STREET STARTING ON THE FOLLOWING SATURDAY.
WE DIDN'T GET POWER BACK UNTIL FRIDAY AFTERNOON SO A LOT OF THOSE PEOPLE WEREN'T EVEN HOME.
THEY MAY OR MAY NOT HAVE HAD THE OPPORTUNITY TO PUT STUFF OUT BEFORE WE CAME AND GOT IT SO SAYING THAT WE PICKED UP 20% AND WE'VE ALREADY PICKED UP THAT STREET DOESN'T MEAN WE PICKED UP THEIR DEBRIS DOESN'T.
SECONDLY, IF YOU THINK IN MY EXPERIENCE, I'M NOT GETTING SOMEONE OUT FOR 3-$700 TO CUT DOWN MY TREE AND HAUL IT AWAY, THERE'S NO WAY.
I'M GOING TO USE MISS DENISE HERE AS AN EXAMPLE.
DO YOU EXPECT HER TO GO OUT AND CLIMB IN HER TREE AND CUT DOWN BRANCHES WITHOUT HIRING A CONTRACTOR? I'M NOT DOING IT.
I'M JUST GOING TO GUESS BY HER STATEMENTS THAT SHE'S NOT GOING TO DO IT SO YOU'RE GOING TO CHALLENGE HOMEOWNERS TO HIRE A CONTRACTOR, AND YOU'RE GOING TO PAY DOUBLE TO HAVE IT HAULED AWAY.
IF YOU'RE SAYING IT'S OUR RESPONSIBILITY, HOW ARE YOU SAYING IF YOU HIRE A CONTRACTOR, IT'S THEIR RESPONSIBILITY? YOU'RE PAYING FOR THAT. THAT'S NOT INCLUDED IN THE CUT UP SERVICE.
THE HAULING SERVICE IS JUST AS MUCH AS THE CUTTING UP SERVICE SO THOSE ARE THE THINGS I WANT TO ADDRESS.
I DON'T KNOW IF I'M COMFORTABLE SPENDING $300,000 TO JUST KEEP GOING AROUND AND PICKING THAT UP I DON'T SUGGEST THAT.
I'M KIND OF LIKE MS. BUHLER, LET'S GO AROUND ONE TIME, AND I DON'T CARE IF THAT TAKES US FOR TWO WEEKS OR TWO MONTHS LET'S GO AROUND ONE TIME AND BE DONE.
IF WE WANT TO HIT SOME OF THESE HARDER AREAS AGAIN, I'M OKAY WITH THAT, IT'S NOT NECESSARY.
I'M OKAY TELLING MY NEIGHBORS, HEY, THE CITY'S PICKED UP OUR STORM DEBRIS ONCE, AND THAT'S ALL THEY'RE GOING TO DO BUT I NEED AN ANSWER.
WHETHER THAT'S A DECISION STAFF MAKES, CWD MAKES, THE COUNCIL MAKES, I NEED TO ANSWER TONIGHT BECAUSE THESE PEOPLE KEEP CALLING ME EVERY DAY.
WHEN ARE THEY COMING BACK AROUND? I DON'T KNOW, THERE'S AREAS THAT HAVEN'T BEEN PICKED UP YET.
I PROPOSE THAT WE MAKE A SECOND ROUND TO SOME OF THESE HARDER HIT AREAS, BUT THAT'S JUST ME.
I KNOW MR. PRESTENBERG, OVER THERE, HIS TREES ARE ABOUT AS TALL AS HE IS, SO I CAN IMAGINE THAT HIS TREES IN HIS YARD DIDN'T HAVE MUCH DAMAGE, MINOR, PROBABLY FOUR STORIES, IF NOT MORE.
I DON'T HAVE A TAPE MEASURE OUT THERE BUT, WE HAD QUITE A BIT, MY 80-YEAR-OLD NEIGHBOR BEHIND ME IS NOT GOING TO CLIMB UP IN HIS TREE AND CUT BRANCHES DOWN THAT ARE BROKEN SO I WANT TO GIVE PEOPLE AN OPPORTUNITY.
IF WE'RE GOING TO SPEND THE MONEY AND TELL EVERYBODY THAT IT'S OUR RESPONSIBILITY, LET'S DO IT RIGHT, LET'S NOT DO IT HALFWAY.
>> JUST FOR CLARIFICATION WHEN YOU SAY HALFWAY, ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT THE TREE CUTTING OR?
>> TURN ME BACK ON, I'LL ADDRESS THAT.
>> AS MY POINT WAS MADE A MINUTE AGO, SO THAT FIRST WEEK, WE STARTED ROLLING OUT TRUCKS ON THAT SATURDAY AND STARTED PICKING UP DEBRIS.
PEOPLE MAY NOT HAVE HAD THE OPPORTUNITY, BEEN HOME, HAD THE ABILITY, HAD THE CONTRACTOR, WHATEVER COME OUT DURING THAT WEEK OR TWO WEEKS OR THREE WEEKS AS IT IS NOW TO DO THAT SO SAYING THAT WE PICKED UP 20% OF THE CITY IS NOT ACCURATE WHEN SOME OF THOSE AREAS DIDN'T HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO DO THAT YET.
I KNOW ON A MAP, WE PICKED UP 20% THAT DOESN'T MEAN WE PICKED UP 20% OF THE AREA, IF THAT MAKES ANY SENSE AT [OVERLAPPING]
>> FROM A VOLUME VERSUS GEOGRAPHICAL STANDPOINT.
>> NO. YOU'RE SAYING WE'VE PICKED UP GEOGRAPHICALLY 20% OF THE CITY.
[00:55:04]
>> WELL, THAT'S MY POINT BUT YOU'RE MAKING [OVERLAPPING]
>> HOLD ON. LET ME FINISH MY POINT.
MY POINT IS 20% OF THE CITY MIGHT HAVE BEEN PICKED UP ON A MAP, BUT OUT OF THAT 20%, NOT ALL HOMEOWNERS HAD THE OPPORTUNITY TO PUT STUFF OUT.
>> ONE OF MY QUESTIONS IS ALREADY ANSWERED, I BELIEVE, THE ROLL AWAY IS MONITORED.
IT SOUNDS LIKE THEY'RE NOT AT ALL, IS THAT FAIR?
>> DO WE HAVE A COST PER ROLL AWAY VERSUS A COST PER ROLLING TRUCK FOR A NEIGHBORHOOD?
>> I DON'T KNOW IF JASON HAS THAT OFF THE TOP OF HIS HEAD, BUT WE CAN.
GO AND SEE WHAT HE CAN GET FOR YOU.
>> YOU WANT TO GIVE IT A SHOT, JASON?
>> MAYOR, COUNSEL. I WAS THE QUESTION THE COST PER ROLL OFF? ROLL OFF.
>> JASON RAMER VICE PRESIDENT COMMUNITY WASTE DISPOSAL.
>> THE COST PER ROLL AWAY VERSUS THE COST FOR SENDING A TRUCK OFF? YES.
>> THE COST PER CALL ROLL OFF, ALL IS ABOUT $470.
EACH TIME IT GETS EMPTIED AND REPLACED.
THEN THE STORM CLEANUP ON THE STREETS IS $215 PER HOUR.
I'M ROUNDING UP A LITTLE $45 A TON.
>> TO FILL UP A TRUCK COULD TAKE 30 MINUTES DEPENDING ON THE NEIGHBORHOOD OR IT COULD TAKE, AN HOUR?
>> WE'RE AVERAGING JUST UNDER, TWO TONS AN HOUR.
JUST BETTER THAN WE ANTICIPATED EVEN LOOKING AT THIS THING.
>> YOU'RE LOOKING AT $300 VERSUS 470.
ALTHOUGH THAT 470 COULD SIT THERE FOR A WEEK OR TWO DAYS OR THREE DAYS.
HOW OFTEN ARE WE EMPTY IN SOME OF THESE?
>> OUR GOAL IS THREE TIMES A WEEK.
>> WE'VE BEEN BATTLING, THEY'RE OVERLOADED WHEN WE ARRIVE, AND WE HAVE TO SEND A CLAW TRUCK TO PUSH IT DOWN, SO WE PULL IT OFF.
>> GOT IT. MY COMMENT ON THAT IS, I KNOW WE'RE CONCERNED ABOUT CONTRACTORS OR WHATEVER UTILIZING THE ROLL OFF.
IT'S A SMALL PRICE, TO ENSURE THAT A NEIGHBORHOOD HAS THE FEASIBILITY, IF THAT'S A WORD TO GO TAKE SOMETHING THERE.
IF WE'RE GOING TO GO TO WHATEVER THAT TIME FRAME IS, I'D LIKE TO THROW OUT AS MANY OPTIONS AS WE POSSIBLY HAVE SO THAT EVERY OPPORTUNITY.
I KNOW THEY CAN'T CARRY A 500 POUND LOG.
[LAUGHTER] BUT THEY CAN AT LEAST CARRY BRANCHES OR SOMETHING, MAKE SEVERAL TRIPS.
I KNOW AS COUNCILMAN MILLSAP SAID, IT'S WEATHER RELATED, AND IT COULD HAPPEN MORE. I GET IT.
BUT, THERE HAS TO BE A STAKE IN THE SAND THAT WE DRIVE TO.
WE DON'T HAVE TO GIVE IT RIGHT NOW, BUT WE HAVE TO AT LEAST KNOW THAT THERE'S A STAKE IN THE SAND THAT WE HAVE TO SHOW THE CITY THAT WE'RE WORKING TOWARDS, AND THEN LIFE WILL BE NORMAL.
I CAN'T IMAGINE TAKING MORE THAN THE END OF THE SUMMER, WHICH END OF AUGUST, BUT I'M ALSO NOT OUT THERE PICKING ALL THIS STUFF UP, HOUSE TO HOUSE.
TO CLARIFY MY TREES ARE NOT AS TALL AS ME.
THEY'RE SHORTER, TALL AS MAYOR PRO TEM, FRANK.
BUT NO, I FEEL FOR EVERYONE THAT'S OUT THERE, AND THIS SUCKS, SO THANK YOU.
>> I WONDER ABOUT THAT. I WAS WAITING FOR YOU TO CLARIFY THAT, SOMETHING. MR. MILLSAP.
>> I HAVE A TRUCK, I HAVE A CHAINSAW.
I HAVE THE SKILLS, AND I HAVE ACTUALLY HAULED SIX LOADS OF MY OWN STUFF OFF TO THE DUMPSTER DOWN AT THE PARK.
BUT NOT EVERYBODY HAS THAT ABILITY TO STREET BEHIND ME, FOR INSTANCE, WHEN THEY FIRST STARTED PUTTING THEIR STUFF UP, THEY HAD FROM THE CURB TO THE SIDEWALK PILED AS HIGH AS IT COULD GET WITHOUT EITHER ROLLING OUT IN THE STREET OR ROLLING OVER THE SIDEWALK, WHICH THEY WOULD HAVE GOTTEN IN TROUBLE FOR DOING THAT.
SAYING WE PICKED IT UP ONCE IS NOT NEAR ENOUGH TO ME WHAT THE FIRST TIME DAMAGE IS.
AS AN EXAMPLE, I HAVE STILL LAND DEAD LIMBS UP IN A 40 FOOT PECAN TREE THAT AT 84-YEARS-OLD, I JUST HAVEN'T CLIMBED THE LADDER YET TO GO UP THERE, BUT THEY STILL HAVE DAMAGE.
I THINK MS. BUHLER HAD A GOOD IDEA.
I JUST DO THIS ON A REGULAR BASIS, NOT UNTIL WE GET 20% OF IT PICKED UP UNTIL WE GET ABOUT 80% OF IT PICKED UP.
THEN LET'S LOOK AT A TIME LIMIT.
THE $300,000 IS NOT MANDATORY THAT WE SPEND THAT MUCH.
>> THIS IS JUST A GUIDELINE? WE DON'T WANT TO GO MORE THAN THAT.
AGAIN, WHAT DID THE ICE STORM COST US? IT'S NOT THE RESIDENT'S FAULT THAT THE WIND BLEW.
IT'S NOT OUR FAULT THAT THE WIND BLEW, BUT IT IS THE CITY'S RESPONSIBILITY SINCE WE MADE A COMMITMENT.
YOU PUT IT OUT, WE WILL PICK IT UP.
I THINK WE NEED TO GO AHEAD AND DO THIS ON REGULAR BASIS UNTIL WE GET ABOUT 80% OF IT AND THEN LOOK AT A TIMELINE AND GO FROM THERE.
[01:00:01]
>> I'M STEALING THIS FROM CHRISTMAS.
WHENEVER WE HAVE THE CHRISTMAS TREE DROP OFF, PICK UP, WHAT HAVE YOU, WE SAY THAT'S GOING TO BE CHIPPED AND MADE INTO MULCH.
DO WE HAVE THE OPTION TO DO THAT NOW? ONE. I KNOW WE WOULD HAVE TO MAN THAT, IF YOU WOULD.
I'M SURE THERE'S DIAMETERS, BUT THAT WOULD ALSO BE A WAY TO MONITOR AND MANAGE WHAT GETS DUMPED IN THOSE ROLL OFFS.
IF WE'RE MULCHING 50% OF IT WITH A CHIPPER.
ONE, I WOULD IMAGINE THAT'S MUCH LESS ROOM IN THE ROLL OFFS OR MUCH MORE ROOM IN THE ROLL OFFS BECAUSE YOU'RE TAKING ALL THE DEAD SPACE OUT OF IT, EVEN IF YOU SMASH IT WITH A CLAW TRUCK.
TWO, YOU MANAGE WHAT THE COUCH AND THE WASHING MACHINE AND ALL THE CRAP THAT DOESN'T STORM DEBRIS GETS DUMPED IN THERE. IS THAT AN OPTION? HAS THAT HAPPENED BEFORE? I KNOW I'M ASKING MULTIPLE QUESTIONS.
WHENEVER OUR CHRISTMAS TREES ARE TURNED INTO MULCH.
IS THAT DONE AT THE PLACE? LET'S SAY, SALMON PARK, THAT'S WHERE WE TRADITIONALLY DO IT.
WHEN THEY'RE DUMPED THERE, DOES SOMEONE COME OUT THERE WITH A SHREDDER OR CHIPPER AND DO IT THERE OR ARE THEY HAULED OFF AND DONE SOMEWHERE ELSE? I DON'T KNOW THE ANSWER.
>> THEY'RE HOLD OFF AND IT'S DONE SOMEWHERE ELSE.
WE DON'T HAVE THOSE EQUIPMENT.
THAT'D BE SOMETHING SEPARATE AND APART.
WE'D HAVE TO CONSIDER GETTING, AND CERTAINLY WE COULD LOOK INTO THAT, JASON.
I DON'T KNOW IF YOU HAVE A WEIGH IN.
>> I DON'T HAVE ALL THE DETAILS ON IT.
I'VE HEARD OF IT BEING DONE BEFORE.
WHAT I'VE HEARD IS VERY LABOR INTENSIVE. IT'S VERY DIFFICULT.
YES, YOU SAVE AN ENORMOUS AMOUNT OF SPACE ON A TRUCK AND AN OPEN TOP DUMPSTER WHEN THE MATERIAL IS MULCHED.
I BELIEVE AND I'D HAVE TO GET MORE DETAILS ON IT, THE CITY OF ALLEN HAS DONE SOMETHING LIKE THAT IN THE PAST.
THEY RENTED SOMETHING CALLED A DRUM CHIPPER.
BIG INDUSTRIAL PIECE CHIPPING EQUIPMENT, AND IT ITSELF COSTS 50-100 GRAND TO DO.
AGAIN, I'D HAVE TO GET DETAILS ON THAT.
I DON'T BELIEVE ANY OF OUR CITIES ARE DOING ANY CHIPPING THEMSELVES TODAY THAT I'M AWARE OF.
>> I KNOW SOME HAVE HIRED COMPANIES.
>> TO GO ALONG WITH WHAT YOU JUST SAID, IF YOU'RE GOING TO DO THAT, YOU MIGHT CONTACT A COMPANY CALLED LIVING EARTH TECHNOLOGIES.
THEY'RE THE BIGGEST MULCH COMPANY IN STATE OF TEXAS, ACTUALLY.
NOW, IT WAS OWNED BY GUNZKA, WHO OWNED THE TAMPA BAY FOOTBALL TEAM FOR A WHILE.
>> THEY'RE DOWN THE STREET FROM OUR YARD.
>> [OVERLAPPING] THEY DO A LOT OF STREET LIVING EARTH.
>> YOU KNOW ABOUT THEM. THEY DO THAT.
BUT KEEP IN MIND THAT THOSE CHIPPERS CAN ONLY CHIP UP TO CERTAIN SIZE LOGS, AND IF THESE TREES FALL OVER, WHAT ARE YOU GOING TO DO WITH A LOG THEN? CHIPPING IS GOOD IN CONCEPT.
YOU COULD COME AND GET ALL THE CHIPS YOU WANTED.
THEY COULDN'T GET RID OF THEM AS FAST AS THEY WERE GENERATING, SO THEY QUIT DOING IT.
THAT WOULD BE ANOTHER THING THAT'S COST PROHIBITIVE.
AS FAR AS BACK TO WHAT WE WERE TALKING ABOUT A WHILE AGO, HOW A COMMERCIAL COMPANY TO COME IN AND TRIM YOUR TREES.
WELL THE CONTRACT IS, LIKE I SAID, OR YOU GOT TO HAUL IT OFF.
WELL, THAT MEANS THEY'RE GOING TO HAVE TO COST CHARGE YOU FOR THAT.
RIGHT NOW, IT'S A GOOD TWO, 2.5, ALMOST THREE HOURS WAIT ONCE YOU GET IN THE GATE AT THE DUMP JUST TO GET UP TO THE DUMP TO EMPTY YOUR TRUCK.
THEY'RE GOING TO BE PROHIBITED FROM THAT.
IT WOULD BE COST EFFECTIVE TO US AS A CITY, AND FOR THE RESIDENTS FOR LET THOSE PEOPLE JUST USE THE ROLLBACKS TO HAUL IT DOWN THERE AND DUMP IT IN, AND IT WOULD BE STILL CHEAPER FOR US AS A CITY THAN IT IS FOR THE OVERALL COMMUNITY.
>> THANK YOU, MR. MILLSAP. DO WE HAVE ONE REQUEST TO SPEAK, MARTY HILL BOT.
>> MARTY HILL BOT, 5511, OAKRIDGE CIRCLE, SACHSE, TEXAS, TOP OF THE HILL.
I'M NOT REAL SURE WHAT STORM HAPPENED ON MARCH 28TH, BUT HOPEFULLY, IT WASN'T 60 DAYS FOR ALL TO GET ORGANIZED.
I'M THE PERFECT SACHSE CITIZEN.
I BUCKED ALL THE BRANCHES OFF FROM THE BIG LIMBS.
I SEPARATED MY BIG LIMBS FROM MY SMALL LIMBS.
I HAULED MY BIG LIMBS TO THE PARK.
BUT I STILL GOT A TREE I GOT TO CUT DOWN.
PLUS, I LOST MY BULK GARBAGE DAY.
[01:05:06]
THAT MEANS I'M GOING TO HAVE MORE THAN SIX CUBIC FEET OUT WHEN IT HAPPENS AT THE END OF THE MONTH AGAIN, AND IT'S NOT GOING TO BE BRANCHES BECAUSE I'M REMODELING.YOU'LL NEED DECIDE WHAT THE HELL YOU'RE GOING TO DO.
[OVERLAPPING] WHETHER OR NOT YOU JUST SAY MAY OR PLEASE BE QUIET.
[BACKGROUND] IF YOU'RE JUST GOING TO SIT THERE AND SAY, MAY 31ST, [INAUDIBLE] THAT.
IF YOU GOT TO TELL PEOPLE TO SEPARATE THEIR GARBAGE, TELL THEM TO SEPARATE.
BUT IF YOU DRIVE UP AND DOWN SACHSE ROAD, THERE WERE PILES OF TREES 15 FEET TALL THAT HAD BEEN PICKED UP TWICE.
FOR YOU ALL TO SIT HERE AND SAY, WE'RE ONLY GOING TO DO IT ONCE.
YOU ALREADY MISSED THAT BOARD, BECAUSE IF YOU WERE ABLE TO FIELD IT UP TALL AND GET IT OUT THERE QUICK, YOU GOT TO PICK UP, AND THAT IS A CONGRATULATIONS TO YOU ALL, BUT YOU CAN'T CUT IT OFF NOW.
SO PEOPLE KNOW WHEN THAT TREE NEEDS TO COME DOWN.
THEY GET A CHANCE TO COME THROUGH.
WHAT ARE YOU GOING TO DO? IF YOU'RE GOING TO WAIT UNTIL THE END OF JULY TO TELL PEOPLE WHAT YOU'RE GOING TO DO, THEN YOU'RE TALKING SEPTEMBER JUST FIGURE IT OUT.
EVERYBODY WANTS TO BE IN CHARGE, AND NOBODY WANTS TO TAKE RESPONSIBILITY.
YOU'LL NEED TO STEP UP TO THE PLANE.
>> NO OUTBURST FROM THE AUDIENCE.
>> THAT'S RIGHT. THREE TIMES. ANYONE ELSE LIKE TO ADDRESS THIS ITEM.
OTHER QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS FROM COUNSEL? MAYOR PRO TEM FRANKS.
>> MY QUESTION REALLY HASN'T BEEN ANSWERED.
ARE WE GOING TO CONTINUE MAKING ROUNDS UNTIL IT'S ALL PICKED UP, OR ARE WE GOING ONE TIME, AS YOU SAID THAT 20% GOT PICKED UP OR NOT? THAT'S WHAT I WANT TO KNOW. I'M SAYING, LIKE I SAID, IF WE STOOD UP HERE AND SAID, IT'S OUR RESPONSIBILITY AND WE'RE SPENDING THE MONEY, THEN WE NEED TO PICK IT ALL UP.
NOT IF YOU HAVE TIME WHEN WE'RE THERE.
>> I HOPE I CAN MAYBE PUT THIS TOGETHER.
MS. NASH HAS ASKED US TO AUTHORIZE HER UP TO $300,000 TO PICK UP THE REMAINING DEBRIS.
I THINK WE'VE HAD A LOT OF DISCUSSION.
WHAT I THINK WE HAVE A CONSENSUS ON IS THAT MR. MILLSAP HAS MENTIONED IT.
I THINK EVERYBODY'S MENTIONED IT IS THAT HEY, LET'S PICK IT ALL UP.
I THINK WE'RE ALL ON THE SAME PAGE THERE.
WAS IT YOU, MR. MILLSAP, HAVE TO TALK ABOUT COMING BACK AT 80%? YEAH. I THINK WE'RE IN AGREEMENT ON THAT.
