May 11, 2026 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting

I CALLED TO ORDER THE MEETING OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SACHSE WILL HOLD A REGULAR MEETING ON MONDAY,

[1. Call to Order: The Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Sachse will hold a regular meeting on Monday, May 11, 2026, at 6:00 PM to consider the following items of business:]

[00:00:07]

FIRST THING IS I WANT TO DECLARE THAT WE DO HAVE A QUORUM.

WELCOME TO PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING.

THE FIRST THING WE'LL HAVE IS THE INVOCATION AND PRAYER.

I'M SORRY. INVOCATION AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE.

FATHER GOD, WE GIVE YOU THANKS FOR THE DAY THAT YOU BLESSED US WITH. AND THE LIFE THAT YOU'VE GIVEN IN IT, GIVEN US IN IT. WE THANK YOU FOR THIS OPPORTUNITY TO SERVE.

WE PRAY FOR WISDOM AS WE CONSIDER THE ITEMS AS WE LISTEN TO THE PUBLIC AND AS WE DEBATE, WE ASK, LORD, THAT YOU WOULD GUIDE US AND DIRECT US, AND THAT WE'D BE STRONG AS WE DO THE THINGS THAT YOU'D HAVE US TO DO.

WE JUST PRAISE YOU IN YOUR SON'S NAME. AMEN. AMEN.

I PLEDGE ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND TO THE REPUBLIC FOR WHICH IT STANDS ONE NATION UNDER GOD, INDIVISIBLE, WITH LIBERTY AND JUSTICE FOR ALL.

HONOR THE TEXAS FLAG. I PLEDGE ALLEGIANCE TO THEE TEXAS.

ONE STATE UNDER GOD, ONE AND INDIVISIBLE. MAY BE SEATED.

AT THIS TIME, THE THE PUBLIC IS INVITED TO ADDRESS THE BOARD REGARDING ANY TOPIC NOT ALREADY ON THE AGENDA FOR ACTION OR PUBLIC HEARING COMMENTS REGARDING ANY DISCUSSION. ONLY ITEMS ON THE AGENDA MAY BE ADDRESSED DURING THE PUBLIC COMMENT SECTION.

THE TIME LIMIT IS THREE MINUTES PER SPEAKER. A PUBLIC COMMENT CARD SHOULD HAVE BEEN PRESENTED TO THE ACTING SECRETARY PRIOR TO THE MEETING.

UNDER THE TEXAS OPEN MEETINGS ACT, THE BOARD IS PROHIBITED FROM DISCUSSING ANY ITEM NOT POSTED ON THE AGENDA, BUT WE WILL TAKE COMMENTS UNDER ADVISEMENT. IS THERE ANYBODY THAT WOULD LIKE TO ADDRESS THE BOARD AT THIS TIME? MR. DON SHIPP? I THINK THAT'S IT VERY GOOD. DOES ANYBODY WANT TO MAKE PUBLIC COMMENT? SEEING NONE WILL MOVE TO THE NEXT AGENDA ITEM.

[1. Consider approving the March 23, 2026, meeting minutes.]

ANYONE FROM THE AUDIENCE HAVE TO WOULD LIKE TO ADDRESS THE BOARD ON THIS ITEM.

SEEING NONE. COULD I HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND? A MOTION THAT WE APPROVE THE MEETING MINUTES FROM PREVIOUS MEETING AS THEY ARE SECOND.

SEEING NONE. CALL FOR A VOTE, PLEASE CAST YOUR BALLOT.

TO CONFIRM, THE SECOND WAS FROM MR. OHMAN. CORRECT? YES. OH, THERE WE ARE THE MOTION PASSES 5 TO 0. NEXT ITEM. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER AND MAKE RECOMMENDATIONS ON AN

[2. Conduct a public hearing to consider and make a recommendation on an ordinance amending the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance and Map, to grant a change of zoning from Residential-1 District (R-1), Agricultural District (AG), and Residential-2A District (R-2A) to Residential-39 (R-39) on a ±14.52 acre tract of land generally located south of Sachse Road and east of Getha Lane at 4912 Sachse Road, 5008 Sachse Road and 5251 Getha Lane, City of Sachse, Dallas County, Texas, within Sachse city limits.]

R-39 ON A PLUS OR -14.52 ACRE TRACT OF LAND GENERALLY LOCATED SOUTH OF SACHSE ROAD AND EAST OF GETHA LANE AT 4912 SACHSE ROAD, 5.8 5. 5008 SACHSE ROAD AND 5251 GETHA LANE. CITY OF SACHSE, DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS.

WITHIN THE SACHSE CITY LIMITS. WE HEAR OUR STAFF PRESENTATION PLEASE.

[00:05:21]

THE REQUEST BEFORE YOU TONIGHT IS FOR A REZONING FROM R-1 AG AND R-2A TO R-39 ON A 14.52 ACRE TRACT, GENERALLY LOCATED SOUTH OF SACHSE ROAD AND EAST OF GETHA LANE AT 4912 SACHSE ROAD, 5008 SACHSE ROAD AND 5251 GETHA LANE. LIKE I SAID, THE REQUEST BEFORE YOU TONIGHT IS ROUGHLY 14.52 ACRES. IT'S CURRENTLY OCCUPIED BY TWO HOMES AND THEIR ASSOCIATED ACCESSORY BUILDINGS.

THE APPLICANT HAS STATED IN THEIR REQUEST THEY INTEND TO CONSOLIDATE THE ZONING OF THE PROPOSED PROPERTY SO THEY CAN EVENTUALLY REPLAT INTO ONE LOT FOR ONE RESIDENTIAL HOME.

THIS REZONING IS THE FIRST STEP OF THAT PROCESS.

THEY WOULD BE LOOKING AT REZONING REPLATTING DOING SOME DEMO WORK THERE AND EVENTUALLY REPLATTING AGAIN TO CONSOLIDATE INTO THAT ONE LOT. IN FRONT OF YOU HERE IS THE AERIAL MAP, AS YOU CAN SEE ALONG SACHSE ROAD THERE WITH A SMALL AMOUNT OF FRONTAGE ONTO GETHA THERE FOR THAT OTHER PROPERTY ON THE SOUTH SIDE.

THIS IS THE ZONING MAP HERE INDICATED IN THE BLUE WITH THE BLUE STAR ON IT.

AS YOU CAN SEE, THE LOT ON THE NORTH WEST SIDE THERE IS ZONED R-1 TO THE RIGHT IT IS ZONED AG AND ON THE BOTTOM THAT BOTTOM PIECE IS ZONED R-2A. THERE ARE SEVERAL REQUIREMENTS THAT ARE VERY SIMILAR IN EACH ZONING DISTRICT.

R-1 AND R-2 ARE LEGACY ZONING DISTRICTS. ANY NEW REZONINGS WOULD NOT BE ALLOWED TO REZONE TO THESE STANDARDS.

IN FRONT OF YOU IS THE R-39 ZONING DISTRICT STANDARDS.

THESE ARE WHAT IS PROPOSED BY THE APPLICANT. IT MIRRORS R-1 ZONING WITH A LOT AREA OF 39,000FT².

