8. Discuss and consider approving the agreement amount with Ron Hobbs Architects for the design of the City of Sachse Service Center for the amount of Nine Hundred Seventy-Three Thousand, One Hundred and No/100 Dollars ($973,100.00).

[8. Discuss and consider approving the agreement amount with Ron Hobbs Architects for the design of the City of Sachse Service Center for the amount of Nine Hundred Seventy-Three Thousand, One Hundred and No/100 Dollars ($973,100.00).]

DISCUSS AND CONSIDER APPROVING THE AGREEMENT AMOUNT WITH RON HOBBS ARCHITECTS FOR THE DESIGN OF THE CITY OF SACHSE SERVICE CENTER FOR THE AMOUNT OF $973,100 MR. MILLSAP TO LAST CITY COUNCIL.

THIS WAS LISTED AND IT HAD TWO DIFFERENT AMOUNTS OF MONEY ON IT.

AND I ASKED FOR CLARIFICATION AND WE DIDN'T HAVE THAT.

AND WE WERE GOING TO GET IT THIS TIME.

AND WE DIDN'T GET A WE HAVEN'T GOTTEN A CLARIFICATION ON WHAT I HAD ASKED FOR, AND OUR LAWYER HAD ASKED RECOMMENDED THAT WE TAKE IT OFF THE AGENDA FROM LAST TIME AND BRING IT BACK, THIS TIME WITH CLARIFICATION.

AND HERE IT SUBSEQUENTLY WAS PUT BACK ON THE CONSENT AGENDA AGAIN AND RATHER RUN AS A SEPARATE ITEM, WHICH I THINK IT SHOULD HAVE BEEN A SEPARATE ITEM. AND I JUST WANTED TO MAKE SURE THAT WE HAD CLARIFICATION THAT THAT IT WAS WHICHEVER ONE IT WAS, EITHER $937, $100, 37,000 OR 73,000, OR THE $937,100.

AND I'D LIKE TO MAKE SURE THAT WE DO HAVE CLARIFICATION.

I KNOW THAT THE WORDING HERE HAS BEEN CHANGED TO BE CONSISTENT WITH WRITTEN AND DOLLARS, BUT I WANTED TO JUST HEAR THAT WE HAVE BEEN CLARIFIED THAT THAT WAS WHAT IT WAS INSTEAD OF THE LESSER AMOUNT.

AND IN MY READING, AND I UNDERSTAND WHAT YOU'RE SAYING, MY READING OF THE STAFF REPORT DOES JUST THAT CLARIFIES THAT IT IS 973 100.

OKAY. IT WAS, IT'S I JUST WANTED TO MAKE SURE THAT IT WAS CLARIFIED RATHER THAN JUST READMITTED.

SURE. AND THAT THAT THAT REASON, I THINK IT SHOULD NOT HAVE BEEN ON THE CONSENT AGENDA.

IT SHOULD HAVE BEEN AN ITEM ACTED ON ITS OWN BECAUSE IT WAS SEPARATED OUT AS AN ACTION ITEM ON ITS OWN.

OKAY. AND WE'RE DOING THAT RIGHT NOW.

YEAH. IS THAT SO? WE ARE IN CONSENSUS THAT IT IS 973 100.

[00:30:05]

YES, SIR. IT IS 973 100.

AND I HAD SENT THE EMAIL TO THE CITY COUNCIL THIS WEEK WITH A CONTRACT THAT SHOWED THAT DOLLAR AMOUNT.

YES. THAT'S CORRECT.

OKAY. OKAY.

ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION FROM COUNCIL? OKAY. ENTERTAIN MOTIONS.

I MOVE THAT WE, HOLD ON.

LET ME TURN YOU ON HERE. I MOVE THAT WE ACCEPT ITEM EIGHT ON THE CONSENT THAT WAS PREVIOUSLY ON THE CONSENT AGENDA AS A SEPARATE ITEM.