MS. NASH, I'M SURE SHE'LL CORRECT ME.
IF THE COUNSEL DOES AUTHORIZE HER TO SPEND UP TO $300,000, THEN THE THINGS THAT WE'VE HEARD TONIGHT, AND I'LL GET CLARIFICATION FROM MS. NASH CAN BE DONE.
I'LL PUT TO YOU THIS WAY, MS. NASH.
IS THERE SOMETHING THAT YOU'VE HEARD REQUEST WISE THAT CAN'T BE DONE? THAT MIGHT BE A FAIR WAY TO ANSWER. THERE YOU GO.
>> THE UP TO $300,000 THAT I'M REQUESTING HAS TO DO WITH BEING ABLE TO GO AROUND AND DEAL WITH THE OTHER 80% OF THE CITY ONE TIME.
IT IS NOT TO BE ABLE TO PICK UP LIMBS IN PERPETUITY.
OTHERWISE, THAT'S A COST THAT IS INSURMOUNTABLE IN TERMS OF WE WOULD NEVER STOP.
I HAD A CONVERSATION WITH JASON RAMER ON FRIDAY AFTERNOON SAYING, HOW MUCH WOULD WE NEED TO BE ABLE TO GET US THROUGH ANOTHER GOOD SWEEP OF THE COMMUNITY TO GET TO 100%.
I SAID, I NEED ONE NUMBER, NOT TO HAVE TO COME BACK, AND THAT'S WHERE WE SETTLED ON THE $300,000, NOT TO EXCEED.
JASON, I'LL LET YOU SPEAK TO THE PARTICULARS OF THAT.
>> BECAUSE I FORCED HIM INTO A NUMBER BECAUSE I DIDN'T WANT TO HAVE TO KEEP COMING BACK TO YOU ALL AND SO WE COULD PROCEED DURING THE MONTH OF JULY BECAUSE THERE IS A COUNCIL RECESS AND BE ABLE TO CONTINUE WORKING WITHOUT HAVING TO COME BACK.
EVEN IF YOU ALL HAD MEETINGS IN JULY I WOULD STILL NEED TIME BETWEEN THAT TWO WEEK PERIOD.
WE WOULD GET QUITE A BIT DONE.
THIS GIVES US THE OPPORTUNITY TO NOT HAVE TO STOP AND ASK AND STOP AND ASK AND WE CAN JUST KEEP MOMENTUM GOING.
[01:10:03]
>> PART OF THE CONVERSATIONS WE HAD ON FRIDAY IS THE PERSPECTIVE OF TODAY.
A LITTLE BIT UPDATED NUMBERS TO DATE.
WE'VE HAD SPENT 208 HOURS PICKED UP 310 TONS, JUST IN SACHSE JUST FOR STORM RELATED.
AN AVERAGE HISTORICAL JUNE COLLECTION, DOING THE YELLOW AND BLUE, ALL MONTH, REGULAR 6 YARDS, EVERYBODY, IS 203 HOURS, 234 TONS.
WE'VE ALREADY PICKED UP ABOUT 32% MORE TONNAGE USING THE SAME HOURS, AND WE'RE ONLY ABOUT 20% THROUGH THE CITY, WHICH IS REALLY MAYBE ABOUT 15 IF YOU COUNT THE HOMES THAT DIDN'T HAVE IT OUT ON TIME.
THAT'S JUST TO LAY THE SCENE ON WHAT WE'RE SEEING OUT THERE AND WHY THIS STUFF TAKES TIME.
WHEN WE FIRST APPROACHED THE CITY RIGHT AFTER THE STORM OCCURRED WAS, IT'S BAD.
I CAN'T TELL YOU NECESSARILY HOW BAD.
I EVEN THREW OUT A NUMBER THAT MAKES THIS NUMBER LOOK TODAY SEEM RIDICULOUS.
WE'RE AT 50 GRAND, AND WE'VE ONLY DONE THIS MUCH OF THE CITY.
WE ARE LEARNING A LITTLE AS WE GO.
IT'S MY UNDERSTANDING THAT THE PURPOSE OF TONIGHT AND THE PURPOSE OF OUR CONVERSATION FRIDAY IS, WHAT IS THE ABSOLUTE HIGHEST? IT IS A RIDICULOUS NUMBER.
I'D NEVER THOUGHT IN MY CAREER, I WOULD SEE THIS AT ONE CITY STORM CLEANUP, AND WE'RE DOING SIX OF THESE RIGHT NOW.
I HAVE NO IDEA WHAT SOME OF THE OTHER MORE IMPACTED AREAS ARE GOING TO COME UP WITH, BUT THE GOAL WAS TO GIVE A NUMBER THAT IS VERY CONSERVATIVE, AND INCLUDES AN ENTIRE SWEEP OF THE CITY GETTING EVERYTHING OFF THE CURB.
OUR DRIVERS ARE NOT LOOKING AT THE WASHING MACHINE UNDER THE BRUSH PILE AND LEAVING IT, THEY'RE GETTING IT ALL.
WE JUST DON'T OPERATE THAT WAY.
THESE ARE TRASH DRIVERS THAT ARE TOLD TO GO AND THEY GO.
BUT THAT 300,000 DOES, AS I STAND HERE TODAY, IT INCLUDES THAT SWEEP, AND IT'S CONSERVATIVE.
WE'RE REPORTING THESE NUMBERS TO THE CITY EVERY DAY, OUR PROGRESS, OUR HOURS, OR TONS, THE BOTTOM NUMBER THAT THE BILL HAS GONE UP TO, TO THE BEST OF OUR ABILITY.
THAT'S TO PUT THE CITY IN CONTROL OF THE BUDGET.
WE FEEL WE CAN DO THAT SWEEP WITHIN THIS NUMBER, AND THERE IS STILL GOING TO BE A REMAINDER AT THE CITY'S DISCRETION.
BECAUSE IT IS ON THE CITY'S BILL, IF YOU WILL.
IF WE NEED TO GO BACK TO OTHER AREAS WE CAN, AND I'M CONFIDENT THAT WE'LL STILL BE UNDER THAT 300,000 NUMBER, THE RIDICULOUS NUMBER.
BUT I CAN'T SAY WITH ABSOLUTE CERTAINTY, I CAN SWEEP THE CITY, THEN GO HIT ALL THE HARD HIT AREAS AGAIN, JUST BECAUSE I DON'T KNOW WHAT THOSE HARD HIT AREAS WILL LOOK LIKE, AGAIN AFTER WE'VE SWEEP UP.
WE HAVEN'T TOUCHED ALL THE TREES, ONLY GOT WHAT WE COULD THAT FELL TO THE GROUND OUT NOW, BUT I DON'T KNOW WHAT HASN'T FALLEN DOWN YET.
THAT'S THAT PERPETUITY, AND IT'S HARD TO GAUGE THAT.
BUT I DO FEEL CONFIDENT IN THIS NUMBER WE'LL LEAVE 95% OF THOSE UP HERE AND IN THE COMMUNITY EXUBERANT HAPPY.
THERE ARE GOING TO BE ONE OFFS, AND WE MAY HAVE TO DEAL WITH THOSE AS WE GO.
I HOPE THAT GIVES SOME CLARITY, BUT I AM CONFIDENT THAT NUMBER INCLUDES A SWEEP, AND THEN WE'RE GOING TO HAVE TO GO TOUCH SOME AREAS, BECAUSE WE'VE CLEARED SOME THAT ALREADY HAVE JUST AS MUCH OUT.
WE'RE LEARNING A LOT AS WE GO TO.
>> BUT IF I UNDERSTOOD YOU CORRECTLY, EVEN THAT WOULD BE YOU THINK UNDER THE 300,000.
>> YOU CAN'T GIVE A DEFINITE ANSWER.
>> HOLD ON. MAYOR PRO TEM FRANKS.
I KNOW IF IT'S FOR HIM OR STAFF.
>> FIRST, LET ME SAY, I TALKED TO TWO OF THE DRIVERS. AWESOME JOB.
THEY WERE PRETTY GOOD SPIRITS.
I'M LIKE, YEAH, MAN, IT'S JUST ANOTHER DAY AT WORK.
GREAT PEOPLE TO TALK TO. I APPRECIATE IT. SIT DOWN AND RELAX.
MAYOR, YOUR UNDERSTANDING OF MINOR STANDARD ARE TWO COMPLETELY DIFFERENT THINGS.
BECAUSE AS I UNDERSTAND IT, THIS UP TWO $300,000 IS ONE TIME AROUND THE CITY, AND THAT'S IT. THAT'S WHAT I UNDERSTAND.
>> WELL, WHAT JASON JUST SAID IS. [OVERLAPPING]
>> HOLD ON. THAT'S HOW IT WAS PRESENTED, THOUGH. CORRECT?
>> YES, BUT I APOLOGIZE, MAYOR PRO TEM. THIS IS UNPRECEDENTED.
>> I WISH THAT I COULD WHIP OUT A CRYSTAL BALL AND TELL YOU HOW THIS IS GOING TO TURN OUT, AND I CAN'T.
JASON WAS IN A CITY THAT I WAS IN PREVIOUS TO HERE THAT WAS HIT MUCH HARDER THAN THIS AND DIDN'T HIT THE $300,000 NUMBER.
WHAT WE WANT TO DO IS UNDER PROMISE AND OVER DELIVER.
THAT'S WHAT WE'RE TRYING TO DO WITH THIS NUMBER TO BE ABLE TO GO OUT AND SWEEP AND GET THIS DONE WITH NO ADDITIONAL MEETINGS IN JULY AND BE ABLE TO JUST GET GOING AND GET MOVING AND TRY TO GET THIS STUFF PICKED UP AS SOON AS WE CAN.
>> THIS HAS TAKEN ABOUT TEN TIMES LONGER THAN I THOUGHT IT WOULD.
THIS DISCUSSION HAS. BUT MY QUESTION IS STILL VERY AMBIGUOUS OR THE ANSWER IS VERY AMBIGUOUS TO ME.
ONCE AGAIN, I'LL ASK DIRECTLY ON THIS, ARE WE GOING TO MAKE OTHER ROUNDS TO AREAS THAT WERE PICKED UP INITIALLY THAT MAY NOT HAVE HAD TIME? OR ARE WE JUST MAKING THE COMPLETED ONE RUN CITY.
I KNOW THAT WE MAY HAVE TO HIT OTHER AREAS AFTERWARDS, BUT THAT'S NOT WHAT THIS SAYS,
[01:15:01]
AND THAT'S NOT WHAT THIS IS ABOUT.I WANT TO UNDERSTAND THAT. THAT'S ALL I'M SAYING.
I HAVE NOT GOTTEN A CLEAR ANSWER.
>> WE'RE GOING TO GO AROUND TO EVERY PLACE THAT HAS NOT BEEN TOUCHED TO DATE.
THEN WE'RE GOING TO TAKE AN ASSESSMENT, AND WE'RE GOING TO LOOK TO SEE IF WE CAN HIT SOME OF THESE AREAS AGAIN THAT GOT HARD HIT.
BECAUSE, AS YOU KNOW, SOME NEIGHBORHOODS DIDN'T EVEN HAVE A LEAF HIT THE GROUND AND OTHERS THAT WERE JUST HIT SO HARD, IT IS DIFFICULT TO TELL FROM THE STREET WHAT THEY'RE GOING TO BE PULLING TO THE CURB.
WE'RE GOING TO TRY TO GO BACK AROUND AGAIN WITH THE FUNDS THAT YOU HAVE ALLOTTED, IF YOU APPROVE THIS ITEM THAT WE CAN COME BACK AND HIT THOSE AGAIN, AND AGAIN, TRY TO EXCEED EXPECTATIONS AND GET THIS STUFF CLEANED UP.
>> I KNOW I'M BEING DIFFICULT, BUT I'M BEING DIFFICULT ON PURPOSE? BECAUSE WHAT I'M GOING TO HAVE TO TELL THE PEOPLE THAT ARE CALLING ME IS THAT NO.
THEY ARE NOT RIGHT NOW, THEY ARE NOT GOING TO COME BACK AROUND.
BECAUSE WE ARE TRYING TO GET THROUGH THE 80% OF THE CITY THAT WE HAVEN'T PICKED UP CURRENTLY OR AS OF YET.
HOWEVER, IF THERE'S TIME, IF WE SET A DATE, IF THERE'S MONEY LEFT OVER THAT WE HAVEN'T SPENT, WE MIGHT.
BUT AS OF RIGHT NOW, I HAVE TO TELL THEM, NO.
THEY NEED TO START MAKING ARRANGEMENTS, BECAUSE I DON'T KNOW IF WE'RE GOING TO BE ABLE TO DO THAT BASED ON THIS.
>> THAT'S FAIR. WE CAN KEEP THE ROLL OFFS OUT FOR FOLKS IF THEY HAVE THE MEANS TO BE ABLE TO DO THAT.
I'VE ALREADY TALKED TO A COUPLE OF CHURCHES THAT ARE INTERESTED IN HELPING FOLKS, LIKE MS.JANICE, THAT SPOKE EARLIER, WE HAVE CHURCHES THAT WANT TO HELP PEOPLE THAT CAN'T HELP THEMSELVES THAT CAN HAUL THAT STUFF AND BRING IT INTO THE DUMPSTERS.
WE HAVE SOME OTHER OPTIONS FOR FOLKS THAT NEED HELP.
WE CAN CERTAINLY INSTITUTE THAT AS WELL.
>> WELL, I DEFINITELY LIKE THE OPTION IF WE'RE NOT GOING TO GUARANTEE THAT WE'RE GOING TO COME BACK AROUND TO YOUR HOUSE IF YOU'VE ALREADY BEEN PICKED UP ON.
I DON'T CARE IF YOU HAVE ONE BRANCH OR 20 TREES OUT THERE.
THEN WE NEED TO OFFER AN OPTION FOR THEM.
THE ROLE ARE THE BEST OPTION, IN MY OPINION, IT DOESN'T SOUND LIKE WE'RE GOING TO ENTERTAIN.
NOBODY ELSE WANTED TO ENTERTAIN EITHER A CHIPPING SERVICE OR A CHIPPING OPTION, WHETHER IT BE PARK STAFF, WHETHER IT BE CWT, WHETHER IT BE A DIFFERENT CONTRACTOR, I DON'T KNOW.
IF WE'RE NOT GOING TO GUARANTEE THAT WE'RE GOING TO GET TO SOME OF THESE HOUSES THAT HAVE DEBRIS THAT WON'T GUARANTEE TO GET PICKED UP, WE NEED TO OFFER THAT AS AN OPTION.
IF YOU HAVE AN SUV AND YOU HAVE TO TAKE IT ONE BRANCH AT A TIME, AND IF YOU DON'T HAVE A TRUCK OR WHATEVER, THEN THAT'S UP TO THEM AT THIS POINT BECAUSE I CANNOT GUARANTEE THAT THEY'RE GOING TO GET BACK AROUND.
I'LL BE DONE BEING DIFFICULT ON THIS ITEM.
>> I DOUBT THAT. CAN WE JUST SAY WE WILL PICK UP 100% OF THE CITY BETWEEN NOW AND WHATEVER TIME FRAME WE WORK OUT WITH CWD? IT'S GOING TO TAKE US TO THE END OF AUGUST TO DO THAT.
JUST THAT WAY, WHEN YOU SEE BULK TRASH COME TO YOUR HOUSE, THAT IS YOUR TIME FROM HERE FOR THIS EVENT UNTIL WE GET BACK ON THE SCHEDULE, WHENEVER THAT MIGHT BE.
THAT WAY, MAYOR PROTON FRANK DOESN'T HAVE TO GO TO HIS NEIGHBORS AND SAY, WE DON'T KNOW YET.
I KNOW YOU'RE WAITING BECAUSE YOU DON'T KNOW WHAT THE BUDGET IS GOING TO LOOK LIKE AFTER THE OTHER 80% GETS PICKED UP.
I GET THAT. CAN WE JUST GO AHEAD AND SAY, EVERYONE WILL AND APPROVE YOU UP TO 300,000 IN JULY BECAUSE WE SHOULDN'T MEET THAT NUMBER UNTIL JULY.
THERE WILL BE SOME INCREMENTAL AMOUNT LEFT WHEN WE MEET JULY 29TH OR WHATEVER IT IS.
THEN WE TALK ABOUT THEN, AND BY THAT POINT, WE SHOULD KNOW WHAT THE ESTIM IS GOING TO BE TO DO THE REMAINDER OF THE CITY.
>> THE ONLY CONCERN THAT I HAVE ABOUT DOING THAT IS THAT PEOPLE ARE USING THIS AS AN OPPORTUNITY TO PUT OUT UNLIMITED BULK.
NOT JUST TREE LIMBS, BUT EVERYTHING.
THAT'S I THINK THE CHALLENGE THAT WE'RE FACING IS PEOPLE ARE JUST USING IT AS AN OPPORTUNITY TO PUT EVERYTHING OUT MORE SO THAN WE ARE USED TO SEEING EVEN.
>> I GET. BUT IF TWD HAS A MAP OR WE HAVE A MAP, LIKE EVERY DAY YOU'LL GET A UPDATE, OR THE CITY STAFF GETS AN UPDATE SAYING, WE COVER THESE FOUR STREETS 100%, PUT THE RED HIGHLIGHT THROUGH IT AND BE DONE WITH IT.
IF THEY PUT ANYTHING ELSE OUT WITH THE NOW THEY'RE BEHOLDEN TO THE RESTRICTIONS OF HOW LONG THEY CAN HAVE MATERIAL OUT THERE AND ALL THOSE THINGS.
IF THEY GRIPE ABOUT IT, WILL THEY GRIPE ABOUT IT AND THEY GET TICKETED OR HOW IT GETS HANDLED.
WE HAVE TO MAKE SURE OUR FOLKS ARE CARE FOR IT AS A SPEAKER SAID EARLIER.
THEY'RE GOING TO HAVE OTHER BULK TO PUT OUT BECAUSE THEY ALREADY MISSED THE OTHER BULK STATE.
NOW AS CWD ALSO SAID, THEY'RE PICKING UP EVERYTHING.
IF IT TOLD IT'S HEADING UNDER EIGHTH BRANCHES, THEY'RE PICKING IT UP.
LET'S JUST COMMUNICATE THAT WE'RE GOING TO DO 100%.
IT'S STARTING ON JUNE, WHATEVER.
ONCE WE'RE DONE WITH THAT, WE'RE DONE, AND THEN WE'RE BACK TO BAU.
THAT'S MY OPINION THAT WAY, WE DON'T HAVE TO GO BACK TO THE DIFFERENT CONSTITUENTS AND NEIGHBORS AND WHATNOT,
[01:20:02]
SAYING, SIR, WE DON'T KNOW IF WE CAN GET TO YOU.THAT'S MY OPINION. MR. LINDSAY.
>> YEAH. SINCE THIS STORM, I'VE BEEN KEEPING TABS ON OTHER CITIES, SEE WHAT THEIR RESPONSE IS, TO SEE IF SACHSE'S RESPONSE IS FAIR AND ADEQUATE, AND ALL THE OTHER CITIES THAT I'VE SEEN SPECIFICALLY ROWLETT, GARLAND, DALLAS, IT'S A ONE TIME OPPORTUNITY.
THEY COME BY, THEY PICK IT UP, THEY MOVE ON.
THEN WE GOT TO GET BACK TO NORMAL WITH THE BULK TRASH.
THE THING THAT MAYBE HAS MY CURIOSITY A LITTLE BIT IS WE FINISHED THE CITY, THE INITIAL SWEEP HIT THE REST OF THE 80%.
THEN WE SWITCHED BACK TO BULK TRASH.
BUT MAYBE THE BULK TRASH CAN BE RELAXED A LITTLE BIT WHENEVER IT COMES TO BULK TRASH.
WE'RE PAYING A FEE ANYWAY, PRESUMABLY TO CWD FOR MONTHLY BULK.
INSTEAD OF THE SPECIAL PICKUP JUST ON STORM DEBRIS, WHAT IF WE TOOK SOME OF THE REMAINING $300,000 AND THEN JUST SUPPLIED IT AS ADDITIONAL FUNDS TO COVER THE EXTRA BULK AS WE GET BACK TO NORMAL PICKUPS? IS THAT EVEN A POSSIBILITY?
>> IT'S CERTAINLY SOMETHING WE CAN LOOK AT.
I THINK IT'S ONE OF THOSE THINGS, AS I'VE SAID, WE'RE JUST GOING TO HAVE TO MONITOR IT.
JASON GETS THESE NUMBERS EVERY DAY.
THE NUMBERS WE PUT IN HERE WERE NUMBERS AS OF FRIDAY AFTERNOON, AND HE'S ALREADY HAD THE NEW NUMBERS FOR TODAY.
I THINK WE'RE JUST GOING TO HAVE TO KEEP MONITORING IT.
LIKE I SAID, I WISH THAT I COULD PREDICT THIS, AS YOU ALL KNOW.
WE DO OUR BEST TO TRY TO GIVE AS MUCH PREDICTABILITY WITH EVERYTHING AS WE CAN.
THE STORM IS JUST NOT JUST WHEN WE THINK WE'VE CLEANED A STREET, THERE'S MORE AND WE JUST DOING THE BEST WE CAN TO GET IT TAKEN CARE OF.
>> MY BIGGEST FEAR IS, THERE'S NEVER GOING TO BE A WAY TO CALL THIS DONE.
AS LONG AS YOU KEEP THIS PROGRAM OPEN, EVERY MONTH THAT GOES BY, PEOPLE WILL HAVE TREES THAT THEY DIDN'T REALIZE THAT WERE FALLING, LET'S SAY IN THE NEXT MINOR WINDSTORM ON THERE.
THEY WERE ALREADY COMPROMISED DURING THIS STORM.
IT'S NEVER GOING TO GET DONE, UNLESS IF WE SET SOME PARAMETERS.
TO ME, WE MAKE THE ROUNDS TO THE REST OF THE CITY AND WE GET BACK TO BUSINESSES AS USUAL.
WE MAKE A CLEAR MESSAGE ON SOCIAL MEDIA AND OTHER AVENUES THAT WE HAVE, THE CITY EMAIL BLAST AND WE SAY, LOOK, IF IT'S NOT ON THE CURB AND WE HADN'T GOT TO YOUR AREA YET, THEN THIS IS YOUR OPPORTUNITY TO GET IT OUT ON THERE.
THEN FROM THERE, IF SOMEBODY'S MISSED AND THEN THEY CALL CWD, DID YOU HAVE IT ON THE CURB BEFORE THE STATE? THEY SAY, YES, WE TAKE THEIR WORK FOR IT.
WE GO BACK AND PICK IT UP ON THERE.