AND R-2A ALLOWS FOR A DENSITY OF 10,000. 10,000FT² PER LOT.

AND THE AG ALLOWS FOR 5 ACRES AS THE MINIMUM.

THE CURRENT PARCEL ON THERE DOES NOT MEET FOR THIS.

THAT ONE ON THE TOP RIGHT THERE. THE PROPOSED MIRRORS R-1 AND IS MORE RESTRICTIVE THAN THE R-2A IN EXISTENCE.

THE FUTURE LAND USE PLAN DESIGNATES THIS AS LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL, WHICH IS DESCRIBED AS SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED DWELLINGS ON A RANGE OF LOT SIZES AND SETBACKS. STATE LAW REQUIRES THAT ZONING DECISIONS BE ADOPTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.

FUTURE LAND USE PLAN SUPPORTS THE PROPOSED REZONING REQUEST.

STAFF RECOMMENDATION. STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THE PROPOSED REZONING REQUEST.

IT IS IN LINE WITH THE COMP PLAN, THE FUTURE LAND USE PLAN.

PERMITTED USES WITHIN THE PROPOSED REZONING REQUEST WOULD BE CONSISTENT WITH THE SURROUNDING RESIDENTIALLY ZONED AND DEVELOPED LAND.

AND THE, THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION WILL GO TO THE CITY COUNCIL ON THEIR JUNE 1ST, 2026 REGULAR MEETING. ARE THERE ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF AT THIS TIME? THE APPLICANT IS HERE AS WELL IN CASE YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR THEM.

OKAY. ANYBODY ON THE COMMISSION HAVE ANY QUESTIONS? YES, SIR.

DOES IT ADD ANY ADDITIONAL RESTRICTIONS TO THE ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS NORTH, SOUTH, EAST OR WEST OF THIS ONE LOT? NO. SO THIS WOULD BE SPECIFICALLY FOR THESE THREE LOTS HERE.

IT WOULD NOT CHANGE ANY OF THE ZONING DISTRICTS SURROUNDING.

THE SECOND QUESTION IS IF THE IF THE APPLICANT AT A LATER TIME WANTED TO COME BACK IN AND SUBDIVIDE THAT LATER EVEN THOUGH THEY STILL MET THE R-39, THAT STILL WOULD TRIGGER A REVIEW OF THAT SITE CHANGE OR ANYTHING ELSE IF THEY MEET ALL OF THE ZONING REQUIREMENTS, THE LOT STANDARDS FOR THAT ZONING DISTRICT.

IT WOULD NOT REQUIRE THAT IT COME BACK TO HERE. THAT WOULD BE ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF REVIEW.

ANY

[00:10:03]

IS THAT CORRECT? IT'S IDENTIFIED IN DCAD AS ONE.

THAT'S WHAT WE HAVE IT AS IN OUR SYSTEM. THIS PARCEL LAYER THAT WAS DONE FOR THE COMP PLAN MAY HAVE JUST SHOWN IT AS THREE AS A PREVIOUS.

SO IT'S THREE SEPARATE PARCELS, THREE SEPARATE ZONINGS BEING CONSOLIDATED INTO ONE.

CORRECT. OKAY. I'M GOOD OKAY. NO OTHER QUESTIONS FROM THE COMMISSION.

I DECLARE THE PUBLIC HEARING OPEN AT 18:11. WOULD ANYBODY FROM THE AUDIENCE LIKE TO SPEAK? MR. SHIPP, I THINK, IS YOUR TIME. THANK YOU. I'M HERE WITH SEVERAL OF MY NEIGHBORS.

WHO ARE ONE OF THE PROPERTIES. WE'RE VERY WITHOUT MORE DATA, WE'RE VERY CONCERNED THAT RIGHT NOW WE HAVE A VERY OPEN VIEW.

WE'RE CONCERNED ABOUT A NEW NEIGHBORHOOD GOING IN WITH TWO STORY BUILDINGS POTENTIALLY LOOKING INTO OUR BACKYARD TAKING AWAY FROM PROPERTY VALUE.

WE'RE CONCERNED ABOUT THE DRAINAGE IMPLICATIONS THAT I DON'T KNOW IF A STUDY HAS BEEN DONE.

AND WHAT IF THAT'S GOING TO COME INTO OUR PROPERTY.

CONCERNED ABOUT NOT ONLY TWO STORY HOMES, BUT OUTBUILDINGS DIRECTLY.

I'VE SEEN CERTAIN OUTBUILDINGS BUILT DIRECTLY AGAINST A FENCE LINE, AND IT TOOK $50 TO $75,000 OFF ONE OF THE VALUES OF THE PROPERTY IN MY IN MY SUBDIVISION. IF WE'RE GOING TO DO THIS THEN MY ASK WOULD BE SOME FOR SOME ACCOMMODATION TO PROTECT THE PROPERTY VALUES OF THOSE WHO ARE ON MAGNOLIA LANE. I DON'T KNOW HOW IT AFFECTS OTHER PEOPLE, BUT I KNOW THAT IT WOULD AFFECT OUR PROPERTY VALUES.

I WOULD ASK THAT WE WOULD YOU KNOW, ENSURE THAT IT DOESN'T AFFECT DRAINAGE.

I WOULD ALSO ASK IF IF TONIGHT'S PROPOSALS LIKE ARE THEY LEGALLY BINDING OR ARE THEY MERELY CONCEPTUAL TONIGHT SUBJECT TO CHANGE LATER, AS WAS MENTIONED BY, IF THIS GETS REZONED LATER AND INSTEAD OF HAVING 10 HOUSES GO IN THERE, WE HAVE 40 HOUSES THAT EVENTUALLY GETS REZONED.

IF ONE OF THOSE OUTLETS COMES INTO MY SUBDIVISION THAT HAS.

THAT HAS A LOT OF TRAFFIC IMPACT IN A, IN A IN A SMALL AREA RIGHT HERE NEAR THE COURTHOUSE.

AND SO THOSE ARE, THOSE ARE SOME OF THE QUESTIONS THAT I HAD.

I'VE GOT A MINUTE AND A HALF. I'LL, I'LL READ SOME OF MY OTHERS AND I'LL BE HAPPY TO, TO HAND THESE OFF.

I WOULD BE INTERESTED TO KNOW IF THE DEVELOPER IS REQUESTING ANY VARIANCES OR WAIVERS OR FUTURE FLEXIBILITY BEYOND THE STANDARD R-39 REQUIREMENTS CURRENTLY.

I WANT I WOULD LIKE TO KNOW IF THERE'S ANY SORT OF BERM THAT IS GOING TO BE ALLOWED TO, TO BETWEEN THEIR PROPERTY AND THESE NEW ONES THAT ARE GOING TO GOING TO BE BUILT. ANY THOUGHTS HAVE BEEN GIVEN TO A LANDSCAPE BUFFER OR A TREE SCREENING BETWEEN THE NEW SUBDIVISION AND EXISTING HOMES.

I WOULD LIKE TO KNOW IF THERE IS A PLAT THAT'S BEEN DEVELOPED.