OKAY. I HAVE A MOTION BY MR. MILLSAP TO APPROVE ITEM EIGHT AS PRESENTED ON THE CONSENT AGENDA.

DO I HAVE A SECOND? MISS HOWARTH.

SECOND. SECOND BY MISS HOWARD.

ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? HEARING NONE. PLEASE CAST YOUR BALLOT.

THAT MOTION CARRIES UNANIMOUSLY.

NEXT ITEM ON THE AGENDA IS ITEM FF1.

[1. Conduct a public hearing regarding amendments to the City's Water, Wastewater, and Roadway 2024-2034 Impact Fee update, including amendments to the Land Use Assumptions, Capital Improvements Plan, and to the Maximum Assessable Impact Fees established by the study.]

CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING AMENDMENTS TO THE CITY'S WATER, WASTEWATER, AND ROADWAY.

2024-2034 IMPACT FEE UPDATE, INCLUDING AMENDMENTS TO THE LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS, CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN AND TO THE MAXIMUM ASSESSABLE ACCESSIBLE IMPACT FEES ESTABLISHED BY THE MRS. NASH. WELL, THERE WE GO.

MAYOR AND COUNCIL, THIS ITEM, AS YOU KNOW, YOU WE PLANNED FOR THIS PUBLIC HEARING TO BE TONIGHT, NOVEMBER 4TH, TO ALLOW FOR A PUBLIC HEARING AND INPUT ON OUR WATER, WASTEWATER AND ROADWAY IMPACT FEE.

UPDATE THE TEN YEAR PLAN THAT WE ARE REQUIRED TO DO.

SO COREY IS HERE TO PROVIDE YOU WITH AN UPDATE.

THE CONSULTANT IS HERE TO ANSWER ANY SPECIFIC QUESTIONS THAT YOU HAVE.

AND THEN ONCE WE GO THROUGH THE PUBLIC HEARING PORTION, THERE IS NO VOTE ON THIS ITEM TONIGHT.

THE ORDINANCE WILL BE ON YOUR AGENDA ON NOVEMBER THE 18TH.

THANK YOU, MISS NASH.

HELLO, MR. NESBITT.

MAYOR, COUNCIL JUST LOGISTICS THING.

I CAN'T SEE IT ON MY SCREEN SO I CAN ONLY SEE IT UP THERE.

SO BEAR WITH ME AS WE CLICK THROUGH THIS IN THE DARK.

RIGHT? SO TO SPEAK. YES.

GOOD EVENING. SO WE'VE TALKED ABOUT THIS SEVERAL TIMES BEFORE.

THIS IS JUST THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR THE IMPACT FEE STUDY THAT HAS BEEN COMPLETED OVER THE SUMMERTIME? AGAIN, AS GINA MENTIONED, THE WORK OF HENDRIX, CONWAY OR CARTER.

SORRY, I HEAR OUR CONSULTANTS HERE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS ALSO.

I KNOW WHO YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT, THOUGH, RIGHT? YEAH. A LITTLE.

AGAIN. SO WE'RE GOING TO GO OVER THIS A LITTLE BIT.

IMPACT FEES 101 JUST FOR THE PUBLIC AS WELL.

WE ACTUALLY HAD THIS DISCUSSED TWICE AT THE PNC, WHICH WAS YOU GUYS RECOMMENDED AS THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE THAT HAPPENED THIS SUMMER AS WELL.

AND SO THEY REVIEWED THE LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS, THE CIP AND OUR FEES, AND THEY MADE A RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE WHAT YOU'LL SEE HERE SHORTLY.

AND WE'LL GO THROUGH SOME FEE BENCHMARKS AND SHOW YOU SOME OTHER CITIES AND WHAT THEIR NUMBERS ARE.

AND WE'LL GO OVER THE QUICK SCHEDULE AND THEN ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS AS NEEDED.

SO AGAIN, WHAT ARE IMPACT FEES? THESE ARE ASSESSED AT THE TIME OF BUILDING PERMIT, DEPENDING ON THE LAND USE.