THAT'S MY RECOMMENDATION AFTER WE HIT 100% OF THE CITY, JUST TO COVER ANY OF THE EDGE CASE SCENARIOS WITH WHATEVER MONEY WE HAPPEN TO HAVE REMAINING.
>> ACTUALLY, MAYORS WANT TO ASK, I WANT TO CLARIFY JASON.
YOU AND I DISCUSSED THIS LAST WEEK.
THOSE BRUSH TRUCKS HAVE THE THIRD EYE TECHNOLOGY.
WHEN YOU PICK IT UP, YOU HAVE A RECORDED CLEANING OF THAT LOCATION, AND THEN YOU KNOW THAT YOU HAVE GONE AND TAKEN CARE OF IT.
IF SOMEONE WAS TO CALL AND SAY, YOU DIDN'T PICK IT UP, WE CAN SAY, BUT WE PICKED UP ON THIS DATE, AND THAT WAS OUR PICK UP DATE.
>> YES. THE TRUCKS DO HAVE THAT TECHNOLOGY.
THE DIFFICULT THING IS TYPICALLY IN A BULK MONTH, WE KNOW WHEN WE'RE RUNNING AN AREA PLUS MINUS WITHIN A DAY.
THE PROBLEM IS, WHEN WE'RE RUNNING, HIT THIS HARD AREA, AND THAT MAY TAKE FIVE DAYS WHERE IT NORMALLY TOOK ONE.
THERE IS A CERTAIN TIME WINDOW WE CAN PULL VIDEO.
IT'S ABOUT 12 OR 15 BUSINESS DAYS THAT THE TRUCKS RUNNING.
IT'S DIFFICULT, BUT I THINK IT WOULD COVER THE MAJORITY OF CASES THAT WE CAN RESEARCH.
>> MAYOR AND COUNCIL, I WANT TO BE CLEAR.
WE USE THE THIRD EYE TECHNOLOGY SOMETIMES WHEN WE HAVE INSTANCES OF THEY'RE SAYING YOU DIDN'T COME BY MY STREET, AND WE'RE LIKE, BUT WE HAVE THE VIDEO.
SOMETIMES THEY WILL GO AHEAD AND PUT MORE AS SOON AS WE'VE PICKED UP.
IT'S JUST FIGURING OUT THAT RIGHT TIMING OF WE'VE PICKED IT UP.
WE KNOW WE SWEPT THAT NEIGHBORHOOD ON THAT DATE.
IS THERE THE TECHNOLOGY TO BACK THAT UP? I JUST WANTED TO CLARIFY. THANKS, JASON.
ACTUALLY, MR. LINDSAY HAD A GOOD POINT I WAS GOING TO PIG IT BACK ON IS THAT I THINK THE WAY WELL, LET ME GO TO MAYOR PROTON FRANK FIRST.
MAYOR PROTON FRANK TALKED ABOUT THE INITIAL PRESENTATION OF THE ITEM, AND WE WERE ON DIFFERENT WAVELENGTHS, I GUESS YOU COULD SAY.
I THINK THAT'S TRUE IN THE BEGINNING.
I THINK THE WAY THIS ITEM HAS EVOLVED, LET'S PUT IT THAT WAY, IS THAT, YES, INITIALLY, LET'S DO THE 80% AND SEE WHERE WE'RE AT.
I THINK COUNCIL HAS HAD A VERY GOOD DISCUSSION TO SAY, WELL, THAT'S GREAT, AND AGAIN,
[01:25:01]
I'LL USE MAYOR PROTON AND FRANK EXAMPLES.LIKE, HEY, WELL, WHAT ABOUT THERE IS THAT WE ALREADY WENT BY THAT HAVE SOME ISSUES WEREN'T HOME, WHAT HAVE YOU? AGAIN, I SEE THIS ITEM IF IT'S APPROVED TONIGHT BY COUNCIL, THE AUTHORIZATION OF NOT TO EXCEED 300,000, IS I THINK THAT ALL THAT CAN STILL BE ACCOMPLISHED.
I THINK THAT WE CAN DO THE INITIAL 80% SWEEP, IF YOU WILL.
THEN, AGAIN, I KNOW JASON IS NOT GUARANTEEING ANYTHING.
BUT IT SOUNDS LIKE BASED ON EXPERIENCE, WE'LL STILL HAVE FUNDS LEFT OVER.
DON'T KNOW FOR SURE, BUT WE'RE GOING TO GIVE IT A SHOT.
IT GOES TO COUNCILMAN LINDSAY'S POINT IS THAT, WHAT, IF WE DO, THEN WE CAN GO BACK AND THEN, AT SOME POINT, HAVE A STOP DATE.
I JUST SEE THE ITEM AS BEING FLEXIBLE ENOUGH FOR MS. NASH AND HER STAFF TO ACCOMPLISH, REALLY, AT LEAST POTENTIALLY STRIVE TO ACCOMPLISH EVERYTHING THAT WE'VE HEARD TONIGHT.
THAT'S WHY I WAS ASKING THIS QUESTION EARLIER IS THAT I KNOW THAT THE INITIAL THOUGHT WAS, HEY, WE'LL DO THE 80% SWEEP, AND THEN WE'LL BE DONE.
BUT I THINK THERE'S BEEN A LOT OF GREAT POINTS BROUGHT UP THAT, WE CAN DEFINITELY DO THAT, BUT WE MAY, AND AGAIN, EMPHASIZE, MAY BE ABLE TO GO BACK AND GO AGAIN.
BECAUSE MY THING IS, IF YOU LOOK AT THE WORST CASE SCENARIO AND $300,000 IS NOT ENOUGH, LET'S SAY, THEN GUESS WHAT WE WILL BE DONE.
WE'LL HAVE ANOTHER DECISION TO MAKE.
WILL IT BE SOMETHING ALONG MR. LINDSAY'S LINES OF, HEY WE'RE DONE AS A COUNCIL, OR YOU KNOW WHAT? TO MR. MILLSAP'S POINT, WE'RE GOING TO PICK IT UP UNTIL WE PICK IT UP.
I THINK THAT'S WHAT THE FLEXIBILITY OF THIS ITEM ALLOWS IS THAT I THINK EVERYBODY UP HERE HOPES THAT YOU COME BACK TO US IN THE FUTURE AND SAY, WE'RE DONE, WE ACCOMPLISH WHAT EVERYBODY WANT TO ACCOMPLISH.
IF WE CAN'T, THEN YOU'LL BE THE FIRST TO TELL US, HERE'S WHAT WE DID.
JASON HAS DONE A GOOD JOB, AND HE'LL TELL US EXACTLY WHAT WE DID AND WHAT WE COULD DO FOR THE MONEY.
WE AUTHORIZE IF THAT'S WHAT WE ULTIMATELY END UP DOING.
THEN WE'RE GOING TO RECONFIGURE AFTER THAT.
THE THING IS THIS STORM IS THE WORST STORM SACHSE HAS HAD IN 25 YEARS PLUS.
THAT'S HOW LONG I'VE BEEN HERE.
YOU CAN'T PLAN FOR A STORM LIKE THIS.
YOU MAY THINK YOU CAN, BUT YOU CAN'T.
AS JASON SAID, WHICH I DIDN'T EVEN KNOW, YOU HAVE OTHER COMMUNITIES THAT MIGHT EVEN BE WORSE OFF THAN SACHSE.
NOT ONLY DO WE HAVE THAT ISSUE, BUT JASON'S TRYING TO COORDINATE WITH THEIR COMPANY.
I'M PRETTY SURE WE'RE NOT THE ONLY ONE THAT HAVE CALLED YOU.
HE'S HAVING TO MANAGE THAT AS WELL.
AGAIN, I THINK THAT WITH MS. NASH AND HER STAFF, I THINK THEY CAN ACCOMPLISH WHAT WE ULTIMATELY WANT TO GET FOR EVERY POINT OF VIEW THAT'S BEEN SPOKEN TONIGHT.
BUT IF THEY CAN'T, BECAUSE THE MONEY JUST WAS CRAZY, AND WE JUST COULDN'T DO IT BECAUSE JASON SAID, HEY, WELL, WE GAVE IT OUR BEST SHOT, BUT THIS IS WHAT WE GOT LEFT, THEN WE CAN MAKE THAT DECISION THEN. MR. MILLSAP.
>> IF IT'S BEEN THREE WEEKS SINCE THIS HAPPENED, AND WE ONLY HAVE 20% OF THE PROPERTY PICKED UP, AND IT'S ONLY SIX WEEKS TILL THE END OF JULY.
THAT MEANS BY THE END OF JULY, WE'LL ONLY HAVE 60% OF IT PICKED UP.
>> WELL IF IT TAKES THREE WEEKS FOR 20%, AND I THINK WE CAN PICK IT UP FASTER THAN THAT.
I THINK WE NEED TO AUTHORIZE THE MONEY UP TO THE AMOUNT REQUESTED AND DO IT AS A ONGOING PROCESS, AND AT THE END OF JULY OR A MEETING IN JULY, THEN WE'LL DO AN UPDATE AND EVALUATE AND DETERMINE WHAT ACTION WE STILL NEED TO DO TO MAKE THE CITY LOOK PRESENTABLE TO THE COMMUNITY THAT WE LIVE IN.
>> IF ANY. WE MAY NEED MORE, WE MAY NOT NEED ANY.
>> I'M WITH YOU THERE. MR. PRESTENBERG.
>> THANK YOU. LIMITED COMMENT HERE.
THING IS THAT WE WANT TO CONSIDER AUTHORIZING TO 300K.
WE KNOW WE DON'T MEET FOR A MONTH.
WE KNOW WE'RE NOT GOING TO SPEND ALL THAT MONEY THERE.
LET'S JUST MOVE FORWARD WITH, IN MY OPINION, GIVING THE PERMISSION TO DO THAT TO SPEND THE MONEY.
BUT ALSO, ESTHER CAN PUT OUT IN HER FACEBOOK POST SO WE WILL GET TO EVERYONE AGAIN, ONE TIME, AND BE DONE WITH IT.
THAT WAY, EVERY NEIGHBORHOOD HAS THE LEVEL OF COMFORT THEY NEED, AND IF WE NEED TO AUTHORIZE MORE MONEY AT THE END OF JULY, WE DO SO.
>> MAYOR, CAN I JUST ADD TO THAT [OVERLAPPING] ON THE ROLL-OFFS THAT WE'LL CONTINUE TO KEEP THOSE OUT.
I WILL SAY THAT THE ONE AT HERITAGE PARK, BECAUSE OF THE RED WHITE AND BLUE BLAST, WE'LL HAVE TO MOVE THAT.
BUT WE'LL LET THE PUBLIC KNOW WHERE THE BEST PLACE IS TO BE TO PUT THAT.
WE WON'T WANT TO HAVE IT IN THE PARK DURING THAT EVENT, BUT WE WILL MOVE THAT AND WE'LL ADVERTISE WHERE THAT WILL BE AND ALL THAT.
WE'RE GOING TO HAVE DISCUSSION ABOUT THAT.
WE WILL KEEP THE ROLL-OFFS OUT, CONTINUE TO HAVE THEM PICKED UP MULTIPLE TIMES A WEEK AS WE'VE BEEN HAVING,
[01:30:01]
IN ADDITION TO JUST CONTINUING THE CLEANUP.>> WE'VE HAD ENOUGH DISCUSSION, TIME FOR A MOTION, OR MORE DISCUSSION.
>> MR. MAYOR, I MAKE A MOTION THAT WE APPROVE ITEM F1 AS PRESENTED.
>> I HAVE MOTION BY MR. LINDSAY TO APPROVE ITEM F1 AS PRESENTED.
DO I HAVE A SECOND, MR. PRESTENBERG?
>> I HAVE A SECOND BY MR. PRESTENBERG.
ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? HEARING NONE, PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTE.
MOTION CARRIES UNANIMOUSLY. NEXT TIME I'M ON AGENDA IS ITEM F2,
[2. Discuss and consider a resolution adopting the City of Sachse City Council Rules of Order and Procedure, providing a repealing clause, and providing an effective date. ]
DISCUSS AND CONSIDER A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE CITY OF SACHSE CITY COUNCIL RULES OF ORDER AND PROCEDURE, PROVIDING A REPEALING CLAUSE AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. MS. GRANGER.>> YES. GOOD EVENING, MAYOR AND COUNCIL.
BACK IN 2022, THE CHARTER REVIEW COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED REMOVING ROBERT'S RULES OF ORDERS FROM THE CHARTER, AND THAT WAS APPROVED BY VOTERS AT THAT NOVEMBER 2022 ELECTION.
THE MAYOR THEN ASKED ME TO RESEARCH SOME BEST PRACTICES FOR DOCUMENTING RULES AND PROCEDURES AFTER THAT.
I SPOKE WITH OUR CITY ATTORNEY, AS WELL AS I CHECKED OUT THE CITY OF ALLEN AND THE CITY OF RICHARDSON'S RULES AND PROCEDURES.
THE DOCUMENT THAT HAS BEEN PREPARED AND PROPOSED FOR YOU TONIGHT TO DISCUSS IS A MIXTURE OF THOSE ITEMS, AS WELL AS MAKING ANY APPLICABLE RELEVANT CHANGES FOR CITY OF SACHSE.
THIS IS AN OPPORTUNITY FOR YOU TO DISCUSS WHAT YOU LIKE, IF YOU WANT TO ADOPT A POLICY AND HOW YOU WANT TO MAKE THOSE CHANGES.
>> THANK YOU, MS. GRANGER. YES. WHEN THE CHARTER WAS AMENDED, I DID ASK MS. GRANGER TO START TO LOOK AT THIS.
THIS HAS ACTUALLY BEEN A VERY LENGTHY PROCESS BECAUSE THERE'S A LOT TO LOOK AT, AND I APPRECIATE THE JOB YOU DID IN PUTTING THIS TOGETHER.
MY COMMENT WOULD BE THAT MY GOAL FOR THIS DOCUMENT THAT WE ULTIMATELY PRESENTED BEFORE COUNCIL TONIGHT IS REALLY JUST A CODIFICATION OF WHAT WE'VE ALREADY BEEN DOING IN THE LAST TWO YEARS.
I DIDN'T SEE ANYTHING DIFFERENT IN THERE, BUT THAT'S WHY WE'RE GOING TO TALK ABOUT IT.
IF THE COUNCIL WERE TO ADOPT THIS, THEN IN ESSENCE, IT WOULD CODIFY WHAT WE'VE BEEN DOING ALREADY. IS THAT A FAIR STATEMENT?
>> WITH THAT DISCUSSION, AMONG COUNCIL, OR PRAISE.
[LAUGHTER] MAYOR PRO TEM FRANKS.
>> THAT CAN BE DIFFICULT, NEXT ITEM NOW.
NO, HONESTLY, WE TOOK OUT ROBERT'S RULES OF ORDER AND JUST SAYS, OUR RULES, BASICALLY, WHATEVER OUR RULES ARE, WHATEVER THAT MEANS.
HAVING THIS SET OF RULES IS GREAT.
I DID HAVE THE ONE COMMENT FROM A CITIZEN ABOUT CITIZEN INPUT NOT BEING IN THE RULES OF ORDER.
IT'S NOW STATE MANDATED, SO DOES IT NEED TO BE IN THERE? BECAUSE IT'S STATE MANDATED, DOES IT NEED TO BE IN THERE? THAT WAS A STATEMENT AND A QUESTION IN THE FORM OF THE SAME EXACT WORDS.
>> I WAS TRYING TO INTERPRET THAT.
>> THEN ALSO, I KNOW THAT YOU ALMOST ALWAYS OFFER, AND I'LL SAY ALMOST BECAUSE I DON'T KNOW THE EXACT RATIO AND 100% OR NOT, THE OPPORTUNITY FOR THE CITIZENS OR THE CITIZEN INPUT ON EACH ADDITIONAL REGULAR AGENDA ITEM.
BUT BECAUSE IT IS A STATE MANDATE, AND IT'S NOT IN HERE, DO WE NEED TO PUT IN THERE? DO WE NOT NEED TO PUT IN THERE? I WOULD HAVE THAT QUESTION.
>> I WOULD DEFER TO MR. GORFIDA.
WE DID TALK ABOUT THIS AND I BELIEVE IT'S COVERED IN THERE, BUT I WILL MAKE SURE HE CONCURS. MR. GORFIDA?
>> UNDER SECTION 5.1, WE HAVE THE RIGHT TO SPEAK, SO THIS TEXAS GOVERNMENT CODE, AND IT CITES TO SECTION 551.007 REQUIRES THE CITY COUNCIL TO ALLOW THE PUBLIC TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL PRIOR TO THE CITY COUNCIL TAKING ACTION ON AN ITEM LISTED.
IT'S NOT SPECIFIC JUST TO PUBLIC HEARINGS, BUT ON AN ITEM LISTED ON THE MEETING AGENDA FOR ACTION.
THE RIGHT OF THE PUBLIC TO SPEAK DOES NOT INCLUDE ITEMS ON THE AGENDA LISTED FOR DISCUSSION ONLY.
THEN THERE'S A PROCEDURE PORTION IN HERE, I BELIEVE, WHERE WE MAY HAVE JUST NOT LISTED THAT OUT, BUT IT IS LISTED IN HERE UNDER 5.1.
>> I BELIEVE IT IS COVERED, OR IT IS COVERED.
>> JUST TO CLARIFY MAYOR PRO TEM FRANKS' COMMENT.
YES. AS MR. GORFIDA SAID THAT BY LAW, WE DO NOT HAVE TO ALLOW A COMMENT ON ANYTHING THAT'S NOT AN ACTION ITEM.
[01:35:02]
HOWEVER, I DO TYPICALLY ALLOW THAT, SO TO CLARIFY THAT.YOU ARE CORRECT, AND ALMOST ALWAYS.
MAYOR PRO TEM FRANKS REFERENCED MR. KEMPER'S EMAIL TO COUNCIL.
I DID SPEAK WITH MR. KEMPER ABOUT THIS, AND SO HOPEFULLY CLARIFIED THIS ISSUE.
OTHER QUESTIONS FROM COUNCIL? MR. LINDSAY?
>> I THINK THIS IS A QUESTION FOR LEAH.
HOW I'M READING THIS, IT DOES NOT SEEM TO AGREE WITH THE OPENING OF OUR CURRENT AGENDA.
IT SAYS THAT BASICALLY TO THE EFFECT OF PUBLIC COMMENT AS FOR ANY REGULAR AGENDA ITEM ON THERE.
SO IS THERE A PLAN TO UPDATE THE OPENING TEXT THAT WE HAVE ON THE AGENDA?
>> MR. GORFIDA CAN CORRECT ME IF I'M WRONG, BUT THE RIGHT TO SPEAK HAS TO DO WITH ITEMS THAT HAVE ACTION.
HOWEVER, THE MAYOR DOES ALLOW CONVERSATION OR PUBLIC COMMENT DURING THAT PUBLIC COMMENT SECTION ON ANY ITEMS. SO ANY ITEM THAT DOES NOT HAVE ACTION, WE INVITE THE PUBLIC TO SPEAK DURING THAT PUBLIC COMMENT SECTION IS WHAT HAS BEEN OUR PRACTICE TO THIS POINT.
>> I ACTUALLY REALIZE I JUST SCROLLED UP TO ITEM C WHICH JUST SAYS, THE PUBLIC IS INVITED TO ADDRESS COUNCIL REGARDING ANY TOPICS NOT ALREADY ON THE REGULAR AGENDA.
COMMENTS REGARDING THE CONSENT AGENDA MAY BE ADDRESSED DURING PUBLIC COMMENT.
IF I JUST READ THAT HOW IT'S PRESENTED RIGHT NOW, IT DOESN'T TELL ME THAT I SHOULD ALSO SPEAK ABOUT DISCUSSION-ONLY ITEMS DURING PUBLIC INPUT.
DO WE NEED TO CHANGE THAT PHRASING?
I WILL ALSO TELL YOU THAT WHENEVER I RECEIVE A SPEAKER COMMENT CARD, IF THEY DO COME IN FOR AN ITEM THAT DOES NOT HAVE ACTION, I DO GO AND SPEAK WITH THAT CITIZEN AND LET THEM KNOW THAT THEY CAN SPEAK DURING THE PUBLIC COMMENT SECTION.
>> IS THERE ANY WAY TO BETTER MARK THE AGENDA ITEMS OR SOFTWARE? DOES IT ALLOW TO SAY, THESE ARE ITEMS THAT THE PUBLIC WILL ESSENTIALLY? OBVIOUSLY, PUBLIC HEARINGS DICTATE THAT THOUGH, BUT IS THERE ANY WAY TO FLAG OTHER AGENDA ITEMS THAT YES, THE PUBLIC WILL HAVE A CHANCE TO SPEAK ON THAT AGENDA ITEM?
>> THE NON-ACTION ITEMS IS WHAT YOU'RE GETTING AT?
>> [OVERLAPPING] ONES WITH ACTION.
>> REALLY, IT JUST BECOMES DIFFERENTIATED.
IF YOU DON'T COME TO COUNCIL MEETINGS VERY OFTEN, HOW DO YOU TELL THE DIFFERENCE? WHAT'S AN ACTION ITEM AND WHAT'S NOT? IS THERE SOME WAY WE CAN FLAG THAT?
>> WE CAN EXPLORE LANGUAGE THAT MIGHT MAKE THAT A LITTLE EASIER.
WE DO USE THE TERM CONSIDER AS AN INDICATION OF ACTION, BUT WE COULD PROBABLY WORK WITH JOE AND SEE IF WE CAN MAYBE FIND SOME MORE. [OVERLAPPING]
>> YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT ON THE AGENDA ITSELF, WE CAN JUST ADD A SIMPLE STATEMENT THAT ANY CARDS RECEIVED FROM THE PUBLIC ON AN ITEM THAT'S NOT AN ACTION ITEM WILL BE MOVED TO THE PUBLIC COMMENT SECTION, OR SOMETHING SIMILAR TO THAT.
>> I'M JUST LOOKING FOR AN EASY WAY TO SEE, FOR A REGULAR PERSON THAT DOESN'T ENJOY SPENDING TIME AT CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS, [LAUGHTER] HOW THEY COULD TELL THE DIFFERENCE.
THAT'S JUST MY MAIN CONCERN OF IT.
>> I THINK, AS MR. GORFIDA SAID, YOU COULD PROBABLY ADDRESS THAT IN THE PUBLIC COMMENT LANGUAGE. MR. MILLSAP.
>> FIRST OF ALL, I GUESS I NEED TO BE STICK IN THE MUD.
THE CHARTER THAT WAS PASSED BY THE CITY RESIDENTS, SECTION 3.13 SAYS RULES OF PROCEDURE.
THE CITY COUNCIL SHALL DETERMINE ITS OWN ORDER OF BUSINESS.