AND IF SO, WHAT ARE THE APPROXIMATE SIZES AND DEPTHS OF THESE, OF THESE LOTS AND WHAT THE APPROXIMATE PRICE RANGE IS AND ANTICIPATED NATURE OF, OF THESE BUILDINGS. AGAIN, THAT AFFECTS PROPERTY VALUES.

SO ALL OF THOSE THINGS WE'RE, WE'RE HERE WE UNDERSTAND THAT THE GROWTH.

GROWTH IS NEEDED AND HEALTHY, BUT WE ARE CONCERNED FOR OUR PROPERTY VALUES OF COURSE, AND, AND THE ENJOYMENT OF OUR HOME. WE BOUGHT THESE HOMES, IT WAS, IT WAS BOUGHT, BACKED UP NEXT TO A LOVELY FIELD THAT HAD HORSES ON IT.

AND HAVING A BUNCH OF TWO STORY HOUSES BACK THERE WOULD SIGNIFICANTLY CHANGE THAT.

AND SO WE WOULD ASK ALL THESE THINGS TO BE CONSIDERED AS YOU LOOK AT THIS.

THANK YOU SIR. DIANA SMITH. HI.

DIANA SMITH 4802 SACHSE ROAD. SO AND I'LL DITTO.

I'LL DON SHIPS QUESTIONS, BUT MY MAIN QUESTION IS HOW MANY BUILDINGS, HOW MANY HOMES COULD BE BUILT ON THIS TRACT OF LAND? WHAT IS THE MAXIMUM NUMBER OF HOMES THAT COULD BE SITTING ON THAT PROPERTY? THAT MIGHT HELP ALLEVIATE MY FEARS? SO MAYBE THE DEVELOPERS CAN ANSWER THAT.

THANK YOU. THANK YOU. IS THERE ANYONE ELSE WHO WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK?

[00:15:09]

MY NAME IS BJ COPE. I LIVE AT 5221 HERITAGE CIRCLE.

I WOULD BE EAST OF THIS DEVELOPMENT QUESTION IS IF IT'S A 3,900 SQUARE FOOT LOT.

DOES THAT MEAN. IS THAT SUPPOSED TO BE JUST THE LARGEST LOT SIZE THAT YOU THAT YOU APPROVE TO, TO BUILD A HOUSE? I WAS I WAS TOLD THAT THE PLAN WAS JUST TO PUT ONE HOUSE ON THERE ON THE WHOLE THING.

IF YOU'RE GOING TO PUT MORE THAN ONE HOUSE, WHAT ARE THE OTHER BUILDINGS THAT ARE PRETTY NEW THAT ARE ON THE BACKSIDE OF THAT PROPERTY ALREADY? AND THE SAME THING AS THE DRAINAGE. WHOEVER OWNS IT OR WHOEVER WAS RUNNING THAT PROPERTY HAS RUN A DRAINAGE LINE, A LINE THAT COLLECTED WATER AND EMPTIES ONTO MY PROPERTY.

AND I ALREADY HAVE DRAINAGE COMING FROM THE DEVELOPMENT NEXT DOOR.

IT COMES ACROSS MY PROPERTY. SOME OF IT COMES UP ACROSS MY BACKYARD, INTO MY POOL, AND I HAD TO PUT A SEWER PUMP IN THERE TO GET RID OF THAT.

THE REST OF IT GOES ACROSS AND THEN TO THE, THE TANK NEXT DOOR ON THE HORSE FARM AND THE REST OF IT JUST GOES DOWN THE BACK OF MY PROPERTY.

AND SO THAT'S ALREADY A PROBLEM. THE QUESTION IS WHAT'S GOING TO BE DONE AS FAR AS THE DRAINAGE PLANNING.

AND ARE THEY GOING ARE THEY GOING TO PROTECT US THERE? AND HOW EASY CAN THIS BE CHANGED? I MEAN, I DON'T MIND GETTING RID OF THE, THE SMALLER LOT REQUIREMENTS THAT WERE ALREADY PLANTED ON THAT, ON THAT PROPERTY NEXT DOOR. IF THEY'RE GOING TO BUILD SOME LARGER HOMES, THAT'S FINE WITH ME.

HOWEVER, IF IT'S GOING TO MISS THE DRAINAGE UP.

I DON'T I'M NOT CRAZY ABOUT THAT. AND I THINK FOR RIGHT NOW, THAT'S ALL MY QUESTIONS.

THANK YOU SIR. THANK YOU. WAS THERE SOMEONE ELSE? YES, MA'AM.

PLEASE PULL THE MIC. THERE YOU GO. STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS.

LINDA CRANK, 5006 HERITAGE CIRCLE. A COUPLE OF QUICK QUESTIONS THAT I MAY NOT THAT STAFF COULD ANSWER, OR THE DEVELOPERS. WAS THE INTENT TO BUILD ONE HOME IN THE CONSOLIDATION OR IS IF IT'S ABOUT 14 PLUS ACRES, IS THAT AT A LOT SIZE OF 10,000 TO BE CONSISTENT WITH THE DESIGNATED ZONING UP THERE, THEN, IS THAT THE INTENT TO BUILD 63 HOMES OR SOME SUBSET OF THOSE NUMBERS? WHAT'S. COULD WE GET A CLARIFICATION? AND THEN JUST ONE CORRECTION.

IT'S CRANK. C-R-A-N-K. THANK YOU. THANK YOU MA'AM.

YES, MA'AM. PLEASE COME FORWARD.

HI THERE. MY NAME IS MIRANDA MCKINNEY. I'M AT 5304 GETHA LANE.

OUR PROPERTY IS RIGHT NEXT TO WHERE THAT LITTLE PIECE OF LAND THAT TOUCHES GETHA ROAD RIGHT THERE.

MY QUESTION IS, DO THEY INTEND? IF THIS DOES GET DEVELOPED OUT INTO A NEIGHBORHOOD, DO THEY INTEND FOR THAT TO BE A MAIN ROAD? AND IF YES, THEN WHAT ARE THE INTENTIONS FOR THE TRAFFIC? WAS A TRAFFIC ASSESSMENT DONE? AND WHAT ARE THE MEASURES THAT MIGHT BE PUT INTO PLACE TO MAKE SURE THAT THERE'S A GOOD BARRIER BETWEEN THAT ROAD AND OUR DRIVEWAY, WHICH IS A COUPLE FEET AWAY.

THAT'S ALL. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. ANYONE ELSE THAT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK, PLEASE? WHAT? THEN SEEING NONE. WOULD THE DEVELOPER LIKE TO SPEAK? I THINK MAYBE THE HOMEOWNER DID YOU CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING? CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING OH ONE SECOND. NEED TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.

TIME IS 18:19. YES, SIR. TODD FERGUSON, I'M THE HOMEOWNER.

JUST TO PUT EVERYBODY'S MIND AT REST. WE HAVE NO INTENTION ON DEVELOPING OR CHOPPING THAT ALL UP.

IT'S JUST GOING TO CONTINUE ON AS THE CURRENT USAGE THAT WE'RE DOING RIGHT NOW.