RIGHT? AND SO THIS IS ONLY CHARGED TO THE DEVELOPER.

THESE FEES ARE NOT CHARGED TO INDIVIDUAL HOMEOWNERS.

THAT QUESTION CAME UP DURING OUR PNC PRESENTATIONS.

I JUST WANT TO BE CLEAR ON THAT, THAT ONE SPECIFICALLY BECAUSE SOME OF THE SOME OF THE, YOU KNOW, THEY HAD QUESTIONS LIKE, WHY AM I GETTING ASSESSED TWO FEES? WELL, THE HOMEOWNERS ARE NOT GETTING ASSESSED.

THIS IS ONLY FOR THE DEVELOPMENT COMMUNITY.

AND AGAIN, THIS IS THE NEXT BULLET POINT.

WE DO THESE FEES EVERY FIVE YEARS.

LAST ONE WAS DONE IN 2017.

AND AGAIN, WE DO WE REVIEW LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS WITH THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT.

WE LOOK AT THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLANS THAT YOU GUYS SEE EVERY YEAR IN OUR FIVE YEAR PLAN.

AND THEN WE DO ADOPTION OF THE IMPACT FEES BY ORDINANCE.

AND AGAIN, AS WE MENTIONED, THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE, THEY REVIEWED THE LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS, CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLANS AND THE IMPACT FEES.

AND THEY ACTUALLY PROVIDED THAT RECOMMENDATION TO YOU AT OUR LAST MEETING.

AND THEN WE DID, WE DID WE DID MEET WITH THEM IN AUGUST AND SEPTEMBER TO GO OVER THESE ITEMS AS PRESENTED.

AGAIN, THIS IS OUR ZONING MAP.

LAND USE ASSUMPTION MAP.

THIS WAS DONE IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT.

THIS IS THIS WILL TAKE US TO OUR BUILD OUT YEAR 2034 AND ROUGHLY SHOWS ON THERE THE POPULATION WE'RE ANTICIPATING IS ROUGHLY 34,000 PEOPLE.

SO AGAIN, A LITTLE BIT ROOM FOR GROWTH.

ABOUT 1.4%.

AND AGAIN, AS YOU GUYS SEE EVERY YEAR, THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN WE WENT THROUGH AND DID A TEN YEAR HORIZON ON THESE THINGS.

AND SO WE LOOKED AT, YOU KNOW, ANYTHING THAT COULD BE PROJECTED OR REDONE IN THE NEXT TEN YEARS.

AND THOSE ARE ALL ELIGIBLE FOR REIMBURSEMENT OR COLLECTION OF IMPACT FEES ON.

AND SO EVEN SOME PROJECTS THAT HAVE BEEN UNDER CONSTRUCTION, IF THE DOLLAR AMOUNT IS CHANGED OR OVER UNDER, WE CAN RECOUP THOSE FEES AS PART OF OUR IMPACT FEE

[00:35:04]

CALCULATIONS. AND AGAIN, WE'LL GET TO THAT IN A SECOND.

BUT THE IMPACT FEE IS CALCULATED BASED ON THE CIP VALUE OVER OUR TEN YEAR GROWTH PERIOD.

AND AGAIN, BY STATE LAW, WE CAN ONLY ACCESS THE 50% OF THE MAXIMUM FEE.

AND I'LL SHOW YOU THAT HERE IN THIS NEXT SLIDE.

AGAIN, THIS IS A MAP OF OUR WATER SYSTEM.

IT SHOWS FUTURE LAND, FUTURE IMPROVEMENTS AS WELL AS ANYTHING THAT'S EXISTING.

AND WE DON'T DO LIKE THE SMALL RESIDENTIAL SIX AND EIGHT INCH LINES.