WHY WERE WE AS CITY COUNCIL NOT ASKED TO HAVE PRIOR INPUT BEFORE THIS WAS GENERATED?
>> THIS IS YOUR INPUT RIGHT NOW?
>> THIS HAS ALREADY BEEN GENERATED RIGHT HERE.
>> YES. BUT IT HASN'T BEEN ADOPTED.
>> IT'S LISTED AS AN ACTION ITEM.
>> IT SAYS THE CITY COUNCIL WILL DO THIS, NOT YOU AS MAYOR OR THE CITY SECRETARY.
WE HAD NO INPUT IN IT UP FRONT.
I'M ASKING THE LAWYER, IS THIS A VALID ENTITY IN ITSELF SINCE WE DID NOT FOLLOW THE CHARTER TO START WITH?
>> YOU'RE FOLLOWING THE CHARTER? IF THESE ARE THE RULES THAT YOU WANT TO ADOPT AND YOU'RE READY TO ADOPT THEM TONIGHT YOU CAN TAKE ACTION OF THESE RULES AND YOU NEED TO DISCUSS THEM FURTHER, ADD TO THEM.
THIS IS YOUR OPPORTUNITY TO DO THAT.
YOU NEED TO BRING THEM BACK. YOU CAN DO THAT ALSO.
I LOOK AT THIS AS BEING A DRAFT.
WHETHER OR NOT YOU APPROVED THE DRAFT OR NOT WILL BE UP TO YOU.
>> BECAUSE I FEEL LIKE THAT WE WERE CIRCUMVENTED TO DO THIS.
ALSO, TO GO ALONG WITH THIS, WE WERE TALKING ABOUT TRANSPARENCY, OPENNESS, FAIRNESS.
CODE 551.007, THE WILLIAM BILL HILL ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL OPINION COMMITTEE STATES, OUR CITIZENS ARE ENTITLED TO MORE THAN A RESULT.
THEY'RE ENTITLED NOT ONLY TO KNOW WHAT A GOVERNMENT DECIDES,
[01:40:04]
BUT TO OBSERVE HOW AND WHY EVERY DECISION IS REACHED.AGAIN, THIS IS HERE PREPARED, PRESENTED TO US AS AN ACTION ITEM TO APPROVE IT AS PRESENTED, AND OUR CITIZENS HAVEN'T HAD AN OPPORTUNITY TO FIND OUT HOW WE REACHED THESE OPPORTUNITIES ALREADY.
I THINK THAT IS WRONG TO DO THAT.
ALSO, IN THEIR OPINION COMMITTEE, IT STATES AN AGENDA ITEM PASSED WITHOUT AN OPPORTUNITY FOR PUBLIC COMMENT MAY BE VOIDABLE.
>> WELL, WE HAVEN'T DONE THAT YET.
>> I KNOW, BUT IF WE DO, IT MAY BE VOIDABLE.
>> I DON'T THINK WE'RE GOING TO. WE'RE DOING THAT. WE'RE DISCUSSING THAT RIGHT NOW.
>> I THINK WE NEED TO THINK ABOUT IT, THAT I FEEL LIKE THIS HAS BEEN PRESENTED IN A VERY UNPROFESSIONAL FORMAT TYPE WAY, AND I'M NOT HAPPY WITH IT.
>> NOTED. WE HAVE ONE REQUEST TO SPEAK, MARTIN HOBOT.
>> I CALLED ON MR. HOBOT FIRST.
>> HE CAN GO. HE EARNED IT. HE DIDN'T CARE, I DON'T CARE
>> I'M SORRY. MY NAME IS BUTCH KEMPER, 7107 LONGMEADOW DRIVE HERE IN SACHSE I SENT YOU GUYS AN EMAIL.
IT HAD LOTS OF TEXT, LONG WORDING REFERENCE TO STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL PAXTON'S OPINION.
JUST LOOKING IT HERE ON, WHAT PAGE IS IT? WELL, IT'S PAGE 9 OF THE RESOLUTION, AND IT SAYS, PROCEDURE FOR MOTION, AND IT GOES DOWN AND LISTS THE PROCEDURES FOR MOTION, AND ITEM IV, WHAT'S THAT? THAT'S FOUR. ITEM 4 SAYS, ONCE THE MATTER HAS BEEN FULLY DISCUSSED, AND THE MAYOR CALLS FOR VOTE, NO ONE FURTHER DISCUSSION WILL BE ALLOWED.
IT SAYS, ONCE THE MOTION HAS BEEN PROPERLY MADE AND SECONDED, THE MAYOR SHALL OPEN THE MATTER FOR DISCUSSION, THE FIRST OPPORTUNITY BY MOVING PARTY AND THEREAFTER TO ANY COUNCIL PERSON PROPERLY RECOGNIZED BY THE MAYOR.
THIS PROCEDURE DOES NOT RECOGNIZE INPUT FROM THE PUBLIC DURING THE DISCUSSION OF SOMETHING THAT IS GOING TO BE VOTED UPON THAT IS REQUIRED BY STATE LAW.
NOW, THE MAYOR HAS BEEN VERY DILIGENT IN ALLOWING PEOPLE LIKE MYSELF AND MARTY TO GET UP HERE AND SPEAK ON ITEMS. HE ASKED FOR OUR COMMENTS AND WE GIVE THEM.
HE DOES A VERY GOOD JOB ON THAT.
BUT HE'S NOT ALWAYS GOING TO BE SITTING IN THAT CHAIR AND THESE THINGS ARE GOING TO LAST FOR A LONG WHILE.
IF THE LAW REQUIRES IT, WE OUGHT TO PUT IT IN OUR RULES, AND THEN WE'LL FOLLOW IT.
THERE WON'T BE ANY PROBLEM ABOUT IT, WON'T BE ANYBODY SAY, MAYOR, YOU FORGOT TO CALL ON US, BECAUSE AND I SAID EARLIER, HE DOES THAT, AND I APPRECIATE IT, BUT HE'S NOT ALWAYS GOING TO BE THERE.
TERM TERM LIMITS TO GET HIM FALL OUT OF FAVOR WITH THE ELECTORATE.
BUT ANYWAY, I'D LIKE FOR YOU ALL TO INSERT THAT IN THAT SECTION 3.5 TO ENSURE THAT IT STATES THAT YOU WILL ACCEPT PUBLIC COMMENT ON AN ITEM THAT'S UP FOR CONSIDERATION AND VOTE. THANK YOU.
>> THANK YOU, MR. KEMPER. MISS OBO.
>> MAYOR, DO YOU WANT A QUICK CLARIFICATION ON THAT.
>> JUST LOOKING AT HIS DISCUSSION, IF YOU LOOK AT THE SECTION 3 THAT YOU'RE DISCUSSING, THAT IS JUST FOR THE MAKING OF THE MOTION.
A MOTION HAS BEEN MADE AND A SECOND AND THAT'S THAT PROCESS FOR THE MOTION.
THE PUBLIC DISCUSSION ACTUALLY COMES BEFORE THAT, WHICH IS IN SECTION 5.1 BECAUSE THERE'S NO PUBLIC DISCUSSION IN THE MOTION PROCESS ITSELF.
SECTION 3 JUST ADDRESSED THE MOTION PROCESS FOR THE COUNCIL TO MAKE THE MOTIONS.
>> THAT'S WHAT I AM OBJECTING TO IS THAT SECTION 3.5 DOES NOT ALLOW FOR PUBLIC INPUT DURING THE DISCUSSION ON AN ITEM WHICH IS TO BE VOTED FOR.
>> NO. BECAUSE THE ITEM IS OPEN, THE PUBLIC HAS A DISCUSSION, COUNCIL DISCUSSES, THEN A MOTION IS MADE.
THAT INVOLVES JUST ONCE THE MOTION IS MADE.
>> I UNDERSTAND WHAT YOU'RE SAYING BUT THERE'S NO PLACE IN THIS THING FOR PUBLIC INPUT.
[01:45:05]
THE ONLY PLACE WHERE PUBLIC INPUT IS MENTIONED IS IN THE BEGINNING AND THAT ITEM THAT SAYS PUBLIC INPUT, AND IT SPECIFICALLY EXCLUDES ITEMS THAT ARE ON THE AGENDA BECAUSE THE INPUT WILL BE TAKEN AT ALL.>> LOOK AT SECTION 5.1 AND READ SECTION 5.1.
GO DOWN TO 5.1. THAT ADDRESSES THE CITY COUNCIL IN THE RIGHT TO SPEAK AND THAT INCLUDES ALL ITEMS.
>> I UNDERSTAND, BUT IF WE'RE LAYING OUT A PROCEDURE ABOUT HOW TO DO IT, I THINK IT OUGHT TO INCLUDE IT SO THAT THERE'S NO CONFUSION LIKE YOU AND I HAVING RIGHT NOW.
>> NO. BUT 3.6 IS JUST FOR VOTING ONLY.
IT JUST DEALS WITH THE VOTING.
3.5 IS JUST THE PROCESS FOR THE MOTIONS.
>> IT'S MOTIONS BUT THEN LOOK AT ITEM 3.
ONCE THE MOTION HAS BEEN PROPERLY MADE, SECOND, IT MAY OPEN DISCUSSION FOR THE FIRST OPPORTUNITY.
THEN ITEM 4 IS, ONCE THE MOTION HAS BEEN FULLY DISCUSSED, AND THE MAYOR CALLS FOR A VOTE, NO FURTHER DISCUSSION WILL BE ALLOWED.
THIS DOES NOT RECOGNIZE INPUT THAT YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT IN 3.6.
YOU'RE LAYING OUT A PROCEDURE.
SOMEWHERE DOWN LOW, IT SAYS, YOU WILL HAVE PUBLIC DISCUSSION.
>> BUT THE PUBLIC DISCUSSION OCCURS BEFORE THE MOTION IS BEING MADE BECAUSE THE MAYOR WILL CALL FOR A MOTION THEN A SECOND.
IS THERE ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION ON THE MOTION?
NOW IT'S ABOUT THIRD TIME, MR. JOHN
>> SORRY MAYOR. I ASKED IF IT'S THERE.
>> MARTIN HOBOT 5511 OAKRIDGE CIRCLE, DAVID HILL.
I REALLY THOUGHT THERE WAS A CONSPIRACY BEHIND THIS WHEN I READ IT THIS MORNING, AND I DIDN'T GET A CHANCE TO READ THROUGH ALL OF IT.
IT'S REFRESHING TO KNOW THAT YOU'RE NOT GOING BACK TO ANY OF THAT RULES ROBERT STUFF.
IF YOU STAY WHERE YOU'RE AT, I'M HAPPY WITH IT FOR WHATEVER THAT'S WORTH.
MY QUESTION, CONNIE IS, IS THAT NOWHERE IN THERE DOES IT SAY, ESPECIALLY WHEN IT COMES TO PUBLIC HEARINGS, THAT Y'ALL HAVE TO ANSWER ANYTHING.
BACK WHEN I DID ALL THIS, IF SOMEBODY SUBMITTED SOMETHING IN WRITTEN FORM, IT HAD TO BE ANSWERED AND PRINTED BUT Y'ALL DON'T DO ANY OF THAT.
Y'ALL JUST SIT THERE AND BE LIKE STATUES AND DON'T OFFER ANY INPUT OR ANYTHING.
I WANT TO KNOW WHAT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THIS ORGANIZATION TO ANSWER A QUESTION? IF THE QUESTION IS A STUPID QUESTION, I DON'T HAVE A PROBLEM WITH SAYING, WE THINK THAT'S A STUPID QUESTION.
BUT I DO DEMAND AN ANSWER, AND Y'ALL DON'T.
Y'ALL JUST BLOW IT OFF AND KEEP ON GOING.
WHAT IS THE REASON FOR HAVING A PUBLIC HEARING? JUST TO HEAR Y'ALL TALK.
I WANT TO KNOW WHAT THE GUIDELINES ARE, AND IF THEY HAVE TO BE WRITTEN OR SPOKEN OF WHAT RESPONSE Y'ALL ARE REQUIRED TO GIVE BECAUSE RIGHT NOW IT'S NOTHING WHICH IS LIKE WHAT YOU GET, WHEN YOU ASK ABOUT BLACKBURN-INGRAM AND LIKE WHAT YOU GET WHEN YOU ASK ABOUT BAY ROD.
NOTHING. WE DON'T HAVE TO TELL YOU NOTHING AND WE SURE AS HELL AREN'T GOING TO. THANK YOU.
>> THANK YOU, MR. HOBOT. JOE, JUST FOR CLARIFICATION ON THAT.
I THINK THERE'S TWO DIFFERENT THINGS.
ONE IS, CORRECT ME IF I'M WRONG, THE STATE STATUTES DON'T TECHNICALLY REQUIRE A RESPONSE. IS THAT CORRECT?
>> YOU HAVE TWO AREAS TO ADDRESS HIS CONCERNS IS RESPONDING TO THE PUBLIC COMMENTS SECTION.
WE DON'T HAVE ANYTHING IN HERE ABOUT, THE COUNCIL WILL NOT RESPOND OR THE COUNCIL WILL ONLY RESPOND WITH FACTS.
THEN PUBLIC HEARING, IT'S REALLY UP TO THE PERSON RUNNING THE MEETING.
IF YOU WANT TO WAIT TILL THE END, EVERYONE TO ASK QUESTIONS AND THEN RESPOND TO THOSE THAT NEED TO BE RESPONDED TO.
>> IT'S AT THE DISCRETION OF THE BODY?
>> CORRECT. IF YOU DON'T WANT TO RESPOND, THEN YOU ARE NOT REQUIRED TO RESPOND.
>> THERE'S NO STATE REQUIREMENTS TO IT. THANK YOU, MR. SCOFIELD.
>> I DID HAVE ONE MORE SPEAKER'S CARD.
I APOLOGIZE, ARI YELONG. DID I GET THAT RIGHT?
MR. MAYOR AND COUNCIL MEMBERS.
AS A SACHSE CITIZEN, I HAVE A QUESTION ALSO FOR THE CITY ATTORNEY.
IS THERE A VIOLATION OF THE FIRST AMENDMENT FREEDOM OF SPEECH WHEN
[01:50:04]
HAND CLAPPING IS TOLERATED AND POTENTIALLY ENCOURAGED WHEN WE RECOGNIZE THE PARKS DEPARTMENT, WHEN WE'RE TOLD ABOUT THAT AND PROCLAMATIONS AND AWARDS.BUT AS CITIZENS, WHEN WE WANT TO EXPRESS OURSELVES, WHEN A MEMBER OF THE COMMUNITY IS SPEAKING OR POSSIBLY ONE OF THE COUNCIL MEMBERS, THEN WE ARE TOLD THAT THERE'S NO OUTBURST.
I'LL WAIT FOR AN ANSWER. WELL, ATTORNEY.
>> PERFECT. THAT WAS BEHIND MY DRINK. I DIDN'T SEE THAT.
>> WE'LL HAVE THE ATTORNEY ADDRESS YOUR COMMENTS AFTER YOU'RE DONE.
>> ACTUALLY, SEVERAL CITIES HAVE A STATEMENT ON THEIR AGENDAS, WHICH WE DO NOT ABOUT, HAND CLAPPING, STOMPING OF THE FEET, AND THOSE TYPES OF THINGS THAT CAN DISRUPT THE MEETING ARE NOT PERMITTED.
HAND CLAPPING, STOMPING OF THE FEET, WHISTLING, HOLLERING.
HOLLERING IS NOT NECESSARILY YOUR FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHT, AT A MEETING.
YOUR FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHT, IS TO COME AND ADDRESS THE COUNCIL AND SPEAK TO THE COUNCIL.
HOPEFULLY, THOSE ARE THINGS WE DON'T HAVE TO PUT IN HERE BECAUSE IT USUALLY ISN'T A PROBLEM.
>> BUT AGAIN, AT THE DISCRETION OF THE BODY.
>> DISCRETION ON THE BODY. WHO'S RUNNING THE MEETING?
JANICE, I DON'T HAVE A CARD FOR ME BUT I UNDERSTAND YOU WANTED US TO HAVE A COMMENT ON THIS SIDE?
>> QUESTION. AGAIN, IF YOU COULD STATE YOUR NAME AND CITY WHEN YOU COME UP.
WHEN YOU GET TO THE MICROPHONE, JUST STATE YOUR NAME AND YOUR CITY. JUST IDENTIFY YOURSELF.
>> MY NAME IS CANDACE JANICE, SACHSE SINCE 2000 LONGTIME.
MY QUESTION IS ABOUT THE FMA STUFF BECAUSE MY UNDERSTANDING THAT THEY'RE SAYING THAT WE ARE NOW CONSIDERED A FEDERAL DISASTER.
>> WELL, LET ME INTERRUPT YOU.
I APOLOGIZE, THAT'S A DIFFERENT ITEM WE'VE ALREADY DISCUSSED, BUT WE CAN ANSWER THAT QUESTION AFTER THE MEETING.
>> WELL, CALL ME LATER THEN I APOLOGIZE.
>> YOU'RE FINE. ANYONE ELSE IN THE AUDIENCE LIKE TO ADDRESS THIS SIDE? I HAD A COUPLE OF QUESTIONS FROM COUNCIL. MS. BUHLER.
>> NO. I'M HOPING CLARIFY FOR MR. KEMPER.
>> WELL, DARE I SAY THIS IS WHERE I WISH THAT WE HAD WORKSHOPS ON THERE.
I WOULD HAVE REALLY PREFERRED TO GO PAGE BY PAGE IN A WORKSHOP AND REALLY HAVE TIME TO GET INTO ALL THE SPEECH TO MR. KEMPER'S POINT, WHICH I CAN SAY MR. KEMPER RIGHT NOW BECAUSE WE HADN'T ADOPTED THIS YET.
I THINK IN SECTION 3.5, IF WE SIMPLY PUT, WHENEVER A MOTION IS BEING MADE, THAT THERE'S A CHECK BARK THERE THAT SAYS, PRIOR TO ACCEPTING A MOTION, WE MADE SURE TO ALLOW THE AUDIENCE TO HAVE INPUT ON THERE.
I THINK WE COULD HANDLE THAT AMBIGUITY, WHICH I ALWAYS MESS UP THAT WORD THOUGH.
>> I THOUGHT YOU'RE GOING FOR A DIFFERENT WORD.
>> THAT WORD STILL. I THINK JUST A SIMPLE POINT THERE IS SOMEBODY MAKES A MOTION.
MAYOR SAYS, I'M SORRY WE HADN'T COMPLETED OUR DISCUSSION, WHICH ALSO INCLUDES ASKING FOR PUBLIC COMMENT.
>> FOLLOWING PUBLIC COMMENTS AND COUNCIL DISCUSSION, MOTION MAY BE MADE BY ANY MEMBER OF THE COUNCIL.
>> SOUNDS PERFECT. I LOVE THAT LEGAL TALK.
>> I HAD A COUPLE OF OTHER THINGS ON THERE TOO.
SPEAKERS ARE PROHIBITED FROM DISPLAYING MATERIALS OR INFORMATION.
DOES THAT PRECLUDE LIKE SOMEBODY SHOWING A RAFFLE BASKET THAT COMES FORWARD? IS THAT A MATERIAL? I THINK THAT CITY ATTORNEY QUESTION.
>> WHICH SECTION IS THAT AGAIN?
>> LET'S SEE. SECTION C. IT'S ON PAGE 12, IF THAT HELPS YOU.
MATERIALS FOR PUBLIC RECORD IS THE HEADING.
>> THE INTENT OF THAT IS REALLY FOR THE PUBLIC COMING IN AND HANDING THE FLASH DRIVE DURING THE PUBLIC SPEAKING, THEY WANT TO BE PRESENTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL TO BE DISPLAYED, MORE WRITTEN MATERIALS.
>> MATERIAL WOULD MEAN A RAFFLE BASKET OR SOMETHING TO THAT EFFECT BECAUSE THIS IS ALL ABOUT COPIES BEING DISTRIBUTED AND SO FORTH.
>> YEAH, I ALMOST CONSIDER IT MORE LIKE A PROP TOO.
EVEN THE ANIMAL SHELTER PRESENTING AN ANIMAL.
[01:55:03]
>> A BAG OF ROCKS THAT WE'VE HAD HERE BEFORE.
>> GOOD TO KNOW ON THERE. IF WE CAN SAY SPEAKERS ARE PROHIBITED FROM DISPLAYING WRITTEN MATERIALS OR INFORMATION.
>> WRITTEN SOUNDS GOOD. I'M JUMPING BACK TO PAGE 6.
I KNOW WE DON'T HAVE IT UP ON THE SCREEN FOR VIDA TO REFERENCE.
UNDERNEATH PAGE 6 WAS JUST HOW AGENDA ITEM COMES TO BE.
I'M GLAD WE'VE GOT SOMETHING WRITTEN DOWN.
I GUESS I'VE NEVER ACTUALLY REALLY UNDERSTOOD THE PROCESS BUT ESTABLISHING THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA.
ALL THE TEXT IN READS, IF A COUNCIL MEMBER WANTS TO PLACE SOMETHING ON THE AGENDA, THEY GET TWO OTHERS, AND THEN THEY TAKE IT TO THE MAYOR.
THERE'S NOT LANGUAGE. HOW DOES A MAYOR PUT SOMETHING ON THE AGENDA? DOES IT STILL HAVE TO GO THROUGH THE SAME PROCESS?
>> YOU MEAN IF IT MEETS THAT CRITERIA YOU JUST READ?
>> WELL, IT SAYS, IF A COUNCIL MEMBER REQUESTS A CITY MANAGER PLACE AN ITEM ON THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA THAT DOES NOT FALL WITHIN SCOPE OF THE CURRENT CITY COUNCIL GOALS AND POLICIES, WHICH IS MY NEXT QUESTION ON THERE, THE COUNCIL MAY SUBMIT A WRITTEN AGENDA REQUEST THAT THE MAYOR, ACCOMPANIED BY WRITTEN SUPPORT OF TWO OTHER COUNCIL MEMBERS, FOR PLACEMENT OF THAT ITEM ON THE AGENDA.
IT DOESN'T SPECIFICALLY SAY IF THE MAYOR PUTS AN ITEM.
>> IF I GOT THAT REQUEST IN WRITING, I WOULD TAKE IT TO THE CITY MANAGER AND HAVE IT PLACED ON IT. THAT'S HOW I INTERPRET THAT.
>> AS A MAYOR, YOU WOULDN'T HAVE TO GO AND GET SUPPORT FROM TWO OTHER COUNCIL MEMBERS.
>> TO ME, IT'S A LITTLE AMBIGUOUS IN THAT PARAGRAPH BECAUSE IT SAYS THE CITY MAG SHOULD ESTABLISH A PRELIMINARY CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA BASED ON THE POLICY DIRECTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL.