AND WE'RE JUST COMBINING THE TWO LOTS IN THE FRONT BECAUSE THERE'S TWO HOMESTEADS THERE.

WE'RE GOING TO TAKE THOSE OUT AND THEN PUT A CENTRALLY LOCATED HOME, A NEW HOME.

AND THEN BETWEEN THOSE TWO, AND THAT'S ALL WE'RE DOING IS JUST TRYING TO GET EVERYTHING ALL STRAIGHTENED OUT. AND THAT'S THE WHOLE PURPOSE BEHIND THE, THE REZONING TO IS JUST TO MAKE SURE THAT WE'RE ALL ON TOP OF ALL THAT WITH THE NEW REZONINGS,

[00:20:06]

YOU KNOW THERE'S NO DESIRES TO I MEAN, THAT'S, THAT'S THE WHOLE PURPOSE OF THE WHOLE PROPERTY BACK THERE WAS TO HAVE IT FOR THE ANIMALS AND THE HORSES AND THE OTHER THINGS THAT WE HAVE BACK THERE.

BUT IT'S NOT GOING TO BE ALL CHOPPED UP AND, AND DEVELOPED.

SO NO INTENT THERE.

COME BACK TO THE REZONING I, IF I, IF I MISS ONE PLEASE LET ME KNOW. SO I THINK SOME OF THE QUESTIONS WERE RELATED TO THE DENSITY OF THIS, OF THIS PROJECT OVERALL. SO THIS IS A, WHAT IN EFFECT A DOWN ZONING FROM A HIGHER CLASSIFICATION, WHICH WOULD BE 10,000FT² PER LOT TO 39,000FT² PER LOT.

SO AS THE, AS THE APPLICANT HAS STATED, THIS IS A CONSOLIDATION OF THESE PROPERTIES INTO ONE LOT FOR THE ENJOYMENT OF, OF ONE HOME WITH SOME ACCESSORY BUILDINGS ON THE OUTSIDE.

SO AS FAR AS ANY FUTURE SUBDIVISION, IF THE OWNER DECIDED TO SELL OR SUBDIVIDE THE PROPERTY IN THE FUTURE, THEY WOULD HAVE TO MEET THE R-39 STANDARDS, WHICH IS 39,000 SQUARE FOOT LOTS, WHICH WOULD BE APPROXIMATELY CLOSE TO ONE ACRE IN SIZE.

SO IN THAT PROCESS, THEY WOULD HAVE TO COME THROUGH A SUBDIVISION PLAT TO REPLAT THAT PROPERTY INTO SMALLER LOTS.

THIS IS THE FIRST STAGE FOR THEIR DEVELOPMENT AS FAR AS GETTING THE ZONING, HAVING CONSISTENT SETBACKS ACROSS ALL THE PROPERTIES, AND THEN THEY CAN COMBINE THAT PROPERTY INTO ONE LOT.

SO AFTER IF THIS REZONING WAS TO GO THROUGH, THEY WOULD REPLAT THE PROPERTY, THE PROPERTIES INTO ONE LOT.

THEY WOULD, I BELIEVE THEY'RE LOOKING AT DEMOING THE ONE OF THE 1 OR 2 OF THE EXISTING HOMES, CONSTRUCTING ONE LARGER HOME AND THEN HAVING SOME ACCESSORY BUILDINGS IN THE BACK FOR, FOR HORSES AND SUCH LIKE THAT.

AS FAR AS DRAINAGE GOES, THAT WILL GO, THAT WILL BE LOOKED AT AT THE POINT OF DEVELOPMENT.

THIS IS THE FIRST STAGE IN THE DEVELOPMENT. SO WE'RE LOOKING AT THE USE USE COMPONENT ITSELF.

THAT'S WHAT THE REZONING IS FOR. WHEN THEY COME THROUGH WITH DEVELOPMENT, THAT'S WHEN DRAINAGE WILL BE LOOKED AT.

SO ANY BUILDING PLANS, ANY DEVELOPMENT OF THE PROPERTY, THAT'S WHEN WE WILL LOOK AT THE DRAINAGE.

AS FAR AS VARIANCES AND DEVIATIONS. WE HAVE NOT SEEN THOSE AT THIS POINT IN TIME BECAUSE THIS IS THE FIRST STEP IN THE PROCESS.

AS FAR AS A BERM OR LANDSCAPE BUFFER TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES.

THE ADJACENT PROPERTIES ARE ALSO ZONED FOR RESIDENTIAL USE.

SO THERE IS NO BUFFER REQUIRED BETWEEN RESIDENTIAL USES.

THERE HAS NOT BEEN A PLAT DEVELOPED AT THIS POINT IN TIME.

ZONING, ZONING DECISIONS NEED TO BE MADE BEFORE A PLAT CAN BE SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW.

AS THIS AS A PLAT WOULD NOT MEET THE REQUIREMENTS, MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE ZONING FOR EACH OF THESE, THESE PROPERTIES. REGARDING THE MAXIMUM NUMBER OF HOMES ON THE PROPERTY AS STATED, THAT WOULD BE LIMITED TO THE 39,000 SQUARE FOOT PER LOT. SO YOU'D HAVE TO GO THROUGH A SUBDIVISION PLAT AND SUBDIVIDE THIS OFF.

AS PART OF THAT SUBDIVISION PLAT. EACH LOT WOULD HAVE TO MEET THE MINIMUM ZONING STANDARDS FOR EACH LOT.

SO ON AN R-39, PHILIP, IF YOU CAN PULL UP THE STANDARDS, THE MINIMUM WIDTH OF THE LOT AT THE BUILDING LINE IS 130FT.

SO YOU'RE GOING TO BE LIMITED BY THE NUMBER OF LOTS THAT YOU CAN HAVE OFF OF A STREET.

MOST NOTABLY, GETHA LANE THERE WOULD BE THE LOT LINE IS NOT WIDE ENOUGH AT THAT POINT, SO THE ONLY WAY THAT LOTS COULD BE CONFIGURED WOULD BE OFF OF SACHSE ROAD. SO THAT WOULD BE A FUTURE SUBDIVISION IF THE OWNER, AT SOME POINT IN THE FUTURE, DECIDED TO DO SO.

LET'S SEE, HOW EASY CAN THE PROPERTY BE CHANGED AS FAR AS ZONING GOES? IT WOULD GO THROUGH THE SAME PROCESS. IT WOULD GO THROUGH THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION FOR RECOMMENDATION, AND THEN CITY COUNCIL FOR FURTHER ACTION IF THEY ARE SUBDIVIDING MEETING THE MINIMUM STANDARDS OF THE R-39, SHOULD THE ZONING GO THROUGH, THEN THAT IS A ADMINISTRATIVE LEVEL REVIEW AND APPROVAL.

I THINK THERE WAS A QUESTION ON, ON INTENT OF MAKING A ROAD ON GETHA LANE THERE.

THAT WOULD NOT MEET CITY REQUIREMENTS AS FAR AS THE LOT STANDARD.