BUT THIS IS THE MAJOR TRANSMISSION LINES THROUGH THE CITY ALSO HAS DIAGRAMS OF OUR PUMP STATIONS, WHICH ARE ELIGIBLE FOR IMPACT FEE REIMBURSEMENT AS WELL.

AND AGAIN, THIS WATER CIP COST SUMMARY BASICALLY BREAKS DOWN THAT MAP AND SHOWS ALL THE PROJECTS THAT WE HAVE SCHEDULED OR ANTICIPATED IN THE NEXT TEN YEARS AND THE ROUGHLY THE APPROXIMATE DOLLAR VALUES FOR THOSE PROJECTS.

AND YOU CAN SEE THAT WE HAVE ROUGHLY $31 MILLION OF UPCOMING PROJECTS.

AND AGAIN, SO HOW'S THAT WATER IMPACT FEE CALCULATED AGAIN? IT'S THE ELIGIBLE EXISTING UTILIZED COST PLUS THE ELIGIBLE PROPOSED UTILIZED COST DIVIDED BY THE NEXT BY THE NEW LIVING UNITS OVER THE NEXT TEN YEARS. AND SO THAT ROUGHLY COMES OUT TO $8,400.

AND AGAIN WE ONLY CAN ASSESS THE MAX OR 50% OF THE MAXIMUM FEE, WHICH PUTS YOU AT 42,300 OR $37 AND CHANGE.

AGAIN, SIMILAR FOR THE WATER.

THIS IS THE WASTEWATER MAP.

AGAIN, YOU CAN SEE ON THE MUDDY CREEK LIFT STATION IMPROVEMENTS AND THE SEWER LINE THAT GOES THROUGH THE LANDFILL ON THE NORTH SIDE.

AND THESE ARE THE SAME THING WE DID FOR THE WATER.

TAKE THE VALUE OF THE CIP IMPROVEMENTS OVER THE NEXT 20 YEARS.

THERE'S ROUGHLY $21 MILLION.

AGAIN, SAME EQUATION. TAKE THAT.

DIVIDE IT BY THE NUMBER OF EQUIVALENT RESIDENTIAL LIVING UNITS OVER THE NEXT TEN YEARS.

AND AGAIN, 50% OF THAT.

AND IT'S ROUGHLY 2800, $2,830 FOR THE SEWER IMPACT FEE.

AGAIN, THERE'S A ROADWAY MASTER PLAN.

AGAIN, NO CHANGES TO THAT. AND YOU'LL SEE SOME OF THIS PROBABLY WITH THE COMP PLAN PRESENTATION TONIGHT.

WE'RE NOT ANTICIPATING ANY MAJOR ARTERIAL ROADWAY EXPANSION.

AND SO THIS IS THE COLLECTION OF ALL THOSE STREETS ON THAT MAP.

AGAIN, THIS IS THE MAP.

THIS IS THE DETAILED BREAKDOWN OF THE MAP.

ROUGHLY $57 MILLION OF PROJECTS.

THAT'S WITHOUT INTEREST.

AGAIN, AS THESE THINGS, AS WE WENT THROUGH THE 2021 BOND PROJECTS ESCALATE, PRICES GO UP.

WE'RE ANTICIPATING THAT TO GO UP TO PROBABLY $81 MILLION IF WE, YOU KNOW, DEPENDING ON THE TIMING OF EACH PROJECT.

AND SO THERE IS A LITTLE BIT OF AN ESCALATION FACTOR AND FIGURED INTO THOSE NUMBERS AS WELL.

BUT ROUGHLY $81 MILLION TO DO THE ROADWAY PROJECTS PROPOSED.

AND AGAIN, SO WE TALKED ABOUT RECOUPING PREVIOUS VISA.

THIS IS THE AMOUNT OF DIFFERENTIAL THAT WE HAD FROM THE PREVIOUS PROJECTS.

$2 MILLION FOR HUDSON.

6.5 MILLION FOR SAXON ROAD.

FIFTH STREET WAS JUST COMPLETED.