TO ME, THOSE ARE TOGETHER AS ONE UNIT.
I GUESS REALLY HOW THAT'S BEING INTERPRETED IS THE MAYOR MAY HAVE THE SET OF ITEMS, AND THEN THE REST OF THE CITY COUNCIL HAS BASICALLY A DIFFERENT PROCESS TO GET THINGS ON THE AGENDA.
>> THAT'S PROBABLY FAIR. I WOULD SAY THAT I THINK MOST OF YOU ALL HAVE MONTHLY MEETINGS WITH MS. NASH.
I'M ASSUMING THERE'S ITEMS THAT COME UP EVERY NOW AND THEN THAT YOU MIGHT WANT TO TALK, MAYBE HAVE ON AN AGENDA.
WHAT THAT IS DOING IS THAT IS OUTLINING THAT PROCESS TO MAKE IT MORE FORMAL. IF THAT MAKES SENSE.
>> YOU DO HAVE A PROCESS, THOUGH.
BASICALLY, IF YOU WANT SOMETHING YOURSELF THAT'S ON THE AGENDA, THERE'S NOT THIS REQUIREMENT FOR YOU TO GO FIND TWO SPONSORS?
>> NO. THE MAYOR HAS A PROCESS.
THE REST OF COUNCIL HAS A PROCESS.
>> THAT'S CLEAR. I SEE THAT CAN BE INTERPRETED EITHER WAY, BUT I'D LIKE AT LEAST TO KNOW WHAT THE INTENT IS, SO I APPRECIATE THE INTENT.
THE POLICY, SO IF IT'S WITHIN THE POLICY, THEN I CAN ASK THE CITY MANAGER TO PUT IT ON THE AGENDA, AND I DON'T NEED TO SPONSORSHIP.
BUT SOME OF OUR POLICIES, I THINK, ARE PRETTY WIDE OPEN.
IF I THOUGHT OF ONE, I THINK ONE OF OURS IS ENRICH THE QUALITY OF LIFE FOR SACHSE CITIZENS.
I COULD ARGUE THAT PUTTING THIS RANDOM SPEED LIMIT ON SOME SIDE STREET IS TO THE PUBLIC.
WHO'S THE JUDGE OF WHAT'S POLICY AND WHAT'S NOT?
>> PROBABLY COMMON SENSE. I WOULD GUESS.
AGAIN, MY UNDERSTANDING IS YOU HAVE MONTHLY MEETINGS WITH THE CITY MANAGER, AND I THINK THAT THOSE ARE THINGS THAT ARE DISCUSSED AND IF IT MEETS SOME INTERPRETATION, YOU PROBABLY HAVE NO ISSUE.
IF IT'S SOMETHING THAT'S, FOR LACK OF A BETTER WAY TO SAY IT, OUT THERE, THEN IT'D PROBABLY BE A DIFFERENT DISCUSSION.
>> AGAIN, UNDERSTANDING THE INTENT THEN BEHIND IT IS BASICALLY THE FIRST COURSE OF ACTION FOR REGULAR COUNCIL MEMBER TO GET SOMETHING ON THE AGENDA, CONSULT CITY MANAGER.
THE CITY MANAGER SAYS, NO, I DON'T THINK THAT REALLY MEETS POLICY.
THEN THE APPEAL IS REALLY GOING TO YOU WITH TWO SPONSORS.
>> PICKING BACK ON MR. KEMPER ON A PERSONAL LEVEL, I'M PRETTY SURE I'M GOING TO BE PRETTY LENIENT WITH YOU JUST COMING TO ME.
>> THE FUTURE MAYOR MAY NOT BE HERE, YEAH.
THE FUTURE MAYOR, THIS MEAN, YES, WOULD NEED YOU AND SOMEBODY ELSE.
>> IT HELPS EXPLAIN. APPRECIATE.
GO ALONG WITH MY OTHER ATTITUDE.
IF A COUNCIL MEMBER ABSTAINS BECAUSE OF LEGAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST, SUCH MEMBER IS NOT COUNTED AS PRESENT FOR THE QUORUM PURPOSES, AND IT IS NOT DEEMED TO BE VOTING.
NOW, THEN, IN THAT CASE, IF THERE'S ONLY FOUR PEOPLE HERE, THAT'S A QUORUM AND ONE OF THOSE PEOPLE VOTING.
>> FRANK, I'M SORRY. CAN YOU PUSH THE MICROPHONE A LITTLE CLOSER?
>> SURE. IF THAT BE THE CASE AND ONE OF THOSE PEOPLE ABSTAINS, DOES THAT MEAN THERE'S NO MORE QUORUM, SO YOU CAN'T VOTE ON THAT ACTION?
[02:00:03]
THAT'S WHAT IT SOUNDS TO ME LIKE.>> WELL, YOU'RE STILL GOING TO HAVE TO HAVE YOUR QUORUM.
IF YOU CAN'T GET YOUR QUORUM, THEN YOU'RE NOT GOING TO BE ABLE TO TAKE ACTION ON THAT ITEM.
THAT ITEM WOULD HAVE TO BE POSTPONED BECAUSE YOU CANNOT APPROVE IT.
>> WELL, I'M INTERPRETING THAT RIGHT, IF WE HAVE FOUR PEOPLE HERE TO FORM A QUORUM UP FRONT AND ACTION ITEM HAPPENS, AND ONE OF THOSE ABSTAINS AND YOU DON'T HAVE A QUORUM, YOU CAN'T VOTE ON THAT ACTION?
>> CORRECT, YOU DON'T. IF YOU HAVE FIVE PEOPLE HERE AND ONE, THEN YOU'RE OKAY.
YOU NEED THREE TO PASS AN ITEM. YOU'RE GOOD.
>> I DON'T SEE THAT THAT WOULD EVER HAPPEN, BUT IT DOES HAVE A POSSIBILITY THAT WE NEED.
>> JUST A RESPONSE FOR MR. MILLSAP.
I WAS SAT IN A BOARD MEETING THAT THAT HAPPENED IN.
I CAN'T REMEMBER, IT WAS PROBABLY EDC, BUT WE ONLY HAD FOUR PEOPLE FOR THE QUORUM, AND ONE OF THE PERSONS, I THINK, SOMEBODY WORKED FOR ENCORE, THE GAS ATMOSPHERE AND WE COULDN'T DO THAT ITEM BECAUSE WE DIDN'T HAVE FOUR PEOPLE IF HE ABSTAINED, AND SO WE JUST HAD TO POSTPONE IT TO THE NEXT MEETING. ONCE.
>> NOW, THEN AGAIN, I THINK YOU TRIED TO ANSWER.
I'M NOT SURE I UNDERSTOOD WHAT YOUR ANSWER WAS ABOUT PUBLIC'S RIGHT TO SPEAK DURING THE MEETING BECAUSE I THINK THE LAW SAYS THAT THE PUBLIC HAS A RIGHT TO SPEAK PRIOR TO AND DURING ANY ACTION ITEM.
WHAT I'M ASKING THEN, I THINK WHAT I HEARD YOU SAY IS, WHAT I DON'T UNDERSTAND, ONCE A MOTION IS MADE AND THE MAYOR OR WHOEVER IS IN CHARGE OF THE MEETING ASKED IS ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION, THAT MEAN THE PUBLIC DOESN'T GET THE DISCUSSION?
>> THERE'S TWO PLACES IN HERE, 5.1 IN HERE.
THAT ADDRESSES THE PUBLIC'S RIGHT TO SPEAK ON ANY ITEM THAT'S ON THE AGENDA THAT'S NOT AN ACTION ITEM.
ANY ITEM THAT'S NOT ON THE AGENDA THAT'S AN ACTION ITEM.
WE'VE ALREADY DISCUSSED SOMETHING THAT'S NOT AN ACTION ITEM.
WE'RE GOING TO ADDRESS THAT THROUGH POSSIBLY CHANGING THE LANGUAGE ON THE AGENDA TO ALLOW THE CITIZENS TO KNOW THAT THEY CAN STILL SPEAK ON THAT.
THAT WOULD JUST BE MOVED TO THE PUBLIC COMMENTS SECTION ON THE AGENDA, WHICH IS THE FIRST THING ON THE AGENDA.
GOING BACK TO THE MOTIONS, WE'RE GOING TO ADD PRIOR TO, WHICH SECTION IS THAT? MOTION 3.5C, I BELIEVE IT'S C.
>> WILL TALKS ABOUT A MOTION TO BE MADE BEFORE THAT, WE'RE GOING TO ADD LANGUAGE FOLLOWING PUBLIC COMMENT AND COUNSEL DISCUSSION JUST TO BE CLEAR, THE PUBLIC COMMENT WOULD BE MADE PRIOR TO A MOTION BEING MADE.
IF YOU THINK OF WHAT THIS IS ADDRESSING IS, WE HAVE THE PUBLIC COMMENTS, THEY SPEAK ON AN ITEM.
LET'S SAY IT'S A NON PUBLIC HEARING ITEM LET'S SAY IT'S THIS, FOR EXAMPLE.
PUBLIC COMES UP AND THEY SPEAK ON IT THE COUNCIL THEN COMMENT HAS COMMENTS ON IT, AND THEN DECIDE, ANY OTHER FURTHER ACTION.
SOMEONE SAYS, I MAKE A MOTION THEN THERE'S A SECOND.
MAYOR ASK IS THERE ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? THAT DISCUSSION IS LIMITED TO BASICALLY THAT MOTION ITSELF AMONGST THE BODY BECAUSE YOU'RE NOW IN THE MOTION PROCESS.
WHEN YOU HAVE A MOTION IN A SECOND, YOU DON'T INVITE THE PUBLIC UP TO DISCUSS THE MOTION THAT'S BEING MADE.
THAT ONLY ADDRESSES THE MOTION MAKING PROCESS.
>> BECAUSE THE PUBLICS ALREADY HAD THE OPPORTUNITY.
>> CORRECT AND YOUR MOTION IS USUALLY BASED ON THE PUBLIC COMMENT.
>> I UNDERSTAND WHERE YOU'RE COMING FROM, BUT HOWEVER, SOMETIMES, AFTER THE PUBLIC SPEAKS, AND THEN THE COUNCIL DISCUSSES IT FURTHER, SOME INFORMATION IS BROUGHT UP THAT THE PUBLIC MAY NEED AN OPPORTUNITY TO ASK MORE QUESTIONS.
>> THAT'S PRIOR TO A MOTION BEING MADE.
>. BUT EVEN AFTER THE MOTION IS MADE, SOMETIMES THE MOTION IS, I THINK SHOULD BE THERE.
BUT ALSO ITEM, LET'S SEE, IT'S 4.2 ITEM BC MATERIALS.
IN ABOUT MIDWAY IN THAT PARAGRAPH, IT SAYS NINE COPIES SHALL BE PRESENTED TO THE CITY SECRETARY AS A SPEAKER APPROACHES TO SPEAK.
COPIES WILL BE DISTRIBUTED TO THE CITY ACCOUNTS ON THE CITY MANAGER AFTER THE MEETING UNLESS DISTRIBUTION IS REQUESTED BY THE MAYOR DURING THE SPEAKER'S COMMENTS.
ALL SUCH MATERIALS PRESENT WHEN IT SAYS ALL MATERIALS PRESENT, I'M ASSUMING THAT MEANS ALL NINE COPIES WILL BE RETAINED BY THE CITY SECRETARY'S OFFICE AS PART OF THE RECORD IN ACCORDANCE WITH REQUIREMENTS OF LAW.
WHY DO WE REQUIRE NINE COPIES IF COUNCILMAN OR MEMBERS MAY NOT EVEN GET TO SEE THEM, AND WHY WE NEED TO KEEP ALL NINE COPIES?
>> WELL, ACTUALLY, I WOULD INTERPRET THAT AS ALL SUCH MATERIALS ARE JUST BASICALLY WHATEVER THE MATERIAL IS.
IN ESSENCE, IN YOUR EXAMPLE, IT'S JUST THE ONE COPY.
NOW, I WILL TELL YOU BASED ON YOUR OTHER COMMENT, THOUGH, WHERE IT SAYS, LET'S SEE COPY AFTER THE MEETING,
[02:05:03]
UNLESS DISTRIBUTION IS REQUESTED BY THE MAYOR, I THINK WE SHOULD JUST MAKE THAT A REQUIREMENT THAT IF THEY SUBMIT NINE COPIES OF THE SECRETARY, REGARDLESS, THEY'LL BE DISTRIBUTED.I THINK WE CAN SOLVE THAT PROBLEM.
>> I FEEL IF YOU'RE GOING TO DISTRIBUTE THEM TO US, WE NEED TO HAVE THEM EARLY ENOUGH TO READ THEM PRIOR TO THE MEETING.
>> IN OTHER WORDS [OVERLAPPING].
>> DON'T BRING THE PRIOR TO THE MEETING RIGHT.
>> I SAY SOMEONE BRINGS SOMETHING TO THE MEETING GOING BACK TO THE NINE COPIES, THEY WOULD GIVE IT TO MISS GRANGER.
THEN I THINK WE CAN, OR WE SHOULD MODIFY THE LANGUAGE TO SAY IT'S NOT IF REQUESTED BY THE MAYOR, JUST TAKE THAT PART OUT, JUST SAY IT WILL BE DISTRIBUTED PERIOD AND THEN YOU GOT YOUR COPIES.
HOW MUCH TIME YOU HAVE TO READ IT. THAT'S A WHOLE DIFFERENT THING AND THEN THAT ORIGINAL COPY, IF CITY SECRETARY WILL HAVE TO KEEP THAT AND SHE'S DONE THAT ALL THE TIME.
THAT'S HOW I PROPOSED TO MODIFY THAT.
ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS FROM COUNSEL? WE CAN DO STUFF, WE CAN HAVE JOE DO HIS THING AND BRING HIM BACK, WHATEVER YOU WOULD LIKE.
I'M ASSUMING JOE TOOK GOOD NOTES, I'M ASSUMING. OH, MS. HOWARD.
>> DO WE NEED TO SEE A NEW COPY FROM JOE, OR CAN WE SAY WE'LL TAKE IT WITH THE CHANGES REQUESTED.
>> YOU READ THOSE CHANGES IN YOUR MOTION?
>> WHICH WOULD BE PROBABLY DIFFICULT.
>> I'VE GOT THEM HERE I CAN READ THEM OUT, BUT IT'S UP TO YOU ALL.
>> I WOULD SAY FOR SIMPLICITY SAKE, SINCE WE HAVE A LITTLE EXTRA TIME.
WE'LL JUST HAVE JOE AND CITY STAFF CODIFY THE CHANGES PROPOSED CHANGES AND THEN WE'LL JUST HAVE IT ON AN NEXT AGENDA FOR.
IF THAT'S OKAY, COUNSEL. DID YOU HAVE ANOTHER COMIC? YOU'RE IN THE KEYS. [LAUGHTER] MR. LINDSAY.
>> THAT SOUNDS GOOD TO GO AHEAD AND BRING IT BACK BECAUSE WE ARE GETTING A LITTLE LONG ON THE VARIOUS WORDINGS.
I'D LOVE ANOTHER OPPORTUNITY TO THINK ABOUT THINGS A LITTLE BIT MORE.
I JUST WANTED TO POINT OUT THAT 1.3 JUST MAKES ME HAPPY HERE JUST TO READ IT REAL FAST.
FROM TIME TO TIME, COUNCIL MEMBERS MAY CHOOSE TO PARTICIPATE IN COMMUNITY ACTIVITIES, COMMITTEES, EVENTS, AND TASK FORCES.
WHEN A COUNCIL MEMBER PARTICIPATES IN THESE TYPES OF ACTIVITIES, A COUNCIL MEMBER IS ACTING AS AN INTERESTED PARTY RATHER THAN ACTING ON BEHALF OF CITY COUNCIL.
I THINK THAT'S TREMENDOUS PROGRESS.
WHENEVER I CAME HERE INTO COUNCIL IN 2020, I WAS ADMONISHED AND RIDICULED AND EVERYTHING ELSE FOR VOLUNTEERING ONE, DO STUFF OUTSIDE OF CITY COUNCIL IN HERE, AND I WAS ALSO TOLD THAT YOU COULDN'T SEPARATE.
YOU COULDN'T BE A CITY COUNCIL PERSON AND BE AN INTERESTED PARTY, YOU COULD ONLY BE A COUNCIL MEMBER.
I LOVE THAT THE VOLUNTEERISM SPIRIT OF 1.3 IS RESTORING SOME OF THE THINGS THAT WERE TAKEN AWAY FROM ME, WHENEVER I WAS FIRST ELECTED TO COUNCIL.
>> TAKE IT AWAY AND GIVE IT BACK.
HOW ABOUT THAT? NOT TO YOU, MR. LINDSAY.
I HEAR THAT WE ARE ALL GOOD WITH HAVING JOE CODIFY THESE CHANGES, BRING THEM BACK FOR REVIEW AT THE NEXT REGULAR REVIEW.
ANY OBJECTION TO THAT. HEARING NONE, WE'LL MOVE ON.
NEXT ITEM ON THE AGENDA ITEM F3,
[3. Discuss and provide direction on adopting a 50/50 Sidewalk Replacement Program.]
DISCUSS AND PROVIDE DIRECTION ON ADOPTING A 50/50 SIDEWALK REPLACEMENT PROGRAM, MS. NASH.>> SORRY, I'M TAKING A NOTE. I DIDN'T EXPECT YOU TO FINISH THAT FAST.
[LAUGHTER] MAYOR AND COUNCIL, COREY HERE TEEING UP HIS PRESENTATION TO TALK TO YOU ABOUT THE 50/50 SIDEWALK REPLACEMENT PROGRAM AS A POTENTIAL POLICY DISCUSSION FOR MOVING FORWARD.
ONE OF THE THINGS JUST TO GIVE YOU SOME PREFACE ON THIS.
THIS ITEM WAS ACTUALLY DISCUSSED WITH THE CITY COUNCIL BACK IN 2017, WHICH WOULD MEAN THAT MAYOR BICKERTFF AND MAYOR PRO TEM FRANKS WERE THE ONLY TWO THAT WERE ON THE CITY COUNCIL AT THAT TIME WHEN THE PROGRAM WAS DISCUSSED AND WAS DISCUSSED NOT TO MOVE THAT FORWARD.
SINCE THAT TIME, WE'VE ADDED QUITE A BIT OF SIDEWALKS TO OUR SIDEWALK PROGRAM, QUITE A BIT OF DEVELOPMENT, SIGNIFICANT, CERTAINLY IN THE LAST SEVEN YEARS SINCE THAT TIME, AND A LOT OF REQUESTS FROM THE COMMUNITY.
THIS WAS AN IDEA TO BRING FORWARD FOR THE COUNCIL TO CONSIDER AS ONE OF MANY OPPORTUNITIES THAT COULD BE CONSIDERED ABOUT SIDEWALK REPLACEMENTS MOVING FORWARD.
MAYOR, WITH THAT, I'LL HAND IT BACK OVER TO YOU.
>> GOOD EVENING, MAYOR, COUNCIL, LIKE, MS. NASH SAID, WE'RE GOING TO GO THROUGH A QUICK LITTLE OVERVIEW HERE.
WE'LL THROUGH SOME DATA, SOME COSTS, SOME POLICIES OF OTHER CITIES, AND JUST LET YOU GUYS DISCUSS OUR PLAN.
WITH THAT, JUST WANT TO GIVE YOU AN OVERVIEW OF WHAT WE CONSIDER TRIP HAZARDS AND WHAT LOOKS LIKE A STRUCTURAL FAILURE AND WHAT IS COSMETIC? OBVIOUSLY, THIS IS SIMPLER THAN IT LOOKS,
[02:10:04]
BUT CERTAINLY DEPENDS ON WHO'S CALLING IN AT THE TIME.OBVIOUSLY A COSMIC THING, IT'S NOT A STRUCTURAL.
IT'S NOT A LIFE SAFETY TRIP HAZARD TYPE THING.
THERE'S NO STRUCTURAL FAILURES EVEN SOME OF THE STRUCTURAL FAILURES MAY NOT NECESSARILY BE A TRIP HAZARD, BUT OBVIOUSLY THE PAVEMENT SECTION HAS FAILED.
OBVIOUSLY A TRIP HAZARD IS WHEN THE CONCRETE PANEL HAS HEAVED OR SETTLED IN THAT MANNER.
JUST WANT TO KIND OF GIVE YOU SOME OVERVIEW OF WHAT WE USE IN OUR TERMINOLOGY.
BASICALLY, OUR CURRENT POLICY IS THAT WE MAINTAIN ALL SIDEWALKS WITHIN THE CITY LIMITS.
THEY ARE DONE BY OUR PUBLIC WORKS CREWS CONTRACTORS.
WE TALKED A LITTLE BIT EARLIER, THE CITY DOES NOT ACTUALLY ACTIVELY BUILD NEW SIDEWALK FOR CURRENT HOMES IN SUBDIVISION.
THOSE ARE GENERALLY BUILT BY THE HOME BUILDER SO THERE'S A LITTLE BIT OF A DISCREPANCY SO I MAKE SURE THAT EVERYBODY UNDERSTANDS THAT WE DO FOCUS RIGHT NOW ON CONCRETE SEPARATIONS THAT ARE THREE INCHES OR GREATER.
THAT GOES BACK TO THAT FIRST PICTURE, TRIP HAZARDS THAT ARE THREE INCHES AND GREATER.
IF THERE'S A HANDICAP OR AD ISSUE WHERE SOMEBODY CAN'T GET OUT OF THE HOUSE AND MAKE IT TO THEIR CAR, THOSE ARE CERTAINLY PUT AT A HIGHER PRIORITY.
AGAIN, COSMETIC OR NON STRUCTURAL ITEMS ARE PUSHED TO THE BOTTOM OF THE LIST AT THIS TIME.
AGAIN, THESE PROJECTS ARE FUNDED THROUGH THE STREET MAINTENANCE PROGRAM.
WE HAVE $150,000 IN OUR BUDGET EACH YEAR RECENTLY TO ACCOMPLISH THIS WORK.. WE'LL SAY THAT THAT 150,000 IS SPECIFICALLY FOR SIDEWALKS, BUT IF WE GO INTO A NEIGHBORHOOD AND WE FIX A STREET SECTION, AND THE SIDEWALK NEEDS TO BE REPLACED, WE'LL FIX THE SIDEWALK WHILE WE'RE THERE.
THOSE FUNDS, THAT 150,000, WE USE A PORTION OF THAT FUNDING TO FIX THE SIDEWALKS AND THE OTHER PORTION OF THE STREET MAINTENANCE BUDGET TO FIX THE STREET.
I JUST WANT TO MAKE THAT SET THAT DESCRIPTION AS WELL.