SO NO, THE ANSWER TO THAT WOULD BE NO. I THINK I'VE TOUCHED ON PRETTY MUCH ALL OF THESE.

AS FAR AS THE QUESTION RELATED TO TWO STORY HOMES, THIS ZONING DISTRICT WOULD ALLOW FOR A TWO STORY HOME ON WITHIN THE R-39 STANDARDS.

[00:25:06]

THE HOMES WOULD BE ABLE TO BE TWO STORY IN HEIGHT. I THINK I'VE TOUCHED ON MOST ALL THE QUESTIONS THAT WERE ASKED AT THIS POINT IN TIME, AND IF COMMISSION HAS ANY FURTHER QUESTIONS, I'D BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY.

I HAVE ONE MORE. ONE MORE CLARIFICATION ON MY END.

THE SETBACKS FOR R-39 WOULD BE A FRONT YARD SETBACK OF A MINIMUM 90FT.

THERE IS NO MAXIMUM TO THAT. AND THEN YOUR YOUR SIDE YARD IS 10% OF LOT WIDTH.

SO DEPENDING ON HOW MUCH FRONTAGE YOU HAVE THERE OR HOW MUCH FRONTAGE YOU HAVE AT THE BUILDING LINE THERE, WE WOULD MEASURE THAT AND MAKE SURE THAT STRUCTURE'S OVER 400FT² ARE SET BACK, THAT 10% THERE.

AND YOUR REAR YARD WOULD BE, IT'S 25FT OR 20%, WHICHEVER IS LESS.

THIS IS A DEEP LOT. SO YOU'D BE LOOKING AT 25FT ON YOUR REAR YARD SETBACK.

THAT 25FT IS FROM THE BACK OF THE HOUSE TO THE END OF THE PROPERTY.

IT'S NOT 25FT FROM LIKE THEIR FENCE LINE TO WHAT'S BEHIND IT.

CORRECT? CORRECT. IT'D BE FROM WHATEVER STRUCTURE OVER 400FT² TO BACK PROPERTY LINE.

GOT IT. OKAY. I HAD A QUESTION ON THE REAR YARD SETBACK.

WHAT IS THE CURRENT SETBACK THAT'S THERE NOW AND IS THE CURRENT SETBACK THAT WILL BE REQUIRED.

IS IT GREATER THAN WHAT WOULD BE THERE? SO THE CURRENT SETBACK FOR R-2A.

BECAUSE THAT IS THE ONE THAT IS ON GETHA LANE THERE MAIN THING IS THAT ALL OF THESE ARE CURRENTLY SUBDIVIDED.

THEY ALL FRONT ON DIFFERENT STREETS THERE. SO R-2A HAS A DIFFERENT SETBACK STANDARD THAN R-39 WOULD IF ALL OF THESE WERE COMBINED AT THAT POINT. R-2A'S. R-2A'S SETBACK IS LET'S SEE 25FT OR 20%, CONSISTENT WITH WHAT'S BEING PROPOSED. R-1 IS 25FT OR 20%.

AND THEN AG IS A 50-YARD SETBACK OR A 50-FOOT SETBACK.

SO JUST, JUST FOR CLARIFICATION, THERE'S NO WE'RE NOT REDUCING DOWN THE SETBACK TO HOW CLOSE ANY BARNS OR ANY ADDITIONAL STRUCTURES ON THE SITE COULD BE PLACED CLOSER THAN WHAT THEY CURRENTLY ARE NOW OR CAN BE NOW.

CORRECT. AND WE'D BE EVALUATING THAT AND MAKING SURE THAT EVERYTHING IS IN CURRENT CONFORMANCE.

WHENEVER THEY COME TO PLAT, THEY WOULD PROVIDE US WITH A SURVEY, AND WE'D MAKE SURE THAT NO EXTRA DEMO WORK NEEDS TO BE DONE AT THAT POINT, MAKING SURE THAT THEY'RE UP TO CURRENT STANDARD WITH THE LAW STANDARDS.

SOUNDS GOOD. OKAY, I'M GOING TO REOPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING. AND 18:28. DOES ANYBODY FROM THE AUDIENCE HAVE ANY FOLLOW UP QUESTIONS THAT WERE NOT ANSWERED BY THE PRESENTATION? YES, SIR.

PLEASE COME FORWARD.

THANK YOU.

THE QUESTION IS, HAS THERE BEEN A DRAINAGE STUDY DONE OF WHAT'S COMING OFF THE PROPERTY THAT EXISTS NOW, EVEN AS A RESULT OF WHAT'S DEVELOPED ALREADY COMING ACROSS THE BACKSIDE OF OUR PROPERTY? THE WATER COMES TO THE STREET AND GOES OUT TO THE CREEK.

IF IT IS A PRETTY BIG RIVER LIKE LAST NIGHT. AND THE OTHER THING IS, THE WATER THAT COMES ACROSS MY PROPERTY RIGHT NOW IS IN ONE PART HAS BEEN DIRECTED ACROSS THE BACK PART OF MY PROPERTY I DON'T KNOW THAT IF THERE'S ANY, THERE'S BEEN ANY APPROVAL OF ANY DRAINAGE SYSTEM BEING PLACED IN THERE OR NOT.

THERE'S A I DON'T HAVE A PROBLEM WITH BIG PROPERTIES AND A NICE BIG HOUSE.

THAT WOULD BE AWESOME. BUT THE DRAINAGE COMING ACROSS MY PROPERTY, IT GOES DIFFERENT WAYS.

I KNOW THAT I THINK WE TALKED ABOUT THE FACT THAT THE VERY BACK PART OF MY PROPERTY IS SET UP TO WHERE WE'RE SUPPOSED TO ALLOW FREE DRAINAGE TO GO,

[00:30:05]

SO I WANT TO KNOW IF THEY'VE DONE A DRAINAGE STUDY, IF THINGS HAVE BEEN INVESTIGATED ALREADY AND MAKE SURE THAT THAT THINGS ARE BEING DONE RIGHT NOW, AND ESPECIALLY IF YOU'RE GOING TO REPLAT OR REDO ANYTHING, ARE THEY GOING TO MAKE SURE THAT THE DRAINAGE IS CONTROLLED AND NOT GOING TO CAUSE MORE PROBLEMS IN OUR NEIGHBORHOOD? BECAUSE THERE'S A HOUSE NEXT DOOR TO ME THAT HAS A BACKYARD ALL THE WAY UP TO THE FENCE LINE, ALSO TO THAT PROPERTY. OKAY. TO ANSWER TO ADDRESS THE QUESTION REGARDING A DRAINAGE STUDY, THERE HAS NOT BEEN A DRAINAGE STUDY AT THIS POINT IN TIME AS PART OF THE REPLAT.

THAT'S WHEN DRAINAGE PLANS ARE LOOKED AT. IN ADDITION, THEY'RE ALSO LOOKED AT AGAIN AT THE TIME OF BUILDING PERMIT FOR ANY KIND OF STRUCTURES.

SO SHOULD THIS ZONING REQUEST GO THROUGH AND THEY MOVE FORWARD WITH THEIR PLAT, THAT'S WHEN WE'LL TAKE A LOOK AT THE DRAINAGE.