AND THEN MAXWELL CREEK AS WELL, SO WE CAN RECOUP THOSE FEES THAT WE SPENT ON THOSE PROJECTS.

AND AGAIN, THAT'S ROUGHLY $12 MILLION THAT GOES INTO THAT CALCULATION OF THE IMPACT FEES.

AGAIN, HERE'S OUR TEN YEAR LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS.

WE ONLY HAVE ONE SERVICE AREA.

WE DON'T WE'RE NOT BROKEN INTO SEVERAL DISTRICTS.

SO WE HAVE ONE SERVICE AREA.

AND THEN AGAIN, THESE ARE THE VALUES OR THE LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS FOR THOSE.

SERVICE UNITS.

SO AGAIN FOR THE ROADWAY IMPACT FEES WE DEVELOP EVERYTHING BASED ON A SERVICE UNIT.

AGAIN THIS IS ALL BASED OFF OF THE IT TRIP GENERATION MANUAL.

AGAIN WE DO WORKPLACE TRAVEL SERVICE AS WELL.

AGAIN, THESE ARE BROKEN DOWN MORE, FAR MORE CLEARLY IN THE REPORT.

BUT THERE'S A LOT OF THIS IS WHAT WE DEAL WITH THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT.

AND AGAIN, SO FOR ONE RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNIT, IT ROUGHLY EQUATES TO 2.8 VEHICLE MILES PER UNIT.

RIGHT. SO TRIPS PER DAY.

MAYBE THAT'S A BETTER WAY OF SAYING IT.

AND AGAIN, IT'S A 1000FT² OF OFFICE IS ROUGHLY IS ALMOST DOUBLE THAT OF A RESIDENTIAL UNIT.

AND SO JUST BASED ON THE IMPACT TO THE STREET OR ROADWAY NETWORK.

AGAIN, ONE SERVICE AREA, WE HAVE 90,000 EXISTING VEHICLE MILES.

WITH THE BUILD OUT PROPOSED PROJECTS, WE WOULD ANTICIPATE 142,000 VEHICLE MILES AGAIN, ROUGHLY $33 MILLION OF THOROUGHFARE GROWTH THAT WE'RE PROPOSING TO BE RECOUPED WITH THE IMPACT FEES.

AND AGAIN. SO THIS IS $33 MILLION DIVIDED BY THE TOTAL GROWTH OF EQUIVALENT SERVICE UNITS.

[00:40:01]

AND AGAIN, SO THAT'S ROUGHLY 50% OF THAT IS $328 PER SERVICE PER YEAR.

A LOT OF NUMBERS FOR THE MAXIMUM ROADWAY IMPACT FEE ALLOWED PER SERVICE UNIT.

AND AGAIN, THIS IS AN EXAMPLE OF HOW WE CALCULATE SOME OF THOSE FEES.

RIGHT. SO FOR ONE SINGLE FAMILY HOME YOU PAID ROUGHLY $926.

AND AGAIN FOR A FOR A 100, 150,000 SQUARE FOOT SHOPPING CENTER, YOU WOULD PAY $202,378 PER 1000FT². AND AGAIN, THAT'S ALL BROKEN DOWN INTO THE IN THE REPORT.

BUT THAT'S BASICALLY HOW THESE CALCULATIONS WORK OUT.

THIS IS OUR BENCHMARKING TABLE.

THIS SHOWS THE COMPARATIVE CITIES.

I WILL NOTE THAT SOME OF THESE CITIES ARE MOST CITIES 2020 THEY'RE PROBABLY GOING TO BE DOING ANOTHER IMPACT FEE ADJUSTMENT HERE IN THE NEXT YEAR OR SO.

SO AGAIN, SOME OF THESE NUMBERS ARE OLD.

WITH THE ANTICIPATION THAT CERTAINLY THEY'LL GO UP AS WELL.

BUT YOU CAN SEE OUR NUMBERS FROM 2017.

OBVIOUSLY THOSE NUMBERS HAVE GONE UP FROM 2024.