>> WE HAVE A VARIOUS LIST OF CHALLENGES THAT WE FACE ON A DAILY BASIS FOR THESE THINGS.
AGAIN, WHEN PEOPLE CALLING, THEY'RE CALLING IN ABOUT THE CONDITION OF THEIR SIDEWALK OR THE CONDITION OF THE PAVEMENT IN FRONT OF THEIR HOUSE.
WE HAVE TO EVALUATE THOSE IS IT A STRUCTURAL CONDITION? IS IT A COSMETIC ISSUE, IS IT A TRIP HAZARD? AGAIN, WHAT WE MAY CONTRIBUTE A WE DECIDE AS A TRIP HAZARD, MAY NOT BE WHAT SOMEBODY ELSE CONSIDERS A TRIP HAZARD.
ONE IS TRIP HAZARD MAY NOT BE THE CERTAINLY NOT THE SAME AS A THREE IS TRIP HAZARD, BUT AGAIN, ACCORDING TO THE CALLER OR TO THE RESIDENT, THAT'S CERTAINLY A DIFFERENT PERSPECTIVE.
AGAIN, AS YOU KNOW, WE'VE HAVE SEASONAL CHANGES IN SIDEWALK.
IN SUMMERTIME, IT MAY BE AT GRADE OR EVEN WITH GRADE OR VICE VERSA, SOMETIMES, WE HAVE A HOT LONG SUMMER CONCRETE PANELS SETTLE OR HEAVE IN THAT MANNER.
AGAIN, DEPENDING ON WHEN YOU CALL AND MAKE THOSE COMPLAINTS OR REQUESTS, THAT MAY BE DIFFERENT.
AGAIN, GOING BACK TO THE VOLUMES IS ANOTHER CHALLENGE.
WE GET ROUGHLY ONE OR TWO CALLS A DAY ON SIDEWALKS.
EACH ONE OF THESE CALLS HAS TO BE EVALUATED.
AGAIN, SOME OF THEM ARE REPEAT, SOME OF THEM ARE MAYBE ONES WE ALREADY HAVE ON OUR LIST THAT WE KNOW ABOUT, SOME OF THEM MAY BE NEW.
BUT AGAIN, WE GO THROUGH AND EVALUATE EACH ONE, AND JUST IT'S TIME EXTENSIVE GET TO DO THAT TYPE OF WORK.
BUT WE HAVE STAFF CREW MEMBERS THAT GO THROUGH THROUGHOUT THE CITY EVALUATE ALL THESE REQUESTS, AND THEN THAT TIES INTO A WORK ORDER SYSTEM.
I'LL GET TO THAT IN A SECOND. AGAIN, OBSERVE PROBLEMS LIKE IF WE KNOW THAT THERE'S A PROBLEM AND WE CAN DOCUMENT AND WE CAN HAVE SOMETHING TO LOOK AT IT, WE CERTAINLY ADD THAT TO THE LIST.
THERE'S SOME PLACES THAT WE DON'T EVEN KNOW THAT THERE WAS AN ISSUE UNTIL SOMEBODY CALLS AND COMPLAINS ABOUT OR MAKE THE REQUEST.
WE DON'T KNOW WHAT WE DON'T KNOW.
I THINK WE DO A GOOD JOB OF TRYING TO COLLECT ALL THAT DATA, BUT CERTAINLY THERE ARE ONES THAT WE HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT, AND THOSE GET ADDED TO THE LIST AS WELL.
WE DO GET A LOT OF REQUESTS WHERE YOU FIX MY NEIGHBOR'S SIDEWALK, WHEN ARE YOU GOING TO FIX MINE.
WE'LL GO EVALUATE IT, MAKE SURE THAT IT'S COMPLIANT, MAKE SURE THAT FOLLOWS OUR POLICY.
BUT AGAIN, YOU GET A LOT OF TAG ON THINGS.
WHILE YOU'RE ALREADY HERE, WHY, CAN'T YOU JUST DO AN EXTRA, DO MY YARD WHILE I'M AT IT.
SOMETIMES THAT'S HARD TO TELL PEOPLE NO.
SOMETIMES IT'S A LEGITIMATE CONCERN.
LIKE I SAID, WE MAY NOT HAVE KNOWN ABOUT IT AT THE TIME.
WE'LL ADD THAT TO THE LIST AGAIN AND MAKE THOSE REPAIRS, BUT I THINK THE BIGGEST SOME OF THAT IS, AGAIN, IT IS PERCEPTION ON SOME OF THAT.
WHAT CONSTITUTES A TRIP HAS OR WHAT CONSTITUTES STRUCTURAL FAILURE, COSMETIC REPAIRS, AND THE LIKE.
JUST SOME OF THE CHALLENGES WE FACE ON A DAILY BASIS.
AGAIN, GOING TO OUR INVENTORY.
I HAVE A WHOLE LIST HERE. I CAN SHOW YOU LATER IF YOU WANT TO SEE IT.
WE GET COMPLAINTS THROUGH SEECLICKFIX, PHONE CALLS, EMAILS, AND ALL THAT DATA GETS TRANSFERRED INTO WHAT WE CALL IWORQ,
[02:15:04]
WHICH IS OUR WORK ORDER SYSTEM.IT'S ALSO OUR ASSET MANAGEMENT PROGRAM.
AGAIN, THOSE REQUESTS GET TRANSLATED INTO A WORK ORDER, WORK ORDERS GET SENT TO OUR STAFF.
STAFF GOES OUT, TRACKS, LOGS, EVALUATES ALL THESE REQUESTS.
THEN BASED ON SOME OF THOSE CONDITIONS, WE CAN ADD THAT AND PRIORITIZE THAT LIST TO MAKE SURE THAT WE'RE DOING THE WORST FIRST TYPE SCENARIO.
WE'LL GO OVER THE SIDE WALK COSTS A LITTLE BIT.
ONE THING I WILL POINT OUT SINCE WE'VE DONE THE ANNUAL CONCRETE CONTRACT, IT'S MADE US EXTREMELY EFFICIENT IN GETTING MORE WORK DONE.
PREVIOUS TO THAT, WE HAD TO EITHER BID LARGER PROJECTS OR DO MUCH SMALLER AMOUNT AND SIZE PROJECTS.
I THINK WE'RE ACTUALLY MAKING A LITTLE BIT MORE HEADWAY NOW WITH THE PROGRESS AND THE AMOUNT THAT WE CAN GET DONE ON AN ANNUAL BASIS, BUT THAT'S ALL PART OF THE ANNUAL CONCRETE CONTRACT.
ROUGHLY JUST FOR PERCEPTION AGAIN.
A FOUR INCH SIDEWALK IN FRONT OF YOUR HOUSE IS ROUGHLY $80 A SQUARE FOOT, A THREE BY THREE PANEL, OR ROUGHLY $40 A LINEAR, 40-$50 A LINEAR FOR IT.
IF YOU HAVE A HOUSE THAT'S 50 FEET WIDE, THAT DOESN'T GET YOU VERY MUCH IN THAT.
AGAIN, SO JUST FOR COMPARISON.
THE $150,000, IF YOU ADD THAT TO WELL LOOK THE NEXT SLIDE HELP ME EXPLAIN SOME OF THIS.
SO AGAIN, WE TALKED ABOUT TRAFFIC DATA.
WE HAVE 140 ACTIVE WORK ORDERS RIGHT NOW.
I HAVE 78 OF THEM THAT WE HAVEN'T EVEN EVALUATED YET.
THAT'S JUST THE ONES AGAIN, THIS IS THE ONES THAT WE KNOW ABOUT.
LAST YEAR, WE DID ALMOST 3,000 SQUARE FEET OF SIDEWALK, LINEAR FEET OF SIDEWALK.
FOR PERCEPTION, THAT'S LESS THAN A MILE.
WE HAVE 145 LANE MILES OF STREETS.
EVEN IF WE DID A MILE A YEAR, THAT'S 140 YEARS TO DO THE COMPLETE SIDEWALKS.
WE'RE MAKING GOOD HEADWAY ON IT, BUT I THINK JUST THE VOLUMES IS PRETTY GREAT.
JUST SOME MORE DATA ON THERE. WE DON'T ANYTHING 0-1 ", WE'RE NOT CONSIDERING AS A WORK ORDER.
WE HAVE ROUGHLY 58 WORK ORDERS OF AROUND A TWO INCH SEPARATION, 35 FOR THREE INCH, AND 14 OF THEM ARE OVER FOUR INCHES RIGHT NOW.
AGAIN, SO WHAT WE'RE PROPOSING OR SOMETHING TO CONSIDER IS A TRUE 50/50 SIDEWALK PROGRAM, WHERE THE CITY AND THE RESIDENTS PARTICIPATE EQUALLY IN THE REPLACEMENT OF THEIR SIDEWALK.
AGAIN, STAFF WOULD EVALUATE THOSE REQUESTS, COME UP WITH A LENGTH BASED ON THE ANNUAL CONCRETE CONTRACT PRICING.
THAT WOULD PROBABLY CHANGE EVERY YEAR DEPENDING ON WHAT THE CONCRETE PRICE IS, BUT WE PROVIDE THAT TO THE HOME OWNER.
AGAIN, IF IT'S A THREE IN S IF IT'S A COSMETIC REQUEST, WE PROBABLY WOULDN'T ADD THAT TO THE TOP OF THE LIST FOR PARTICIPATION, EVEN IF THE HOMEOWNER WANTS TO PAY FOR HALF OF IT.
WE WOULD STILL DO THE POLICY AT WORST FIRST AND TRY TO GET THE BIGGEST ONES DONE FIRST.
WE WOULD RECOMMEND THAT THIS IS ONLY FOR HOMEOWNER OCCUPIED HOMES.
THIS WOULD NOT BE ELIGIBLE FOR RENTAL UNITS OR HOMEOWNERS THAT HAVE THE NON OCCUPIED HOMES.
THIS WOULD ALLOW US TO DO MORE LENGTH WITH THE SIMILAR FUNDING AND NOT INCREASE THE FUNDING.
HOPEFULLY IT WOULD REDUCE THE BACKLOG AND MAYBE REDUCE SOME OF THE CUSTOMER SERVICE REQUESTS.
AS ALWAYS, WE CAN PULL OUR COMPARATIVE CITIES.
SOME CITIES HAVE MORE INFORMATION ON THEIR WEBSITES THAN OTHERS.
WYLIE THEY DO NOT HAVE A PROGRAM.
MURPHY ACTUALLY HAS A PROGRAM WHERE THE CITY IS COMPLETELY RESPONSIBLE FOR IT.
PROSPER, COLLEYVILLE, AND COPPELL THEY ARE ALL RESPONSIBLE FOR IT.
ROWLETT AND RICHARDSON BASICALLY MAKE THE HOMEOWNER REPAIR IT.
AGAIN, THERE'S SOME OTHER FUNDING OPTIONS, GARLAND HAS A 50/50.
I WILL SAY THAT DENNISON FORNEY, LANCASTER, MESQUITE ALL HAVE A TRUE 50/50 PROGRAM.
WHERE EACH HOMEOWNER IN THE CITY PARTICIPATE AT 50/50.
AGAIN, MESQUITE, FOR EXAMPLE, IF YOU DON'T PARTICIPATE, IT DOESN'T GET FIXED.
THEY'RE ONLY DOING WHATEVER IT'S AGREED TO WITH THAT 50/50 PARTNERSHIP.
SOME OTHER FUNDING OPTIONS, IF YOU WERE TO LOW INCOME OR HUT AREA, YOU COULD GET A 25% DISCOUNT.
YOU CAN DO AN AGE EXEMPTION OR HOMEOWNER EXEMPTION FOR SOME CERTAIN AREAS TO HELP OFFSET SOME OF THOSE COSTS.
BUT CERTAINLY FOR THAT, THAT'S OUR PROPOSAL.
[02:20:01]
THAT'S OUR COMPARATIVE LIST OF CITIES, AND CERTAINLY WE'LL OPEN IT UP FOR QUESTIONS AND COMMENTS.>> THANK YOU, MR NESVILLE. QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS FROM COUNCIL. MR. PRESTENBERG.
>>THANKS FOR THE PRESENTATION. FEW QUESTIONS.
IF WE WENT TO A 50/50 PARTNERSHIP, HOW WOULD FUNDS BE COLLECTED BY THE CITY? I GUESS THEY'D HAVE TO HAVE 100% OF THE DOWN PAYMENT FROM THE 50% PORTION OR THE CITIZENS PORTION, WHATEVER THAT MIGHT BE?
>> I THINK WE COULD DO SOMETHING WITH A PERMIT OF SOME FORM OR BECAUSE WE HAVE THE ONLINE SOFTWARE NOW FOR THE PERMITTING STUFF.
WE CAN CERTAINLY BET THAT AND GET THAT UP, BUT EVEN IF IT'S JUST A DEPOSIT INTO AN ESCROW ACCOUNT, CAN WE HAVE TO TALK TO FINANCE ABOUT THAT, BUT WE COULD CERTAINLY COME UP WITH SOMETHING.
>> I GUESS THE IDEA OF THIS IS TO GET TWICE AS MUCH WORK DONE IN THE SAME TIME FRAME.
DOES THE $40 PER LINEAR FOOT, DOES THAT COVER, LIKE A TRIP CHARGE OF ANY SORT? IT'S ALL ENCOMPASSING. JUST WONDER IF THERE WAS A DISCOUNT IF YOU AND YOUR NEIGHBOR WANTED TO GO IN AT THE SAME TIME, IF THERE WAS A COST SAVING?
>> I THINK THAT GOES BACK TO THE CRITERIA ALSO.
IF YOU BOTH MET THE CRITERIA, THEN CERTAINLY WE WOULD LOOK AT MAYBE DOING A LARGER SCALE PROJECT, BUT.
>> LET'S SEE. ARE THE SHARED FUNDING OR THE SHARED DISCOUNTS THAT YOU HAD PUT IN THERE THAT OTHER CITIES HAVE? ARE THEY STACKABLE? IN THE SENSE THAT SOMEONE'S, HOMESTEAD AND OVER 65 AND ALL THOSE THINGS? ARE THEY STACKABLE FOR A DISCOUNT?
>> I THINK THAT'S SOMETHING YOU GUYS COULD RECOMMEND.
I DIDN'T KNOW IF OTHER CITIES HAD STACKABLE?
>> I DON'T KNOW THAT THEY'RE STACKABLE.
AT LEAST WHAT I COULD FIND IT DIDN'T SAY THAT, BUT I DON'T KNOW WHAT THEIR POLICY IS.
>> THEN, DO YOU KNOW THERE'S ANY CONSIDERATION, YOU GO OUT THERE AND VISIT? THERE'S A THREE INCH GAP.
IT LOOKS LIKE IT'S PERFECTLY SUITABLE FOR THIS EVENT THAT WE WANT TO DO, BUT THE HOME OWNER PLANTED A TREE TWO FEET AWAY FROM THE SIDEWALK, AND THAT'S THE MAIN REASON WHY IT'S CAUSED, THE.
>> BILL. YOU KNOW WHAT I MEAN?
>> VERY MUCH SO. I THINK THAT GIVES THE PROPERTY OWNER RIGHTS.
I DON'T KNOW THAT WE COULD AFFECT SOME OF THAT, BUT.
I DON'T KNOW. THAT'S A GOOD QUESTION.
>> IN THEORY, IT SOUNDS LIKE A GOOD IDEA THAT YOU GET MORE SIDEWALKS, BUT THEN AGAIN, YOU'RE THROWING ADDITIONAL FEES ONTO A CITIZEN THAT SOME PEOPLE CAN AFFORD IT.
SOME PEOPLE CAN JUST SAY, YOU KNOW WHAT, DON'T WORRY ABOUT THE CITY.
I WANT TO GET IT DONE TOMORROW, NOT THREE MONTHS FROM NOW.
A LITTLE TORN BETWEEN, DO WE WANT TO PASS THAT EXPENSE ON TO OUR CITIZENS WHEN THEY MIGHT NOT BE ABLE TO AFFORD IT? BECAUSE CURRENTLY, IF YOU DID THIS LAST YEAR, THE CITY DID 100% OF IT.
I KNOW WE TALKED ABOUT THE FAIR WORD [LAUGHTER] NOT BEING FAIR, BUT WE DON'T WANT TO WAIT FIVE YEARS FOR A CERTAIN SIDEWALK TO GET REPAIRED BECAUSE WE HAVE SO MANY FOUR INCH GAPS ALL OVER THE PLACE.
>> I DON'T KNOW THAT THIS WOULD CHANGE OUR CURRENT POLICY.
WE'RE STILL GOING TO GO AND FIX SIDEWALKS.
WE'RE STILL GOING TO DO THE THREE IN SEPARATION.
WE'RE STILL GOING TO DO THE EDA STUFF.
BUT IF YOU MET THAT CRITERIA AND WANTED IT DONE FASTER, CERTAINLY THAT HELPS.
BUT WE'RE STILL GOING TO DO THE WORK THAT NEEDS TO GET DONE.
THAT DOESN'T CHANGE OUR OPERATIONS.
>> YOU'RE SAYING THERE'D STILL BE A FREE ASPECT TO THIS, AND THEN THERE'D BE ABOVE AND BEYOND THAT WOULD BE A 50/50 PARTNERSHIP.
THAT WOULD MOVE SOMEONE UP THE LIST, MAYBE?
>> IT'S ALL AN OPTION [LAUGHTER].
>> A LOT OF UNCERTAINLY HERE, BUT OKAY. THANK YOU.
>> THANKS FOR THE PRESENTATION.
I KNOW WE'VE BEEN TALKING ABOUT THIS FOR A LONG TIME, SO IT'S GREAT TO SEE THIS BROUGHT BEFORE COUNCIL.
I'M JUST VERY CONFUSED AT THIS POINT, AND IT GOES WITH COUNCILMEMBER PRESTENBERG'S COMMENTS ON THERE.
I'M TRYING TO FIGURE OUT HERE IS WE HAVE $150,000 A YEAR THAT WE HAVE BUDGETED RIGHT NOW.
THERE WOULD STILL BE MONEY TO COVER THINGS JUST LIKE HOW WE ARE RIGHT NOW LIKE, SAY, HYPOTHETICALLY, $50,000 OF THAT BUDGET GOES TO FIXING THINGS IN THE PRIORITY THAT WE'RE CURRENTLY DOING THEM.
THEN THE OTHER 100,000 COULD SAY BE A COST SHARING MECHANISM. HOW ARE WE SEEING THAT?
>> AGAIN, I THINK THAT'S ALL UP FOR DISCUSSION.
CERTAINLY, WE'RE NOT GOING TO REDUCE THOSE FUNDS.
WELL, HOPEFULLY JUST DON'T REDUCE THOSE FUNDS, BUT WE'RE GOING TO DO $150,000 WORTH OF SIDEWALK.
IF WE CAN GET HOMEOWNERS TO PARTICIPATE IN THAT, THEN WE CAN DO MORE OBVIOUSLY.
BUT AGAIN, IT DOESN'T CHANGE WHAT WE'RE GOING TO DO OPERATIONALLY.
I THINK WE COULD GET MORE DONE IF WE DECIDED TO DO SOMETHING LIKE THIS.
AGAIN, WHAT THOSE SPECIFIC CRITERIA ARE, WE'RE OPEN TO DISCUSS THAT.
>> A HOMEOWNER THAT CAN CONTRIBUTE, IT WOULD MOVE THEM AHEAD OF THE LINE THAN SOME OF THE OTHER PROJECTS.
>> IF THEY MET THE CURRENT POLICY CRITERIA.
>> THINGS THAT MEET CURRENT POLICY CRITERIA WOULD
[02:25:01]
CONTINUE TO BE FIXED AS THE CITY'S RESPONSIBILITY.BUT IF IT DID NOT MEET THAT CRITERIA, IT WAS JUST LIKE AN INCH OFF, THEN A HOMEOWNER COULD CHOOSE TO PAY FOR HALF OF IT, INSTEAD OF WAITING FOR IT TO GET EVENTUALLY WORK ON.
>> I THINK OUR RECOMMENDATION WOULD STILL BE THAT IF IT'S A COSMETIC REQUEST, THAT STILL GETS LOWER, EVEN IF YOU'RE WILLING TO PAY FOR IT, I WOULD NOT PUT THAT ABOVE AN ADA REQUEST OR SOMETHING IN THAT CATEGORY. DOES THAT MAKE SENSE?
>> YEAH. I GUESS EVERY COMPARATIVE CITY THAT I LOOK AT, I SPENT SOME TIME GOING THROUGH LOOKING AT OTHER CITIES ON THERE.
IT DOES SAY ON HERE, HOMEOWNER RESPONSIBILITY, BUT IN LOOKING AT THEIR BUDGET, THEY GET $50,000 FOR 50/50 PROGRAM.
IT GETS EATEN UP REALLY QUICK, THAT IT'S ALMOST JUST A JOKE. NOBODY'S GOING TO GET IT.
I SAW IN THEIR BUDGET, THEY HAVE $62,000 FOR INCOME DISADVANTAGED PEOPLE WHERE IT CAN HELP.
BUT OTHERWISE, IT'S HOME OWNER RESPONSIBLE.
I LOOK IN ALLEN, IT'S BEEN CHANGED OVER THE NUMBER OF YEARS BECAUSE AS THE CITY START GROWING, THEY RECOGNIZE BEFORE ALL THEIR LAND WAS DEVELOPED THAT, HEY, WE'RE GOING TO HAVE AN ISSUE HERE.
WE'RE NOW IN SACHSE, WE'RE ALMOST FULLY DEVELOPED.
NOW WE'RE SAYING, THERE'S POTENTIALLY GOING TO BE A POLICY ISSUE.
THAT'S REALLY WHAT I'M TRYING TO FIGURE OUT IS I LOOK AT THE ORDINANCE FOR ALL THESE WITH THE 50/50 PROGRAM, AND IT SAYS IT'S THE HOMEOWNER'S RESPONSIBILITY.
IT SAYS, THE HOMEOWNER IS RESPONSIBLE AND HAS 15 DAYS FROM WHEN A VIOLATION, THAT DOESN'T MEET THE THREE INCH RULE OR WHAT HAVE YOU, THE LIST OF POLICIES THAT WE HAVE RIGHT NOW.
THEY'VE GOT 15 DAYS TO REMEDIATE IT.
MANY OF THE ORDINANCES THEY GO ON TO SAY THAT THE LIABILITY IS COMPLETELY ON THE HOMEOWNER.
IF SOMEBODY'S WALKING DOWN THE SIDEWALK AND THEY TRIP AND FALL IN THAT THREE INCH CRACK, IT'S THE HOMEOWNER'S RESPONSIBILITY.