OKAY. AND HOW THEIR NEW HOME AND HOW THEY'RE RECONFIGURING THE LOT, HOW THAT IMPACTS THE DRAINAGE IN THAT AREA.

OKAY. THANK YOU AGAIN. LINDA CRANK. 5006 HERITAGE CIRCLE. I WOULD CONCUR WITH MR. COPE. HERITAGE CIRCLE CURRENTLY GETS A LARGE AMOUNT OF WATER THAT'S GOING THROUGH.

SO I DON'T KNOW IF WE'VE DONE. I KNOW WE HAVEN'T AT THIS PARTICULAR TIME, BUT IF THERE'S BEEN ANY PRIOR STUDY OF THE IMPACT OF THE OTHER NEIGHBORHOODS THAT ARE PUTTING THE WATER DOWN ON HERITAGE CIRCLE IN THAT STREET.

SO I'D ENCOURAGE YOU TO KEEP THAT ONE IN CONSIDERATION, BECAUSE WE ARE ESPECIALLY WITH THE STORMS LAST NIGHT, WE'RE SEEING JUST A HUGE VOLUME OF WATER. THANK YOU.

THANK YOU. ANYONE ELSE? OKAY, I'LL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING A SECOND TIME.

IT'S 18:32. AND WE'VE HEARD FROM STAFF. WE'VE HEARD FROM QUESTIONS FROM THE COUNCIL, WE'VE HEARD FROM THE PUBLIC HEARING.

IS THERE ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION ON THE FROM THE COUNCIL? SO I JUST WANT TO FIND OUT, HAS THIS FLOODING BEEN EXISTING CONDITION FOR THEM OR IS IT SOMETHING HAS CHANGED BECAUSE OF THAT THE FLOODING IS OCCURRING NOW.

DO WE. ARE WE AWARE ABOUT THAT? AS FAR AS IF THERE'S AN EXISTING FLOODING ISSUE IN THIS AREA? RIGHT. I'M NOT AWARE OF EXISTING FLOODING ISSUE PER SE, BUT YOU KNOW, IF THE HOMEOWNERS ARE SAYING THAT THERE'S SOME DRAINAGE CONCERNS, THEN OBVIOUSLY WE CAN CONTACT OUR PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT AND HAVE, HAVE SOME OF THAT LOOKED AT.

SURE. YEAH. IF IT'S CAUSING PROBLEM AND THESE ARE NEIGHBORS, THEY SHOULD BE HAPPY WITH NEIGHBOR NEIGHBORHOOD.

SO PROBABLY WE SHOULD LOOK INTO THAT OKAY. NOTHING MORE FROM THE COUNCIL? I'D ENTERTAIN A MOTION.

MAKE A MOTION WE APPROVE C.2 AS PRESENTED. WELL, I HAVE A MOTION AND NEED A SECOND.

HAVE A SECOND FROM MR. MONDOK. PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTE.

PASSES 5-0. LET ME JUST MENTION THIS WILL GO TO JUNE 1ST YOU MAY JUST MENTION THIS GOES TO JUNE 1ST THIS. THIS IS A MOTION TO PRESENT THIS TO THE CITY COUNCIL, AND THIS WILL BE HEARD AT CITY COUNCIL ON JUNE 1ST. SO IF YOU HAVE FURTHER QUESTIONS AND WISH TO HAVE DISCUSSIONS AGAIN, YOU'LL HAVE THAT OPPORTUNITY AT CITY COUNCIL ON JUNE 1ST. THERE BEING NO OTHER BUSINESS COMING BEFORE US.

I HOPE

[3. Conduct a public hearing to consider and make a recommendation on amendments to Chapter 11 Zoning, Exhibit 11A Zoning Ordinance, Article 3, Section 15, amending the Old Town District Regulating Plan and the Character Areas established, to create a neighborhood manufactured home district.]

ARTICLE 3, SECTION 15 AMENDING THE OLD TOWN DISTRICT REGULATING PLAN AND THE CHARACTER AREAS ESTABLISHED TO CREATE A NEIGHBORHOOD MANUFACTURED HOME DISTRICT. COUNCIL. STAFF. GOOD EVENING.

[00:35:07]

WE'RE LOOKING TO ADD A NEIGHBORHOOD MANUFACTURED HOME DISTRICT WITHIN THIS WITHIN THE OLD TOWN ZONING DISTRICT.

THE ONGOING MAINTENANCE OF REGULATIONS AND THE STREAMLINING OF PROCESSES AND PROVISIONS IDENTIFIED AS TASKS WITHIN THE CITY'S 2025 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE IS ONE OF OUR MOTIVES FOR THIS ITEM. THE PROPOSED CHANGES INCLUDE AMENDMENTS TO THE CITY ZONING ORDINANCE TO COMPLY WITH THE STATE REGULATIONS REGARDING MANUFACTURED HOMES AND 2025 STATE, THE STATE PASSED LEGISLATION MANDATING THAT CITIES PERMIT BY RIGHT THE INSTALLATION OF NEW HUD-CODE COMPLIANT MANUFACTURED HOMES WITHIN MUNICIPAL BOUNDARIES UNDER AT LEAST ONE RESIDENTIAL ZONING CLASSIFICATION, RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICT, OR DEDICATED ZONING CLASSIFICATION.

THIS ACT WILL TAKE EFFECT SEPTEMBER 1ST OF 2026.

THE REQUEST BEFORE YOU TONIGHT, LIKE I SAID, IS THE CREATION OF THE CHARACTER AREA DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR THE NEIGHBORHOOD MANUFACTURED HOME CHARACTER AREA IN THE OLD TOWN DISTRICT.

THE PROPOSED REGULATIONS WOULD FOLLOW THE NEIGHBORHOOD STANDARDS OF THE OLD TOWN DISTRICT, WITH THE ADDITIONAL USE OF HUD-CODE MANUFACTURED HOMES BEING A PERMITTED USE.

THE OLD TOWN DISTRICT REGULATING PLAN WOULD BE AMENDED TO SHOW THE NEW DESIGNATED NEIGHBORHOOD MH CHARACTER AREA.

THE AREA PROPOSED TO BE DESIGNATED AS NEIGHBORHOOD MANUFACTURED HOME CHARACTER AREA IS CURRENTLY LOCATED OVER THE WILDWOOD VILLAGE MANUFACTURED HOME PARK.

THE AMENDMENT FORMALIZES THE EXISTING USE OF THE PROPERTY WHILE STILL ALLOWING FOR THE PROPERTY TO BE REDEVELOPED IN A TRADITIONAL RESIDENTIAL INTO A TRADITIONAL RESIDENTIAL USE DOWN THE LINE. LIKE I WAS SAYING, THAT IS IT WOULD FOLLOW THE NEIGHBORHOOD USES AS WELL AS THE, THE STANDARDS FOR NEIGHBORHOOD JUST WITH THE ADDITIONAL OF THE HUD-CODE MANUFACTURED HOMES BEING A PERMITTED USE AS WELL.