AND AGAIN HERE'S THE HERE'S THE TABLE OF OUR ROADWAY IMPACT FEES WITH COMPARATIVE CITIES.

AND YOU CAN SEE THAT, YOU KNOW, WE'RE STILL RELATIVELY LOW BECAUSE WE'RE, WE'RE REALLY APPROACHING BUILD OUT.

AND SO THERE'S NOT MUCH MORE RESIDENTIAL UNITS THAT ARE GOING TO BE COMING ON THE GROUND COMPARED TO PROSPER OR MCKINNEY OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT, OR FLOWER MOUND CERTAINLY STANDS OUT. RIGHT.

AGAIN, NEXT. THIS IS OUR LAST PUBLIC HEARING FOR THIS ITEM.

CERTAINLY. WE'LL OPEN COMMENTS AND TAKE ANY QUESTIONS FROM COUNCIL AND FROM THE PUBLIC.

THIS YOU WILL SEE A RESOLUTION IN AN ORDINANCE AT THE NEXT MEETING, AND WE ALSO WILL ADOPT THE MASTER FEE AMENDMENTS TO FOR THESE NUMBERS AS WELL.

SO A LOT OF NUMBERS, A LOT OF TABLES.

IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE LET ME KNOW.

LOOK, WE CAN GO THROUGH THE BOOK AND AGAIN DEREK'S HERE AS WELL.

HE CAN HELP ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS AS NEEDED.

THANK YOU, MR. NESBITT.

JUST A COUPLE OF THINGS.

POINTS OF EMPHASIS YOU MENTIONED.

ONE IS WE JUST HAVE ONE SERVICE AREA.

CORRECT. I KNOW, I'M ASSUMING THAT'S BECAUSE OF OUR LIMITED GEOGRAPHIC SIZE.

CORRECT? YES. LARGER CITIES WOULD HAVE MORE THAN ONE SERVICE.

CORRECT. AND THEN YOUR COMMENT AT THE VERY BEGINNING THESE DOES NOT APPLY TO OUR RESIDENTS.

ONLY APPLIES TO DEVELOPERS AND TO THE DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE.

CORRECT. YES, SIR. I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE.

QUESTIONS FROM COUNCIL FOR MR. NESBITT. MR. PRESTENBERG, CAN YOU PUT ON SLIDE 14 WHERE IT JUST TALKS ABOUT THE DIFFERENT ROADS AND THEN THE TOTAL COST WITHOUT INTEREST AND THEN INTEREST AND THEN THE TOTAL PROJECTED COST, RIGHT.

YEAH. THAT ONE. SO WHEN YOU'RE CALCULATING THESE YOU'RE THROWING IN THERE THE FUTURE OR THE POTENTIAL COST OF INTEREST ON THERE TO CORRECT? RIGHT. OKAY. SO IF WE DID EVERYTHING TODAY AGAIN, IT'S LIKE THE BOND.

IF WE DID EVERYTHING TODAY, IT'S 57 MILLION.

IF YOU STAGGER THAT OVER TEN YEARS, IT COULD COST UP TO AS MUCH AS $82 MILLION.

OKAY. AND THEN YOU KNOW, THAT LAST CHART OR TWO WHEN YOU HAD US COMPARED ON SLIDE 22? SO WHEN I SEE SINGLE FAMILY, THAT'S ANY NEW HOUSE ONCE THIS GETS APPROVED, OR SHOULD IT GET APPROVED AT THIS RATE, ANY NEW HOME WOULD COME IN. THAT BUILDER WOULD PAY THAT IMPACT FEE FOR THIS GETS PAID AT THE TIME OF BUILDING PERMIT.

YEAH. CORRECT. OKAY.

AND THEN ARE THESE STAGGERED LIKE SO THIS IS APPROVED YOUR YEAR ONE.

RIGHT. SO IT GETS APPROVED.