SO THAT'S WHAT I SEE IN THESE OTHER 50/50 PROGRAMS. I'M TRYING TO FIGURE OUT WHAT IS OUR GOAL? WHAT'S THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION? ARE WE SAYING THAT WE WANT TO DRAW A LINE IN THE SAND AND SAY THE CITY IS NO LONGER RESPONSIBLE FOR SIDEWALK REPAIR, OR ARE WE HAVING SOMETHING HERE TO WHERE WE'RE GOING TO KEEP SPENDING $150,000 TO DO WHATEVER WE CAN.
WHAT I HAD HOPED OUT OF THIS IN THE INITIAL DISCUSSIONS IS WE CREATED ANOTHER POT OF MONEY TO HELP WITH THE COST SHARING IN A SEPARATE BUCKET.
I'M JUST TRYING TO FIGURE OUT WHAT THE INTENTION IS.
>> I THINK MS. NASH HAS A COUPLE OF COMMENTS ON THAT.
>> THIS TRULY IS A POLICY DISCUSSION.
THERE ISN'T ANY PRECONCEIVED STAFF RECOMMENDATION.
THIS IS AN OPPORTUNITY FOR YOU ALL TO TALK ABOUT WHAT YOU WOULD BE INTERESTED IN RELATIVE TO THIS PROGRAM.
WHEN WE LOOK AT OUR SIDEWALKS ACROSS THE CITY, THEY'RE AGING RAPIDLY.
YOU LOOK AT ORIGINAL WOODBRIDGE, AND THEY'RE OVER 25-YEARS-OLD.
WE'VE HAD SOME PRETTY EXTREME SUMMERS OVER THE LAST FEW YEARS, WHICH CREATES EVEN MORE HEAVING AND MORE BREAKAGE AND WE STILL HAVE MORE SIDEWALKS TO DEVELOP OUT.
WE'VE GOT A BUDGET OF $150,000, WHICH HAS INCREASED OVER THE YEARS.
SINCE I GOT HERE, THE ORIGINAL BUDGET WAS ABOUT $25,000.
WE'VE TRIED TO INCREMENTALLY INCREASE IT AND AT THIS POINT, AS COREY HAS SHOWN YOU IN HIS PRESENTATION, IT'S JUST IMPOSSIBLE TO KEEP UP WITH WHAT PEOPLE ARE LOOKING FOR.
WHAT WE'RE TRYING TO PROPOSE IS POTENTIALLY, THIS COULD BE SOME RELIEF.
IT DOESN'T HAVE TO BE ALL OR NOTHING, 50/50, AND THAT'S ALL WE DO.
YOU CAN SEE THAT LIKE IN A CITY LIKE LITTLE ELM, THEY DO A HYBRID PROGRAM.
REALLY, IT'S JUST AGAIN, THIS IS ANOTHER ONE OF THOSE ITEMS TONIGHT OF WHAT IS IT THAT YOU WANT TO SEE? WHAT DO YOU FROM A POLICY PERSPECTIVE, THINK WE SHOULD DO MOVING FORWARD, RELATIVE TO THE BODY OF THE PROBLEM? THEN GIVE US SOME DIRECTION ON WHAT WE CAN DO.
AGAIN, I ENVISIONED WE WOULD PROBABLY COME BACK WITH A PROGRAM IF YOU ALL WANTED TO PURSUE THIS WITH SOME MORE INFORMATION AND FULLY BAKE IT, IF YOU WILL, BASED ON YOUR DIRECTION FROM A POLICY PERSPECTIVE.
>> THAT HELPS A LITTLE BIT, SO I'LL JUST STIR MY OPINION THEN IN THERE FOR THE DISCUSSION IS THAT I THINK WE'RE TOO LATE IN THE GAME TO SHIFT THE BURDEN TO SAY SIDEWALK REPAIR IS NOW COMPLETELY THE HOMEOWNER'S RESPONSIBILITY, AND WE'LL THROW SOME COSTS MATCHING LIKE SOME OF THESE OTHER CITIES HAVE DONE.
I THINK THAT'S TOO EXTREME OF A POLICY.
WILEY, BY THE WAY, IS CITY RESPONSIBLE.
I'M NOT SURE WHY IT'S NOT LISTED UP THERE, BUT IT'S CITY RESPONSIBLE.
THE PROBLEM, I THINK WITH TRYING TO CHANGE THE BURDEN OF WHO IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE SIDEWALK IS, IS THERE'S JUST SO MANY VARIABLES AT PLAY.
WE LOOK AT, FOR EXAMPLE, MILES ROAD WITH THE MILLION DOLLAR WALL, ABOUT 850,000, BUT WE ROUND TO A MILLION WALL.
OVER THERE, THOSE HOMEOWNERS, THEY HAVE SIDEWALK ON BOTH SIDES OF THEIR PROPERTY.
I READ ALL THESE ORDINANCES AND THEY SAY, WHEN YOUR PROPERTY ABUTS A SIDEWALK.
[02:30:01]
IN THAT PARTICULAR SITUATION, THEY'VE GOT THE RESIDENTIAL STREET, AND TECHNICALLY, THEIR PROPERTY ABUTS THE SIDEWALK THAT GOES DOWN MILES ROAD.SO TO ME, THERE WOULD BE A MILLION DIFFERENT SCENARIOS LIKE THAT OF TRYING TO ESTABLISH WHO'S TRULY RESPONSIBLE FOR A SIDEWALK.
GOT AREAS, FOR EXAMPLE, DOWN MILES ROAD DOWN ON THE OTHER SIDE CONNECTING THE SCHOOLS, TO WHOSE BENEFIT IS IT? GARLAND ISD, I NOTICED THAT IN THE GARLAND ORDINANCE, THEY SPECIFICALLY EXCLUDE THE SCHOOL DISTRICT FROM BEING COST SHARING.
SO RIGHT NOW, GARLAND ISD WOULD ASSUME THAT WE'RE FOOTING THE BILL FOR REPAIRING ANY OF THE SIDEWALKS IN FRONT OF THE SCHOOL.
THAT WOULD BE A POLICY SHIFT THAT THEY WOULD NEED TO BUDGET FOR.
I THINK FOR WHATEVER REASON, IF WE HEADED DOWN THAT ROAD TO TRY TO CHANGE WHO IS RESPONSIBLE FOR SIDEWALKS, WE NEED TO HAVE SOME PERIOD OF TRUE UP.
BASICALLY, WE HAVE SEVERAL MONTHS OF LOOK, IF YOUR SIDEWALK IS IN DISREPAIR, GET IT LOGGED AFTER THIS DATE, WE'RE NO LONGER EM.
IT'S ASSUMED TO BE YOUR RESPONSIBILITY, AND THEN OVER THOSE NEXT COUPLE OF YEARS, WE WORK TO FINISH OUT ALL THE EXISTING WORK ORDERS.
AGAIN, THE WAY THAT I'D LOVE TO SEE THIS IS WE KEEP BUSINESS AS USUAL WITH $150,000 A YEAR.
THEN WE ADD TO IT, LET'S SAY, FOR EXAMPLE, $50,000 AS A COST SHARING.
THOSE PEOPLE WHO DON'T WANT TO WAIT, THEY HAVE LESS SERIOUS ISSUES, WE CAN ALSO ADDRESS THOSE SIDEWALKS.
TO ME, THAT'S A BENEFIT TO EVERYBODY IN THE CITY.
SOME COULD LOOK AT THAT AND SAY, YOU'RE LETTING THE PEOPLE WITH MEANS JUMP AHEAD AND GET THEIR SIDEWALK REPAIRED.
PART OF THAT'S TRUE, BUT I THINK MORE IMPORTANTLY, WHAT WE'RE DOING IS WE'RE ACTUALLY GETTING THE PROBLEM ADDRESSED BEFORE IT CONTINUES TO FESTER AND GET WORSE, AND IT WILL COST US MORE DOWN THE LINE.
IF THERE'S SOMETHING WE CAN DO RIGHT NOW, LET'S GO FOR IT.
>> THANK YOU, COREY FOR THE PRESENTATION.
WHAT WOULD YOU SAY IF YOU JUST HAD TO GUESS, AND I KNOW EVERY SCENARIO IS DIFFERENT AND EVERY PROBLEM IS DIFFERENT.
WHAT WOULD A TYPICAL COST BE FOR A HOMEOWNER OF JUST A TYPICAL SIZE HOME FOR THESE REPAIRS?
>> IF YOU HAD A 40 FOOT LOT, IT'D BE $1,600, ROUGHLY.
>> THEN OUR CURRENT BUDGET, HOW MANY PROPERTIES DO YOU THINK YOU'RE TAKING CARE OF A YEAR?
>> I THOUGHT I HAD THAT ON THERE, BUT MAYBE WE DIDN'T HAVE THAT.
I CAN PROBABLY GET YOU THAT DATA, BUT SOME OF IT'S NOT EVEN TRACKED BY PROJECT BECAUSE, AGAIN, IF WE DO A STREET REPAIR, WE'RE JUST GOING TO FIX THE SIDEWALK OR IF WE FIX SIDEWALK AT A PARK.
THAT DOESN'T GET NECESSARILY LOGGED IN AS A HOMEOWNER REQUEST, BUT I THINK WE HAVE ALL THAT DATA.
I CAN PROBABLY GET THAT INFORMATION FOR YOU.
>> I JUST DON'T FEEL COMFORTABLE PUTTING THIS FINANCIAL BURDEN ON THE RESIDENTS.
PEOPLE SHOULD BE ABLE TO WALK OUT TO THEIR CAR SAFELY WITHOUT FALLING.
ADA ISSUES SHOULDN'T BE BASED ON THEIR FINANCIAL ABILITY TO PAY.
THEY SHOULD BE ABLE TO GET TO THEIR CAR SAFELY.
I WOULDN'T MIND A HYBRID OPTION, LIKE MS. NASH MENTIONED, IF PEOPLE DO HAVE THE MEANS, AND THEY WOULD LIKE TO BUMP THEIR PROJECT AND PUT SOME MONEY IN AS WELL.
BUT I DON'T FEEL LIKE IT'S RIGHT TO PUT THIS.
WE PAY A LOT IN TAXES, AND I KNOW ALL ARE GOING TO CONTINUE TO PRIORITIZE, BUT THERE ARE CERTAIN SITUATIONS THAT PEOPLE HAVE NO NO FAULT IN, LIKE MISS IKELBERG EMAILED US.
WE'RE PUTTING AN EIGHT FOOT SIDEWALK ON BAILEY ROAD.
THAT'S GOING TO BE A HUGE BURDEN THAT THOSE RESIDENTS DID NOT SIGN OFF ON.
WHEN THAT FAILS, THAT'S A LOT OF CONCRETE FOR THEM TO PAY FOR.
I THINK WE SHOULD CONTINUE WITH OUR GRADING SYSTEM AND MAKING THE MOST OF OUR BUDGET.
I KNOW WE HAVE 150,000 BUDGETED, BUT IT SAYS WE ONLY SPENT 119,000 OF IT LAST YEAR, IS THAT CORRECT?
>> SORRY. YES. WE SPENT 119,000 SPECIFICALLY ON SIDEWALKS.
BUT WE ALSO DID PARK IMPROVEMENTS THAT DIDN'T GET INCLUDED IN SOME OF THAT.
>> I KNOW WE ALSO HAVE THE BOND, THE NEIGHBORHOOD PACKAGE THAT'S SUPPOSED TO GO FOR SIDEWALKS AS WELL.
>> THAT'S NOT INCLUDED WITH THIS NUMBER.
>> BUT THERE ARE SIDEWALKS IN ADDITION TO THESE NUMBERS BEING FIXED, CORRECT?
>> RIGHT. ROUGHLY WE'VE DONE 1,000 FEET THIS YEAR SO FAR, BUT WE HAVE A BUNCH OF PROJECTS THAT ARE STILL UNDER CONSTRUCTION, AND WE STILL HAVE THREE MORE MONTHS IN THE YEAR, SO THAT'LL CHANGE A LITTLE BIT.
THE 919,000, I KNOW WE SPENT ALL 150 OF IT.
>> WE SPENT IT. COREY, THIS WAS THE LIST OF PROJECTS WE WERE TALKING ABOUT EARLIER.
SOME OF THESE PROJECTS, HE HAD A STREET THAT WAS REPAIRED THAT NEEDED A SIDEWALK REPAIR.
HE TAKES IT OUT OF THE SIDEWALK BUDGET, AND SO THAT'S WHY THAT PARTICULAR NUMBER IS 119.
[02:35:02]
>> THOSE ARE JUST EXCLUSIVE SIDEWALK PROJECTS.
IT WAS ONLY FOR THAT SIDEWALK.
SOMETIMES, LIKE HE SAID, WHEN WE GO IN AND WE FIX A ROAD, HE'S GOING TO USE SIDEWALK MONEY FOR THAT.
HE CANNOT USE STREET MAINTENANCE TAX MONEY.
IT ALL HAS TO BE IN FRONT OF THE CURB FOR STREET MAINTENANCE TAX MONEY.
YOU CAN'T USE THAT ON THE SIDEWALK.
>> I THINK THIS IS SOMETHING WE SHOULD REALLY DIVE INTO AS A COUNCIL TO AS BUDGET IS HERE, WHAT WE CAN DO TO MAKE THIS MORE A PRIORITY AND TAKE THIS BURDEN OFF OUR RESIDENTS.
>> WE ARE IN BUDGET SEASON, SO ARE YOU. MAYOR FELTON FRANKS.
>> YES, THIS IS A GREAT OPTION.
BUT IT'S NOT TO TAKE THE PLACE OF THE ORIGINAL PROGRAM.
SO IF WE'RE GOING TO DO THIS, I'D LIKE IT TO BE HYBRID.
HOWEVER, WE AND OR STAFF WANTS TO WORK OUT, HEY, WE HAVE 14 WORK ORDERS OF FOUR INCHES OR GREATER.
WE GO TO THOSE 14 AND LIKE, WE CAN ONLY DO THREE OF THEM THIS YEAR.
I DON'T KNOW WHAT THE NUMBER IS, AND THOSE AND SOME OF THAT OR THREE PLUS INCH.
HEY, YOU'RE GOING TO HAVE TO WAIT PROBABLY A COUPLE OF YEARS TO GET THAT DONE UNDER THE CURRENT PROGRAM AND BUDGETED.
HOWEVER, IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GO INTO A 50/50 PROGRAM, WE HAVE ANOTHER OPTION AVAILABLE, AND THAT'S HOW I'D LIKE TO SEE IT WORK.
WE CAN TALK ABOUT THIS PROGRAM HAVING ITS OWN SEPARATE BUDGET DURING BUDGET SEASON, BUT NOT TONIGHT.
WE CAN TALK ABOUT INCREASING THE CURRENT PROGRAM'S BUDGET, BUT NOT TONIGHT.
SO I'D LIKE BOTH OPTIONS AVAILABLE, NOT THIS TO REPLACE THE CURRENT OPTION.
>> I THINK I LIKE A HYBRID APPROACH AS WELL.
I KNOW THAT THERE ARE PROBABLY PHONE CALLS THAT GET MADE FROM PEOPLE THAT HAVE BEEN WAITING TO HAVE A SIDEWALK REPAIR THAT ARE VERY UPSET THAT PROBABLY IF YOU SAID, YOU CAN WAIT THE TIME PERIOD, AND THE CITY WILL COVER IT, OR IF YOU WANT IT DONE NOW, THAT THEY HAVE THAT OPTION THAT THEY WOULD TAKE IT.
THERE IS A FRACTION OF PEOPLE THAT CARE A LOT AND ARE WILLING TO PAY.
THERE ARE PEOPLE THAT CARE A LOT AS LONG AS IT'S FREE.
I THINK IF YOU SET UP A SEPARATE PROGRAM, YOU CAN KIND OF TEASE THOSE APART AND MAYBE SETTLE DOWN A LITTLE BIT OF THE DISGRUNTLEMENT THAT, I DON'T WANT TO PAY OR I CAN'T PAY, BUT I CAN WAIT TILL MY NAME COME MY SIDEWALK THAT'S DONE HAS COME UP.
I KNOW I REPORTED A PIECE OF SIDEWALK IN OUR NEIGHBORHOOD THAT MY FATHER IN LAW THAT TRIPPED OVER, AND I THINK IT WAS PROBABLY ABOUT 2.5 YEARS BEFORE IT GOT WORKED, AND SO IT'S A CONSIDERABLE WAIT.
I YOU KIND OF ASSUME THAT IT'S NEVER GOING TO HAPPEN BECAUSE IT'S BEEN SO LONG, BUT IT DID EVENTUALLY GET FIXED.
BUT ANYTHING WE COULD DO TO MAKE THAT LIST MOVE A LITTLE BIT FASTER BECAUSE I KNOW KNOCKING ON DOORS, I'VE HAD CONVERSATIONS WITH PEOPLE, AND THESE WAS NOT THE MAJORITY, BUT THEY'RE LIKE, JUST CHARGE ME MORE AND DO IT TODAY.
I'M LIKE, BUT THAT'S NOT HOW EVERYONE FEELS, SO GIVE THEM THE OPTION, AND MAYBE USE THAT TO FIND THE LIST A LITTLE BIT MORE QUICKLY, SO I THINK A HYBRID APPROACH IS PROBABLY WHERE I WOULD FALL ON THAT.
>> SHE'LL NEVER GET A CONSENSUS ON CHARGE [OVERLAPPING]
OTHER QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS FOR MR. NESBITT. MR. LINDSAY?
>> Y'ALL HIT SAME TIME. GO AHEAD.
>> I WAS JUST GOING TO SAY ON THE SORRY.
>> IT'S LIKE JEOPARDY, YOU BEAT HIM UP.
>> THAT'S RIGHT. I GUESS WHY I WAS REALLY READING INTO THIS AS BEING A PROPOSAL TO SHIFT THE BURDEN TO HOMEOWNERS.
IT'S JUST SOME OF THE THINGS THAT ARE IN THIS SLIDE.
FOR EXAMPLE, THERE WAS AN EXCLUSION FOR NON OWNER OCCUPIED HOMES.
TO ME, IF YOU'RE A LANDLORD AND YOU RENT OUT A HOUSE, WHY WOULD WE NOT WANT TO TAKE THEIR MONEY AND GO AHEAD AND GET A SIDEWALK FIXED ON THERE? THAT'S SOME OF THE COMPETING LANGUAGE THAT I SAW THAT LOOKED LIKE THIS WAS AN ATTEMPT TO GO OVER THERE.
I WOULD JUST ADD THAT AS WELL IS THAT WE GO THROUGH, I GUESS, WHENEVER THIS, ARE WE TO CONSIDER THIS THIS EVENING OR THIS IS JUST A DISCUSS?
>> AS WE BRING THIS BACK, I WOULD JUST SAY THAT WE TRY TO TIGHTEN UP THE PRESENTATION A LITTLE BIT MORE.
WHY EXCLUDE THE MONEY IF IT'S THERE.
IN OTHER CITIES, ALSO A LITTLE BIT MORE DETAIL ABOUT WHAT THE OTHER CITIES, HOW MUCH THEY SHARE WITH.
LIKE, FOR EXAMPLE, I WENT TO [INAUDIBLE] AND FOUND OUT WHAT'S IN THEIR BUDGET, SO I WOULD DEFINITELY LIKE TO KNOW FOR COMPARATIVE CITIES, AND TO BE PRESENTED TO EVERYONE ELSE, WHO'S RESPONSIBLE AND THEN HOW MUCH MONEY IT IS, SO THAT'S MY ASK FOR THE NEXT TIME.
>> I DON'T REALLY CATER TO THE CONCEPT THAT WE HAVE HERE, 50/50 MATCHING AND [INAUDIBLE] BEING IS THAT LIMITS
[02:40:04]
THOSE SIDEWALKS TO BE REPLACED ONLY BY THOSE PEOPLE WHO HAVE MONEY TO PAY FOR IT.AS SACHSE GETS FILLED, YOU LOOK AT OUR DEMOGRAPHICS, OR AVERAGE AGE IS CREEPING UP A LITTLE BIT ON AN ANNUAL BASIS, WHICH MEANS AS WE GET FILLED OUT, WE'RE GOING TO BE MATURED, IS LIKE, I'M A GOOD EXAMPLE, RETIRED.
I'VE LIVED HERE ALMOST 50 YEARS, AND YOU SAID I'D GET MY SIDEWALK FIXED ONCE IN 50 YEARS.
THAT'S NOT A REALLY GOOD DEAL, BUT IF WE DO A 50/50 BASIS, WHAT WE'RE REALLY DOING IS SAYING, THOSE PEOPLE WHO CAN ECONOMICALLY AFFORD TO MATCH THAT CAN GET THEIR SIDEWALKS DONE FASTER.
WHAT ARE WE DOING? WE'RE SEPARATING THE CLASS SYSTEM GREATER.
THOSE WHO HAVE MONEY THAT CAN AFFORD IT, CAN GET IT DONE, THOSE WHO CAN'T, CAN'T GET IT DONE, SO IT'S NOT GOING TO GET DONE.
WE'RE LETTING THE OLDER PART OF TOWN, THE LESS INCOME PART OF TOWN, DEGRADE FASTER.
I DON'T THINK THAT'S WHAT WE AS A CITY SHOULD BE DOING.
I WOULD RATHER TO SAY US DOUBLE THE MONEY.
WE'RE BUILDING A BUDGET. THERE'S WAYS TO FIND MONEY.
MAYBE SOME OTHER PROBLEMS CAN BE LOOK.
WE HAVE AS AN EXAMPLE, MDD, MUNICIPAL DEVELOPMENT MONEY DOESN'T ALL HAVE TO GO TO RECREATION.
WE'VE DONE OUR MAJOR RECREATIONAL PUSH RIGHT NOW, WE'RE GETTING IT PRETTY MUCH FILLED OUT.
THAT WAS GOING TO BE TWO, THREE YEARS DOWN THE ROAD.
WE'RE LOOKING AT INTEGRATING IT A LITTLE FASTER, MAYBE WE COULD SAY, LET'S TAKE $150,000 OUT OF THAT MONEY AND PUT IT IN AND KEEP OUR POLICY THE WAY IT IS AND DO THESE PROGRAMS FASTER.
BUT FROM A SOCIAL INSTINCT, I REALLY AM NOT IN FAVOR OF MAKING THIS ON AVAILABLE BASIS.
ALSO, IN A CITY BLOCK, HOW MANY HOUSES ARE IN A CITY BLOCK? ABOUT FIVE?
>> DEPENDS ON YOUR NEIGHBORHOOD.
>> DEPENDS ON THE NEIGHBORHOOD, BUT THE TRADITIONAL NEIGHBORHOOD IS ABOUT FIVE OR SIX HOUSES.