IN FRONT OF YOU IS THE EXISTING REGULATING PLAN.

THE SITE THAT WE'RE TALKING ABOUT IS RIGHT HERE.

AND HERE IS THE PROPOSED REGULATING PLAN. AS YOU CAN SEE, WE ADDED THE CHARACTER AREA NEIGHBORHOOD MH WITHIN THAT AREA AND JUST COVERED UP THAT SPECIFIC AREA FOR WILDWOOD VILLAGE THERE.

HERE IS THE AERIAL OF THE PROPOSED AREA. AS YOU CAN SEE, IT'S AN EXISTING USE.

CURRENTLY THERE IS 30 DIFFERENT SPOTS. OUTLINED WITHIN THEIR SITE PLAN AND IS WHAT WOULD BE ALLOWED WITHIN THAT NEIGHBORHOOD MANUFACTURED HOME AREA AS WELL. STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THE PROPOSED ORDINANCE AMENDMENT AS IT COMPLIES WITH STATE MANDATE, STATE MANDATED REQUIREMENTS WHILE FORMALIZING EXISTING DEVELOPMENT, AND THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THE CITY COUNCIL AT THEIR JUNE 1ST, 2026 REGULAR MEETING.

THIS IS A STAFF ITEM. IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE LET US KNOW.

ANYBODY? ONE MANUFACTURED HOME IN THE IN THAT PART OF THE CODE.

IT SAYS THAT WE HAVE TO ALLOW FOUR MANUFACTURED HOMES BY RIGHT IN ONE RESIDENTIAL AREA.

THE INTENT WHEN WE WENT THROUGH THE OLD TOWN TYPE OF STUFF WAS TO ENHANCE AND BEAUTIFY AND MAKE THINGS, YOU KNOW, MORE ALIVE TYPE OF DEAL WITH A MANUFACTURED HOME.

IS THERE ANY REQUIREMENT OF WHAT TYPE OF MANUFACTURED HOMES GO IN THERE, OR CAN THEY JUST PUT ANYTHING THEY WANT? SO IT'D HAVE TO MEET HUD-CODE STANDARDS? AND THEN WITH THAT, LIKE I WAS SAYING, IT IS NEIGHBORHOOD UNDERNEATH THAT.

SO EVERYTHING THAT IS ALLOWED WITHIN NEIGHBORHOOD WOULD BE ALLOWED AS WELL. SO IF THAT DID REDEVELOP AT SOME POINT, IT WOULD FOLLOW BASICALLY THE SAME STANDARDS THAT WAS IN THE EXISTING REGULATING PLAN AS WELL.

IS THERE ANY OPPORTUNITY TO PUT THAT TYPE OF CLASSIFICATION IN A DIFFERENT AREA ALTOGETHER? BECAUSE, YOU KNOW, THE INTENT, LIKE I SAID, THE INTENT BEHIND THE OLD TOWN TYPE AREA WAS, WAS TO DO CERTAIN THINGS.

[00:40:04]

YEAH. THE CHALLENGE WITH DESIGNATING A DIFFERENT AREA IS EITHER COMING UP WITH AN ENTIRELY NEW ZONING DISTRICT AND THEN FIGURING OUT WHERE THAT LOCATION IS AND OR YOU'RE ADDING IT TO AN EXISTING ZONING DISTRICT. SO IT'S EITHER YOU'RE CREATING A BRAND NEW ONE SOMEWHERE, OR YOU'RE ADDING THAT USE TO AN EXISTING RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICT.

AND THE CHALLENGE WITH CREATING, ADDING THAT USE TO AN EXISTING RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICT IS THAT MEANS IT CAN GO THROUGHOUT THE CITY VERSUS IN A SPECIFIC AREA.

THE REASON THIS ONE WAS, WAS LOOKED AT IS THIS IS AN EXISTING USE ON THAT SUBJECT PROPERTY.

THIS IS THE PATH OF LEAST RESISTANCE AS FAR AS THIS HAS BEEN IN PLACE SINCE THE 90S.

THEY HAVE MANUFACTURED HOMES ON THAT PIECE OF PROPERTY.

THIS WOULD FORMALIZE THAT, BUT ALSO GIVE THE ABILITY TO FOR IT TO CHANGE IN THE FUTURE, SHOULD THE OLD TOWN DISTRICT CHANGE OVERALL AND INFLUENCE THAT PROPERTY OWNER TO SELL INTO AND TO CREATE A MORE OF A NEIGHBORHOOD TYPE DEVELOPMENT? SO IT'S FORMALIZING WHAT'S THERE, BUT STILL ALLOWING THE CHANGE TO MEET WHAT THE ORIGINAL OLD TOWN ZONING DISTRICT WAS, WAS TRYING TO ACCOMPLISH. OKAY. HAS THE CURRENT OWNER.

IS THE CURRENT OWNER REQUESTING THIS CHANGE OR IS THIS JUST WE'RE, WE'RE TALKING ABOUT DOING THIS ON HIS BEHALF? HIS OR HER BEHALF? THE OWNER IS NOT REQUESTING THIS.

THIS IS CITY MANDATE. A CITY INITIATED REZONING IN ORDER TO MEET THE STATE LEGISLATION REQUIREMENTS.

LAST QUESTION I WOULD ASK IS, SAY THE CURRENT OWNER WANTED TO DO LEFT THIS PROPERTY AS IT AT EXISTING SITUATION AND WE APPROVED THIS.

HE CAN CONTINUE TO DO THIS. THIS SAME SCENARIO IN HIS YOU KNOW, CURRENT TILL WHENEVER.

RIGHT? THAT'S CORRECT. WHETHER THE ZONING GOES THROUGH OR NOT, THEY ARE ENTITLED TO CONTINUE OPERATING THEIR USE AS IT IS.

IT IS CONSIDERED A NON-CONFORMING USE AT THIS POINT IN TIME, BUT THEY ARE ABLE TO UTILIZE A PROPERTY FOR THAT, THAT USE UNTIL THEY TERMINATE THAT USE FOR A PERIOD OF TIME.

SO IN THE SENSE THIS FORMALIZES, IT ALLOWS IT TO CONTINUE ON WHILE, WHILE MEETING CITY STANDARDS VERSUS IT BEING CLASSIFIED AS NON-CONFORMING USE. AND THEY'RE STILL ALLOWED TO USE IT.

JUST, IF THEY ABANDON THAT USE, THAT'S WHEN THEY WOULDN'T BE ABLE TO PUT IT BACK THERE.

AND THE LAST QUESTION I WOULD ASK IS, IF WE DESIGNATE THIS ONE LOCATION AS THIS MANUFACTURED HOME AREA.

THEY. WITHOUT HAVING TO GO THROUGH AND DO A NEW ZONING REQUEST SOMEWHERE ELSE.

THAT USAGE CANNOT BE USED ANYWHERE BUT THAT ONE LOCATION, CORRECT? THAT'S CORRECT. OKAY. SO YOU MENTIONED THAT IT'S THAT COULD CHANGE IN THE FUTURE.