LET'S JUST SAY TODAY IS IT JUST 926? NO MATTER IF YOU BUILD A HOUSE TOMORROW OR YOU FILE FOR A PERMIT FIVE YEARS FROM NOW.

CORRECT. IT DOESN'T GO UP.

AND THAT'S WHY WE DO THIS EVERY FIVE YEARS TO KIND OF CORRECT THE COLLECT THE DATA FROM THE CIP PROJECTS AND ANY NEW GROWTH.

RIGHT. BUT WE'RE ALMOST BUILT OUT.

SO THERE'S LIMITED GROWTH, BUT WE STILL WILL HAVE PROJECTS THAT WILL QUALIFY FOR IMPACT FEE REIMBURSEMENT.

YEAH, I'M NOT WORRIED ABOUT SINGLE FAMILY THAT MUCH.

IT WAS MORE THE RESTAURANT OR SHOPPING CENTER THAT IF WE APPROVED IT TODAY, DO WE SEE OR DO WE EXPECT TO SEE A HUGE INCREASE IN THE NEXT THREE YEARS OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT FROM A COST PERSPECTIVE? IF NOT, THEN IT'S NOT THAT BIG OF A DEAL.

I DON'T KNOW. THAT'S A GOOD QUESTION.

IF WE CAN FIND OUT, I MEAN, AGAIN, THEY WOULD STILL HAVE THOSE FEES FOR THE NEXT FIVE YEARS UNTIL WE DID ANOTHER UPDATE.

SO. RIGHT. I WAS JUST THINKING, YOU KNOW, EVERYTHING ELSE HAS A GRADUAL INCREASE, LIKE EVERY YEAR, 2.5% OR EVERY YEAR 3% OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT.

IT DIDN'T. IT'D BE I DON'T KNOW IF OTHER CITIES DO THAT OR NOT, LIKE AN ANNUAL RIDER OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT.

THAT JUST KIND OF SLIGHTLY INCREASES IT TO HELP OUT THE CITY SHOULD, YOU KNOW, COSTS GO UP AND YOU'RE NOT.

MAYBE DEREK, YOU CAN ANSWER THAT, BUT I DON'T I DON'T THINK MOST I MEAN AGAIN, THEY DO THEY DO UPDATES EVERY FIVE YEARS.

AND THAT'S WHEN YOU WOULD COLLECT THAT DATA OR CORRECT THAT NUMBER.

SO YEAH, IN MY EXPERIENCE EVERY CITY IS FIVE YEARS MINIMUM.

AND THEN THEY'LL LOOK AT IT AFTER FIVE YEARS.

JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT IN THOSE FOUR YEARS WE'RE NOT LOSING MONEY.

SO ALL RIGHT THANK YOU.

[00:45:01]

OTHER QUESTIONS FROM COUNCIL FOR STAFF.

OKAY. HOLD ON, MR. NESBITT. OH, HOLD ON, MR. MILLSAP. MR. PRESTENBERG JUST ASKED A QUESTION ABOUT A NEW HOME.

WHAT ABOUT A BUSINESS AS OPPOSED TO REBUILDING AN OLD BUILDING BUSINESS? DOES THAT? DO THEY ALSO HAVE TO PAY THE IMPACT FEES? AS AN EXAMPLE AS WE WERE LOOKING AT OUR SERVICE CENTER, WE MOVED THAT AND WE HAPPEN TO SELL WHERE THE PARKS DEPARTMENT IS ON 78, AND SOMEBODY BUYS THAT AND WANTS TO TEAR THAT BUILDING DOWN AND BUILD ANOTHER BUILDING THERE.

DO THEY HAVE TO PAY IMPACT FEES SINCE THE UTILITIES ARE ALREADY THERE? THE STREETS ARE ALREADY THERE.

THERE'S NO REALLY INCREASE IN IMPACT FEES.

SO I THINK THAT'S PROBABLY A PLANNING QUESTION ON THE BUILDING SIZE, RIGHT.