>> AS THAT IF THAT HAPPENS, ONLY THE HOUSES ON EACH END OF THAT NEIGHBORHOOD, IT'S A CORNER LOT, SO THEY HAVE TWICE AS MUCH.
IT'S GOING TO COST THEM TWICE AS MUCH, AND THEY HAS BEEN MENTIONED, THE RESIDENTS DON'T HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO SAY, I DON'T WANT A SIDEWALK CODE REQUIRES IT.
IF THE CITY REQUIRES IT, CITY SHOULD BE MAINTAINING IT, SHOULD WE DO IT.
ALSO, AGAIN, IF A CITY GETS IN WHERE THE RESIDENTS HAVE TO DO IT, THEN AS CHANCE' MENTIONED, WHAT ABOUT LIABILITY? SIDEWALKS NOW OUR CITY PROPERTY.
YOU DON'T GET TO CHOOSE WHAT SIDEWALK GOES IN.
AS YOU MENTIONED, NOW THE WAY WE'RE DOING THINGS, IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO HAVE A FOUR FOOT SIDEWALK, BUT THE CITY SAYS, OH, NO, YOU NEED A EIGHT FOOT SIDEWALK, YOU DON'T GET A CHOICE.
I THINK IF YOU'RE GOING TO HAVE PEOPLE TO PAY FOR IT, THEY OUGHT TO HAVE A CHOICE.
YOU'RE GOING TO BUILD YOUR OWN FENCE, YOU OUGHT TO BE ABLE TO PICK OUT WHAT COLOR OF FENCE YOU WANT.
I'M NOT IN FAVOR OF THE WAY IT'S BEING PRESENTED, BUT I WOULD BE IN FAVOR OF INCREASING OUR BUDGET EVEN DOUBLE OF WHAT IT IS NOW TO SPEED SOME OF THIS UP.
>> I WANTED TO MAKE SURE YOU WERE INCLUDING YOURSELF IN THAT AGING DEMOGRAPHIC, IS THAT WHAT YOU WERE SAYING?
>> WELL, YEAH. AND IT'S A MATTER OF LIFE.
AS WE GET FILLED OUT, IT'S GOING TO GET FASTER QUICKER THAN MOST OF US REALIZE BECAUSE YOU'RE NOT THERE YET.
WHEN YOU GET THERE, THEN IT GETS FASTER AND FASTER.
>> I'M GETTING THERE. [LAUGHTER]
>> THANK YOU, MR. MILLSAP. MS. HOWARD.
>> I WAS JUST GOING TO RESPECTFULLY DISAGREE WITH FRANK ON THAT A LITTLE BIT.
THAT ALLOWING SOMEONE WHO REALLY CARES ABOUT THEIR SIDEWALK GETTING PAID FOR NOW, SAY THEY PAY 50/50 AND THEY PAY $100 INTO IT PROVIDES $100 TO THE CITY TO FIX SOMEONE ELSE'S SIDEWALK WHO CAN'T PAY RIGHT NOW, BECAUSE THEY CARE, AND THEY'RE WILLING TO PAY BECAUSE THEY CARE.
IT ALLOWS SOMEONE WHO CAN'T AFFORD TO PAY OR IS FARTHER DOWN ON THAT LIST TO GET IT COVERED THAT YEAR RATHER THAN THE NEXT BUDGET YEAR.
AND THAT'S COMPLETELY OPTIONAL.
THAT'S AN OPT IN, NOT A NOT A, YOU CAN'T DO THIS.
I THINK IF SOMEONE'S WILLING TO, AND IT CAN HELP US GET TO THE NEXT GUY FASTER, WHO EITHER CAN'T AFFORD IT OR DOESN'T CARE FOR THE WEIGHT, THAT'S MONEY THAT WE DIDN'T HAVE TO TAKE OUT OF SOMEBODY'S TAX BILL TO GET THE SAME WORK DONE.
>> ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR MR. NESBITT OR STAFF? MS. EICHELBERGER, YOU FILLED OUT A CAR, WOULD YOU LIKE TO SPEAK? COME ON, DOWN.
>> HEY, JACKIE, EICHELBERGER, I LIVE ON BAILEY ROAD,
[02:45:02]
AND I LIVE IN SACHSE.WE TALKED ABOUT THIS AT MANY COUNCIL MEETINGS IN THE PAST, BUT NO SOLUTION HAS EVER BEEN BROUGHT FORTH.
WE PAY TAXES THAT ARE SUPPOSED TO TAKE CARE OF THE FACILITIES, THE ROADWAYS, AND I ASSUME THE SIDEWALKS IN THE CITY.
BUT SOMEHOW, WE'RE EXCLUDING SIDEWALKS AND WANTING TO MAKE THE BIRD NATURALLY, TAXPAYERS, HOMEOWNERS WHO HAPPEN TO HAVE A SIDEWALK IN FRONT OF THEIR HOME WITH 50% OF THE COST OF WHEN REPAIRS ARE NEEDED.
THE CITY IS SUPPOSED TO TAKE CARE OF THESE SIDEWALKS, BUDGET ENOUGH MONEY TO PUBLIC WORKS SO THAT THEY CAN MAINTAIN THE SIDEWALKS, IF THEY NEED MORE PERSONNEL TO DO IT, GIVE THEM ENOUGH MONEY TO HIRE MORE PERSONNEL TO DO IT.
THAT LIST COULD BE MAYBE TAKEN CARE OF IN LESS THAN A YEAR AND A HALF.
BUT THIS PROPOSAL, AS THE WAY IT'S WRITTEN, IS INCLUDING EVERYONE IN SACHSE, WHO HAS A SIDEWALK IN FRONT OF THEIR HOME, NOT JUST THE PEOPLE ON THAT LIST, BUT EVERYBODY FOREVER WILL HAVE TO PAY 50% OF ANY REPAIRS OF THE SIDEWALK IN FRONT OF THEIR HOME.
IT'S THE CITY SHOULD BE TAKING OVER THIS.
A LOT OF THESE ARE SAFETY ISSUES.
WE HAVE PLACED A WALL ON MILES ROAD THAT THE CITY DID NOT BUILD ORIGINALLY, BUT THE CITY PAID IN FULL TO REPLACE THAT WALL BECAUSE IT WAS A SAFETY HAZARD.
ANY DAMAGE TO A SIDEWALK IS A SAFETY HAZARD? WHY DON'T WE TREAT SIDEWALKS LIKE WE TREAT THAT WALL? THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
>> THANK YOU, MISS CICHEL BERG. ANYONE ELSE LIKE TO ADDRESS THIS ITEM? HEARING NONE? WE WILL, AS I MENTIONED, IT IS A DISCUSS AND PROVIDE DIRECTION, SO THERE'S NO ACTION TONIGHT.
I WOULD SAY FROM A HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE, AS MS. NASH MENTIONED EARLY ON, THIS WAS BROUGHT BEFORE I GUESS ME AND MAYOR POT FRANKS BACK IN 2017, AND SIMILAR DISCUSSION, AND THE QUESTION THEN, IF MY MEMORY SERVES ME WAS, MUCH LIKE IT IS TONIGHT, IS THERE ANOTHER OPTION TO POSSIBLY BUILD MORE SIDEWALKS IN HERE.
A LOT OF GOOD DISCUSSION THEN, A LOT OF GOOD DISCUSSION TONIGHT.
MY GOAL FOR THIS PROJECT, I'VE HEARD A LOT OF GOOD IDEAS.
I THINK THE HYBRID IS A GOOD THING THAT SATELLITE STAFF IS GOING TO PURSUE.
I'M DEFINITELY IN FAVOR OF THAT.
I GUESS IN AN OVERARCHING SENSE, I'M IN FAVOR OF OPTIONS FOR OUR RESIDENTS.
I THINK THAT IF A RESIDENT WANTS TO PARTICIPATE IN THAT AS MAYOR FT FRANKS MENTIONED, THEN GREAT.
BUT IF THEY DON'T WANT TO PARTICIPATE IN THAT, THEN THEY CERTAINLY DON'T HAVE TO.
THE WAY WE HAVE IT RIGHT NOW IS THAT THEY DON'T EVEN HAVE THAT OPTION AT ALL.
THEY AS MS. HOWARD MENTIONED, I FORGET HOW LONG, TWO YEARS 2.5.
NOW, GRANTED, MR. MILLSAP BROUGHT THIS UP IS WE'RE IN BUDGET SEASON, AND WE CAN SPEED THAT PROCESS UP A LITTLE BIT.
MISS AKOBERG JUST MENTIONED THAT.
WE CAN INCREASE OUR BUDGET, AND I'M SURE THAT'S GOING TO BE DISCUSSED.
I GUESS THE BIGGER POINT I'M TRYING TO MAKE IS THAT WHETHER IT'S INCREASING THE BUDGET OR HEY, WHATEVER HYBRID COMES OUT OF IT, WE HAVE THAT AS WELL.
YOU DON'T HAVE TO PARTICIPATE, BUT WE DO HAVE IT IF YOU WANT TO. THAT'S MY GOAL.
I WOULD GO BACK TO MS. NASH AND SAY, IF YOU HAVE THE DIRECTION YOU NEED TO INCORPORATE WHAT YOU'VE HEARD TONIGHT.
>> I DO. SO WHAT I WILL DO IS, WE WILL LOOK COREY AND I WILL DISCUSS POTENTIALLY PUTTING IN A BUDGET PROPOSAL FOR SIDEWALKS AND GIVE YOU ALL SOME OPTIONS AS TO HOW MUCH MORE WE COULD DO IN A YEAR BASED ON THE BUDGET OUTLINED.
THEN ALSO LOOK AT A HYBRID PROGRAM THAT IF YOU WANT TO OPT IN, WHAT WOULD SOMETHING LIKE THAT LOOK LIKE IF YOU WANTED THAT CHOICE? WE COULD DO BOTH OF THOSE THINGS.
WE COULD HAVE A SUPPLEMENTAL BUDGET ITEM FOR YOUR BUDGET MEETING ON JULY 29, AND THEN WE CAN HAVE AN ITEM TO COME BACK FOR THE 50 50 DISCUSSION IN AUGUST.
>> SOUNDS LIKE WINTER TO ME? ANY OTHER DISCUSSION AMONG COUNSEL? I'M HERE, NO OBJECTIONS, SO, MS. NASH, I GUESS YOU GOT YOUR DIRECTION. YES, SIR.
NEXT ITEM ON THE AGENDA ITEM F FOUR,
[4. Receive an update on the CWD Commercial Transition.]
RECEIVE AN UPDATE ON THE CD COMMERCIAL TRANSITION. MS. NASH.>> HI, JASON. HE'S STILL HERE.
>> HE DIDN'T LEAVE. ALL RIGHT.
>> HE DIDN'T. MAYOR AND COUNSEL, AS YOU RECALL, WHEN WE DID THE AGENDA OR WHEN WE DID THE ITEM TO EXTEND CWD CONTRACT,
[02:50:03]
WE TALKED ABOUT THAT IT IS ALSO TIME FOR US TO DISCUSS A COMMERCIAL TRANSITION.IN THE BACKGROUND, STILL BEEN WORKING ON THIS OVER THE LAST SEVERAL MONTHS.
UNFORTUNATELY, TONIGHT, IT'S GOING TO BE THE NIGHT TO TALK ABOUT IT, WHICH WE STILL ARE, BUT JASON'S BEEN KIND OF WORKING DOUBLE DUTY BETWEEN STORM CLEANUP AND THIS COMMERCIAL TRANSITION UPDATE.
LOGAN THATCHER, ASSISTANT TO THE CITY MANAGER HAS BEEN WORKING ON THIS PROJECT WITH CWD.
HE'LL GIVE YOU A PRESENTATION, AND THEN JASON RAMER IS ALSO HERE, VICE PRESIDENT OF CWD TO ANSWER QUESTIONS AND ASSIST.
>> HI. GOOD EVENING, MARY COUNSEL.
I'D ALSO LIKE TO JUST STATE THAT WE ALSO HAVE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PRESENT AS WELL AS OUR COMMUNICATIONS WITH ESTHER AND DENISE AND ALSO SHOUT OUT TO FINANCE SO THEY'VE BEEN HELPING ME TREMENDOUSLY THROUGHOUT THIS PLAN ROLLING IN THIS PARTNERSHIP WITH CWD.
JUST A QUICK OVERVIEW, WE'LL GO OVER THE BACKGROUND OF THIS ITEM AND THEN GIVE A SUMMARY OF KIND OF WHERE WE STAND.
THE COMMUNICATION THAT'S BEEN PLANNED WITH OUR COMMUNICATION PLAN, A TIME FRAME OF WHERE WE'RE GOING TO GO FORWARD, AND THEN JUST SOME PENDING ITEMS OR ONE PENDING ITEM, ACTUALLY, AND THEN OPEN IT UP FOR QUESTIONS FOR EITHER STAFF OR, AS MS. NASH MENTIONED, FOR JASON WITH CWD.
AT THE FEBRUARY 19, 2024, REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING, STAFF PRESENTED A BRIEFING REGARDING THAT UPDATE FOR THE CONTRACT WITH CWD.
ONE OF THE ITEMS OF THAT UPDATE WAS TO MAKE CWD THE EXCLUSIVE COMMERCIAL FRANCHISE FOR THE CITY OF SACHSE.
THAT'S THE UPDATE OF WHERE WE STAND RIGHT NOW.
THERE ARE ABOUT 145 COMMERCIAL LOCATIONS THAT EXIST BETWEEN CWD AND OTHER SERVICE PROVIDERS.
BREAKUP OF THAT IS ABOUT 56 OR WITH CWD CURRENTLY AND 89 WITH OTHER SERVICE HAULERS.
CWD HAS BEEN IN COMMUNICATION WITH THOSE SERVICE PROVIDERS AND INITIAL TRANSITION TERMS HAVE BEEN AGREED UPON, SO THERE'S NO ANY DISRUPTIONS THERE WITH THOSE TERMS THAT HAVE BEEN DISCUSSED.
>> WITH OUR COMMUNICATION PLAN, EACH COMMERCIAL CUSTOMER HAS BEEN MAILED A JOINT LETTER FROM CWD AND THE CITY, ADVISING THE FRANCHISE CHANGE WILL TAKE PLACE ON OCTOBER 1ST.
THIS I BELIEVE WAS SENT OUT LAST WEEK.
I BELIEVE LAST WEDNESDAY, CORRECT?
>> THURSDAY, AND SO THOSE LETTERS HAVE ALREADY GONE OUT.
THERE IS A SITE AUDIT, AND WE WILL GO OVER THE TIME FRAME OF THE SITE AUDIT.
BUT A SITE AUDIT WILL BE PERFORMED FOR EACH COMMERCIAL CUSTOMER TO CONFIRM THE EXISTING SERVICES AND THE PICKUP DAYS.
IF COMMERCIAL CUSTOMERS DO HAVE CONCERNS, STEPH IS PREPARED TO ADDRESS THOSE.
HERE IS THE BROCHURE THAT HAS BEEN CREATED WITH CWD IN PARTNERSHIP WITH THE CITY, ALONG WITH THAT LETTER THAT IS ALSO ATTACHED TO THAT BROCHURE.
THAT IS THE LETTER THAT WAS SENT OUT, AND THEN HERE IS THE FRONT PART OF THAT BROCHURE.
TIME FRAME, AS I JUST MENTIONED, LAST WEEK, THOSE LETTERS WERE MAILED TO THE COMMERCIAL CUSTOMERS.
STARTING TODAY TILL JULY 10TH, SITE VISITS WILL BE TAKING PLACE TO EACH COMMERCIAL CUSTOMER AND THEN FROM JULY 11 TO AUGUST 9, CWD WILL CREATE THOSE ACCOUNTS AND FOR ROUTING.
SEPTEMBER 2ND TO SEPTEMBER 27TH, THE COMMERCIAL TRANSITION WILL BEGIN AND AT THAT SAME TIME, CWD WILL SWAP THE CUSTOMERS EXISTING COMMERCIAL CONTAINER WITH THE CWD CONTAINER, AND THE CWD WILL THEN TAKE THE EXISTING CONTAINER TO A STAGING AREA FOR THE VENDOR TO COLLECT.
THIS IS ABOUT A MONTH PRIOR TO WHEN THE TERMS TAKE PLACE, BUT JUST IN SENSE OF GETTING THOSE ALL PUT INTO A STAGING AREA THAT THE PREVIOUS PROVIDER WILL THEN GO AND COLLECT.
THE EXISTING VENDOR WILL STILL SERVICE THE CWD CONTAINER UNTIL OCTOBER 30TH, WHEN CWD WILL TAKE OVER THOSE COLLECTIONS AND THIS AGREEMENT HAS BEEN CONFIRMED WITH THOSE OTHER SERVICE PROVIDERS.
AS I MENTIONED, THAT STAGING AREA, THIS IS THE ONE PENDING AREA THAT STAFF AND CWD STILL NEED TO FOCUS ON AND WORK ON FINDING A SOLUTION FOR DETERMINING THAT STAGING AREA FOR THOSE CONTAINERS, AND WE WILL BE IN DISCUSSION WITH CWD TO GET THAT RESOLVED.
AT THIS TIME, I HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF OR FOR CWD.
[02:55:05]
>> THANK YOU, MR. THATCHER. QUESTIONS FOR STAFF FROM COUNCIL? MR. MILLSAP.
>> GO BACK TO YOUR TIME FRAME SLIDE.
WE WERE TALKING ABOUT THE OTHER PROVIDERS.
BUT THE BOTTOM SENTENCE IS THIS AGREEMENT HAS BEEN CONFIRMED WITH THE OTHER SERVICE PROVIDER.
IS THERE ONLY ONE? OR IS THERE MORE THAN ONE?
>> SORRY. THERE'S MORE THAN ONE.
HOWEVER, THERE SEEMS TO BE ABOUT ONE OTHER SERVICE PROVIDER THAT WAS OUR PREVIOUS PROVIDER THAT WAS A MAJORITY OF THOSE AND THEN THERE ARE A FEW ONE OFF.
>> SO THERE IS MORE THAN ONE PROVIDER.
>> BUT THEY'RE PROBABLY LESS THAN OUR PREVIOUS PROVIDER.
>> OTHER QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? I DO HAVE A SPEAKER'S CARD, AND MARTIN HOBOT.
>> MARTIN HOBOT, 5511 OAKRIDGE CIRCLE, TOP OF THE HILL.
BACK WHEN YOU APPROVED THIS, BILL OR ORDINANCE, I ASKED, WHAT'S IT WORTH TO CWD? AND YOU DIDN'T KNOW.
WHAT IS THIS MONOPOLY WORTH TO CWD? WHAT'S THE DOLLAR VALUE PER YEAR? YOU GOT 86 CUSTOMERS. SOMEBODY SHOULD KNOW.
WHAT HAS BEEN THE RESPONSE? YOU DIDN'T ASK CHAMBER OF COMMERCE TO BEGIN WITH.
YOUR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT WAS CLUELESS.
YOU DIDN'T CARE WHAT ANYBODY ELSE THOUGHT? YOU JUST BASICALLY STOOD UP HERE AND SAID THAT.
WELL, WE DON'T NEED TO TALK CHAMBER OF COMMERCE.
WHEN YOU BRING KROGERS IN HERE, AND KROGERS TELLS YOU WHAT THEY THINK ABOUT YOU MESSING WITH THEIR GARBAGE, THEN I'LL HAVE SOME FAITH IN YOU.
WHAT DOES ALL THE RECYCLING BINS THAT KROGERS AND WALMART HAS? HOW'S THAT AFFECTED IN THERE, CARDBOARD BUNDLING AND EVERYTHING ELSE THAT GOES ALONG WITH THAT? IT WOULD BE NICE IF YOU ALL KNEW WHAT THE HELL YOU WERE DOING BEFORE YOU STEPPED OUT INTO SOMETHING. THANK YOU.
>> THANK YOU, MR. HOBOT. ANYONE ELSE LIKE TO ADDRESS THIS? HEARING NONE, I DO NOT SEE THIS AS AN ACTION ITEM, IS THAT CORRECT, MR. MILLSAP? SORRY.
>> SO THE PROGRAM WE APPROVED IS GOING FORWARD?
>> YES, SIR. THIS IS JUST TO GIVE YOU AN UPDATE ON WHERE WE ARE WITH THE SPECIFIC TIMELINES AND HOW WE'RE MOVING FORWARD.
>> GOT YOU. THANK YOU, MR. MILLSAP.
ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS FROM COUNCIL? HEARING NONE, WE'LL MOVE ON. NEXT ITEM ON THE AGENDA,
[G. Executive Session]
IS ITEM G EXECUTIVE SESSION.THE CITY COUNCIL SHALL CONVENIENCE EXECUTIVE SESSION PURSUANT TO TEXAS GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 551.704, PERSONNEL MATTERS TO DELIBERATE THE APPOINTMENT, EVALUATION, AND DUTIES OF THE CITY ATTORNEY.
ITEM G2, THE CITY COUNCIL SHALL CONVENIENCE TO EXECUTIVE SESSION PURSUANT TO TEXAS GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 551.074, PERSONNEL MATTERS REGARDING THE MID YEAR REVIEW OF THE CITY SECRETARY. TIME, MS. GRANGER.
>> THE TIME IS 9:28 P.M. WE ARE NOW ADJOURNED INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION.
WE ARE CONVENED BACK INTO REGULAR SESSION. TIME, MS. GRANGER?
>> 10:06 P.M. WE ARE BACK IN REGULAR SESSION.
NEXT ITEM ON THE AGENDA, IS ITEM H REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS.
[1. Take any action as a result of Executive Session regarding personnel matters related to the City Attorney.]
NUMBER 1, TAKE ANY ACTION AS A RESULT OF THE EXECUTIVE SESSION REGARDING PERSONNEL MATTERS RELATED TO THE CITY ATTORNEY. MS. HOWARD.>> YES. I WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION TO APPOINT THE CITY ATTORNEY TO ACT IN THE CAPACITY AS THE PROSECUTING ATTORNEY FOR THE MUNICIPAL COURT BEGINNING AUGUST 1ST OF 2024.
DO I HAVE A SECOND. MR. PRESTENBERG.
>> I HAVE A SECOND BY MR. PRESTENBERG.
ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? HEARING NONE, PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTE.
MOTION PASSES WITH MR. MILLSAP VOTING NO.
NEXT ITEM ON THE AGENDA, IS ITEM 2 TAKING THE ACTION AS A RESULT OF AN EXECUTIVE SESSION REGARDING THE MID YEAR REVIEW OF THE C SECRETARY.
ITEM 3, ADJOURNMENT. THE TIME MS. GRANGER.
>> TIME IS 10:07 P.M. WE ARE ADJOURNED.
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.