DOES THAT IF IT CHANGES, THEY CAN BUILD JUST REGULAR HOUSES IN THAT AREA? THAT'S CORRECT. SO IF THEY COME BACK IN AND FILL THAT WITH REGULAR HOUSES, THEN DO WE HAVE TO GO BACK AND CREATE A NEW ZONE SOMEWHERE? NO.

OKAY. GOT IT. OKAY. IS THERE SPACE IN THERE FOR SOMEONE TO PUT A HOUSE A NEW MOBILE HOME IN MANUFACTURED HOUSE? WELL, AS PART OF THEIR ORIGINAL SITE PLAN, IT'S LIMITED TO 30.

THE, THE CODE AS AMENDED LIMITS IT TO 30 AS WELL.

SO IF SOMEBODY MOVES OUT OR, OR CHANGES, THEN THEY WOULD BE ABLE TO PUT ANOTHER ONE IN THERE, BUT THEY WOULD NOT BE ABLE TO SEE EXCEED 30 ON THAT PIECE OF PROPERTY ARE THERE ANY VACANT SPOTS IN THERE NOW? I BELIEVE THERE'S A COUPLE VACANT SPOTS.

OKAY. AND IF IT GETS FULL, THAT'S CORRECT. OKAY. BECAUSE WE HAVE THAT DESIGNATED.

OKAY.

THE PROPER NOTIFICATION WAS SENT OUT TO THE NEWSPAPER.

AS FAR AS THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR THIS PIECE OF PROPERTY.

AS FAR AS THEIR NOTICE, WE HAVE NOT HEARD FROM ANYBODY WITHIN THAT, THAT MANUFACTURED HOME PARK.

IT'S ALL ALONG BILLINGSLEY AND 7TH STREET. AND IF THERE ARE QUESTIONS FOR THE.

THE COMMISSION. THE PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE OPEN HERE IN JUST A MOMENT.

[00:45:06]

WE'RE ACTUALLY ADDING AN ADDITIONAL USE TO THEIR PROPERTY FOR THEM TO BE ABLE TO ENJOY THE PROPERTY.

AND WE AND THE CITY HAS NOT RECEIVED ANY DIRECT RESPONSE FROM THIS OWNER? NO. THAT'S CORRECT. OKAY. I DECLARE THE PUBLIC HEARING OPEN AT 18:45.

WOULD ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE CARE TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM? SORRY, YOU ASKED A QUESTION EARLIER. DID YOU GET.

PLEASE COME TO THE MICROPHONE. STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS.

MIKE ELLIS MIKE. MICHAEL ELLIS 5240 MAGNOLIA LANE. NO, I'M JUST.

CONCERNED WITH THE PLACEMENT OF WHAT THAT LAST LOCATION OF THE HUD HOMES.

YOU'RE TALKING MANUFACTURED HOMES VERSUS TRAILER HOMES BECAUSE THEY'RE TWO SEPARATE.

YOU GOT THE TRAILER HOMES WHICH ARE ON WHEELS, WHICH YOU CAN PLACE JUST ABOUT ANYWHERE.

AND YOU GOT MANUFACTURED HOMES THAT ACTUALLY DO HAVE A STANDARD BASE THAT IT SITS ON.

AND YOU'RE SAYING, WHAT ARE WE GETTING? ARE Y'ALL GETTING.

COMPENSATION TO HAVE THAT? THAT'S WHY YOU HAVE TO MAKE USE OF THAT LOCATION.

WHY DO YOU SAY WE MANDATE FOR THAT LOCATION? ANYBODY? I'M WAITING FOR YOU TO COMPLETE YOUR TIME. THAT'S IT.

OKAY. TO ANSWER THE QUESTION, HUD-CODE MANUFACTURED HOMES, THERE'S A SPECIFIC DEFINITION AND IT'S DEFINED AT THE FEDERAL LEVEL.

THAT DEFINITION IS INCLUDED IN THE ZONING DESIGNATION ITSELF.

ONCE AGAIN, THIS IS A MANDATED CHANGE BY THE STATE LEGISLATURE THAT EACH CITY HAS TO ALLOW FOR MANUFACTURED HOMES WITHIN THEIR CITY, AND IT HAS TO BE PERMITTED BY. RIGHT. I SEE. AND THE SPECIFIC LOCATION THAT'S IN QUESTION.

IT IS AN EXISTING MANUFACTURED HOME PARK ALREADY.

IT'S A NON-CONFORMING USE. IT'S BEEN THERE SINCE AT LEAST THE 90S.

I'M GOING BLANK ON BILLINGSLEY. WHERE'S THAT? IS THAT OFF OF 76? IT'S ONE STREET BACK OFF OF HIGHWAY 78.

78. YEAH, I'LL CHECK THAT. BEHIND SONIC. BEHIND SONIC.

OKAY. OKAY. IS THERE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? COMMENTS FROM THE AUDIENCE? OKAY. I DECLARE THE PUBLIC. OH. EXCUSE ME. LINDA CRANK, 5006 HERITAGE CIRCLE. JUST A QUICK QUESTION. IN THE HUD DEFINITION, IT USUALLY LOOKS AT THE PERMANENT CHASSIS'S 320FT².

WHETHER IT'S ATTACHED OR NOT. COULD YOU PLEASE CLARIFY OR COMMENT ON DOES THAT INCLUDE TINY HOMES? AND DOES THAT THEN HAVE TO HAVE WHEELS VERSUS PERMANENT CHASSIS? AND HOW DOES THAT AFFECT THAT PARTICULAR PARK? THANK YOU. SO I'LL ADJUST THE DEFINITION HUD-CODE MANUFACTURED HOME MEANS A MANUFACTURED HOME CONSTRUCTED WITH A PERMANENT CHASSIS DESIGNED FOR OVER THE ROAD TRANSPORTATION AND DELIVERED TO THE HOME SITE IN ONE OR MORE SECTIONS.

ACCORDING TO THE NATIONAL MANUFACTURED HOME CONSTRUCTION AND SAFETY STANDARDS ACT OF 1976, ENFORCED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT. HUD REGULATES THE HOMES DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION, STRENGTH AND DURABILITY, TRANSPORTABILITY FIRE RESISTANCE, ENERGY EFFICIENCY, AND QUALITY CONTROL.

IT ALSO SETS TOUGH PERFORMANCE STANDARDS FOR HEATING, PLUMBING, AIR CONDITIONING, THERMAL AND ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS. SO IF IT CAN MEET THE DEFINITION OF A OF THE FEDERAL DEFINITION OF HUD-CODE MANUFACTURED HOME, THEN IT WOULD BE ALLOWED. I DON'T BELIEVE THE TINY HOMES WOULD MEET THAT REQUIREMENT.

OKAY. NO OTHER QUESTIONS FROM THE PUBLIC. I DECLARE THE PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 18:49. ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION FROM THE COUNCIL? IF NOT, I'D ENTERTAIN A MOTION. MOTION. MOVE THAT WE.

[00:50:04]

VOTE PASSES. 5-0 THANK YOU, FOLKS. I DECLARE THE MEETING ADJOURNED AT 18:50.

THANK YOU FOR COMING.

* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.