IF THEY IF THEY DEMOED THE IF THEY DEMOED THE BUILDING AND RECONSTRUCTED A NEW BUILDING, YES, I WOULD THINK THEY WOULD PAY ROADWAY IMPACT FEES IF THEY HAD A TWO INCH WATER METER NOW AND THEY ONLY NEEDED A TWO INCH WATER METER, WE WOULDN'T NECESSARILY COLLECT ADDITIONAL IMPACT FEES, BUT IF THEY WENT FROM A TWO INCH METER TO A THREE INCH METER, WE WOULD COLLECT THAT DIFFERENCE.

OKAY. SO, ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FROM COUNCIL.

SO THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING.

SO I WILL NOW DECLARE THE PUBLIC HEARING OPEN.

THE TIME IS GRANGER 7:16 P.M..

PUBLIC HEARING IS NOW OPEN AT 716.

ANYONE LIKE TO ADDRESS THIS ITEM AT THIS TIME? ALL RIGHT. SEEING NONE, I DECLARE THE PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED.

THE TIME IS GRANGER 716.

716. ALL RIGHT.

OKAY. AS MISS NASH INDICATED, THERE IS NO ACTION TONIGHT, AND THIS WILL COME BACK ON OUR NOVEMBER 18TH MEETING.

HOWEVER, IF THERE'S ANY FINAL QUESTIONS BEFORE WE MOVE ON, NOW IS THE TIME.

ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU, MR. NESBITT. THANK YOU, SIR. APPRECIATE IT.

NEXT ITEM ON THE AGENDA IS ITEM F.2.

[2. Discuss and consider authorizing the City Manager to execute an agreement with Kompan, Inc. in the amount of One Million, One Hundred Thirty-One Thousand, Eight Hundred Ninety-Eight and No/100 Dollars ($1,131,898.00) for the purchase and installation of playground equipment at J.K. Sachse Park.]

DISCUSS AND CONSIDER AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT WITH COPAN, INCORPORATED IN THE AMOUNT OF $1,131,898 FOR THE PURCHASE AND INSTALLATION OF PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT AT JC SACHSE PARK.

MR. NASH. MAYOR AND COUNCIL.

THIS IS THE NEXT PHASE IN THE CONSTRUCTION OF JC SACHSE PARK.

AS YOU KNOW, THIS PROJECT HAS BEEN WILDLY SUCCESSFUL FOR THE PUBLIC AND IT HAS BEEN A PAY AS YOU GO PROJECT FROM THE MUNICIPAL DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT THAT THE COUNCIL SET ASIDE FUNDS SPECIFICALLY TO PAY FOR PHASES OF PARK PROJECTS SPECIFICALLY DEDICATED TO PARK INFRASTRUCTURE, NOT PARK OPERATIONS.

SO THIS IS SORT OF THE THIRD PHASE.

WE'VE KIND OF TAKEN A FEW THINGS OUT OF ORDER, WHICH LANCE WILL DISCUSS WITH YOU, BUT WE'RE VERY EXCITED ABOUT THIS HUGE ADDITION TO JC SACHSE PARK.

AND LANCE HAS A FULL PRESENTATION FOR YOU.

HELLO, MR. WHITWORTH. HELLO.

THANK YOU, MAYOR. THANK YOU, MISS NASH, FOR COVERING A LITTLE BIT OF THE BACKGROUND.

THIS IS TECHNICALLY PHASE TWO B, BUT IT'S KIND OF PHASE THREE OR NOT TO BE.

SORRY. ONE THING THAT THAT WASN'T MENTIONED BY MISS NASH IS THAT WITH OUR SALES TAX REVENUE OVER THE LAST SEVERAL YEARS, THIS PROJECT, WHEN WE ORIGINALLY PLANNED IT WAS SCHEDULED TO BE DONE IN FIVE, POSSIBLY SIX YEARS.

AND WE'RE TWO YEARS AHEAD OF THAT.